GTA 4 on PC - Dont bother PLEASE!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for michaeljcox24
michaeljcox24

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 michaeljcox24
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
I picked this up for ten pounds yesterday. After a 1.5 hour installation, and numerous online forms to fill in, the game loaded. Even with all the settings on LOW, the game is still choppy. A couple of times my PC switched itself off from overheating. My rig isn't skynet, but still well within the specs recommended on the box. It's Q6600 quad, 8800GTS and 2GB Ram. Honestly, I warn everyone out there who has a decent rig PC. PLEASE dont buy this game. It runs far better on the 360. I dont know why, it just does. Buy yourself a 360, and a DVI cable. You'll save yourself a hell of alot of stress!
Avatar image for DigitalExile
DigitalExile

16046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 DigitalExile
Member since 2008 • 16046 Posts

If it's overheating that sounds like its your fault for not cooling, or powering, it properly.

Q6600, stock, GTX280 stick, 4Gb RAM. FPS isn't great, I'll give you that much, but the game is entirely playable with the right hardware.

Avatar image for uchihataru
uchihataru

531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#3 uchihataru
Member since 2007 • 531 Posts
[QUOTE="michaeljcox24"]I picked this up for ten pounds yesterday. After a 1.5 hour installation, and numerous online forms to fill in, the game loaded. Even with all the settings on LOW, the game is still choppy. A couple of times my PC switched itself off from overheating. My rig isn't skynet, but still well within the specs recommended on the box. It's Q6600 quad, 8800GTS and 2GB Ram. Honestly, I warn everyone out there who has a decent rig PC. PLEASE dont buy this game. It runs far better on the 360. I dont know why, it just does. Buy yourself a 360, and a DVI cable. You'll save yourself a hell of alot of stress!

actually it runs pretty good on both my PCs,a E8500,2gb ram and HD4830 and a Pentium D 3.00ghz,4gb ram and a 9800gt...both runs great...word of advice,never ever turn the settings to low ..keep it at medium or high to play well...low will make it even more unplayable..
Avatar image for michaeljcox24
michaeljcox24

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 michaeljcox24
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
Yes, I agree, it is. My point was though, is my specs are better than the internals of the 360, yet the game runs worse on PC. Some games yeah, you can justify buying it for PC. Far Cry 2 for example. Not this one.
Avatar image for Perhampus
Perhampus

231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Perhampus
Member since 2008 • 231 Posts

Funny that many people still have problems, I bought this game when it first came out here (was 200 ytl= 130 dollars or so :O) but it was completely worth it strange enough at first I had some problems and was dissapointed with my 1 month pc that I hadn't gone with a quad instead with a e8400, strangely the game runs really nice now, I didn't even do anythign special but update my drivers constantly (and of course properly taking care of my rig,) texture render is at high graphics at high and view distance 23 (not a problem for me since I stare at my character mostly especially while driving lol :P) and others cranked to 60-70 range, and no problems whatsoever my fps is fine 30+ , and the crazy thing is my resolution is 1280x1024 (native) and it isnt choppy, for people who don't know lower resolutions are more CPU intensive then GPU (vise versa), and I owna dual core.... so maybe your problem is drivers, try cut down on resolution make it more CPU intensive as you have a quad, take care of your PC (I think daytona has a really nice guide)

Specs:

-e8400 @3.0Ghz

-4gb G.SKill RAM @ 1066 MHz

-XFX black edition GTX 260/216Core

-Windows XP SP3

Avatar image for thekodaman
thekodaman

1733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 thekodaman
Member since 2006 • 1733 Posts
Don't bother with the PC Version, it' an awful port of a great game. Even on a rig like mine (same as the above pretty much but I'm running 64-bit Vista and have an Intel Q9950 2.86Ghz Quad Core) the game isn't capable of running on the higher settings I get an fps of 10 which is pathetic considering I can run Crysis with maxed out settings @ a steady 30fps. Get it for 360 or PS3.
Avatar image for Tuzolord
Tuzolord

1409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#7 Tuzolord
Member since 2007 • 1409 Posts
I get 35fps avg. on mostly High Settings @ 1680x1050 (50fps in the benchmark), running vista 64bit, no problems at all.
Avatar image for danzoid_101
danzoid_101

1592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 danzoid_101
Member since 2005 • 1592 Posts
The game runs fine on my PC, 8800GS, E7200 2.53 GHz dual-zore and 2GB ram Vista Ultimate 64bit. I get a fps of 30-40 on medium texture detail. One of my friends has a GTX 280, Quad-core and he gets an fps of 10 on low. It seems that R* shoudl have tested this a bit more and spent a few more months optimizing the game. how this game got a 9.0 on PC we will never know.
Avatar image for thusaha
thusaha

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 thusaha
Member since 2007 • 14495 Posts
Patched it?
Avatar image for mhofever
mhofever

3960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#10 mhofever
Member since 2008 • 3960 Posts
Lol? I thought it was worth spent. Had no big issues with it plus my installation didn't take over an hour at all. Patch 2 will further help fixing the issues as well.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts
GTA worked fine on medium when I had 8800gtx and it works fine now when i have 260gtx and I do not even have any awesome processor. 2.4ghz core2 duo and 2gb of ram. The only gripe i have with the game is that it is hard to get a full server online.
Avatar image for Macutchi
Macutchi

11217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 Macutchi
Member since 2007 • 11217 Posts

I picked this up for ten pounds yesterday. After a 1.5 hour installation, and numerous online forms to fill in, the game loaded. Even with all the settings on LOW, the game is still choppy. A couple of times my PC switched itself off from overheating. My rig isn't skynet, but still well within the specs recommended on the box. It's Q6600 quad, 8800GTS and 2GB Ram. Honestly, I warn everyone out there who has a decent rig PC. PLEASE dont buy this game. It runs far better on the 360. I dont know why, it just does. Buy yourself a 360, and a DVI cable. You'll save yourself a hell of alot of stress!michaeljcox24

works fine for me with almost everything on high (shadows on 0 though) after the last patch and ive got a similar rig to you (q6600, 4Gb ram, 8800gtx). sounds like your pc needs a clean or some extra cooling.

you could try taking out your gfx card, unscrewing it all and giving it a clean out. i did the same a while ago when i noticed framerate drops in certain games and my pc getting hot, opened up my card and there was a ton of dust clogging up the fan that i couldnt get to through normal cleaning / dusting. cleaned it all out, problem solved.

Avatar image for harry_james_pot
harry_james_pot

11414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 harry_james_pot  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 11414 Posts
it runs great for me, every thing maxed out @ 1600x1200 with +40 FPS, 49FPS in the benchmark. no patch.
Avatar image for harry_james_pot
harry_james_pot

11414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14 harry_james_pot  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 11414 Posts
it runs great for me, every thing maxed out @ 1600x1200 with +40 FPS, 49FPS in the benchmark. no patch.
Avatar image for dos4gw82
dos4gw82

1896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 dos4gw82
Member since 2006 • 1896 Posts
Runs fine on mine. I'd say if you have a quad core and >=8800 it's not a bad game to buy.
Avatar image for Hellboard
Hellboard

2429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#16 Hellboard
Member since 2008 • 2429 Posts
yeah the game is a joke and a disgrace to pc gaming.. same to rockstar games.. i really wanted to play it on the pc.. but the damn missing buildings.... well i choose th console version... and the patch is even worse, still better port than mercenaries 2...
Avatar image for Tyson8earzz
Tyson8earzz

885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Tyson8earzz
Member since 2004 • 885 Posts
mine runs super smooth after the patch, be sure you have patched it. I have a feeling its something on your system or else why is it working perfectly on my pc.. i guess im "special"!
Avatar image for -D3ATH-
-D3ATH-

615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 -D3ATH-
Member since 2008 • 615 Posts
I got 10-22FPS, not even patching helped, I already once totally removed the shadows from game, this didn't give me FPS boost at all. I lowered Farclp, nothing still same, tried many commandline.txt stuff. I feel like my FPS is locked at 10-22. D:
Avatar image for Timbury
Timbury

552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Timbury
Member since 2005 • 552 Posts
yeah the game is a joke and a disgrace to pc gaming.. same to rockstar games.. i really wanted to play it on the pc.. but the damn missing buildings.... well i choose th console version... and the patch is even worse, still better port than mercenaries 2...Hellboard
Hi Hellboard this isnt a slagging post, just every thread i have seen you in recently you are mouthing off about this or that! So just a quick question do you like anything cause from what i have read you dont :D Anyway back on thread with the game patched up everything at the highest level except view distance the game runs great on my rig. As other people have stated a Quad Core is the way to go with this game.
Avatar image for the_ChEeSe_mAn2
the_ChEeSe_mAn2

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 the_ChEeSe_mAn2
Member since 2003 • 8463 Posts
Hellboard is always like that. I personally am having lots of fun in GTA IV. Almost never below 20 fps, everything medium, some high at 1440*900. Laptop specs: T7500 Core 2 Duo 2.2ghz, 4 gb ram, 8800M GTS 512 mb.
Avatar image for Hellboard
Hellboard

2429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#21 Hellboard
Member since 2008 • 2429 Posts
[QUOTE="Hellboard"]yeah the game is a joke and a disgrace to pc gaming.. same to rockstar games.. i really wanted to play it on the pc.. but the damn missing buildings.... well i choose th console version... and the patch is even worse, still better port than mercenaries 2...Timbury
Hi Hellboard this isnt a slagging post, just every thread i have seen you in recently you are mouthing off about this or that! So just a quick question do you like anything cause from what i have read you dont :D Anyway back on thread with the game patched up everything at the highest level except view distance the game runs great on my rig. As other people have stated a Quad Core is the way to go with this game.

Hellboard is always like that. I personally am having lots of fun in GTA IV. Almost never below 20 fps, everything medium, some high at 1440*900. Laptop specs: T7500 Core 2 Duo 2.2ghz, 4 gb ram, 8800M GTS 512 mb.the_ChEeSe_mAn2
yeah i like fallout 3 , far cry 2, dead space, a bit mirrors edge, and bully plus gta iv but rockstar managed to shove my expectations in my butt :cry: seriously pc versions make me cry the latest 2 years..
Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts
Which is why I got the PS3 version.
Avatar image for FamiBox
FamiBox

5481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 FamiBox
Member since 2007 • 5481 Posts

Which is why I got the PS3 version.Treflis

and why I got the 360 version.

Avatar image for Jinroh_basic
Jinroh_basic

6413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Jinroh_basic
Member since 2002 • 6413 Posts

no sweat, i'll just play it on my ps3 -- once i get one, of coz.

Avatar image for k0r3aN_pR1d3
k0r3aN_pR1d3

2148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#25 k0r3aN_pR1d3
Member since 2005 • 2148 Posts
Runs great on a Core i7...mebe that is what Rockstar had in mind. :3
Avatar image for mo0ksi
mo0ksi

12337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#26 mo0ksi
Member since 2007 • 12337 Posts
Mine runs fine and the second patch made the game a lot better. I finished it twice now, and my second playthrough is at 95% completion. Also since that the PC versions is much better graphically, there's a reason on why it takes a lot of resources.
Avatar image for Jd1680a
Jd1680a

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#27 Jd1680a
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts

Yes, I agree, it is. My point was though, is my specs are better than the internals of the 360, yet the game runs worse on PC. Some games yeah, you can justify buying it for PC. Far Cry 2 for example. Not this one. michaeljcox24
Rockstar North said they would increase the population density and increase graphic quality for the PC version compared to the Xbox 360 version. When that happens, the CPU will need to work harder to calculate every single moving NPC. That includes the NPCs driving in cars, stopping at stop lights and going when its green, NPCs walking on the side walks also take alot of CPU power to calculate. For those who have low end to medium end systems I would not be getting this game if they want a satisfying playing experience.

The PC version is better then the Xbox 360.