This topic is locked from further discussion.
Oh, I wouldn't know. :P
Anyway, the program I recommended works good. It's a lot faster than window's, at least in XP.
Oh, I wouldn't know. :P
Anyway, the program I recommended works good. It's a lot faster than window's, at least in XP.
animemog
haha, you're lucky you don't know. thanks though, i just downloaded :)
AusLogics Disk Defrag. But, why not just use the windows defragger?animemog
That one isn't so good...
It might be faster but not better,
O&O and Diskeeper I have found to be better. There's free version of both I think, with limited options ofcourse.
Most defintely O&O 10. For one it has options to completely defrag your HDD unlike AusLogics and Diskeeper which arrange files though the most frequent use(which is why you can defrag a 1TB HDD in less than 15 minutes).SSJBenI vote for O&O too... Im using it for awhile and its doing GREAT so far
If you using Vista installing a 3rd party defrag program is a waste of time. The Xp derag program is really bad though. You can get diskkeeper but i think it cost money.DeihmosSo are you saying Vista's is good then?
[QUOTE="Deihmos"]If you using Vista installing a 3rd party defrag program is a waste of time. The Xp derag program is really bad though. You can get diskkeeper but i think it cost money.lettuceman44So are you saying Vista's is good then?
There is nothing wrong with it and in many ways it is better than XP.
So are you saying Vista's is good then?[QUOTE="lettuceman44"][QUOTE="Deihmos"]If you using Vista installing a 3rd party defrag program is a waste of time. The Xp derag program is really bad though. You can get diskkeeper but i think it cost money.Deihmos
There is nothing wrong with it and in many ways it is better than XP.
Vista' defrag utlility is known to be somehow better than XP's one but i still like to use O&O anyway.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment