hd 7770 specs confirmed by gpu-z shot

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

we have a gpu-z shot of a 7770 and yeah it just confirms what we already knew..

http://www.techpowerup.com/160434/Radeon-HD-7770-Specifications-Confirmed-in-GPU-Z-Screenshot.html

dx11.1

640 shaders

128-bit bandwidth

1ghz core 1.1mhz mem

1gb gddr5

16 rops

Avatar image for deactivated-5a9b3f32ef4e9
deactivated-5a9b3f32ef4e9

7779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-5a9b3f32ef4e9
Member since 2009 • 7779 Posts

1GHz core clock, wow O_O

Avatar image for dovberg
dovberg

3348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#3 dovberg
Member since 2009 • 3348 Posts

so...about like a 6870?

I'm wondering if this would be a good replacement for my GTX 550 ti or if the improvement would be a little too marginal and maybe I should wait for the GTX 660 or 7870. I want to run Lost Planet 2, Battlefield 3, The Witcher 2 on max with no slow down.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#4 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

so...about like a 6870?

dovberg

umm could be we either have an ultra low power 6870 or a gtx 460 1gb that uses basically no power

Avatar image for Diwashb
Diwashb

519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Diwashb
Member since 2008 • 519 Posts

If it provides about the same performance of the 560 448 cores im gonna get it.... Lets wait for the prices though.... :-/

Avatar image for OldSoldier123
OldSoldier123

257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 OldSoldier123
Member since 2009 • 257 Posts

Wow wayy too high expectations, we'll be lucky if it matches a GTX460/6850 ortherwise it will be similar to GTX550Ti/6790/5830

Avatar image for Slow_Show
Slow_Show

2018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Slow_Show
Member since 2011 • 2018 Posts

If it provides about the same performance of the 560 448 cores im gonna get it.... Lets wait for the prices though.... :-/

Diwashb

It definitely won't. The 560 448 is basically a slightly slower 570; the 7770 should be in the same ballpark as the 6800 series.

Avatar image for Guovssohas
Guovssohas

330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Guovssohas
Member since 2010 • 330 Posts
It will probably be about the same as 6850.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

Some are forgetting the 128 bit memory bus wont allow the card to surpass the 6850 , and also the 7770 has 320 less processors then a 6850.

Avatar image for kaitanuvax
kaitanuvax

3814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 kaitanuvax
Member since 2007 • 3814 Posts

6770 performance = bulldozer worthy praise

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts
I don't know what any of that means but judging from the comments, it ain't too good!
Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

Everyone seems to not understand that this is the 6770 replacement not the 6870 replacement.

6770

800 Shaders
16 ROPs
pixel fill rate 13.6 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 34.0 GTexel/s
Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s

7770

640 Shaders
16 ROPs
pixel fill rate 16 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 40 GTexel/s
Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s

Why on earth would you make the conclusion this is the 68xx series replacement?

Avatar image for humpdabump
humpdabump

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 humpdabump
Member since 2011 • 92 Posts

Everyone seems to not understand that this is the 6770 replacement not the 6870 replacement.

NailedGR

Exactly. You can't expect a 50% performance leap with every new generation, and especially not after such a successfull series like 5000/6000 was/is.

Avatar image for LeadnSteel
LeadnSteel

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 LeadnSteel
Member since 2009 • 371 Posts

Lol @ only 128 bit memory.

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

Lol @ only 128 bit memory.

LeadnSteel

u dum

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#16 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

[QUOTE="NailedGR"]

Everyone seems to not understand that this is the 6770 replacement not the 6870 replacement.

humpdabump

Exactly. You can't expect a 50% performance leap with every new generation, and especially not after such a successfull series like 5000/6000 was/is.

hd 5770+5830 and 6700's were pretty lousy cards.. they were basically clones of the flagship 4800 series

Avatar image for LordEC911
LordEC911

9972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 LordEC911
Member since 2004 • 9972 Posts

Lol @ only 128 bit memory.

LeadnSteel

How do you propose they fit a larger interface on a ~134mm2 die?
4870 was pad limited in it's original design until they added more units so they could fit the 256bit bus on there.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts
[QUOTE="NailedGR"] Everyone seems to not understand that this is the 6770 replacement not the 6870 replacement. humpdabump
Exactly. You can't expect a 50% performance leap with every new generation, and especially not after such a successfull series like 5000/6000 was/is.

So is there any point in me waiting for the HD 7870 to come out if I could buy a GTX 570 or HD 6970 now?
Avatar image for LordEC911
LordEC911

9972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 LordEC911
Member since 2004 • 9972 Posts

[QUOTE="humpdabump"] [QUOTE="NailedGR"] Everyone seems to not understand that this is the 6770 replacement not the 6870 replacement. Hexagon_777
Exactly. You can't expect a 50% performance leap with every new generation, and especially not after such a successfull series like 5000/6000 was/is.

So is there any point in me waiting for the HD 7870 to come out if I could buy a GTX 570 or HD 6970 now?

If you need one right now, no reason to wait.
If you can wait, it should offer lower power consumption, better thermals with the potential of higher performance, cheaper price and better overclocking. It also might drop prices on other cards that perform similar.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="humpdabump"] Exactly. You can't expect a 50% performance leap with every new generation, and especially not after such a successfull series like 5000/6000 was/is. LordEC911

So is there any point in me waiting for the HD 7870 to come out if I could buy a GTX 570 or HD 6970 now?

If you need one right now, no reason to wait.
If you can wait, it should offer lower power consumption, better thermals with the potential of higher performance, cheaper price and better overclocking. It also might drop prices on other cards that perform similar.

So the HD 7870 has the potential to perform better, plus everything else? So it can actually replace the HD 6970, unlike the HD 7770 which isn't replacing the HD 6870?
Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="humpdabump"]

[QUOTE="NailedGR"]

Everyone seems to not understand that this is the 6770 replacement not the 6870 replacement.

ionusX

Exactly. You can't expect a 50% performance leap with every new generation, and especially not after such a successfull series like 5000/6000 was/is.

hd 5770+5830 and 6700's were pretty lousy cards.. they were basically clones of the flagship 4800 series

And you have a 5830 in your sig and always talk about how good it is.

srsly

srlsy

c'mon

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#22 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="humpdabump"]

Exactly. You can't expect a 50% performance leap with every new generation, and especially not after such a successfull series like 5000/6000 was/is.

GummiRaccoon

hd 5770+5830 and 6700's were pretty lousy cards.. they were basically clones of the flagship 4800 series

And you have a 5830 in your sig and always talk about how good it is.

srsly

srlsy

c'mon

oh i like it.. doesnt mean i also cant accept the reality that any card preforming near the 4890 doesnt do very well in todays games