Help! Blu-Ray or HD-DVD?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for atrain4
atrain4

1408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 atrain4
Member since 2005 • 1408 Posts
Which format shows the better picture quality? Which ever one shows the best picture I'm gonna go buy that player.
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#2 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
I think they're very very similar, but Bluray has more support. You should consider that.
Avatar image for Kikouken
Kikouken

15913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#3 Kikouken
Member since 2006 • 15913 Posts

I never watched a hddvd movie but I do have a blu-ray player.

picture quality is amazing.

Avatar image for MotherSuperior
MotherSuperior

3745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 MotherSuperior
Member since 2003 • 3745 Posts

They both have pretty much identical pictures. As posted above, Blu-Ray has more and better support from movie and other industries. Technologically, Blu-Ray is superior but expensive. I have a feeling that Blu-Ray will win the next gen movie disc war but its reign will not last as long as DVD until a new and better disc technology comes along. Holographic- and gel-based discs, anyone?

EDIT: I forgot to explicitly mention that Blu-Ray is the superior disc technology right now.

Avatar image for BEAN_LARD_MULCH
BEAN_LARD_MULCH

4720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 BEAN_LARD_MULCH
Member since 2006 • 4720 Posts
If you are going to buy a Blu-Ray player, which I recommend...buy a PS3 :lol:......
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#6 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
If you are going to buy a Blu-Ray player, which I recommend...buy a PS3 :lol:......BEAN_LARD_MULCH
That's what I did. It plays games as a bonus. :P
Avatar image for atrain4
atrain4

1408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 atrain4
Member since 2005 • 1408 Posts

If you are going to buy a Blu-Ray player, which I recommend...buy a PS3 :lol:......BEAN_LARD_MULCH

Yeah, most blue ray players out their are $1000+

Avatar image for kemar7856
kemar7856

11789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#8 kemar7856
Member since 2004 • 11789 Posts

blu-ray duh

Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#9 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts

they're going to have players that play both fairly soon, so I'd wait for those.

Technically Blu-ray has the best chance at "optimal" picture quality, but alot of reviews I read say HD-DVD ends up looking better

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#10 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts
Moved from OT.
Avatar image for BadAndy642
BadAndy642

1069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 BadAndy642
Member since 2006 • 1069 Posts
They both offer the same codecs. Technically Blu-ray has more potential with greater bandwidth, but only enthusiasts will see a difference. I will admit that I personally find movies coded in VC-1 or AVC/Mpeg-4 look better than those in Mpeg-2, but that is just me. I personally am a HD DVD owner, because the currently better interactivity, prices, and better movie selection to my tastes. Only 3 of my10 HD DVD's are available in Blu-ray
Avatar image for BlacKJaCK2290
BlacKJaCK2290

1775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 BlacKJaCK2290
Member since 2005 • 1775 Posts
At the moment they are pretty much neck and neck. However i feel HDDVD has been more consistent.
Avatar image for TimothyB
TimothyB

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 TimothyB
Member since 2003 • 6564 Posts

I think the Toshiba HD-DVD HD-A2 player (1080i max) is $250 at Costco stores, then you can get 5 free movies by mail. Or if you have 360 there's the $199 add-on, includes a movie and I think some stores let you pick any 2 movies instantly with purchase.

There is a new Blu-ray player in the $500-600 range I think it comes with 3 popular movies in the box.

Both are neck and neck in picture quality. HD-DVD started off better, but over time Blu-ray quality went up compared to its initial releases. The only difference there might be on a multi-format relase is the HD-DVD version having more advance features and better audio over the Blu-ray version. Anyway, a lot of the bad stuff is in the past and both are good, but the early flaws might have had people make up their minds already.

Who will win? I like HD-DVD, but you never know. Blu-ray might seem like the best option especially with the PS3. Though, just look at the releases so far and see which format has movies more to your taste. Reviews and upcoming releases here: www.hidefdigest.com

Avatar image for mike7677
mike7677

2426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 mike7677
Member since 2006 • 2426 Posts
I'm getting rid of my hd dvd player.  First, this one doesn't pick up where you left off if you should shut the machine down.  Secondly, every disc I got with this, hasn't worked.  When you string along 4-5 discs thaat had this problem, the problem I feel isn't the discs, it's the machine.

With Universal, the last holdout for hddvd going dual format, this does not bode well for hddvd

Good point about this:  It upconverts dvd's rather well.

Blu ray:  This is the only format you'll see Pirates of the Caribbean on.  Star Wars for that matter.
Avatar image for Kodai_kun
Kodai_kun

1413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Kodai_kun
Member since 2005 • 1413 Posts

Good point about this: It upconverts dvd's rather well.

The new Samsung player, and the Panasonic player share the same video chipset, they do it just as well.

Avatar image for kreestoph
kreestoph

442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 kreestoph
Member since 2007 • 442 Posts
on a console? blue ray, because it comes built in, and adds deepscan to your ps3 to avoid those **** scratchesif hd dvd came with the 360 or elite, and if either system didnt breakdown all the time, ide say maybe.
but thats if you want a console and a player. why else would you discuss it on gamespot if you didnt though. 
i think the ps3 is also concidered cheep for a blueray player. 
one more thing, if your not getting the player in a console you might just be wasting your money on something youd get eventually because you like videogames. so it really is a matter of ps3 or 360
Avatar image for codezer0
codezer0

15898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#17 codezer0
Member since 2004 • 15898 Posts

Depends on the codec used.

Most HD-DVD's started with VC-1, which is around H.264 quality; BluRay started with MPEG-2, and barely looked any better than existing up-scaled DVD's. However, the majority of movies released now on both formats are now using MPEG-4 and/or H.264.

Avatar image for Kodai_kun
Kodai_kun

1413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Kodai_kun
Member since 2005 • 1413 Posts

The codec used actually has no bearing on the final quality of the image, merely the disc space required for it. Since the vast majority of Blu-Rays now use BD-50, it's completely a non-factor.

Kingdom of Heaven for example is one of the best HD discs out there for video, and it uses MPEG-2. Most of the MPEG-2 hate came from inexperienced compressionists using DVD tricks on an HD compression, combined with some awful master tapes like Fifth Element,on a rush job to have product ready for launch.