Help Deciding between COD4 or GRAW2

Depends on what your after...if you want a degre of realism, go for GRAW2.

If your after just a modern day shooter, its COD4, allthough that game blows if u ask me...ill probably catch tons of flack for this, but just go and play BF2 :D

Honestly i would go with cod4. Ghost Recon 2 on the pc wasnt that great and it was hugley difficult lol. Anyway yea i would go with cod4 cause the demo is great.Hector_01

I am sorry mate but u cant compare two games like this.

I have GRAW 2 and have played demo of COD4.

If u like being a commander of the team, and love doing objectives on the main support from team tactics and team work.And love using your team and changing them according to the circumstances, I think u should start over with GRAW2.Its a bit hard, but where is the fun if aint come real life.

Whereas if u like being the one called the warhero, i think u should stick with COD4(ofcourse when it comes out).The straight forward gameplay, with simple objectives(mostly of them being blowing things around), and just get-in-the-war gameplay will highly attract you for a long time.COD4 focuses on just a single user player.Of course they are other AI controlled team mates, but most of the time you are following them instead of the vice versa.

ANyway its you to decide.

Graphically wise COD4 is better, but i dont think there is that much team work and tactics to be used.But also its the most latest.

so my friend you chose according to your taste.In my opinion i already have GRAW2 and a real time fun to play it.I am 100% sure that i will get COD4.

But in the end I am sure that i will like GEARS OF WAR more than any other.Because simply it includes both of the features.AN immense team work and tactics and the chance to prove and become a warhero.

GRAW 2 was over-complicated, and that would be a strike in my books. Some players like realism, but realism for me is like getting shot in the head and staying down instead of respawning.

Since games obviously can't be realistic to that extreme, then why bother going realistic in the first place?

CoD 4 puts just enough challenge into the game, defined by not dying in a few hits (unless you go to veteran mode), and putting a huge variety into the game (loads of different guns) with a storyline that puts you in the place of the heroes (I'm a sucker for 'vanquishing evil' games).

The multiplayer 'perks' also lend variety and fun to the multiplayer community, which is more than I can say for GRAW or GRAW 2.

GRAW 2 was over-complicated, and that would be a strike in my books. Some players like realism, but realism for me is like getting shot in the head and staying down instead of respawning.

Since games obviously can't be realistic to that extreme, then why bother going realistic in the first place?

CoD 4 puts just enough challenge into the game, defined by not dying in a few hits (unless you go to veteran mode), and putting a huge variety into the game (loads of different guns) with a storyline that puts you in the place of the heroes (I'm a sucker for 'vanquishing evil' games).

The multiplayer 'perks' also lend variety and fun to the multiplayer community, which is more than I can say for GRAW or GRAW 2.