Help understanding ATI/AMD

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TheBlackKnightX
TheBlackKnightX

321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TheBlackKnightX
Member since 2006 • 321 Posts
It seems PC gamers prefer ATI/AMD over nVidia/Intel or so I heard so I thought about making my own gaming PC and using ATI/AMD. But I was wonder what ATI cards to buy and what AMD processors to get. They don't have a simple naming structure like nVidia and Intel has so I was confused on what each card and processor offered.
Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
It seems PC gamers prefer ATI/AMD over nVidia/Intel or so I heard so I thought about making my own gaming PC and using ATI/AMD. But I was wonder what ATI cards to buy and what AMD processors to get. They don't have a simple naming structure like nVidia and Intel has so I was confused on what each card and processor offered.TheBlackKnightX
If you ask me Intel/ATI is the way to go right now. Core 2 and Core i7 line outperforms the Phenom II line, and ATI's HD 4 series of graphics cards provide an impressive amount of power, efficiency, price and features. Of course Nvidia offers some great cards to, if you can find them at the right price. Also, I think Nvidia has the most confusing naming structure, did you know the that there are two versions of the 8800GTS? 2 versions of the GTX 260, the 8800GT, 9600GT are and some future GTX 1xx card are all pretty much the same, the 8800GTX and 9800GTX are pretty much the same, There is also a 9600GSO that is the same as an 8800GS. My advice, get a fast Core 2 duo and pair it with an HD 4870, can't go wrong there.
Avatar image for Lightbulb9
Lightbulb9

41

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Lightbulb9
Member since 2008 • 41 Posts
I agree with Marfoo, a intel and ati rig is the way to go. Get a 4870 for about 229 dollars, and a core 2 quad or duo9 like the e8400 or q95500 and that will get you great performance in most games.
Avatar image for Dr_Brocoli
Dr_Brocoli

3724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Dr_Brocoli
Member since 2007 • 3724 Posts
The problem with i7 is cost. You cpu, mobo, ram are needed. Now that can be REAALLLLY expansive for an i7 rig. So if you chose that route be prepared to spend :P Arent the new Phenoms just as fast clock for clock as C2D now? And it is quite cheap atm. Your choice though =P
Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
The problem with i7 is cost. You cpu, mobo, ram are needed. Now that can be REAALLLLY expansive for an i7 rig. So if you chose that route be prepared to spend :P Arent the new Phenoms just as fast clock for clock as C2D now? And it is quite cheap atm. Your choice though =PDr_Brocoli
Unfortunately no, they are faster than the old Phenom's clock for clock, but Core 2 is still ahead of Phenom II and offers just as much or more overclocking headroom than the Phenom II has. The only reasons to get a Phenom II, you can get if for really cheap, you already have motherboard that can run it, or your so much of an AMD fan you're willing to overlook the ability to get a superior product and invest in AMD.
Avatar image for nVidiaGaMer
nVidiaGaMer

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 nVidiaGaMer
Member since 2006 • 7793 Posts
AMD is much better if you are on a budget for the price of the cheapest Intel Quad Core (around $200) you can get a AMD Phenom X4($99), motherboard($70-$80 or less if you go micro atx), and RAM($30 or less).
Avatar image for yoyo462001
yoyo462001

7535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#7 yoyo462001
Member since 2005 • 7535 Posts
Ati and Nvidia naming scheme are pretty much as bad as each of them, i would personally go Phenom II (which is look quite impressive now) and ATI HD 4850, but regardless of which combo you go for you wont be missing out on much at all.
Avatar image for Captain__Tripps
Captain__Tripps

4523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Captain__Tripps
Member since 2006 • 4523 Posts
AMD is much better if you are on a budget for the price of the cheapest Intel Quad Core (around $200) you can get a AMD Phenom X4($99), motherboard($70-$80 or less if you go micro atx), and RAM($30 or less).nVidiaGaMer
Its not that much cheaper. Q6600 is I think $189, motherboard/ram will be the same as you listed. The only X4 for $99 is the 9600 which a Q6600 will much outperform even at stock, it won't even be close if you OC that Q6600. But if you've already got the motherboard, a Phenom II probably isn't a bad way to go.
Avatar image for LTZH
LTZH

2704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#9 LTZH
Member since 2003 • 2704 Posts
[QUOTE="TheBlackKnightX"]It seems PC gamers prefer ATI/AMD over nVidia/Intel or so I heard so I thought about making my own gaming PC and using ATI/AMD. But I was wonder what ATI cards to buy and what AMD processors to get. They don't have a simple naming structure like nVidia and Intel has so I was confused on what each card and processor offered.Marfoo
If you ask me Intel/ATI is the way to go right now. Core 2 and Core i7 line outperforms the Phenom II line, and ATI's HD 4 series of graphics cards provide an impressive amount of power, efficiency, price and features. Of course Nvidia offers some great cards to, if you can find them at the right price. Also, I think Nvidia has the most confusing naming structure, did you know the that there are two versions of the 8800GTS? 2 versions of the GTX 260, the 8800GT, 9600GT are and some future GTX 1xx card are all pretty much the same, the 8800GTX and 9800GTX are pretty much the same, There is also a 9600GSO that is the same as an 8800GS. My advice, get a fast Core 2 duo and pair it with an HD 4870, can't go wrong there.

LOL, yeah go ahead and do that...lets see, the cheapest I7 is $300, then the cheapest mobo that supports it is $200, and 4gb of the cheapest DDR3 ram is $200...dam that was expensive! I could've gotten an amd pehenom 2 940 for $250, a $125 mobo (K9A2), and 4gb of Corsair dominator DDR2 1066mhz ram for $80....and OC'd the CPU to 4ghz easily with the aftermarket cooler I already own... so what I didnt get an extra 5 fps in Crysis, but I saved $245...maybe I can get a new ATI HIS 4870 1GB ICEQ4 Turbo with all that money I just saved!
Avatar image for Beaglesniffer
Beaglesniffer

707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#10 Beaglesniffer
Member since 2006 • 707 Posts
It seems PC gamers prefer ATI/AMD over nVidia/Intel or so I heard so I thought about making my own gaming PC and using ATI/AMD. But I was wonder what ATI cards to buy and what AMD processors to get. They don't have a simple naming structure like nVidia and Intel has so I was confused on what each card and processor offered.TheBlackKnightX
so of the more enthusiast people go with a ATI/AMD set up i guess because it should interact well with each other as its all made by the same company GPU/CPU/chipset it also provides verry good overclocking even though i know an intel setup is better for some strange reason i want to try an AMD/ATI setup
Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
[QUOTE="Marfoo"][QUOTE="TheBlackKnightX"] LOL, yeah go ahead and do that...lets see, the cheapest I7 is $300, then the cheapest mobo that supports it is $200, and 4gb of the cheapest DDR3 ram is $200...dam that was expensive! I could've gotten an amd pehenom 2 940 for $250, a $125 mobo (K9A2), and 4gb of Corsair dominator DDR2 1066mhz ram for $80....and OC'd the CPU to 4ghz easily with the aftermarket cooler I already own... so what I didnt get an extra 5 fps in Crysis, but I saved $245...maybe I can get a new ATI HIS 4870 1GB ICEQ4 Turbo with all that money I just saved!LTZH
Read the whole post man, I said get a CORE 2 DUO, you can build a Core 2 system for cheaper or the same as Phenom II, and Core 2 is the superior performer.
[QUOTE="TheBlackKnightX"]It seems PC gamers prefer ATI/AMD over nVidia/Intel or so I heard so I thought about making my own gaming PC and using ATI/AMD. But I was wonder what ATI cards to buy and what AMD processors to get. They don't have a simple naming structure like nVidia and Intel has so I was confused on what each card and processor offered.Beaglesniffer
so of the more enthusiast people go with a ATI/AMD set up i guess because it should interact well with each other as its all made by the same company GPU/CPU/chipset it also provides verry good overclocking even though i know an intel setup is better for some strange reason i want to try an AMD/ATI setup

I wouldn't say that the CPU/GPU interact better because they are made by the same company, but you do get benefits like Fusion for Gaming, which frees up resources and overclocks your system when gaming. If you want to go AMD/ATI that's fine, just making sure you're aware of what hardware is out there how it performs and how it's priced.
Avatar image for nattydreadlocks
nattydreadlocks

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 nattydreadlocks
Member since 2008 • 115 Posts

all of the above is true, but Core 2 duo are the same price as phenom ii, so with future proofing in mind, would it not be better to go for more cores?

EDIT: just looking on aria it is a direct toss ip between:

AMD Phenom Quad 9850 Black Edition 2.5GHz

and

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz 95W G0 Stepping

They are basically the same, but for some reason, i kinda like AMD more, is this me being wierd, or could it be better?

Avatar image for kjghs
kjghs

947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 kjghs
Member since 2005 • 947 Posts
Negative , nvidia /intel is the way to go. Especially with the new i7 920.
Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#14 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

all of the above is true, but Core 2 duo are the same price as phenom ii, so with future proofing in mind, would it not be better to go for more cores?

EDIT: just looking on aria it is a direct toss ip between:

AMD Phenom Quad 9850 Black Edition 2.5GHz

and

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz 95W G0 Stepping

They are basically the same, but for some reason, i kinda like AMD more, is this me being wierd, or could it be better?

nattydreadlocks

From what benchmark did you see thoose two be basicly the same, for gaming they arent. Then we migth want to speak about gaming power, there the Q2D is a fair bit stronger clock for clock.

Edit: (the Phenom 9850 isn't a Phenom II either.)

Avatar image for Targzissian
Targzissian

1228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 Targzissian
Member since 2003 • 1228 Posts
AMD had better CPUs five years ago when Intel was still stuck in Pentium-land. ATI had better GPUs than nVidia at that time as well but then they dropped the ball and only in the past year are they beginning to become competitive again. Currently nVidia/Intel is still the performance king.
Avatar image for cornholio157
cornholio157

4603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#16 cornholio157
Member since 2005 • 4603 Posts

[QUOTE="Dr_Brocoli"]The problem with i7 is cost. You cpu, mobo, ram are needed. Now that can be REAALLLLY expansive for an i7 rig. So if you chose that route be prepared to spend :P Arent the new Phenoms just as fast clock for clock as C2D now? And it is quite cheap atm. Your choice though =PMarfoo
Unfortunately no, they are faster than the old Phenom's clock for clock, but Core 2 is still ahead of Phenom II and offers just as much or more overclocking headroom than the Phenom II has. The only reasons to get a Phenom II, you can get if for really cheap, you already have motherboard that can run it, or your so much of an AMD fan you're willing to overlook the ability to get a superior product and invest in AMD.

i dont know where you read that but the reviews i read say the opposite, and for the most part the core 2 quads are the ones coming close to phenom 2 but its right behind i7 when the test isnt just number crunching which i know i7 is very good at. they do overclock very well if you get the 940 with its unlocked multiplyer on a board with the SB750 southbridge they can overclock as good as the core 2 duos with lower temps aswell

Avatar image for cornholio157
cornholio157

4603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#17 cornholio157
Member since 2005 • 4603 Posts

It seems PC gamers prefer ATI/AMD over nVidia/Intel or so I heard so I thought about making my own gaming PC and using ATI/AMD. But I was wonder what ATI cards to buy and what AMD processors to get. They don't have a simple naming structure like nVidia and Intel has so I was confused on what each card and processor offered.TheBlackKnightX

basically its very simple higher number is more powerful. 9950 phenom is better than 9550 phenom, same for the ati cards 4870 is better that 4850. the first number in the ati cards is the series number 4000 is the 4000 series is the current series and the 4870 is the top card, the X870 cards are usually the top cards in a series.

also this isnt really the right place to ask about building an AMD system people here for the most part only buy intel right now and will tell you to buy intel, theres a few of us who understand the current AMD lineup and can help you if you want an AMD system, if you do just ignore everyone else, me and beefdog are the only 2 i can think of right now but theres a few others

Avatar image for Baselerd
Baselerd

5104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#18 Baselerd
Member since 2003 • 5104 Posts
Both companies offer similar performance for the prices you pay. Personally I would get a nice core 2 duo or quad and an hd 4800 series gpu. The i7's are too expensive right now and an e8500 or q9400 will be plenty fast for anything these days.
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
There are 3 versions of the 8800GTS, also slap whoever told you ATI and AMD are the way to go. ATI and Nvidia are a toss up, the GTX280 just dropped in price, i would take the new GTX285 because i run folding@home.