how do people justify prices on gaming desktops?

  • 86 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Decrate
Decrate

1731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 Decrate
Member since 2004 • 1731 Posts

i've been trying to convince myself to throw down money for a gaming PC but i can't seem to make sense of the math.

take for instance people who buy a radeon 5970, a $700 graphics card. for $100less i can buy an xbox360 and ps3. surely theres more value in 2 gaming systems than 1 graphics card which can't do much on its own.

now lets take a regular gaming machine that should cost around $800 given that you use an intel processor and not amd and you want to play on max. considering most people already have a computer for internet usage and other programs, you'd be spending all that money just to play games. i say to myself.. with $800 i can buy 13 new games for my consoles or 40 used games. or just a lot of new clothes, a lot of beer, who knows.

and dont say i can upgrade my existing computer because its a laptop which already does everything i need from a computer minus gaming.

so how do you convince someone who already owns a cheap desktop or laptop to spend that money on another one just for games? i really want to play starcraft2, diablo3, swtor, etc. but all that money just to play those games on max?

Avatar image for Decrate
Decrate

1731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 Decrate
Member since 2004 • 1731 Posts

also, when i read reviews on those $700+ graphics cards, people say "amazing card! plays all games on max!" and i say to myself.. you just spent that much on a graphics card, what do you expect? did you really have nothing more useful to spend that much money on?

then again, i am a broke university student.. which might explain a lot

Avatar image for GTR12
GTR12

13490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 GTR12
Member since 2006 • 13490 Posts

People don't want to play on max always, and PC graphics far supersedes every console. A PC game on low would still beat the quality of a console if it properly written and coded. Take for instance Crysis, lets see if Crysis 2 on consoles can even match the quality of the original Crysis when it comes out.

Avatar image for desertpython
desertpython

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 desertpython
Member since 2006 • 1277 Posts
Why not? What's the point of living if you don't live and spend all your time on thinking on how much you'll save? I'd rather spend a lot of money on hardware rather than a dull box that sits and accepts discs, with little upgrade potential. And I can never get over the fact of gaming on a PC. It just feels right. Money comes and go but once you go, its over.
Avatar image for ywywyw
ywywyw

2297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ywywyw
Member since 2005 • 2297 Posts

I actually see your point and like your arguement. For me its this: Ive been a PC gamer for quite sometime now and getting me to switch to a console is no easy task. I consider my PC to be a hell of a lot more powerful then a xbox or ps3. I also prefer keyboard+mouse to a traditional controller. This being said, I think its a matter of preference really. If your into console gaming and/or prefer a controller then your probably going to go for the xbox or ps3, or possibly both. Like I said I am a PC gamer and I speak for many when i say that its (personally) better then any console. Now the tricky part is "what if i dont have any money for a mid-range+ gaming rig?" I cant really say what to do for this seeing as my computer was a generous gift from my mom. My best advice would to be getting a job and saving up.

But now im just getting off topic. I'm pretty noob when it comes to whats inside the pc (although im learning) Sadly the only way i can answer you is by saying that its all preference on what you want to buy. It has nothing to do with pricing or math IMO

Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts
Your first problem was looking at $700 graphics cards, price/performance goes to crap around $200 or so and gets more and more rediculous after that point. Your second problem is thinking that a computer is limited to being a gaming machine, like the consoles. When in fact it can do infinitely many more things a console can, as well as some people need more powerful computers for school/work (such as myself since I'm a graphic design major). To me having one device that can do both my schoolwork and play games is much more practical than buying a console as well as a personal computer that probably has limited or no upgrade options..
Avatar image for ywywyw
ywywyw

2297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 ywywyw
Member since 2005 • 2297 Posts
Your first problem was looking at $700 graphics cards, price/performance goes to crap around $200 or so and gets more and more rediculous after that point. Your second problem is thinking that a computer is limited to being a gaming machine, like the consoles. When in fact it can do infinitely many more things a console can, as well as some people need more powerful computers for school/work (such as myself since I'm a graphic design major). To me having one device that can do both my schoolwork and play games is much more practical than buying a console as well as a cheaper personal computer.General_X
100% agree'd. The multi-tasking ability of a computer is phenomenal.
Avatar image for RobboElRobbo
RobboElRobbo

13668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 RobboElRobbo
Member since 2009 • 13668 Posts

How much did you pay for your laptop? If you would have never bought that and built a desktop for games instead, you'd probably have more money than you do now.

Avatar image for BeavermanA
BeavermanA

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 BeavermanA
Member since 2003 • 2652 Posts
Besides my opinion that consoles suck because of poor controls(mouse/kb), lower resolution, crap frames per second, no extensive mods to games, and just overall much worse graphics just to name a few, pc users are generally game enthusiasts. The extra money is well spent on their hobby. To the casual gamers, a console will do. It's just like any other hobby such as cars for instance, a Honda Civic will serve the same general purpose that a Ferrari will, personal transportation, but if you like cars and have the money, a Civic isn't going to cut it.
Avatar image for RobboElRobbo
RobboElRobbo

13668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 RobboElRobbo
Member since 2009 • 13668 Posts
Besides my opinion that consoles suck because of poor controls(mouse/kb), lower resolution, crap frames per second, no extensive mods to games, and just overall much worse graphics just to name a few, pc users are generally game enthusiasts. The extra money is well spent on their hobby. To the casual gamers, a console will do. It's just like any other hobby such as cars for instance, a Honda Civic will serve the same general purpose that a Ferrari will, personal transportation, but if you like cars and have the money, a Civic isn't going to cut it. BeavermanA

Even then, if you knew a thing or two about cars then you would know that Ferrari isn't actually that great. :P

Avatar image for BeavermanA
BeavermanA

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 BeavermanA
Member since 2003 • 2652 Posts
[QUOTE="BeavermanA"]Besides my opinion that consoles suck because of poor controls(mouse/kb), lower resolution, crap frames per second, no extensive mods to games, and just overall much worse graphics just to name a few, pc users are generally game enthusiasts. The extra money is well spent on their hobby. To the casual gamers, a console will do. It's just like any other hobby such as cars for instance, a Honda Civic will serve the same general purpose that a Ferrari will, personal transportation, but if you like cars and have the money, a Civic isn't going to cut it. RobboElRobbo

Even then, if you knew a thing or two about cars then you would know that Ferrari isn't actually that great. :P

Haha, well I guess the Ferrari would be considered the Alienware of cars. Cool but expensive and overkill, just more of a status symbol. My cars are more like my pc's, pretty cheap and modded for performance, as they are my other hobby.
Avatar image for RobboElRobbo
RobboElRobbo

13668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 RobboElRobbo
Member since 2009 • 13668 Posts
[QUOTE="RobboElRobbo"][QUOTE="BeavermanA"]Besides my opinion that consoles suck because of poor controls(mouse/kb), lower resolution, crap frames per second, no extensive mods to games, and just overall much worse graphics just to name a few, pc users are generally game enthusiasts. The extra money is well spent on their hobby. To the casual gamers, a console will do. It's just like any other hobby such as cars for instance, a Honda Civic will serve the same general purpose that a Ferrari will, personal transportation, but if you like cars and have the money, a Civic isn't going to cut it. BeavermanA

Even then, if you knew a thing or two about cars then you would know that Ferrari isn't actually that great. :P

Haha, well I guess the Ferrari would be considered the Alienware of cars. Cool but expensive and overkill, just more of a status symbol. My cars are more like my pc's, pretty cheap and modded for performance, as they are my other hobby.

CIassic cars ftw :D

Avatar image for icyseanfitz
icyseanfitz

2493

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 icyseanfitz
Member since 2006 • 2493 Posts

tbh ive spent (360 was 420 euro, ps3 was 350 euro, wii was 300 euro (piece of ****).....god damn now that i count it :(, and then my hd sammy was 1000 euro) over 2000 this gen alone on consoles never mind games so either way gaming ends up costing you a lot of money

Avatar image for acsam12304
acsam12304

3387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 acsam12304
Member since 2005 • 3387 Posts

$700? yes they are that kind of cards but you are a lot of card for less tehn $300 that can give a lot pf power to run a lot of new games on high maxed out settings.

look at my rig on my sig total price i paid for it if you dont count the sales tax and shipping cost i spent around close to $500 and it can run crysis, metro 2033, BF:BC 2, all on very high maxed out settings with no lag what so ever

Avatar image for ywywyw
ywywyw

2297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 ywywyw
Member since 2005 • 2297 Posts

$700? yes they are that kind of cards but you are a lot of card for less tehn $300 that can give a lot pf power to run a lot of new games on high maxed out settings.

look at my rig on my sig total price i paid for it if you dont count the sales tax and shipping cost i spent around close to $500 and it can run crysis, metro 2033, BF:BC 2, all on very high maxed out settings with no lag what so ever

acsam12304
can you tell me how exactly you max out crysis, metro, and bfbc2 with your rig? im sorta sure my pc is a bit better and i cant max out crysis or metro with no lag whatsoever. your probs 10x better then me with computers but im always curious on how to improve my performance
Avatar image for Roggirek
Roggirek

1103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Roggirek
Member since 2007 • 1103 Posts
Well, in today's world, you're going to need a PC at some point. Say this costs $500 or so. Then add the cost of a $300 console, and theres your gaming PC.
Avatar image for megapikachu101
megapikachu101

1386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 megapikachu101
Member since 2007 • 1386 Posts
i bought a 460 for 200 bucks and i max bfbc2 with 32x AA 16x AF 1440x900 with 30fps+ :P i just need a new monitor for highers res lol
Avatar image for Roggirek
Roggirek

1103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Roggirek
Member since 2007 • 1103 Posts
32xAA!? Jeez, you DO need a new monitor.
Avatar image for kaitanuvax
kaitanuvax

3814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 kaitanuvax
Member since 2007 • 3814 Posts

Well, in today's world, you're going to need a PC at some point. Say this costs $500 or so. Then add the cost of a $300 console, and theres your gaming PC.Roggirek

This. Console fan boys do tend to forget a PC isn't just used for gaming..

Avatar image for ywywyw
ywywyw

2297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 ywywyw
Member since 2005 • 2297 Posts
[QUOTE="megapikachu101"]i bought a 460 for 200 bucks and i max bfbc2 with 32x AA 16x AF 1440x900 with 30fps+ :P i just need a new monitor for highers res lol

whats the rest of your rig like. i got a 460 as well and im pretty sure i cant do that. i skip every once in a while. i got a gtx 460. phenom 4x. win 7 64 bit and 4gigs ram.
Avatar image for megapikachu101
megapikachu101

1386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 megapikachu101
Member since 2007 • 1386 Posts
[QUOTE="ywywyw"][QUOTE="megapikachu101"]i bought a 460 for 200 bucks and i max bfbc2 with 32x AA 16x AF 1440x900 with 30fps+ :P i just need a new monitor for highers res lol

whats the rest of your rig like. i got a 460 as well and im pretty sure i cant do that. i skip every once in a while. i got a gtx 460. phenom 4x. win 7 64 bit and 4gigs ram.

keep in mind the 1440 by 900 res its pretty low i got athlon ii x4 4gb of ram too also overclocked the gpu pretty far what res do you play at?
Avatar image for ywywyw
ywywyw

2297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 ywywyw
Member since 2005 • 2297 Posts
[QUOTE="megapikachu101"][QUOTE="ywywyw"][QUOTE="megapikachu101"]i bought a 460 for 200 bucks and i max bfbc2 with 32x AA 16x AF 1440x900 with 30fps+ :P i just need a new monitor for highers res lol

whats the rest of your rig like. i got a 460 as well and im pretty sure i cant do that. i skip every once in a while. i got a gtx 460. phenom 4x. win 7 64 bit and 4gigs ram.

keep in mind the 1440 by 900 res its pretty low i got athlon ii x4 4gb of ram too also overclocked the gpu pretty far what res do you play at?

i have my res at 1900x1080. is that the pwoblem?
Avatar image for megapikachu101
megapikachu101

1386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 megapikachu101
Member since 2007 • 1386 Posts
[QUOTE="ywywyw"][QUOTE="megapikachu101"][QUOTE="ywywyw"] whats the rest of your rig like. i got a 460 as well and im pretty sure i cant do that. i skip every once in a while. i got a gtx 460. phenom 4x. win 7 64 bit and 4gigs ram.

keep in mind the 1440 by 900 res its pretty low i got athlon ii x4 4gb of ram too also overclocked the gpu pretty far what res do you play at?

i have my res at 1900x1080. is that the pwoblem?

well i wouldnt say "problem" but yes thats what is keeping you from having a steadier frame rate higher res = needs more power if you're running at 1080p just take the AA down its not that necessary anyways
Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#25 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
How do people justify buying Ferrari and Lamborghini when they can simply get a cheap Japanese car? I enjoy PC gaming. Getting a top of the line computer doesn't require me to chop off an arm or leg, nor sacrifice other essential spendings. I'm more than justified to spend as much money as I want on a gaming computer.
Avatar image for ywywyw
ywywyw

2297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 ywywyw
Member since 2005 • 2297 Posts
[QUOTE="megapikachu101"][QUOTE="ywywyw"][QUOTE="megapikachu101"] keep in mind the 1440 by 900 res its pretty low i got athlon ii x4 4gb of ram too also overclocked the gpu pretty far what res do you play at?

i have my res at 1900x1080. is that the pwoblem?

well i wouldnt say "problem" but yes thats what is keeping you from having a steadier frame rate higher res = needs more power if you're running at 1080p just take the AA down its not that necessary anyways

what exactly is AA anyway. im dumb as hell when it comes to this stuff. im learning more and more as i go but some of it still seems like chinese to me :(
Avatar image for megapikachu101
megapikachu101

1386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 megapikachu101
Member since 2007 • 1386 Posts
[QUOTE="ywywyw"][QUOTE="megapikachu101"][QUOTE="ywywyw"] i have my res at 1900x1080. is that the pwoblem?

well i wouldnt say "problem" but yes thats what is keeping you from having a steadier frame rate higher res = needs more power if you're running at 1080p just take the AA down its not that necessary anyways

what exactly is AA anyway. im dumb as hell when it comes to this stuff. im learning more and more as i go but some of it still seems like chinese to me :(

AA gets rid of "jaggies" as they are called they're supposed to be less visible at a higher res though so you shouldnt have a problem
Avatar image for ywywyw
ywywyw

2297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 ywywyw
Member since 2005 • 2297 Posts
[QUOTE="megapikachu101"][QUOTE="ywywyw"][QUOTE="megapikachu101"] well i wouldnt say "problem" but yes thats what is keeping you from having a steadier frame rate higher res = needs more power if you're running at 1080p just take the AA down its not that necessary anyways

what exactly is AA anyway. im dumb as hell when it comes to this stuff. im learning more and more as i go but some of it still seems like chinese to me :(

AA gets rid of "jaggies" as they are called they're supposed to be less visible at a higher res though so you shouldnt have a problem

gotcha. thanks chief.
Avatar image for desertpython
desertpython

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 desertpython
Member since 2006 • 1277 Posts
My 4890 is getting old but it still has enough grunt to push 1080p pixels in any game on high. Your 460 shouldn't have too many problems. I also built this PC for games, there is nothing on it but drivers and Flash and 120GB+ of games.
Avatar image for Neo_revolution7
Neo_revolution7

2088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Neo_revolution7
Member since 2008 • 2088 Posts

my 4850's in crossfire are pretty dam good at 1680x1050 as far as crysis goes didn't like it to much but any other of my games i throw at it are pretty much maxed out for the most part.

Avatar image for acsam12304
acsam12304

3387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#31 acsam12304
Member since 2005 • 3387 Posts

My 4890 is getting old but it still has enough grunt to push 1080p pixels in any game on high. Your 460 shouldn't have too many problems. I also built this PC for games, there is nothing on it but drivers and Flash and 120GB+ of games.desertpython

i hope one of the game are not Star Wars Unleashed cuz that game on the PC is 30GB big:P

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

If I was a broke university student, I'd still stick with a PC because aside from playing games with it, I could do my homework and projects on it. From my own experiences as a student, I wouldn't have a lot of time to play games anyway. I might as well do everything with one box. Plus, a cheap laptop wouldn't cut it for me. Laptops are notoriously slow compared to desktops when it comes to tasks such as video-editing and encoding/transcoding. I already saw that first hand while editing videos taken during our recent road trip.

As for my gaming PC..... it's fairly weak for a recent (Nov 2009) build and it cost less than $800. But, I game at low resolutions anyway (1440x900 or 1280x768 ). It's plenty enough for most games at those resolutions.

Avatar image for dracos9000
dracos9000

1318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#33 dracos9000
Member since 2006 • 1318 Posts

I am a PC gamer and console gamer.

$1200 Game PC
CPU: AMD x4 955 @ 3.8

GPU: ASUS 5870 1gb

MEM: 8gb Mushkin 1600mhz

HDD 1.5 TB/226GB left

MB: Biostar 890FX

Case: Antec 1200

PSU: Antec 650W

Maxes everything at 1920x1080. (Need a monitor running on 50inch DLP not good for PC gaming but good for console gaming)

I have a 360(28 Games)/PS2(15 Games)

I use the PC for gaming and programming.

I use to buy $80 graphic cards back in the day to just get by playing pc games on lowest settings but soon I tried $160 then $300+ I hope I stop there.

If you want to game on low-med settings a $600-$700 gaming rig is possible if built with amd. To answer your question it really is only justifiable to the individual to spend X amounts of money on a gaming PC but it is always cheaper to build then buy.

Avatar image for mouthforbathory
mouthforbathory

2114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#34 mouthforbathory
Member since 2006 • 2114 Posts

Well, in today's world, you're going to need a PC at some point. Say this costs $500 or so. Then add the cost of a $300 console, and theres your gaming PC.Roggirek
Took the words right out of my mouth. This is always my first reason for the defense of PC gaming. What's funny is you can buy a home office PC with a quad core, 4 GB RAM for $500 and with only $100 you can drop a new graphics card that literally pulverizes a console graphically. I like going on to Newegg and building gaming PCs for as little as possible just to see how cheap I can get. $600 can get you an Athlon II x4, 4 GB DDR3, and a Radeon 5770 equipped machine. $400-450 will get you console "parity" in terms of graphics for today's cost in parts and what's easily available and is still a PC for everyday computer needs.

Avatar image for SaPhIrX_lOl
SaPhIrX_lOl

592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#35 SaPhIrX_lOl
Member since 2009 • 592 Posts

I paid way to much for my rig, thats for sure. Side note: Always buy from the net. Because it's cheaper.

Avatar image for MarineXXII
MarineXXII

1583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 MarineXXII
Member since 2007 • 1583 Posts

I usually just build my own rig which is about 1/2 the price or more than the ones u buy fully assembled. Like the way overpriced Alienwares.....

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#37 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

People don't want to play on max always, and PC graphics far supersedes every console. A PC game on low would still beat the quality of a console if it properly written and coded. Take for instance Crysis, lets see if Crysis 2 on consoles can even match the quality of the original Crysis when it comes out.

GTR12
Or RAGE.
Avatar image for SPBoss
SPBoss

3746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 SPBoss
Member since 2009 • 3746 Posts

also, when i read reviews on those $700+ graphics cards, people say "amazing card! plays all games on max!" and i say to myself.. you just spent that much on a graphics card, what do you expect? did you really have nothing more useful to spend that much money on?

then again, i am a broke university student.. which might explain a lot

Decrate

You dont need a $700 graphics card to max out games, my GTX 260 can max out all games and only cost me £130, which is about $200-300 :)

Avatar image for Hekynn
Hekynn

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Hekynn
Member since 2003 • 2164 Posts
You don't need a really expensive video card to run games these days a single GTX 460 768MB is plenty to run new games at high settings with a Core i5 760 and 4gb of ram or any other quad core.
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts

By the fact that all the games can be had for free. :P

I'm sure somebody's already said it but beside the back compatibility, depth, price, variety and sheer number of games available for PC, a computer's something that every home's going to have anyway, so why not save a little money and make it into your games machine at the same time?

Avatar image for Threesixtyci
Threesixtyci

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Threesixtyci
Member since 2006 • 4451 Posts
Just buy a 4870, instead.... they're usually under 130 bucks, now. And are a bit faster than the 5770, minus the DX11 support. As for an excuse of paying more than 900 bucks for a PC... PC's do a lot more than just gaming.
Avatar image for Rob_101
Rob_101

3291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Rob_101
Member since 2004 • 3291 Posts

bah! every time I think I am spending too much on an item, I just think of the (rich) people who spend $10,000 on a wrist watch.... yeah.

Avatar image for zaney
zaney

326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 zaney
Member since 2003 • 326 Posts

Though, I do tend to like my games to have better visuals, to me it really doesn't justify the higher price over a console. I have the extra money, so I do drop some cash for nice video cards. The reason PC gaming is far superior to consoles is one simple thing that I don't think anyone mentioned here. MODs. I can not even begin to tell you how much better games like fallout 3 and Dragon age are with many of the player made MODs out there. Also Games like half life 2 get some pretty good graphical upgrades like from fake factory. That 2004 game is one of my best looking games with the cinematic 10 mod. So, old games get overhauled by player mods, so they meet todays standards in gaming. You can not do this on a console. I buy fewer games a year on PC because I get so many more hours in with mods.

Avatar image for CellAnimation
CellAnimation

6116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 CellAnimation
Member since 2007 • 6116 Posts
PCs do a hell of a lot more than just play games, but when they do play games they look better, play smoother, have mods, the list goes on and on. It is your money though buy whatever you want.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
Fact is most people do not buy top of the range hardware. I'm still perfectly happy with my 3 year old 8800gts. Most people only really shell out once every 5 years or so then just put in about $100-$200 a year to keep it at the top or add new features. What most people miss in these calculations is the fact that most non-PC-gamers already have a PC and the extra power you have for gaming helps elsewhere too. If you compare a gaming PC and a PC+console then the cost is pretty close really and when you start adding on games it quickly shunts towards the gaming PC being cheaper also there's other perhaps 'tangential savings' as PC gamers tend to be more technologically competent than general users and so can easily save $100 by just spending half an hour on maintenance.
Avatar image for nintendog66
nintendog66

2300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 nintendog66
Member since 2006 • 2300 Posts
And nobody hasn't mentioned exclusives yet? xD Crysis, STALKER series, Stacraft 2, Diablo 3, Team Fortress 2(any valve game for that matter), Sins of Solar Empire, etc etc 20+ years of back catalog that beat any console. Not to mention ithat it's impossible to play most games with a controller.
Avatar image for LordRork
LordRork

2692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#47 LordRork
Member since 2004 • 2692 Posts

I'm a tinkerer and a control freak. If I'm not happy with an aspect of my machine, I can upgrade it to get just what I want when I want it. Yes, it's on the expensive side, but sometimes you should buy a high-end piece of equipment (be it a computer, TV, car or whatever) to appreciate the high end and what it can give you.

The PC is just so flexible on every level (including variety!).

Avatar image for desertpython
desertpython

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 desertpython
Member since 2006 • 1277 Posts

bah! every time I think I am spending too much on an item, I just think of the (rich) people who spend $10,000 on a wrist watch.... yeah.

Rob_101
Only $10,000? I saw a fat 18 carat for $30,000 watch last week that could buy South Africa . . . .
Avatar image for boybrushdred
boybrushdred

1892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 boybrushdred
Member since 2007 • 1892 Posts

there are games that will only succed on the PC like WoW. but me, i've built a PC for Diablo 3, and Mass Effect (i dont have a x360).

And nobody hasn't mentioned exclusives yet? xD Crysis, STALKER series, Stacraft 2, Diablo 3, Team Fortress 2(any valve game for that matter), Sins of Solar Empire, etc etc 20+ years of back catalog that beat any console. Not to mention ithat it's impossible to play most games with a controller.nintendog66

team fortress 2 is included in the orange box. which is also on the ps3 and x360.

Avatar image for acsam12304
acsam12304

3387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#50 acsam12304
Member since 2005 • 3387 Posts

[QUOTE="Roggirek"]Well, in today's world, you're going to need a PC at some point. Say this costs $500 or so. Then add the cost of a $300 console, and theres your gaming PC.mouthforbathory

Took the words right out of my mouth. This is always my first reason for the defense of PC gaming. What's funny is you can buy a home office PC with a quad core, 4 GB RAM for $500 and with only $100 you can drop a new graphics card that literally pulverizes a console graphically. I like going on to Newegg and building gaming PCs for as little as possible just to see how cheap I can get. $600 can get you an Athlon II x4, 4 GB DDR3, and a Radeon 5770 equipped machine. $400-450 will get you console "parity" in terms of graphics for today's cost in parts and what's easily available and is still a PC for everyday computer needs.

i do the same thing. i have like 10 wish listest. i try to build a PC so cheap but have a bit of power to run a game in high settings. and i also do a very over kill build to see if i ever have the money to spend on a over kill PC will be like. :D