This topic is locked from further discussion.
strange game.
runs bad with stutter and audio echo on 2 cores (laptop)
set to run on 1 single core it runs nearly flawless ...
I run it on an older PC armed with a GTX 560 Ti, runs very well on ultra, with minimum framerates of 30 FPS at 1080p. No AA, of course.
you guys think this game can run on a old raedon hd 4670,with core i3 and 4 GB RAM?canaveri
The 4670 is below the minimum requirements, so I'd assume not very well - depends on your resolution.
Yeah, it's picky and very sensitive to specific builds. Can't really give a good answer to this, but it runs good enough.strange game.
runs bad with stutter and audio echo on 2 cores (laptop)
set to run on 1 single core it runs nearly flawless ...
CHANCESUNDANCE
How does Batllefield3 run on pc? what pc do you have to run it? and is it enjoyable? what are the ups and downs on BF3 on pc?montag1
Playing it at 2560 x 1440, everything on high except terrain in low; ir runs around average 40 fps in 64 player matches (in large maps as Firestorm, Caspian or Kharg) using an i720/ 6GB/ 6870 and it looks as the game with the best graphics (overall) despite that the weapons has less polygons than Crysis/C2/MW3, environment destruction is lower than in Bad Company 2 and some games are better in a few particular areas -animations are better in C2, and water also).
The game is interesting in some areas, but so far I like BC 2 more in maps design, gameplay, gunplay and infantry/vehicle balance. But has some strong points: tons of attachments to weapons and better netcode, plus a much better ballistic implementation. In the bad part, Battlelog is such a lame service, and the HUD and UI could be a lot better (you need to jump into multiple instances to customize your weapons instead to doing it in the main menu as in BC2).
The game has too much lenticular effects/blinding effects, but taking that aside looks superb and sounds even better, and runs smoothly.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment