I need a sub-$400 HDMI reciever recommendation

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#1 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts

I need a new reciever pronto, but I don't know much about audio equipment. I need a lot of HDMI inputs, but that's really my only requirement.

Any suggestions/recomended brands?

Avatar image for Bozanimal
Bozanimal

2500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#2 Bozanimal
Member since 2003 • 2500 Posts

Honestly, there is little difference from receiver to receiver at any particular price point.It's not like home theaters in a box or headphones wherequality varies widely from product to product; most any $500 receiver from a reputable brand is going to yield similar performance.I personally prefer Yamaha, because I have liked their amplifier topology in the past, but it's been years since I've looked at such details. In general, Sony is looked poorly upon, though their Sony ES line of mid-range amplifiers have done well.

  • Denon
  • Harmon Kardon
  • Marantz
  • Onkyo
  • Pioneer
  • Yamaha

Note that the Denon AVR-1911 is particularly popular at your pricepoint, so I'd start there. Take a look at these receivers and review their HDMI options, then think hard about where you purchase your receiver. Personally I find the place you purchase from is as important as the product when it comes to something as complex as a receiver; there's a lot that can go wrong during shipment and you will probably want the option to return it in the first 30 days, at least, if you're not satisfied or something is not working properly.

Good luck,

Boz

Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#3 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts
Thanks, I'll check it out.
Avatar image for rastan
rastan

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 rastan
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts
Denon is receiver of choice, but NewEgg currently has a killer deal on the Yamaha vx-r867 for $430 and it is more in line with receivers that cost $200 more (somewhere between Denon AVR-2112 and AVR-2312 in terms of amps and function) . Look here: http://bfads.net/Hot-Deal/11050
Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#5 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts
Denon is receiver of choice, but NewEgg currently has a killer deal on the Yamaha vx-r867 for $430 and it is more in line with receivers that cost $200 more (somewhere between Denon AVR-2112 and AVR-2312 in terms of amps and function) . Look here: http://bfads.net/Hot-Deal/11050rastan
I would totally get that Yamaha, but the coupon expired :( Thanks for your help, though.
Avatar image for rastan
rastan

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 rastan
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts
Crap. It was a good deal!
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
[QUOTE="rastan"]Denon is receiver of choice, but NewEgg currently has a killer deal on the Yamaha vx-r867 for $430 and it is more in line with receivers that cost $200 more (somewhere between Denon AVR-2112 and AVR-2312 in terms of amps and function) . Look here: http://bfads.net/Hot-Deal/11050donalbane
I would totally get that Yamaha, but the coupon expired :( Thanks for your help, though.

Don't feel too bad.. Yamaha is overpriced IMO anyway. My more expensive Yamaha system didn't sound nearly as good as my friends Sony system. If you have a Best Buy nearby, go listen to the various systems for yourself. I know that people don't like to recommend Sony receivers, but I like them personally... @BOZ.. I didn't read your post before I commented, though it seems like it now =P Just my personal experience...
Avatar image for rastan
rastan

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 rastan
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts
Dude, I've yet to hear any Sony receiver outside of their ES line sound better than a Yamaha receiver and even the ES is not as good as the equivalently priced Yamaha. If your talking HTIB, they mostly all suck anyways, but on the receiver level there is no comparison.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Dude, I've yet to hear any Sony receiver outside of their ES line sound better than a Yamaha receiver and even the ES is not as good as the equivalently priced Yamaha. If your talking HTIB, they mostly all suck anyways, but on the receiver level there is no comparison.rastan

I like Sony products but theres no way I'd recommend them now.

Might I suggest looking at Accessories4Less for some Denon, Marantz, and Onkyo receivers?

Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
Dude, I've yet to hear any Sony receiver outside of their ES line sound better than a Yamaha receiver and even the ES is not as good as the equivalently priced Yamaha. If your talking HTIB, they mostly all suck anyways, but on the receiver level there is no comparison.rastan
Nah, it was an expensive (overpriced IMO) Yamaha receiver. I got the one that the guy at Best Buy recommended (probably not the best idea). I may be able to get the model number off it, but I doubt it. I burned it in a bonfire last winter when it quit working...
Avatar image for Bozanimal
Bozanimal

2500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#11 Bozanimal
Member since 2003 • 2500 Posts

To be frank, the prejudice and preferences for one brand over another is largely silly. In my experience receivers have reached a point where they're all going to sound very, very similar, since their amplifier section is going to be limited by their digital audio processors, and their digital audio processing chips are - for the most part - all licensed from one of two or three firms. Unless you're getting a bottom-of-the-barrel Coby, no worries. The relative (keyword) levels of distortion in, say,a Sherwood versus a Onkyo at the same price point is going to be inaudible. It's not like back in the day where one tube actually wasn't as good as another and you'd get amplifier hiss or a turn-on thump; most of the solid-state amp technology from receiver to receiver is interchangable. A $500 receiver from Marantz isn't going to sound a whole heck of a lot different than one from Sony so long as they both support the formats you want(Dolby 5.1/7.1 DTS ES, etc.). Every manufacturer takes their competitor's products apart and cribs.

Much more important for consumers is going to be the number of inputs and outputs, video pass-through and upscaling to 1080p, additional effects like auto-calibration, and other features of the processor having little to do with the amplifier section. By far the mostsignificant considerationis going to be broad consumer evaluation to determine if there is a pattern in problems with a specific model, just as you would a car. Particular makes and models may be prone to specific issues, such as the rear channels failing after a few months or overheating, but this is model by model and not make by make. Sound quality is not usually a concern for anything under four figures.

Yahama Guts - RX-V863 - = -

Really, can you tell the difference?

Yamaha has three lines of products: The HTR, RX, and Aventage lines. They are designed mostly for different distribution models, but in general the HTR is going to be a more mainstream and entry-level line, the RX is your full-line of receivers (including the amazing RX-Z11, which is over $5,000), and the Aventage line that caters more towards high-end home-theater and digital media users. Yamaha's modeling system general sees a sizable improvement in quality - meaning a change in the quality of the circuitry, such as larger capacitors - in the 1,000's lineup, meaning the RX-A1000 is a significant improvement over the RX-A800, but the RX-A800 is not as significant an improvement over the RX-A700. Yamaha's basic products sold at Best Buy and similar mainstream outlets are going to be of a lower quality, generally speaking, than what you'll find at specialty retailers and boutiques carrying their higher-end stuff.

This response was more for perspective than specific guidance, but I think it's worth thinking about. Not quite as fun as saying, "Onkyo sucks!" and "No, Yamaha sucks!" though, from an internet conversation standpoint. :P

Boz

TL/DR - Ignore brand and look for features of multiple models at your price point, and whether there are consistent reviews showing a pattern of complaints for your model.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Another great post by Boz /cheers

You're right about anything under $400 not sounding totally different. I noticed you didn't mention anything about power supplies. When I was looking for a new receiver last year Rastan was the one that helped find my Onkyo. One thing I've noticed about low-end Sonys and Pioneers, is that they're quite. Very quite. I used one of each I picked up from Best Buy to test. They each went up to 80 I believe. 40-50 was required to make them audible for basic music listening. Even 80 isn't that loud. With my Onkyo I don't even have to try. It goes to 70 and its loud enough at 20. Features are what you want to look for these days, but I'm convinced the PSU plays a big part. Also must mention its headphone port was also extremely quiet, and that was with using my HD555s.

Features are mainly the same across the board too though these days too. They all have 5.1/7.1, all have HDMI 1.4a, all do DTS-HD/Dolby TrueHD decoding, and usually have the same inputs too. EQs are what I don't like about this Onkyo I have (TX-SR508.) It turn on anything, you have to use its auto-calibration or else the sound is terrible and flat. Only good thing about the Pioneer is that it sounds decent out of the box but all of them lack proper EQs. Even with its Audyseey (sp?) EQ on, it doesn't give you anything besides bass/treble. I still think they're the best value for the money at the low-end, but I've yet to hear the Yamahas.

Avatar image for rastan
rastan

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 rastan
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts
Exactly. Cheap receivers have cheaper parts and the place where many manufacturers skimp is the power supply. Sony is one of the biggest offenders. For example, their $500 receiver, STR-DN1010, is rated something like 100x7, but they only put in a 250 watt power supply so in reality is can probably only do something under 35 watts/channel with 7 channels driven or ~50 watts/channel with 5 channels driven. The $500 Denon AVR-1912 is rated at 90 watts/channel and has a 460 watt power supply so realistically, it can produce ~65 watts/channel with 7 channels driven or right about the rated 90 watts/channel with 5 channels driven. This directly translates to more/less dynamic headroom and more/less distortion. Funny part is Yamaha also has fallen into this camp with their lower end line which wasn't true back a few years, but with all the new logos and licensing, money has to be shaved off somewhere. Fortunately most of their power supplies are still superior to the Sony ones. Denon, Marantz and Onkyo are three mainstream brands that still come with superior power supplies that can actually drive all their channels at the same time close to what they are rated. Chubby Guy equates this to loudness with his Onkyo, but really the truth is he can get loud with clean sound because his amps have enough juice to do so. His 508 was also a good deal for an amp with a nice 450 watt power supply. Anyways the reason I recommended the Yamaha 867 was that it was really an excellent deal for $430 (It has a 400 watt power supply with some features that are found normally in receivers costing a couple of hundred dollars more) .
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Chubby Guy equates this to loudness with his Onkyo, but really the truth is he can get loud with clean sound because his amps have enough juice to do so. His 508 was also a good deal for an amp with a nice 450 watt power supply. Anyways the reason I recommended the Yamaha 867 was that it was really an excellent deal for $430 (It has a 400 watt power supply with some features that are found normally in receivers costing a couple of hundred dollars more) .rastan

Thank you for clarifying that. It was the best by a long shot at a little over 300 at the time (shipping was expensive) and its dropped 100 bucks since then (Linked in case the TC wanted to see it.) Only downside is how stubborn it is when adjusting any kind of EQ. Of course there are better ones like the 509, 608,and 609.

Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
I definitely need to do some research about receivers before I buy my next one.. Very informative btw Rastan :) And Boz too...
Avatar image for Bozanimal
Bozanimal

2500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#16 Bozanimal
Member since 2003 • 2500 Posts

They each went up to 80 I believe. 40-50 was required to make them audible for basic music listening. Even 80 isn't that loud. With my Onkyo I don't even have to try. It goes to 70 and its loud enough at 20. Features are what you want to look for these days, but I'm convinced the PSU plays a big part.ChubbyGuy40
I really wanted to comment on this, but was having trouble trying to figure out how to explain why the number you've attached to a given volume is not a good measure of comparison. You cannot compare 80 on one stereo to another because each amplifier puts out different amounts of power, uses a different scale, and each speaker has different levels of sensitivity to that power.

  • Sensitivity - Using the same stereo to power two different sets of speakers will get vastly different volume levels. Klipsch speakers, for example, and known for being "sensitive," so they'll be louder than other speakers at the same volume level in most circumstances.
  • Scale - My receiver actually goes from -80db to 0db. That's right: Negative. A user at the linked site says it best, "Properly speaking, you are not turning your stereo up when you are turning it up -- you are throttling it less. At the zero point, you are not throttling it at all." The discussion is actually quite entertaining if you care to click.
  • Power - This is the most obvious one, and the one you are alluding to when you mention the PSU. The capability of the PSU to provide sufficient amperage to the amplifier stage allows that section to create the power for your speakers.

Maxell Tape Guy: CIassic

If all of this sounds confusing, that's because it is, which is why I try to keep my recommendations basic and avoid discussions of power. Unless you're really into stereos and are looking to match drivers with power output or take on some heavy DIY work, 99% of consumers need to look at features and reliability rather than power and the underlying hardware.

I have no idea why I decided to write all that. :P

Boz

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Typing quickly and I really couldn't put it in a better answer. :P I know the numbers are essentially worthless. I was trying to give a visual sense of how much power they had.

I did those tests with a basic set of Polk bookshelves, TSi100.

Avatar image for rastan
rastan

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 rastan
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts
Good clarification/links Bozanimal. You decided to write all that in order to satisfy that inner geek:-) My Denon actually goes from negative 60 to 0 and then positive, but I think it justs another representation of the same 80 db scale. I still think it is worthwhile to research the specs before you buy a mid-priced receiver because they are not all equal and truth be told I would still take my 5 year old Denon 3805 without HDMI over one of the $500 receivers out there today because the amps are definitely and noticeably better. However, I also understand your point that many people wouldn't be able to tell the difference between many of the receivers out there or don't have the right speakers to reveal those differences anyways. One thing I forgot to mention in the prior post is that the Sony guts above I believe are from the Sony STR-DA777ES. That is a higher end receiver and their cheap receivers look nothing like that inside. That receiver also has a 600 watt power supply right there in the lower left hand corner and has been hailed as one of the better Sony amps ever produced. The cheap Sony stuff looks nothing like that whereas the mid-end Yamaha and the Denon/Onkyo/Marantz's all pretty much do.
Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

To someone who thinks all receivers are the same........I laugh.

something to keep in mind though, in order to hear the difference between them (and there is one, often sizeable) you need speakers that will let you hear it. Not some Optimus ones.

now just go ahead and try to tell me all speakers are the same....heh

Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#20 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts

To someone who thinks all receivers are the same........I laugh.

something to keep in mind though, in order to hear the difference between them (and there is one, often sizeable) you need speakers that will let you hear it. Not some Optimus ones.

now just go ahead and try to tell me all speakers are the same....heh

dxmcat

I'm going to be using Klipsch Promedia 5.1 speakers btw, for now at least. I know they are PC speakers, but they are compact and sound nice to my uneducated ears.

Avatar image for Bozanimal
Bozanimal

2500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#21 Bozanimal
Member since 2003 • 2500 Posts

To someone who thinks all receivers are the same........I laugh.dxmcat
This is not what I said. I said:
...there is little difference from receiver to receiver at any particular price point.Bozanimal
There is a big difference between what you claim I said and what I actually said. A Denon AVR-1612 (~$350) isn't going to do what a Denon AVR-4810CI (~$arm or $leg) will do. A Denon AVR-1612 will, however, perform markedly similar to a Yamaha RX-V471 or Onkyo TX-NR509, which are all about the same price. The biggest differences are going to be features, like HDMI pass-through and the number and type of inputs, and reliability of the particular model. Further, anyone buying a receiver in this price range probably isn't going to hear a difference between them.
something to keep in mind though, in order to hear the difference between them (and there is one, often sizeable) you need speakers that will let you hear it. Not some Optimus ones. now just go ahead and try to tell me all speakers are the same....hehdxmcat
Actually, a LOT of speakers - at least the drivers - are the same, but rebranded by region and distribution model. Klipsch isn't going to sound like Polk who isn't going to sound like Infinity, because they all use proprietary drivers and enclosures. But you'll find a lot of companies using generic drivers from a few select Chinese manufacturers. That said, of course all speakers don't sound the same, and I say as much in my prior comment when I mention sensitivity.

As an aside, Optimus, the Radio Shack brand you so off-handedly disparaged, actually carried a few decent drivers back in the '90's if you knew what to look for. I had a pair of separates that had a woofer with a bumped back plate and rubber surround and a 1" silk-dome tweeter more typical of mid- and upper-level woofers for $50 (including a decent crossover). This is why I say:

...the prejudice and preferences for one brand over another is largely silly.Bozanimal
Especially if you know what to look for.

I'm going to be using Klipsch Promedia 5.1 speakers btw, for now at least. I know they are PC speakers, but they are compact and sound nice to my uneducated ears.donalbane
If you visit Crutchfield you can do a comparison of receivers at your price point and compare their features. I know HDMI inputs was one of your priorities, but they've all got about four HDMI inputs at that price. I still recommend the Denon AVR-1911, which has more options and inputs than the other receivers in its range (on-screen menu, certain video pass-throughs).

Good luck,

Boz

Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#22 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts

I've looked around a bit and am liking the Yamaha RX V667for its 6 HDMI inputs. If anybody has a compelling reason why this isn't a decent receiver, let him speak now or forever hold his peace. I have a Yamaha currently and I like it quite a bit.

Avatar image for dxmcat
dxmcat

3385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 dxmcat
Member since 2007 • 3385 Posts

I was referring to the amplifier quality, sorry I didnt specify.

Yea there were a lot of good speakers back in the day, but we dont live back in the day, we live in the now.

Sorry if I came off as dismissive :/

Avatar image for rastan
rastan

1405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 rastan
Member since 2003 • 1405 Posts
Love my Paradigms. Built and designed by Paradigm in Canada from start to finish. One of the few fully integrated speaker manufacturers.
Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#25 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts
I just ordered the Yamaha. Thanks for all the help.
Avatar image for quikdash6
quikdash6

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 quikdash6
Member since 2004 • 480 Posts

I think the Onkyo HT-RC260 is a great receiver for the price.

http://www.amazon.com/Onkyo-HT-RC260-7-2-Channel-Theater-Receiver/dp/B003FSTAVY/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1308408826&sr=8-1