I need some honest opinions about ATI Radeon GPUs. No bias

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#1 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

Well, to make it short, I've never used an ATI Radeon GPU, only GeForce. Most complaints seem to be about drivers. What do you think? (I'm asking because I'm considering buying one)

Also, just so I don't make another thread, how is a HD 6870 compared to a GTX 460 SE?

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16918 Posts

well when it comes down to driver support, AMD is a little bit slower than nvidia on fixes and improvements for the latest titles. So if you're one of those paranoid ones who has to have driver support for all the latest games on day 3 then go nvidia. 9/10 the latest titles don't have any issues, but the occasional ones do and thats where nvidia shines..

Nvidia might take a week for the drivers whereas AMD may take anywhere between 1-2 weeks. I personally with my radeon 6950 have very few issues. One of the issues I do notice from time to time, is if I leave my computer on over night then it MIGHT BSOD. This might not even be due to the video card so take that as you will.

Overall Radeon cards are generally greater bang for buck across the board than nvidia ones. Try one you won't be dissapointed. If you crossfire then their could also be more issues that come up, but that also is true for nvidia as well.

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

The majority (not all) of the people poo pooing amd's drivers have either never owned an amd card or haven't for years.

When looking for a card just take what you're willing to spend and find the card with the best price to performance ratio/power draw and heat signature (if you care about that).

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts
AMD's drivers are fine. Everyone is still stuck 3 years in the past. If you say anything enough times, people will start taking it as truth. This is what happens. Also, 6870 > 460 but not by much.
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16918 Posts

AMD's drivers are fine. Everyone is still stuck 3 years in the past. If you say anything enough times, people will start taking it as truth. This is what happens. Also, 6870 > 460 but not by much.ShadowDeathX

i think hes talking about the 192 bit 460 gtx in which case 6870 >> 460 gtx.

Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#6 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]AMD's drivers are fine. Everyone is still stuck 3 years in the past. If you say anything enough times, people will start taking it as truth. This is what happens. Also, 6870 > 460 but not by much.blaznwiipspman1

i think hes talking about the 192 bit 460 gtx in which case 6870 >> 460 gtx.

Yeah, the GTX 460 SE

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]AMD's drivers are fine. Everyone is still stuck 3 years in the past. If you say anything enough times, people will start taking it as truth. This is what happens. Also, 6870 > 460 but not by much.blaznwiipspman1

i think hes talking about the 192 bit 460 gtx in which case 6870 >> 460 gtx.

Oh yeah. They don't make the older versions anymore. Shame.
Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#8 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

AMD's drivers are fine. Everyone is still stuck 3 years in the past. If you say anything enough times, people will start taking it as truth. This is what happens. Also, 6870 > 460 but not by much.ShadowDeathX

Look up on what happened with the 12.2 driver for skyrim, and tell me they are fine again.

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]AMD's drivers are fine. Everyone is still stuck 3 years in the past. If you say anything enough times, people will start taking it as truth. This is what happens. Also, 6870 > 460 but not by much.Lox_Cropek

i think hes talking about the 192 bit 460 gtx in which case 6870 >> 460 gtx.

Yeah, the GTX 460 SE

Yup 6870 it is for sure!
Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#10 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

i think hes talking about the 192 bit 460 gtx in which case 6870 >> 460 gtx.

ShadowDeathX

Yeah, the GTX 460 SE

Yup 6870 it is for sure!

How big is the difference...?

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]AMD's drivers are fine. Everyone is still stuck 3 years in the past. If you say anything enough times, people will start taking it as truth. This is what happens. Also, 6870 > 460 but not by much.DoomZaW

Look up on what happened with the 12.2 driver for skyrim, and tell me they are fine again.

Lets not get into a "list f'ed up driver updates" list match here, as nvidia has their fair share as well.

Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#12 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]AMD's drivers are fine. Everyone is still stuck 3 years in the past. If you say anything enough times, people will start taking it as truth. This is what happens. Also, 6870 > 460 but not by much.topgunmv

Look up on what happened with the 12.2 driver for skyrim, and tell me they are fine again.

Lets not get into a "list f'ed up driver updates" list match here, as nvidia has their fair share as well.

Not trying to start a war here, but didn't nvidia once launch a driver that fried a bunch of cards?

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16918 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]AMD's drivers are fine. Everyone is still stuck 3 years in the past. If you say anything enough times, people will start taking it as truth. This is what happens. Also, 6870 > 460 but not by much.DoomZaW

Look up on what happened with the 12.2 driver for skyrim, and tell me they are fine again.

what happened? I googled it and it said some radeon cards had issues with the AA, but most did not. The ones that had problems just needed to revert to 12.1 for rock solid gameplay.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#14 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]AMD's drivers are fine. Everyone is still stuck 3 years in the past. If you say anything enough times, people will start taking it as truth. This is what happens. Also, 6870 > 460 but not by much.DoomZaW

Look up on what happened with the 12.2 driver for skyrim, and tell me they are fine again.

So do we need to start listing nvidia problems as well because of one bug on a driver version? TDR errors on windows with my previous 460 before dying were annoying as hell TDR errors happen form time to time with my 6850 as well but with the 460 were much more frequent TC amd drivers are no better nor worse than nvidias. The think is though nvidia update drivers a bit sooner so a few problems might be addressed sooner from nvidia but other than that AMD drivers are perfectly stable
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#15 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

Look up on what happened with the 12.2 driver for skyrim, and tell me they are fine again.

Lox_Cropek

Lets not get into a "list f'ed up driver updates" list match here, as nvidia has their fair share as well.

Not trying to start a war here, but didn't nvidia once launch a driver that fried a bunch of cards?

Yeah.. they launched a driver that made the fans stop working on some cards. It wasn't good.

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

Look up on what happened with the 12.2 driver for skyrim, and tell me they are fine again.

Lox_Cropek

Lets not get into a "list f'ed up driver updates" list match here, as nvidia has their fair share as well.

Not trying to start a war here, but didn't nvidia once launch a driver that fried a bunch of cards?

If you were overclocking with a modified vcore the fan wouldn't work right, yes.

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#17 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

Look up on what happened with the 12.2 driver for skyrim, and tell me they are fine again.

Lox_Cropek

Lets not get into a "list f'ed up driver updates" list match here, as nvidia has their fair share as well.

Not trying to start a war here, but didn't nvidia once launch a driver that fried a bunch of cards?

I can't even update to the lastest Nvidia drivers because my cards go up to 99% workload but it cuts my frames on a load of games by 75% compared to the previous drivers.
Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

Look up on what happened with the 12.2 driver for skyrim, and tell me they are fine again.

Lox_Cropek

Lets not get into a "list f'ed up driver updates" list match here, as nvidia has their fair share as well.

Not trying to start a war here, but didn't nvidia once launch a driver that fried a bunch of cards?

Yeah both companies have their success and failures with driver updates, nvidia is the only one that blew their own cards up though.

Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#19 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

Do you guys think it's worth it going from a GTX 460 SE to a HD 6870?

The rest of the PC is:

Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bits

Core 2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.9Ghz

8GB RAM DDR3 @ 1333MHz

GeForce GTX 460 SE

--

Also, how is Linux support for AMD ATI drivers? (Ubuntu)

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
Both make solid products, both have solid drivers, although some have states, their release cycles are a bit different. My advice to you, just let your wallet guide you and get the most out what you want to spend. It it ends up AMD, great, if it ends up Nvidia, great.
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#21 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25780 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"][QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]Yeah, the GTX 460 SE

Lox_Cropek

Yup 6870 it is for sure!

How big is the difference...?

somewhere in excess of 25% better. the 6870 dominates the 460 SE

Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#22 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"] Yup 6870 it is for sure!ionusX

How big is the difference...?

somewhere in excess of 25% better. the 6870 dominates the 460 SE

Do you think it's worth it? I play at 1080p.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#23 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25780 Posts

[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]How big is the difference...?

Lox_Cropek

somewhere in excess of 25% better. the 6870 dominates the 460 SE

Do you think it's worth it? I play at 1080p.

---- yea

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#24 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]AMD's drivers are fine. Everyone is still stuck 3 years in the past. If you say anything enough times, people will start taking it as truth. This is what happens. Also, 6870 > 460 but not by much.DoomZaW

Look up on what happened with the 12.2 driver for skyrim, and tell me they are fine again.

BSOD, Rage still not fixed, Skyrim stuttering, crash to desktop. Yeah.... so 3 years ago.
Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts

Well, to make it short, I've never used an ATI Radeon GPU, only GeForce. Most complaints seem to be about drivers. What do you think? (I'm asking because I'm considering buying one)

Also, just so I don't make another thread, how is a HD 6870 compared to a GTX 460 SE?

Lox_Cropek
Honest opinion? They make great cards, with a good bang for buck value. I've had 3 ATi/AMD cards, and the experience was overall positive, minus a few issues. I would buy and recommend them equally to nvidia.
Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]AMD's drivers are fine. Everyone is still stuck 3 years in the past. If you say anything enough times, people will start taking it as truth. This is what happens. Also, 6870 > 460 but not by much.DevilMightCry

Look up on what happened with the 12.2 driver for skyrim, and tell me they are fine again.

BSOD, Rage still not fixed, Skyrim stuttering, crash to desktop. Yeah.... so 3 years ago.

Rage was an awfully coded game, that was all on id. A lot of nvidia users had problems with it too. Just not the same ones.

Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#27 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

Is XFX a good brand?

Found a nice XFX HD 6870 1GB for the same price of a GTX 550 Ti

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#28 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts

Is XFX a good brand?

Found a nice XFX HD 6870 1GB for the same price of a GTX 550 Ti

Lox_Cropek
Black Edition? Great. Regular? Good.
Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

Do you guys think it's worth it going from a GTX 460 SE to a HD 6870?

The rest of the PC is:

Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bits

Core 2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.9Ghz

8GB RAM DDR3 @ 1333MHz

GeForce GTX 460 SE

--

Also, how is Linux support for AMD ATI drivers? (Ubuntu)

Lox_Cropek
No it isn't worth it. If you already have a GTX 460 SE, you might as well wait and save some more money. A 25% increase in performance is not worth buying a whole new card for.
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16918 Posts

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]

Do you guys think it's worth it going from a GTX 460 SE to a HD 6870?

The rest of the PC is:

Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bits

Core 2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.9Ghz

8GB RAM DDR3 @ 1333MHz

GeForce GTX 460 SE

--

Also, how is Linux support for AMD ATI drivers? (Ubuntu)

ShadowDeathX

No it isn't worth it. If you already have a GTX 460 SE, you might as well wait and save some more money. A 25% increase in performance is not worth buying a whole new card for.

agreed

Avatar image for Ghost_702
Ghost_702

7405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#31 Ghost_702
Member since 2006 • 7405 Posts
Although your answer may have been answered, if it helps I have owned a Sapphire 5870 for years and it hasn't had any problems yet. I also download drivers when I get the automatic pop-ups for them through its control center and haven't had a problem with those either. It's a rather reliable card if you ask me.
Avatar image for tequilasunriser
tequilasunriser

6379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 tequilasunriser
Member since 2004 • 6379 Posts
You came to gamespot for a non biased opinion? Lol...
Avatar image for LongZhiZi
LongZhiZi

2453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 LongZhiZi
Member since 2009 • 2453 Posts
I can't really recommend ATI/AMD cards, unless you're a person who intends to upgrade every few years or so. But if you're a guy like me who likes to really wear out a card before replacing it (either by running it to death or until games are unplayable on anything but low at 800x600), then AMD is proving themselves to be ****. From the grapevine, AMD is dropping support for its 2XXX, 3XXX, and 4XXX line of cards sometime this summer. This is balls, as my 4870 1GB is perfectly capable of running all games in existence. Given the fact that I'm losing support just 3 years after purchasing the card, I won't buy AMD next time, that's for sure. But again, if you're the kind of person who upgrades relatively frequently, this won't affect you. Then, I'd mostly just say look at price/performance and whichever company does best in your price range should get your money.
Avatar image for streetridaz
streetridaz

3276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 streetridaz
Member since 2003 • 3276 Posts

i've never once had driver issues with any of my ATI/AMD cards.

Avatar image for Obiwan_1O
Obiwan_1O

286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Obiwan_1O
Member since 2003 • 286 Posts

I can't really recommend ATI/AMD cards, unless you're a person who intends to upgrade every few years or so. But if you're a guy like me who likes to really wear out a card before replacing it (either by running it to death or until games are unplayable on anything but low at 800x600), then AMD is proving themselves to be ****. From the grapevine, AMD is dropping support for its 2XXX, 3XXX, and 4XXX line of cards sometime this summer. This is balls, as my 4870 1GB is perfectly capable of running all games in existence. Given the fact that I'm losing support just 3 years after purchasing the card, I won't buy AMD next time, that's for sure. But again, if you're the kind of person who upgrades relatively frequently, this won't affect you. Then, I'd mostly just say look at price/performance and whichever company does best in your price range should get your money.LongZhiZi

Wow dude your a fool, losing support just means they wont be making new drivers for it. The card will still run fine and since its been around so long they have developed the drivers as good as they will get so not making new ones means nothing. All you have to do is stick with 12.7 or whatever will be the last ones till you need a new card and you wont have any problems running it into the ground. A new card like the 7xxx series has not been fully harnesing its power so new drivers are needed to optamize it but your 4870 wont run any better any time soon as they have wrung all the performance possible out of it so new drivers are pointless for you. Nvidia does this too, when new technologies come out often older cards arent even capable of utalizing them so thats just the way it is, technology moves fast and why would you want it to slow down?

Avatar image for Grey_Eyed_Elf
Grey_Eyed_Elf

7971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Grey_Eyed_Elf
Member since 2011 • 7971 Posts
I've owned a HD 4890 and now own Crossfire HD 6950's... there are no issues with drivers other than the occasionally issues but those are borderline universal. Right now drivers are far from the main issue its the inconsistency of talent in optimising for PC, A lot PC exclusives are done by indie developers or developers with small budgets and the majority of multi-platform games are ported very poorly. You shouldn't be thinking which company provides the best drivers but who is developing this game I'm excited for?...
Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#37 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]

Do you guys think it's worth it going from a GTX 460 SE to a HD 6870?

The rest of the PC is:

Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bits

Core 2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.9Ghz

8GB RAM DDR3 @ 1333MHz

GeForce GTX 460 SE

--

Also, how is Linux support for AMD ATI drivers? (Ubuntu)

ShadowDeathX

No it isn't worth it. If you already have a GTX 460 SE, you might as well wait and save some more money. A 25% increase in performance is not worth buying a whole new card for.

Actually, I'm sorry, I should have been more detailed. The thing is: my GTX 460 SE is "borrowed". A friend was doing some work with some hi-def cameras and he needed a good GPU for his work. When he stopped working on it, I gave him my 9800 GT and he gave me his GTX 460 SE, but he said that he'd need it back because next year (this year now) he'd go back to working with his cameras. So, in reality I need a substitute for the GTX 460 SE, but I actually have a 9800 GT :P

My options are basically: GTX 460 SE (U$230), GTX 460 (U$250), Radeon 6850 (U$230), Radeon 6870 (U$270) or GTX 550 Ti (U$200). Not american prices

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

I can't really recommend ATI/AMD cards, unless you're a person who intends to upgrade every few years or so. But if you're a guy like me who likes to really wear out a card before replacing it (either by running it to death or until games are unplayable on anything but low at 800x600), then AMD is proving themselves to be ****. From the grapevine, AMD is dropping support for its 2XXX, 3XXX, and 4XXX line of cards sometime this summer. This is balls, as my 4870 1GB is perfectly capable of running all games in existence. Given the fact that I'm losing support just 3 years after purchasing the card, I won't buy AMD next time, that's for sure. But again, if you're the kind of person who upgrades relatively frequently, this won't affect you. Then, I'd mostly just say look at price/performance and whichever company does best in your price range should get your money.LongZhiZi

WDDMvsD3D.jpg

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

[QUOTE="LongZhiZi"]I can't really recommend ATI/AMD cards, unless you're a person who intends to upgrade every few years or so. But if you're a guy like me who likes to really wear out a card before replacing it (either by running it to death or until games are unplayable on anything but low at 800x600), then AMD is proving themselves to be ****. From the grapevine, AMD is dropping support for its 2XXX, 3XXX, and 4XXX line of cards sometime this summer. This is balls, as my 4870 1GB is perfectly capable of running all games in existence. Given the fact that I'm losing support just 3 years after purchasing the card, I won't buy AMD next time, that's for sure. But again, if you're the kind of person who upgrades relatively frequently, this won't affect you. Then, I'd mostly just say look at price/performance and whichever company does best in your price range should get your money.Obiwan_1O

Wow dude your a fool, losing support just means they wont be making new drivers for it. The card will still run fine and since its been around so long they have developed the drivers as good as they will get so not making new ones means nothing. All you have to do is stick with 12.7 or whatever will be the last ones till you need a new card and you wont have any problems running it into the ground. A new card like the 7xxx series has not been fully harnesing its power so new drivers are needed to optamize it but your 4870 wont run any better any time soon as they have wrung all the performance possible out of it so new drivers are pointless for you. Nvidia does this too, when new technologies come out often older cards arent even capable of utalizing them so thats just the way it is, technology moves fast and why would you want it to slow down?

Drivers often fix bugs in new games. Losing support is a big deal. Especially for people using crossfire setups, where new games often work badly. Also TC, AMD linux support is generally considered not as good as nvidia's.
Avatar image for deactivated-57d307c5efcda
deactivated-57d307c5efcda

1302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 deactivated-57d307c5efcda
Member since 2009 • 1302 Posts

Honestly I have a very mixed opinion on both companies. For desktops I'm beginning to like Nvidia better, currently running crossfire 5870s, the drivers are a royal pain expecially for certain titles like skyrim. 12.3 prevented me from even playing the game with a single gpu enabled and it gave flashing lights of seziures with xfire enabled. Nvidia just seems to have fewer hiccups (but not always the case as Dragon Age II worked better on ati cards when first released). I'm debating if I want to just upgrage to a GTX 680 and ditch the Radeons.

If your going mobile, then I will say I like ATI more than nvidia. Nvidia kinda screwed me with their 8800m gtx and it's stupid switchable graphics (the first attempt). They decided to change it and no longer write the code in any driver after a while and that caused me to be stuck with an old driver and I couldn't get new ones. (ATI handles this better, by letting the companies write the switchable code. I can install dells first to get the code, then install ATI's overtop).

So as far as my opinion goes;

Desktop: Nvidia

Mobile: ATI

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"][QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]

Do you guys think it's worth it going from a GTX 460 SE to a HD 6870?

The rest of the PC is:

Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bits

Core 2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.9Ghz

8GB RAM DDR3 @ 1333MHz

GeForce GTX 460 SE

--

Also, how is Linux support for AMD ATI drivers? (Ubuntu)

Lox_Cropek

No it isn't worth it. If you already have a GTX 460 SE, you might as well wait and save some more money. A 25% increase in performance is not worth buying a whole new card for.

Actually, I'm sorry, I should have been more detailed. The thing is: my GTX 460 SE is "borrowed". A friend was doing some work with some hi-def cameras and he needed a good GPU for his work. When he stopped working on it, I gave him my 9800 GT and he gave me his GTX 460 SE, but he said that he'd need it back because next year (this year now) he'd go back to working with his cameras. So, in reality I need a substitute for the GTX 460 SE, but I actually have a 9800 GT :P

My options are basically: GTX 460 SE (U$230), GTX 460 (U$250), Radeon 6850 (U$230), Radeon 6870 (U$270) or GTX 550 Ti (U$200). Not american prices

Then the 6870 will be your best bet.
Avatar image for Bruin1986
Bruin1986

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Bruin1986
Member since 2007 • 1629 Posts

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]AMD's drivers are fine. Everyone is still stuck 3 years in the past. If you say anything enough times, people will start taking it as truth. This is what happens. Also, 6870 > 460 but not by much.Lox_Cropek

i think hes talking about the 192 bit 460 gtx in which case 6870 >> 460 gtx.

Yeah, the GTX 460 SE

Make sure you realize that ALL 460s (SE and normal) are now 192-bit and aren't as good as the older 256-bit variants.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#43 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="Obiwan_1O"]

[QUOTE="LongZhiZi"]I can't really recommend ATI/AMD cards, unless you're a person who intends to upgrade every few years or so. But if you're a guy like me who likes to really wear out a card before replacing it (either by running it to death or until games are unplayable on anything but low at 800x600), then AMD is proving themselves to be ****. From the grapevine, AMD is dropping support for its 2XXX, 3XXX, and 4XXX line of cards sometime this summer. This is balls, as my 4870 1GB is perfectly capable of running all games in existence. Given the fact that I'm losing support just 3 years after purchasing the card, I won't buy AMD next time, that's for sure. But again, if you're the kind of person who upgrades relatively frequently, this won't affect you. Then, I'd mostly just say look at price/performance and whichever company does best in your price range should get your money.kraken2109

Wow dude your a fool, losing support just means they wont be making new drivers for it. The card will still run fine and since its been around so long they have developed the drivers as good as they will get so not making new ones means nothing. All you have to do is stick with 12.7 or whatever will be the last ones till you need a new card and you wont have any problems running it into the ground. A new card like the 7xxx series has not been fully harnesing its power so new drivers are needed to optamize it but your 4870 wont run any better any time soon as they have wrung all the performance possible out of it so new drivers are pointless for you. Nvidia does this too, when new technologies come out often older cards arent even capable of utalizing them so thats just the way it is, technology moves fast and why would you want it to slow down?

Drivers often fix bugs in new games. Losing support is a big deal. Especially for people using crossfire setups, where new games often work badly. Also TC, AMD linux support is generally considered not as good as nvidia's.

True but also to be fair to AMD they didnt exactly said they would stop releasing drivers but rather change policy on older card and not update their drivers as often as new cards

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/AMD-Catalyst_Software-Radeon_HD-Drivers-download,15429.html

Avatar image for GS550L
GS550L

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 GS550L
Member since 2011 • 923 Posts

[QUOTE="Obiwan_1O"]

[QUOTE="LongZhiZi"]I can't really recommend ATI/AMD cards, unless you're a person who intends to upgrade every few years or so. But if you're a guy like me who likes to really wear out a card before replacing it (either by running it to death or until games are unplayable on anything but low at 800x600), then AMD is proving themselves to be ****. From the grapevine, AMD is dropping support for its 2XXX, 3XXX, and 4XXX line of cards sometime this summer. This is balls, as my 4870 1GB is perfectly capable of running all games in existence. Given the fact that I'm losing support just 3 years after purchasing the card, I won't buy AMD next time, that's for sure. But again, if you're the kind of person who upgrades relatively frequently, this won't affect you. Then, I'd mostly just say look at price/performance and whichever company does best in your price range should get your money.kraken2109

Wow dude your a fool, losing support just means they wont be making new drivers for it. The card will still run fine and since its been around so long they have developed the drivers as good as they will get so not making new ones means nothing. All you have to do is stick with 12.7 or whatever will be the last ones till you need a new card and you wont have any problems running it into the ground. A new card like the 7xxx series has not been fully harnesing its power so new drivers are needed to optamize it but your 4870 wont run any better any time soon as they have wrung all the performance possible out of it so new drivers are pointless for you. Nvidia does this too, when new technologies come out often older cards arent even capable of utalizing them so thats just the way it is, technology moves fast and why would you want it to slow down?

Drivers often fix bugs in new games. Losing support is a big deal. Especially for people using crossfire setups, where new games often work badly. Also TC, AMD linux support is generally considered not as good as nvidia's.

If I understand correctly, they'll still be releasing driver updates on a quarterly basis; they're not dropping driver support completely.

Avatar image for Tim_Millington
Tim_Millington

1615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#45 Tim_Millington
Member since 2007 • 1615 Posts

I have been using my ati 4850 for a couple of years. Never had problems with the drivers.

Look back at the last few pages, and you will see more people are having issues with nvidia drivers rather than ATI's

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16918 Posts

But don't get the 550ti, it's about the same as the radeon 6770 and nowhere close to the 6850, 6870 or the 460gtx.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="Obiwan_1O"]

[QUOTE="LongZhiZi"]I can't really recommend ATI/AMD cards, unless you're a person who intends to upgrade every few years or so. But if you're a guy like me who likes to really wear out a card before replacing it (either by running it to death or until games are unplayable on anything but low at 800x600), then AMD is proving themselves to be ****. From the grapevine, AMD is dropping support for its 2XXX, 3XXX, and 4XXX line of cards sometime this summer. This is balls, as my 4870 1GB is perfectly capable of running all games in existence. Given the fact that I'm losing support just 3 years after purchasing the card, I won't buy AMD next time, that's for sure. But again, if you're the kind of person who upgrades relatively frequently, this won't affect you. Then, I'd mostly just say look at price/performance and whichever company does best in your price range should get your money.kraken2109

Wow dude your a fool, losing support just means they wont be making new drivers for it. The card will still run fine and since its been around so long they have developed the drivers as good as they will get so not making new ones means nothing. All you have to do is stick with 12.7 or whatever will be the last ones till you need a new card and you wont have any problems running it into the ground. A new card like the 7xxx series has not been fully harnesing its power so new drivers are needed to optamize it but your 4870 wont run any better any time soon as they have wrung all the performance possible out of it so new drivers are pointless for you. Nvidia does this too, when new technologies come out often older cards arent even capable of utalizing them so thats just the way it is, technology moves fast and why would you want it to slow down?

Drivers often fix bugs in new games. Losing support is a big deal. Especially for people using crossfire setups, where new games often work badly. Also TC, AMD linux support is generally considered not as good as nvidia's.

They are moving the 2xxx/3xxx/4xxx from monthly driver updates to quarterly driver updates, specifically to fix bugs. Your point is moot.

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
[QUOTE="Obiwan_1O"]

[QUOTE="LongZhiZi"]I can't really recommend ATI/AMD cards, unless you're a person who intends to upgrade every few years or so. But if you're a guy like me who likes to really wear out a card before replacing it (either by running it to death or until games are unplayable on anything but low at 800x600), then AMD is proving themselves to be ****. From the grapevine, AMD is dropping support for its 2XXX, 3XXX, and 4XXX line of cards sometime this summer. This is balls, as my 4870 1GB is perfectly capable of running all games in existence. Given the fact that I'm losing support just 3 years after purchasing the card, I won't buy AMD next time, that's for sure. But again, if you're the kind of person who upgrades relatively frequently, this won't affect you. Then, I'd mostly just say look at price/performance and whichever company does best in your price range should get your money.kraken2109

Wow dude your a fool, losing support just means they wont be making new drivers for it. The card will still run fine and since its been around so long they have developed the drivers as good as they will get so not making new ones means nothing. All you have to do is stick with 12.7 or whatever will be the last ones till you need a new card and you wont have any problems running it into the ground. A new card like the 7xxx series has not been fully harnesing its power so new drivers are needed to optamize it but your 4870 wont run any better any time soon as they have wrung all the performance possible out of it so new drivers are pointless for you. Nvidia does this too, when new technologies come out often older cards arent even capable of utalizing them so thats just the way it is, technology moves fast and why would you want it to slow down?

Drivers often fix bugs in new games. Losing support is a big deal. Especially for people using crossfire setups, where new games often work badly. Also TC, AMD linux support is generally considered not as good as nvidia's.

I've been running my 4870s nearly 4 years, I would consider that running them into the ground. Also, AMD is not dropping driver updates for pre 5000 cards, they are switching to quarterly updates instead of monthly.
Avatar image for Masenkoe
Masenkoe

4897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#49 Masenkoe
Member since 2007 • 4897 Posts

I just made the jump from a 9600GT to a 6870 and honestly as far as drivers go, I have had zero problems. I think it's mostly brand bias out there that gets people so worked up.