or should i wait for more of a price drop? also hows the performance? they get the stuttering fixed?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I don't have it on PC so I can't answer your latter two questions, but that is an "ok" price. I was really let down by the game and still haven't beaten it yet. I would honestly save your money for Bioshock Infinite on PC, but that is just menightshade869yea iv been waiting on a price drop for this game but theres so many other games i need to beat! but was wondering if its a must play now or should i wait for it to be $10 or $15. as for bioshock i ill prob wait for a price drop on that as well since i still need to beat the second one
It's worth about 20$ if you want more AC, if you're in it for the story, stay far away from it, the story is absolutely terrible with by far the worst ending in the history of gaming.DanielDusti thought the first 4 games story were alright and are the reason i wanna play 3
IMO the worst of the lot, though not a horrible game. I still regard AC2 the best, Ezio was a much more interesting character to follow, Connor's story was just bland and dull, not much depth into it. Most of all, cities felt so lifeless even though you have npcs trodding around, I felt like you weren't encouraged to use rooftops either compared to Assassin's Creed 2.Â
Mulitplayer as usual is enjoyable but it sucks that there's barely anyone playing it on PC, hopefully the sale will increase player activity for a little while.
Same here. I think a part of that reason is the milking of the franchise too. First, I really thought this would be the new direction the franchise needed but it looks like it just opened up a can of worms. Next, we're getting AC: PIrates. The last, best AC game was AC2.Too be honest I thought it was a snooze fest.
CUDGEdave
i also think ac2 is the best of the 4 ive played! but by all the negative comments goin on about 3... i think ill just wait till it drops to $10IMO the worst of the lot, though not a horrible game. I still regard AC2 the best, Ezio was a much more interesting character to follow, Connor's story was just bland and dull, not much depth into it. Most of all, cities felt so lifeless even though you have npcs trodding around, I felt like you weren't encouraged to use rooftops either compared to Assassin's Creed 2.Â
Mulitplayer as usual is enjoyable but it sucks that there's barely anyone playing it on PC, hopefully the sale will increase player activity for a little while.
mhofever
[QUOTE="CUDGEdave"]Same here. I think a part of that reason is the milking of the franchise too. First, I really thought this would be the new direction the franchise needed but it looks like it just opened up a can of worms. Next, we're getting AC: PIrates. The last, best AC game was AC2.Too be honest I thought it was a snooze fest.
Elann2008
It's just a bad game in general anyway, not even a good AC game. They stripped almost all the best parts out of the game and it's a terrible open world game too. Constantly holds your hand or gives you too many restrictions during missions
You spend the first 7 hours looking forward to it getting interesting, but it never does.
The naval battles are the only highlight. And one of the villians has a pretty badass moustache.Â
Forget about the cost, I want my 20 hours back.Â
You'd actually pay full price for AC3?Pays thousands for a gaming PC, cheaps out on the games.
Mr_BillGates
You spend the first 7 hours looking forward to it getting interesting, but it never does.
The naval battles are the only highlight. And one of the villians has a pretty badass moustache.Â
Forget about the cost, I want my 20 hours back.Â
with_teeth26
Â
Exactly how I felt.Â
Only beat AC2, so I wasnt overwhelm by it thus I liked AC3 quite a bit.
Nothing like stealth killing all the guards in middle of the night while is raining heavily then taking their cargo loot. I think thats the highlight of the game. Â
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment