Is Dragon Age 2 worth picking up cheap ?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for xXShortroundXx
xXShortroundXx

1807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 xXShortroundXx
Member since 2011 • 1807 Posts

I'm interested in the game, but I've been put off by people who tell me it's a bad game because they reuse dungeons or something ?

I thought I would get some more opinions however ;)

Avatar image for kris9031998
kris9031998

7554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 kris9031998
Member since 2008 • 7554 Posts
Well, i honestly liked the game but its not anywhere NEAR GOTY or anything. Depending on how "cheap" it is
Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#3 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts
I thought overall the game was fine. The story was good, nothing spectacular and I thought the combat was good. The landscapes do get rather repetitive, being stuck in one city and all but I enjoyed myself, so if you can get it cheap I saw go for it.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Have you played the first? Check that out, first. I enjoyed it however it's not a good game quite frankly; rather a case study of everything wrong that you can do in a triple A game, that wants to please everyone and fails miserably doing so. For that reason it's interesting. Question is are you enough of a masochist or morbidly intrigued to give it a shot?
Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#5 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

The first was awesome.

With the second one, I don't know how I even managed to finish that game. A lot of people say its not that bad. I thought it was pretty darn bad. Finishing the game was work.

I'll just add that this is my honest opinion after giving this game a fair shot. Yes, the reused dungeons are pretty lame. You go into a house for a quest and find out the same house is reused for different quests. Thats one reason. The story lacks any amount of epicness that RPG's usually have. You aren't saving the world or anything. You don't travel to exotic places. You are stuck in the same place. I don't know how anyone can say the story was good.

The combat is over the top. Press a button and the dude does all sorts of flips and bodies explode at the swing of a sword. Its just over the top ridiculous.

I just really didn't like the game. You may like it, but I thought it was crap and wasn't worth the time I spent to beat it. Then again, I tend to have high standards because I don't have a lot of time to play games that are just ok.

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#6 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

I'm interested in the game, but I've been put off by people who tell me it's a bad game because they reuse dungeons or something ?

I thought I would get some more opinions however ;)

xXShortroundXx
You're going to get a lot of hate posts, even from people who either never played the game, or those who just tried the demo. The game is fine, even given the repeated environments. However, both the Legacy and MotA DLCs have new environments. Watch Kevin Van Ord's video review, he will give you a better opinion on the game. And by the way, it didn't release as bug-ridden as a beta version like Skyrim did.:lol:
Avatar image for Orrendamente
Orrendamente

362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Orrendamente
Member since 2007 • 362 Posts
I thoroughly enjoyed the game. To me it felt like a fantasy version of Mass Effect, albeit on a much smaller scale. Granted, however, I did play it before Origins so I had no basis for comparison in that regard.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

I found it enjoyable. Not as enjoyable as DA:O, but it wasn't bad.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#9 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

I found it enjoyable. Not as enjoyable as DA:O, but it wasn't bad.

airshocker
Agreed. DA2 gets too much hate. When I bought it, I wasn't thinking in my head that this game had to be better than DAO because it was going in a different direction. Although it wasn't a true successor and meet everyone's expectations, I still found it to be a good game. Definitely worth it cheap. I bought it full price, launch day. :)
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#10 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts
[QUOTE="airshocker"]

I found it enjoyable. Not as enjoyable as DA:O, but it wasn't bad.

Elann2008
Agreed. DA2 gets too much hate. When I bought it, I wasn't thinking in my head that this game had to be better than DAO because it was going in a different direction. Although it wasn't a true successor and meet everyone's expectations, I still found it to be a good game. Definitely worth it cheap. I bought it full price, launch day. :)

There were reasons it was better than DA:O, such as character animation - your mage used his staff as an actual weapon, instead of looking like he was winding up to pitch a baseball.:lol: Also, it was nice having your rogue execute a true backstab position-wise, and starting with dual-weapon right off the bat.
Avatar image for KalDurenik
KalDurenik

3736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 KalDurenik
Member since 2004 • 3736 Posts
DA2 is bad. Overall not worth it. I played it just so i could see if the game could beat the last bad thing thats how bad it was in my opinion.
Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#12 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="airshocker"]

I found it enjoyable. Not as enjoyable as DA:O, but it wasn't bad.

topsemag55

Agreed. DA2 gets too much hate. When I bought it, I wasn't thinking in my head that this game had to be better than DAO because it was going in a different direction. Although it wasn't a true successor and meet everyone's expectations, I still found it to be a good game. Definitely worth it cheap. I bought it full price, launch day. :)

There were reasons it was better than DA:O, such as character animation - your mage used his staff as an actual weapon, instead of looking like he was winding up to pitch a baseball.:lol: Also, it was nice having your rogue execute a true backstab position-wise, and starting with dual-weapon right off the bat.

I thought the animations were ridiculous. Everytime the mage casts a spell he has to make a flambouyant 360 move. The rogues magically burrow underground and reappear 20 feet away. Its silly. I know bioware wants me to say, "wow thats friggen awesome!" But, I'm not impressed.

The straight up normal animations in DAO were much better. Cast a spell...raise your staff. Swing your sword...cut off a head (as opposed to a gigantic explosion of flying body parts in DA2)

Avatar image for LordRork
LordRork

2692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#13 LordRork
Member since 2004 • 2692 Posts

DA2 was a decent game. The amount of streamlining was a serious shame, but really I preferred it to Origins. DA2 keeps the skill trees simple while Origins blitzed you with too many things; it also helped that DA2 had a player character I could engage with unlike the mute in Origins.

In terms of scope and quality, Origins is by far and away the better game. DA2 is just much more accessible and less long winded than its predecessor.

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#14 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

DA2 was a decent game. The amount of streamlining was a serious shame, but really I preferred it to Origins. DA2 keeps the skill trees simple while Origins blitzed you with too many things; it also helped that DA2 had a player character I could engage with unlike the mute in Origins.

In terms of scope and quality, Origins is by far and away the better game. DA2 is just much more accessible and less long winded than its predecessor.

LordRork
Not to mention no Level Cap. Origins froze you at Level 25 in the main game, but you can get Hawke to Level 29 without an expansion.
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#15 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

[QUOTE="topsemag55"][QUOTE="Elann2008"] Agreed. DA2 gets too much hate. When I bought it, I wasn't thinking in my head that this game had to be better than DAO because it was going in a different direction. Although it wasn't a true successor and meet everyone's expectations, I still found it to be a good game. Definitely worth it cheap. I bought it full price, launch day. :)Mr_Ditters

There were reasons it was better than DA:O, such as character animation - your mage used his staff as an actual weapon, instead of looking like he was winding up to pitch a baseball.:lol: Also, it was nice having your rogue execute a true backstab position-wise, and starting with dual-weapon right off the bat.

I thought the animations were ridiculous. Everytime the mage casts a spell he has to make a flambouyant 360 move. The rogues magically burrow underground and reappear 20 feet away. Its silly. I know bioware wants me to say, "wow thats friggen awesome!" But, I'm not impressed.

The straight up normal animations in DAO were much better. Cast a spell...raise your staff. Swing your sword...cut off a head (as opposed to a gigantic explosion of flying body parts in DA2)

What particular spell has this "flamboyant 360 move"? So you don't like the way the dev implemented the backstab - it's still better than pausing and trying to maneuver around. Besides, bosses usually pick up on the backstab anyway, and immediately spin around to face Hawke.
Avatar image for tanerb
tanerb

1300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 tanerb
Member since 2003 • 1300 Posts

it is no witcher or skyrim but a good game for 10-15 bucks

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

define cheap.

if its 20$ or less is worth it

Avatar image for Gamerperson33
Gamerperson33

557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Gamerperson33
Member since 2011 • 557 Posts
I bought the game on release day, and I did not regret it. Maybe I just love Dragon Age or something, but I found a way to still enjoy myself, and it took me around 35 hours to beat the game, the same as Dragon Age: Origins. It was really worth it in my opinion. Sure, there are flaws, but it didn't detract from my experience, and I would say to get the game!
Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts
Problem is that its mega repetitive, you go on the same maps and caves, over and over and over till you just want to stop. Some of the bosses that you have to fight also feel a little bit cheap and I had to resort to kiting etc on in particular.
Avatar image for Mr_Ditters
Mr_Ditters

1920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#20 Mr_Ditters
Member since 2008 • 1920 Posts

[QUOTE="Mr_Ditters"]

[QUOTE="topsemag55"] There were reasons it was better than DA:O, such as character animation - your mage used his staff as an actual weapon, instead of looking like he was winding up to pitch a baseball.:lol: Also, it was nice having your rogue execute a true backstab position-wise, and starting with dual-weapon right off the bat.topsemag55

I thought the animations were ridiculous. Everytime the mage casts a spell he has to make a flambouyant 360 move. The rogues magically burrow underground and reappear 20 feet away. Its silly. I know bioware wants me to say, "wow thats friggen awesome!" But, I'm not impressed.

The straight up normal animations in DAO were much better. Cast a spell...raise your staff. Swing your sword...cut off a head (as opposed to a gigantic explosion of flying body parts in DA2)

What particular spell has this "flamboyant 360 move"? So you don't like the way the dev implemented the backstab - it's still better than pausing and trying to maneuver around. Besides, bosses usually pick up on the backstab anyway, and immediately spin around to face Hawke.

The 360 move is their standard attack. They hit swing twice shooting bolts then spin around 360 for the third hit then spin 360 in the other direction slamming the staff into the ground.

So yeah its two 360's for the standard attack--a lot of superfluous motion. DA2 took a page right out of the Harlem Globetrotters--a little razzle dazzle for ya.

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#21 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

The 360 move is their standard attack. They hit swing twice shooting bolts then spin around 360 for the third hit then spin 360 in the other direction slamming the staff into the ground.

So yeah its two 360's for the standard attack--a lot of superfluous motion. DA2 took a page right out of the Harlem Globetrotters--a little razzle dazzle for ya.

Mr_Ditters
Then it makes sense because the standard attack is targeting enemies when all your spells are in cooldown. One thing you missed is if a NPC is close enough, you'll see the mage actually hitting the NPC with the staff. Also in Origins, the Dalish keeper slams his staff into the ground in a cutscene.
Avatar image for therealFrek
therealFrek

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#22 therealFrek
Member since 2003 • 705 Posts

My opinion is no it's not worth it. If I could back in time and un-preoder it I would. I deeply regret giving Bioware full price for the poor excuse of a game they released.

I suggest you go read reader reviews on metacritic. Yes there's a lot of them that are rubbish but you'll find a lot of reviews that point out the good and the ugly about this game.

Two of the real bad points about this game are the waves of enemies that spawn in mid air above your head and the same dungeon over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.

DAII is the type of game that at first you think it's pretty cool. By Act III you'll be so put off by the lazy development that you'll be ready to go write a rant.

Avatar image for the_ChEeSe_mAn2
the_ChEeSe_mAn2

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 the_ChEeSe_mAn2
Member since 2003 • 8463 Posts
For cheap it is worth it. It's not a AAA game, but it is a solid AA game and if you can get it at 20 bucks or less, you won't regret it.
Avatar image for Johnny_Rock
Johnny_Rock

40314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 Johnny_Rock
Member since 2002 • 40314 Posts

DA2 isn't worth picking up at all. If you've played the first one, you've played the better one.

Avatar image for CCpotter
CCpotter

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 CCpotter
Member since 2011 • 134 Posts

Don't like the game personally, but hear people say it's good, so you might wanna try it

Avatar image for bussinrounds
bussinrounds

3324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 bussinrounds
Member since 2009 • 3324 Posts

Why do it when there are tons of better RPGs out there ? (unless your really into bisexual relationships in video games)