Is Mafia 2 going to run ok on my PC?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for UnknownSniper99
UnknownSniper99

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 UnknownSniper99
Member since 2010 • 57 Posts

Intel Core 2 Duo E7300

2GB RAM

500GB Hard Disk

Nvidia 9600 GSO

Windows 7 64-bit

Avatar image for Teh_Can
Teh_Can

148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Teh_Can
Member since 2010 • 148 Posts

Try the demo

Avatar image for telep_man
telep_man

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 telep_man
Member since 2010 • 203 Posts

You should be ok, I have a similar rig and I got very high FPS as long as I kept physix off.

Avatar image for broken_bass_bin
broken_bass_bin

7515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 broken_bass_bin
Member since 2009 • 7515 Posts

Should be okay on medium. Try the demo.

Avatar image for UnknownSniper99
UnknownSniper99

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 UnknownSniper99
Member since 2010 • 57 Posts

Ok, but I've heard that the game has great physics, so I'm planning on leaving them on. Will this cause the game to lag?

Please tell me for I don't want to buy a game that lags on my PC.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

Ok, but I've heard that the game has great physics, so I'm planning on leaving them on. Will this cause the game to lag?

Please tell me for I don't want to buy a game that lags on my PC.

UnknownSniper99
high end physics is for top level nvidia cards and 4+ core CPUs, dont turn it on
Avatar image for agpickle
agpickle

3293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 agpickle
Member since 2006 • 3293 Posts

PhysX on medium makes it barely playable for me, so don't even try.

Avatar image for broken_bass_bin
broken_bass_bin

7515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 broken_bass_bin
Member since 2009 • 7515 Posts

Activating PhysX will bring your system to its knees.

Avatar image for gravitygamer
gravitygamer

948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 gravitygamer
Member since 2010 • 948 Posts
i have an ati radeon 4650xfx 1 gb and an amd dual corell x 2 245 and i played with physx on till i was in the middle of the game...i dint get serious lags at all....i got low fps only at certain high gfx areas.but turning of the physx really improves gameplay
Avatar image for agpickle
agpickle

3293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 agpickle
Member since 2006 • 3293 Posts

i have an ati radeon 4650xfx 1 gb and an amd dual corell x 2 245 and i played with physx on till i was in the middle of the game...i dint get serious lags at all....i got low fps only at certain high gfx areas.but turning of the physx really improves gameplay gravitygamer
I'm pretty sure you need a Nvidia card to use physX. So...lies.

Avatar image for gravitygamer
gravitygamer

948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 gravitygamer
Member since 2010 • 948 Posts

even though we need nvidia for using physx but the option for using physx is also there for ati radeon inthe game.

i can change the physx to medium and it wrks fine.i dont need to lie....

Avatar image for telefanatic
telefanatic

3008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 telefanatic
Member since 2007 • 3008 Posts

[QUOTE="gravitygamer"]i have an ati radeon 4650xfx 1 gb and an amd dual corell x 2 245 and i played with physx on till i was in the middle of the game...i dint get serious lags at all....i got low fps only at certain high gfx areas.but turning of the physx really improves gameplay agpickle

I'm pretty sure you need a Nvidia card to use physX. So...lies.

No lies im actually using the Physx in that game on med with my 5870.

Avatar image for mouthforbathory
mouthforbathory

2114

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 mouthforbathory
Member since 2006 • 2114 Posts

I'd leave the PhysX off. The 9600 GSO won't have a tough time with the game BTW at a 720p like resolution.

Avatar image for mhofever
mhofever

3960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#14 mhofever
Member since 2008 • 3960 Posts

There's a way to tweak the physx so that only the player has cloth dynamics. Reason why Physx will lag for lower end computers is because that every NPC walking around has cloth dynamics enabled, and especially the female NPC's with the skirts that use up a lot of resource. You'd still have the particles and such, just that NPC cloth is disabled and it should be because it's pretty much pointless to be honest.

Avatar image for lpjazzman220
lpjazzman220

2249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#15 lpjazzman220
Member since 2008 • 2249 Posts

Ok, but I've heard that the game has great physics, so I'm planning on leaving them on. Will this cause the game to lag?

Please tell me for I don't want to buy a game that lags on my PC.

UnknownSniper99

look at my sig...i went from 30-40fps to 10 just by turning on the physics...it really needs a dedi physics card...which is unfortunate

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#16 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

[QUOTE="UnknownSniper99"]

Ok, but I've heard that the game has great physics, so I'm planning on leaving them on. Will this cause the game to lag?

Please tell me for I don't want to buy a game that lags on my PC.

lpjazzman220

look at my sig...i went from 30-40fps to 10 just by turning on the physics...it really needs a dedi physics card...which is unfortunate

What do you expect, you have an ATI/AMD card. Your CPU is doing the work :?

Avatar image for lpjazzman220
lpjazzman220

2249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#17 lpjazzman220
Member since 2008 • 2249 Posts

[QUOTE="lpjazzman220"]

[QUOTE="UnknownSniper99"]

Ok, but I've heard that the game has great physics, so I'm planning on leaving them on. Will this cause the game to lag?

Please tell me for I don't want to buy a game that lags on my PC.

millerlight89

look at my sig...i went from 30-40fps to 10 just by turning on the physics...it really needs a dedi physics card...which is unfortunate

What do you expect, you have an ATI/AMD card. Your CPU is doing the work :?

ummm....i kinda expected that 4cores running at nearly 3 gig could handle it much faster than that...specially with 8 gig of ram runnin at 1333mhz....

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]

[QUOTE="lpjazzman220"]

look at my sig...i went from 30-40fps to 10 just by turning on the physics...it really needs a dedi physics card...which is unfortunate

lpjazzman220

What do you expect, you have an ATI/AMD card. Your CPU is doing the work :?

ummm....i kinda expected that 4cores running at nearly 3 gig could handle it much faster than that...specially with 8 gig of ram runnin at 1333mhz....

Well you need to learn a little about the software then. ;)
Avatar image for lpjazzman220
lpjazzman220

2249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#19 lpjazzman220
Member since 2008 • 2249 Posts

[QUOTE="lpjazzman220"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]What do you expect, you have an ATI/AMD card. Your CPU is doing the work :?

millerlight89

ummm....i kinda expected that 4cores running at nearly 3 gig could handle it much faster than that...specially with 8 gig of ram runnin at 1333mhz....

Well you need to learn a little about the software then. ;)

so the software has tacked on physics...cause checking my cpu and mem usage without physics...it didnt look like it was doin all too much...it didnt use that many resources at all...especially in the processor area...i could set the affinity for 2 cores and probably not take a hit in frames that much at all...so why would physics destroy my frames that much when my computer isnt working thaaaat hard to run it? seems to me...the software is horribly written then...ive never had any problems with aegia or the newer nvidia physics on any other game...maybe 5 frames...but thats not much...so if u r correct...which is seems u could be...the software has some serious problems...

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#20 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="lpjazzman220"]

ummm....i kinda expected that 4cores running at nearly 3 gig could handle it much faster than that...specially with 8 gig of ram runnin at 1333mhz....

lpjazzman220

Well you need to learn a little about the software then. ;)

so the software has tacked on physics...cause checking my cpu and mem usage without physics...it didnt look like it was doin all too much...it didnt use that many resources at all...especially in the processor area...i could set the affinity for 2 cores and probably not take a hit in frames that much at all...so why would physics destroy my frames that much when my computer isnt working thaaaat hard to run it? seems to me...the software is horribly written then...ive never had any problems with aegia or the newer nvidia physics on any other game...maybe 5 frames...but thats not much...so if u r correct...which is seems u could be...the software has some serious problems...

Did you try the tweak? The one where you disable the unneeded cloth physics on all of the NPCs?
Avatar image for Videodogg
Videodogg

12611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Videodogg
Member since 2002 • 12611 Posts

Activating PhysX will bring your system to its knees.

broken_bass_bin
I just got a GTX580 and it runs full physics just fine. So, just spend $500 and you will be all set.
Avatar image for Jor297
Jor297

97

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Jor297
Member since 2010 • 97 Posts
With 64 bit I would say yes.
Avatar image for telep_man
telep_man

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 telep_man
Member since 2010 • 203 Posts

Here's the thing, Jazzman - Nvidia has always played dirty paying developers to optimise games for their Geforce cards. Phyisx is just another step. They need that because for the last couple of years AMD/Ati cards have been superior in terms of FPS per wat and usualy FPS per dollar, too, so they need something. I know many people will disagree, but believe me I'm not an Ati guy, I'm just trying to be rational.

Avatar image for lpjazzman220
lpjazzman220

2249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#24 lpjazzman220
Member since 2008 • 2249 Posts

Here's the thing, Jazzman - Nvidia has always played dirty paying developers to optimise games for their Geforce cards. Phyisx is just another step. They need that because for the last couple of years AMD/Ati cards have been superior in terms of FPS per wattage and usualy FPS per dollar, too, so they need something. I know many people will disagree, but believe me I'm not an Ati guy, I'm just trying to be rational.

telep_man

ive always thought nvidia was overpriced lol...but i guess it would make sense...lol

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#25 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="lpjazzman220"]

Well you need to learn a little about the software then. ;)millerlight89

so the software has tacked on physics...cause checking my cpu and mem usage without physics...it didnt look like it was doin all too much...it didnt use that many resources at all...especially in the processor area...i could set the affinity for 2 cores and probably not take a hit in frames that much at all...so why would physics destroy my frames that much when my computer isnt working thaaaat hard to run it? seems to me...the software is horribly written then...ive never had any problems with aegia or the newer nvidia physics on any other game...maybe 5 frames...but thats not much...so if u r correct...which is seems u could be...the software has some serious problems...

Did you try the tweak? The one where you disable the unneeded cloth physics on all of the NPCs?

Can't answer a simple question?
Avatar image for lpjazzman220
lpjazzman220

2249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#26 lpjazzman220
Member since 2008 • 2249 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="lpjazzman220"]

so the software has tacked on physics...cause checking my cpu and mem usage without physics...it didnt look like it was doin all too much...it didnt use that many resources at all...especially in the processor area...i could set the affinity for 2 cores and probably not take a hit in frames that much at all...so why would physics destroy my frames that much when my computer isnt working thaaaat hard to run it? seems to me...the software is horribly written then...ive never had any problems with aegia or the newer nvidia physics on any other game...maybe 5 frames...but thats not much...so if u r correct...which is seems u could be...the software has some serious problems...

millerlight89

Did you try the tweak? The one where you disable the unneeded cloth physics on all of the NPCs?

Can't answer a simple question?

sry...some of us sleep and have class...and i didnt see it till now...but no i didnt try the tweak didnt know there was one...physics wasnt that important to me anyway...i was just vexed that it didnt work on my system cause it didnt make sense as to why my system was taxed so much with physics where it wasnt taxed nearly enough when i was running it without physics

Avatar image for UnknownSniper99
UnknownSniper99

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 UnknownSniper99
Member since 2010 • 57 Posts

Ok I'll keep that in mind. But what the hell are the game developers doing?! I doubt that the graphics and physics Mafia 2has are better than the ones Crysis has - and I used to play Crysis Warhead on maximum (enthusiast or something) details and experienced no lag at all. - But I'll have to play this game without physics.

What the hell is going on?