Is my hard drive bottlenecking my system?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Zseal
Zseal

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Zseal
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts

So I've recently upgraded every aspect of my computer except for my hard drive (and my sound card, but I'm happy with the on board sound). My computer specs are:

AMD Phenom II X2 550 Processor, 3565 MHz overclocked.

ATI Radeon HD4890

4GB Ram (DDR3-1600MHz)

Hard drive:Seagate 160GB Barracuda 7200.10 Serial ATA II 7200RPM 8MB Buffer SATA

Avatar image for SaPhIrX_lOl
SaPhIrX_lOl

592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#2 SaPhIrX_lOl
Member since 2009 • 592 Posts

I have no idea, i thought bottlenecking only can occur if either the GPU or CPU are to weak etc - strong CPU - weak GPU = bottlenecked. I'm just saying now, you should have gotten a seagate 1TB instead!! More games :D

Avatar image for Too_tight_shoes
Too_tight_shoes

2486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Too_tight_shoes
Member since 2009 • 2486 Posts
In terms of gaming performance no not at all, but 160GB for a gamer is a little low Im using the Seagate Barracuda 500GB 7200.12 and its almost full. Mind you 7K HDD are slowing gamers down in terms of loading time that takes you out of the gaming world. If you are planning on getting a new HDD get one of the following: - Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 - Samsung Spinpoint F3 - Western Digital Caviar Black Also great setup I have the same CPU/GPU combination.
Avatar image for ColdfireTrilogy
ColdfireTrilogy

4911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#4 ColdfireTrilogy
Member since 2005 • 4911 Posts
You wont really bottleneck from the HDD perspective. Now your not going to get the ridiculously quick load times that a raid cluster of Hard drives is going to give but heck 99% of people use a 7200 rpm drive in single array anyway. Long story short, no not at all. If your getting low on space thing about buying another but that will serve fine if your not planning on filling it.
Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#5 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

In Win/linux you'll se a great diffrence between a old sluggish 160GB and a new HDD (preferable one with 500GB disks).

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#6 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts
You wont really bottleneck from the HDD perspective. Now your not going to get the ridiculously quick load times that a raid cluster of Hard drives is going to give but heck 99% of people use a 7200 rpm drive in single array anyway. Long story short, no not at all. If your getting low on space thing about buying another but that will serve fine if your not planning on filling it.ColdfireTrilogy
Do you honesly belive that the rpm is the only factor? There is an enourmus diffrence between many diffrent HDD's, even new 5200rpm's are faster than old 7200rpm's. Some new high GB HDD's is faster than 10k raptors in most aspects.