Well after a few days of choosing the video card I found myself with a horrible conflict of views around the articles on the web
First it was the GeForce 8800GTS 640mb vs the Radeon HD 2900XT
many people recommended the 2900XT cuz the drivers were making it better and had the possibility of becoming better than the 8800GTS 640MB, but after the new 7.7 drivers a HUGE amount of people just lost fate and immediately recommend the 8800GTS 640 over the 2900XT they had previously recommend cuz it looks like the 2900XT reached its limit
Now some people (including GS) that if you dont want to deal with this 8800GTS vs 2900XT simply get the 8800GTX but here is where it gets confusing
GS says that the GTX is in another completely different level of power when compared to the GTS or 2900XT and that extra cash (around 120 more than the others) is worth it to get the best performance all around
But then I find articles in respectable places like Toms Hardware that say the GTX ONLY performs considerably better than the GTS in VERY high (2048 x 1536 aprox) res and the rest is just waisting money
the other comments I find is that the GTX is EXTREMELY large to the point it might cuz trouble to some peple, can any one comment about this? just exactly how big is it
Log in to comment