Is the Unreal 3 Engine getting stale?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for crazyfist36
crazyfist36

574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 crazyfist36
Member since 2003 • 574 Posts
well basically i'm getting tired of seeing the unreal engine 3 everywhere.i dont hate the engine but i'd like to see developers picking up other engines like cry engine 2, source engine or maybe even the engine for far cry 2.surely there must be others who are kinda geting sick of what to always expect from unreal engine 3.its a great running engine which is easil scaleable but i dont know i just think that too much of a good thing is bad and the unreal engine 3 is kinda getting overly used.what are your thoughts?
Avatar image for Realmjumper
Realmjumper

873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#2 Realmjumper
Member since 2007 • 873 Posts
I don't think it's getting stale, it's only finally starting to being used fully. What I find more interesting is the law suit against Epic games from Silicon Knights.
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#3 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
Get used to it kiddo! There are going to be a lot more games using that Engine my ol' friend...including Gamespot: The Game! Save Jeff! Slay the executives of Eidos! Rig the 2007 PC Awards! Moderate the forums and stop the fanboys! Only you the rookie Gamespot Editor can bring an end to the System Wars!
Avatar image for jfsebastianII
jfsebastianII

1084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#4 jfsebastianII
Member since 2007 • 1084 Posts

Get used to it kiddo! There are going to be a lot more games using that Engine my ol' friend...including Gamespot: The Game! Save Jeff! Slay the executives of Eidos! Rig the 2007 PC Awards! Moderate the forums and stop the fanboys! Only you the rookie Gamespot Editor can bring an end to the System Wars!biggest_loser

Sounds good - as long as there's a rocket launcher and a sniper rifle, I'm in...

Avatar image for Jd1680a
Jd1680a

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#5 Jd1680a
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts

Game publishers/developers like unreal engine 3 because it is so console friendly. Cryengine 2 will be more widely used once the next generation consoles come out.

Tho I dont think Unreal engine 3 is getting stale. UT3 and Gears of War is just amazing and jaw dropping because of the graphic quality. Had this one guy, who a non gamer, couldnt believe the graphics are really from a game it is so good. Cant wait to what Dragon Age would look like with it being on the same engine.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Too bad it was used in the most craptacular fashion in BioShock. Bad optimisation, unbelievably low-res textures.

But I like in other games, when it's not overdone. UT3 looks awfully kitsch, but at least runs good. GoW, although it's from the same design team, looks awesome, full of details, but not so full to hurt your eyes. Stranglehold is ok... not special, just ok and enough next-gen for me.

On the other hand, in Tiberium, it's the blandest thing in the last few years. Even Quake 4 had more appeal, with awesome design despite the bland colours.

I don't know about you, but to me that engine used in Infernal (an old-school, pretty and repetitive 3rd person shooter) looks very much like UE3, and it's even better optimised.

Avatar image for Gooeykat
Gooeykat

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#7 Gooeykat
Member since 2006 • 3412 Posts
I am not a fan of the UT3 engine, so yes I hope that developers will take a look at other options in the future such as Crytek's Cry engine 2 or the the new Tech 5 engine from id (which supposedly is console friendly as well). Personally, I think the Source engine is old and would like to see Valve make a Source 2 engine.
Avatar image for DucksBrains
DucksBrains

1146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 DucksBrains
Member since 2007 • 1146 Posts

Game publishers/developers like unreal engine 3 because it is so console friendly. Cryengine 2 will be more widely used once the next generation consoles come out.

Tho I dont think Unreal engine 3 is getting stale. UT3 and Gears of War is just amazing and jaw dropping because of the graphic quality. Had this one guy, who a non gamer, couldnt believe the graphics are really from a game it is so good. Cant wait to what Dragon Age would look like with it being on the same engine.

Jd1680a

It's not that it's just console friendly, it's very easy to use compared to other engines.

Avatar image for mimic-Denmark
mimic-Denmark

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#9 mimic-Denmark
Member since 2006 • 4382 Posts

Yes, it is getting pretty stale.

Im very tired of seeing that damn engine all over the place. Just because coca cola taste good dosnt mean i wanna drink it all the time :)

Plus, even though the visuals that engines makes is impressive its still rather boring. Bioshock is the only game on that engine so far that really impressed me, and thats because of the art work. Gears of war many other unreal engine 3 games look great, but is rather dull to look at because its mostly just grey.

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
It isn't getting stale for me.
Avatar image for johnny27
johnny27

4400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 johnny27
Member since 2006 • 4400 Posts
not really the graphics still look great to me so i c no reason to use a diffrent engine
Avatar image for broqz
broqz

773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 broqz
Member since 2003 • 773 Posts

i can see why so many developers use it. i mean wasn't unreal 2 one of the most used engines of last gen? (atleast on consoles) but personaly i would rather they make there own engines that are optimized to take advantage or their game. that's one reason i think some console games are showing so much promise ;MGs4, Killzone 2, REsistance 2. these games seem to be made to work on the PS3 and only the PS3 thus the need to write a game engine that is optimized to the specs of the Cell and RSX(?)

but with the multiple diffrent hardware configs on the PC side i see why they use it. so far U3 has had a decent track record on the PC and i only see it getting better as hardware gets better and developers get more savy with the engine.

p.s. i too would like to see valve make a new Source engine. maybe when HL3 comes out sometime in 2012? (that's only a guess)

Avatar image for SKaREO
SKaREO

3161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 SKaREO
Member since 2006 • 3161 Posts

The engine is heavy and unfinished, and the support Epic offers its licensees is laughable at best.

Silicon Knights is a smaller development house than the others named in the recent lawsuit, therefore they are affected most by the delays and miscommunication from Epic. The lawsuit has less to do with the Unreal Engine 3 and more to do with how Epic treats their business relationships. Albeit, UE3 is a decent engine for use on the XBox, but in my opinion it fails to compete with the more popular and streamlined Source engine.

Playing online is where you see UE3 start showing its quirks.