Just installed a phenom 2 1090t, done some benchmarks and its apparently low compaired to others.

Version: 1.0.1
SystemInfo Version: 4.0
11/23/11 1:16:07 PM
Id: 2240912Score:P3716 Your Score isLowCompared to Similar Systems.There may be a problem.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 video card 3DMark 11 benchmark test score

Processor clock3616 MHz

Physical / logical processors1 / 6

# of cores6Graphics CardGraphics CardNVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

VendorGainward GmbH

# of cards1

SLI / CrossFireOff

Memory1024 MB

Core clock800 MHz

Memory clock2000 MHz

Driver name

Driver version8.17.12.8562

Driver statusNot FM Approved

Oh thats a bit jumbles up :/

Doesnt seem to run much different to the one in my tag? any idead?

Ah k thanks :)

Benchmarks are useless anyway, play some games, if you notice performance issues then, that is when you worry.

Games are poor applications to test the real power of a CPU. try encoding or rendering videos.

ok thanks guys

it's because you're using ddr2 ramevildead6789

[QUOTE="evildead6789"]it's because you're using ddr2 ramSpike1988

[QUOTE="Spike1988"][QUOTE="evildead6789"]it's because you're using ddr2 ramevildead6789

[QUOTE="evildead6789"][QUOTE="Spike1988"] Lol just stop man..You're embarrassing yourself.kraken2109

[QUOTE="kraken2109"][QUOTE="evildead6789"] may be , but i'm rightevildead6789

[QUOTE="kraken2109"][QUOTE="evildead6789"] may be , but i'm rightevildead6789

You do understand that memory controllers are on the CPU now right?

[QUOTE="evildead6789"]

[QUOTE="kraken2109"] No it's not. DDR2 to DDR3 makes no difference in games.GummiRaccoon

You do understand that memory controllers are on the CPU now right?

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

[QUOTE="evildead6789"] It depends with what chipset it's combined, a chipset that supports ddr2 and ddr3 will show no difference , but a dedicated ddr2 chipset vs a dedicated ddr3 chipset will show a difference, 5-10 procent difference.

evildead6789

You do understand that memory controllers are on the CPU now right?

[QUOTE="evildead6789"][QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

You do understand that memory controllers are on the CPU now right?

kraken2109

There aren't any.

[QUOTE="evildead6789"][QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

You do understand that memory controllers are on the CPU now right?

kraken2109

http://www.anandtech.com/show/2232/8

and these are older memory chipsets show already a significant performance gain, it's even better with newer memory chipsets

They also say with a chipset that supports ddr2 and ddr3 , there is no performance difference but with a dedicated chipset there is

That's why you thought there wasn't any difference

[QUOTE="kraken2109"][QUOTE="evildead6789"] not with a ddr2 chipset it isn't , smarty pantsevildead6789

http://www.anandtech.com/show/2232/8

and these are older memory chipsets show already a significant performance gain, it's even better with newer memory chipsets

They also say with a chipset that supports ddr2 and ddr3 , there is no performance difference but with a dedicated chipset there is

That's why you thought there wasn't any difference

Cpus have integrated memory controllers now, AMD since the earliest athlon 64s, intel since nehalem.

So your link does not help your case at all.

[QUOTE="evildead6789"]

[QUOTE="kraken2109"] Found me a benchmark yet?GummiRaccoon

http://www.anandtech.com/show/2232/8

and these are older memory chipsets show already a significant performance gain, it's even better with newer memory chipsets

They also say with a chipset that supports ddr2 and ddr3 , there is no performance difference but with a dedicated chipset there is

That's why you thought there wasn't any difference

Cpus have integrated memory controllers now, AMD since the earliest athlon 64s, intel since nehalem.

So your link does not help your case at all.

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

[QUOTE="evildead6789"]

http://www.anandtech.com/show/2232/8

and these are older memory chipsets show already a significant performance gain, it's even better with newer memory chipsets

They also say with a chipset that supports ddr2 and ddr3 , there is no performance difference but with a dedicated chipset there is

That's why you thought there wasn't any difference

evildead6789

Cpus have integrated memory controllers now, AMD since the earliest athlon 64s, intel since nehalem.

So your link does not help your case at all.

You can't explain it better because you don't understand how it works.

[QUOTE="evildead6789"][QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

Cpus have integrated memory controllers now, AMD since the earliest athlon 64s, intel since nehalem.

So your link does not help your case at all.

GummiRaccoon

You can't explain it better because you don't understand how it works.

[QUOTE="kraken2109"][QUOTE="evildead6789"] not with a ddr2 chipset it isn't , smarty pantsevildead6789

http://www.anandtech.com/show/2232/8

and these are older memory chipsets show already a significant performance gain, it's even better with newer memory chipsets

They also say with a chipset that supports ddr2 and ddr3 , there is no performance difference but with a dedicated chipset there is

That's why you thought there wasn't any difference

it's because you're using ddr2 ramevildead6789

read the conclusion smart *ssesevildead6789

ddr performance differences and chipset performance differences are 2 totally different things. Also the article you linked is dealing with chipsets that have memory controllers on them WHICH ARE NOT MADE ANYMORE. As all desktop CPUs have the memory on die. Often referred to as the integrated memory controller. For instance AMD has done this since the Athlon 64 was created, so changing chipsets WILL NET YOU NO PERFORMANCE INCREASE IN TERMS OF MEMORY PERFORMANCE ON CURRENT PROCESSORS.

Thank you and good day.