king arthur? how is it?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts

heard mixed things about this game.... seems like a fantasy version of the total war games honestly, which i usually enjoy. anyone have an impression for me? thanks.

Avatar image for Mazoch
Mazoch

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 Mazoch
Member since 2004 • 2473 Posts

I'm a huge total war fan and ended up being disappointed by King Arthur. Technically it seemed to work ok, but the battles just never really amounted to much beyond click blob one and right click blob two.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

It's a fantasy Total War with RPG elements.

It takes place in a mythical Britain. The south of the map is divided into a lot of different kingdoms. You start from Cornwall and make your way up towards the spooky forest in the north. The further you go north the more fantasy creatures you meet. Every turn is a season. Every season has different effects on your armies. During winter you can't move; that's when you level up the units, receive the resources from your vassals and, well, manage your kingdom.

The strategic map is somewhere between Total War and Heroes. There are locations that provide bonuses, like druid circles or monasteries. Quests regularly pop up. Some of them are text adventures, other are diplomatic or trading quests that may or may not end up being solved in battle.

There's a morality board... You move freely along two axis - Old Faith vs Christianity and Tyrant vs Rightful. You unlock spells by moving on this board, and the various factions, units and characters change their stance according to it.

Arthur is not an actual unit. You roleplay as him though and manage the Round Table... You give fiefdoms to your knights, manage their inventory, send them in quests and so on. It's seriously fun to pick up and manage these guys.

So, the strategic part is very cool and has a lot of depth.

The actual battles are a lot like Total War, but with some fun additions. They mostly revolve around capturing key locations on the battlefield (which is oddly realistic in a fantasy game). So you'll have to split the troops and runs for these locations - which also provide bonuses and spells for the duration of the battle. My favourite spell is lightning - it's beyond awesome to hit the enemy troops with a gigantic bolt and watch them being thrown around. These spells will make the difference on the battlefied. You'll rarely be able to just send everybody in like in Total War, it requires you to pay attention on multiple fronts. And you can command some really badass units, including giants. The game launched with some serious balance issues, but it's all working just fine now.

The game is stunning. The strategic map is incredible. The battle maps are huge. There's a lot of variety among the same type of units, you'll notice how they wear different armour, weapons and trinkets. The physics make the spells fun, you'll see how the pieces of equipment fall when the units die... The art styIe perfectly fits the setting and I like the music a lot.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#4 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
Nice review there. My interest for this game went up incredibly. I might just pick this one up. I love the Total War games and I wouldn't mind a "fantasy-version." Thanks. :)
Avatar image for Cenerune
Cenerune

588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Cenerune
Member since 2008 • 588 Posts

I second Baranga, game is awesome. I found it better than Total War in every way.

I picked it up a few months ago for 15 bucks and I was actually surprised at how good, deep and good looking it was.

Avatar image for dsgsdfgf
dsgsdfgf

1004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 dsgsdfgf
Member since 2005 • 1004 Posts

What performance are you getting? It's basically unplayable for me which seem kinda weird. Shouldn't it atleast be playable on medium on a GTX295?

Avatar image for soldine
soldine

1980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 soldine
Member since 2007 • 1980 Posts

Yup the graphics are beutiful but it comes at a real price. I myself never bought it but I thought the demo was alright.

Avatar image for malikmmm
malikmmm

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 malikmmm
Member since 2003 • 2235 Posts
its freaking 5 bucks on steam. has anyone played this on 8800 gts?
Avatar image for sn4k3_64
sn4k3_64

1134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 sn4k3_64
Member since 2007 • 1134 Posts

Sounds good, currently downloading on steam. How complex is this game though? My issue is that im not very patient, so if its very difficult to learn at first i might lose interest quickly lol :S. Cant believe its so cheap considering you get all the dlc included and the graphics look gorgeous

Avatar image for sn4k3_64
sn4k3_64

1134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 sn4k3_64
Member since 2007 • 1134 Posts

What performance are you getting? It's basically unplayable for me which seem kinda weird. Shouldn't it atleast be playable on medium on a GTX295?

dsgsdfgf
That is weird :S. Do you have the AA cranked up really high or what? Im sure a gtx 295 will be able to handle it just fine, theres no way your processor will struggle either
Avatar image for dsgsdfgf
dsgsdfgf

1004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 dsgsdfgf
Member since 2005 • 1004 Posts

[QUOTE="dsgsdfgf"]

What performance are you getting? It's basically unplayable for me which seem kinda weird. Shouldn't it atleast be playable on medium on a GTX295?

sn4k3_64

That is weird :S. Do you have the AA cranked up really high or what? Im sure a gtx 295 will be able to handle it just fine, theres no way your processor will struggle either

I don't think there's any AA at all. I couldn't find an ingame setting for it.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Sounds good, currently downloading on steam. How complex is this game though? My issue is that im not very patient, so if its very difficult to learn at first i might lose interest quickly lol :S. Cant believe its so cheap considering you get all the dlc included and the graphics look gorgeous

sn4k3_64

It's not hard to learn, especially if you played Total War before.

My old 9800GT ran it well on a mixture of medium-high. It is taxing though.

Avatar image for sn4k3_64
sn4k3_64

1134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 sn4k3_64
Member since 2007 • 1134 Posts

So are the graphics really good then?

Avatar image for sn4k3_64
sn4k3_64

1134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 sn4k3_64
Member since 2007 • 1134 Posts

[QUOTE="sn4k3_64"][QUOTE="dsgsdfgf"]

What performance are you getting? It's basically unplayable for me which seem kinda weird. Shouldn't it atleast be playable on medium on a GTX295?

dsgsdfgf

That is weird :S. Do you have the AA cranked up really high or what? Im sure a gtx 295 will be able to handle it just fine, theres no way your processor will struggle either

I don't think there's any AA at all. I couldn't find an ingame setting for it.

Dont see how it could lag your system tbh because i would of thought if anything it would be using more processor power than gpu power