This topic is locked from further discussion.
Red Orchestra would be the perfect game for you.
It's an excellent game, with a massive focus on realism. Doom_HellKnight
Yeah sounds pretty good! I had remembered seeing somewhere that it was one of the most realistic WW2 shooters available but I haven't played it yet. Also, (I know it's not WW2 but) what about America's Army? I've been hearing good things about it's multiplayer recently.
[QUOTE="Doom_HellKnight"]Red Orchestra would be the perfect game for you.
It's an excellent game, with a massive focus on realism. Forerunner-117
Yeah sounds pretty good! I had remembered seeing somewhere that it was one of the most realistic WW2 shooters available but I haven't played it yet. Also, (I know it's not WW2 but) what about America's Army? I've been hearing good things about it's multiplayer recently.
Americas army was fun for a while....but eventually I just got board.....it has a ton of maps (likee 40) but half of them have barely anyone playing them.....and the general propaganda the game gives off kinda got to me pretty fast.
still, its a free game, no harm in trying it out.
Red Orchestra is a very realisitc game....but extreamly hard to learn, and very complex.
Right now though...Im about to try Project reality mod for BF2...which is supposed to make the game very realistic.
Haha are you kidding, CoD2 licks ass when it comes to realism! Regenerating health? You can just run around spraying like Quake or something. Sorry, but CoD2 FAILS at realism. However, I thought that the original CoD was great. All of that aside, yes I'd suggest getting Red Orchestra. I only downloaded the demo, and I thought it was really good. But IMO, I prefer Day of Defeat: Source.... but that's just me. Red Orchestra is far more realistic and challenging; I'll agree to that.ruuuj
Hmm ok thanks! Maybe I'll try the demo first. But hey since you've played both DoD: Source and RO, can you tell me what the main difference between them is? They're both WW2 and stuff so...
[QUOTE="ruuuj"]Haha are you kidding, CoD2 licks ass when it comes to realism! Regenerating health? You can just run around spraying like Quake or something. Sorry, but CoD2 FAILS at realism. However, I thought that the original CoD was great. All of that aside, yes I'd suggest getting Red Orchestra. I only downloaded the demo, and I thought it was really good. But IMO, I prefer Day of Defeat: Source.... but that's just me. Red Orchestra is far more realistic and challenging; I'll agree to that.Forerunner-117
Hmm ok thanks! Maybe I'll try the demo first. But hey since you've played both DoD: Source and RO, can you tell me what the main difference between them is? They're both WW2 and stuff so...
Hes looking for realism, not the best ww2 shooter, and cod isnt realistic.
i would recommend red orchestra and brothers in arms
Artosa
Exactly Artosa!
alright thanks for the recommendation! it looks like i may be getting red orchestra soon ;) oh yeah i forgot about bia! do they have that for the pc?
[QUOTE="Artosa"]Hes looking for realism, not the best ww2 shooter, and cod isnt realistic.
i would recommend red orchestra and brothers in arms
Forerunner-117
Exactly Artosa!
alright thanks for the recommendation! it looks like i may be getting red orchestra soon ;) oh yeah i forgot about bia! do they have that for the pc?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment