Looking forward to Bioshock 2 but..

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BackHatch
BackHatch

273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 BackHatch
Member since 2010 • 273 Posts

Honestly I thought Bioshock 1 was way overrated and not that good. The idea was really cool but it was just too much of the same. The weapons mostly sucked and were not fun and the story was good but nothing that really hooked me.. On the Gamespot scale I would have given Bioshock like an 8.0. But sequels are so overy hyped these days... Sometimes I think we get a little overly excited for things maybe we didnt even like that much the first time.

The exception for this for me personally is MAFIA 2. You could not name a sequel that im looking forward to more. Nothing. (I have played MAFIA 1 all the way through 5 times!)

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#2 mrbojangles25  Online
Member since 2005 • 60709 Posts

I agree Bioshock must go down as one of the most overrated games in history.

It is, without a doubt, an exercise in repetition. For all the talent, effort, and time put into developing Bioshock, the gameplay came down to simplistic, boring ways of dispatching enemies.

You either froze and shattered, electrified and shot, or another one or two methods.

And this sufficed for 98% of the game. This is the greatest crime, too; the game simply didnt use the huge variety of tools, powers, and weapons given to the player. There just were not a lot of opportunities to experiment.

Add to this predictable, stupid, and bland enemies and there is just no challenge to the game. You could hear the Splicers' moanings and wailing from yards away and get the jump on them. The occasional Big Daddy encounter was definitely cool, but hardly justification to invest time to play the game.

While Bioshock is a solid game, even a good game, it is without a doubt the greatest disappointment in my gaming career.

Avatar image for wigginender
wigginender

644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 wigginender
Member since 2003 • 644 Posts

It just a matter of taste, I found Bioshock to be amaxingly good, and worth every penny. I just pre-ordered Bioshock 2. Yet to me COD4, COD5 WaW and MM2 all suck. If you didn't like Bioshock, why on earth would you even remotley consider the sequel?

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#4 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Yeah i would also give bioshock about an 8.0 it was good but it did not really shine out as an amazing game. I cant really consider bioshock 2 as a very improved sequel from what i have seen. But since the first was "ok" i believe the second will also be ok and it will be worth it to pick it sometime but its not my number one choice!
Avatar image for DJ_Lae
DJ_Lae

42748

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#5 DJ_Lae
Member since 2002 • 42748 Posts
Bioshock's setting was amazing. The story was okay (great until they completely pissed it away in the last couple of hours). The gameplay was garbage. Since they're keeping the same setting for the second game they really have nowhere to go but up.
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#6 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

The first one had amazing atmosphere and a very good story imo. its the Variety and gameplay that needs a improvement imo.

Avatar image for jedinat
jedinat

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jedinat
Member since 2003 • 3560 Posts
My biggest issue with the first game was all the random psychos running around that attacked you on sight. They didn't feel like real people (deranged or not). You got Fontaine, Ryan, and a couple others who act like actual people and the rest are rabid animals (who for some reason haven't killed each other off), when in fact, for all their splicing up, they should be little different than you (who splices up as well). As a result Rapture never felt like a believable place... there should have been "towns", places where people actually eat food and are around each other, places of relief between the action where you could interact with people.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#8 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
I would say that the problem is that in comparison with ss2 or dead space. Bioshock is starting to loose quality at the later levels. By all means it did not turn bad at the latest parts, it just didnt reach its peak as it happens with most fps!
Avatar image for OoSuperMarioO
OoSuperMarioO

6539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 OoSuperMarioO
Member since 2005 • 6539 Posts

Bioshock gameplay was terrible, terrible, terrible.. It is a bummer because everything else in Bioshock was extraordinary. Despite that the gameplay literally made me fell sleep at the keyboard in multiple sessions. Why the public exalted the gameplay is a mystery in itself.

Avatar image for jpph
jpph

3337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#10 jpph
Member since 2005 • 3337 Posts

Honestly I thought Bioshock 1 was way overrated and not that good. The idea was really cool but it was just too much of the same. The weapons mostly sucked and were not fun and the story was good but nothing that really hooked me.. On the Gamespot scale I would have given Bioshock like an 8.0. But sequels are so overy hyped these days... Sometimes I think we get a little overly excited for things maybe we didnt even like that much the first time.

The exception for this for me personally is MAFIA 2. You could not name a sequel that im looking forward to more. Nothing. (I have played MAFIA 1 all the way through 5 times!)

BackHatch

MAFIA 2, i am also SO SO SO hyped for it.