Lowest Review From Gamespot for C&C 4 Prediction

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for CommandoAgent
CommandoAgent

1703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#1 CommandoAgent
Member since 2005 • 1703 Posts

Since Command & Conquer 4 wasnt featured in the most wanted games of 2010, the irony of it SupCom 2 and starcraft II were featured it got me wondering to a point, why wasnt it featured? is it beacause it is not wanted? if not then what would be the lowest possible review score for an RTS with an bad taste?

What would be the lowest review score you think command & conquer 4 will get from reviwers?

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#2 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
7/10
Avatar image for zaku101
zaku101

4641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 zaku101
Member since 2005 • 4641 Posts

5.5

Avatar image for dinuattila
dinuattila

1355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 dinuattila
Member since 2005 • 1355 Posts

6.5

Avatar image for F1_2004
F1_2004

8009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 F1_2004
Member since 2003 • 8009 Posts
7/10. High profile games don't get lower than that (with some exceptions). CnC4 is pretty bad, though.
Avatar image for BluePaw-
BluePaw-

184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 BluePaw-
Member since 2009 • 184 Posts

Wow, is it really that bad?

I haven't played the C&C4 Beta so i have no clue what it's like.

Avatar image for F1_2004
F1_2004

8009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 F1_2004
Member since 2003 • 8009 Posts
Considering the name it tries to live up to, yeah it's that bad. It's not terrible but it's just shallow and boring.
Avatar image for BluePaw-
BluePaw-

184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 BluePaw-
Member since 2009 • 184 Posts

Considering the name it tries to live up to, yeah it's that bad. It's not terrible but it's just shallow and boring.F1_2004

Isn't C&C4 suppose to be the last of the series?

Avatar image for illmatic87
illmatic87

17935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 564

User Lists: 0

#9 illmatic87
Member since 2008 • 17935 Posts
I think It will fare well getting an 8.0 here at the very least. I expect PC publications to serve up a few 7s... C&C4 will probably be a fairly polished game like it or not.
Avatar image for grisibur
grisibur

600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 grisibur
Member since 2004 • 600 Posts

Wow, is it really that bad?

I haven't played the C&C4 Beta so i have no clue what it's like.

BluePaw-

The game is a weak mix between something like supcom and the multiplayer part of DoW2, all you do is spam units.

I hope that this game gets somewhere between 1-5 in rating, so that EA games might learn something.

Avatar image for Doom_HellKnight
Doom_HellKnight

12217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 Doom_HellKnight
Member since 2005 • 12217 Posts
6.5. That game is... not very good. Shame really, because I love my Command & Conquer...
Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#12 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

[QUOTE="F1_2004"]Considering the name it tries to live up to, yeah it's that bad. It's not terrible but it's just shallow and boring.BluePaw-

Isn't C&C4 suppose to be the last of the series?

yep, shame really, because it plays so different from the others, and not as in "DOW2 different good"

Avatar image for wizdom
wizdom

10111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#13 wizdom
Member since 2003 • 10111 Posts
[QUOTE="CommandoAgent"]

Since Command & Conquer 4 wasnt featured in the most wanted games of 2010, the irony of it SupCom 2 and starcraft II were featured it got me wondering to a point, why wasnt it featured? is it beacause it is not wanted? if not then what would be the lowest possible review score for an RTS with an bad taste?

What would be the lowest review score you think command & conquer 4 will get from reviwers?

Just because GS isn't jumping up and down for it, doesn't mean they will total trash the game, but from what I have seen of the game I'm not that impressed with it.
Avatar image for BluePaw-
BluePaw-

184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 BluePaw-
Member since 2009 • 184 Posts

[QUOTE="BluePaw-"]

[QUOTE="F1_2004"]Considering the name it tries to live up to, yeah it's that bad. It's not terrible but it's just shallow and boring.DoomZaW

Isn't C&C4 suppose to be the last of the series?

yep, shame really, because it plays so different from the others, and not as in "DOW2 different good"

Indeed, it is a shame. I think the C&C series is great. Looks like it's going to end on a low.

Avatar image for badtaker
badtaker

3806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 badtaker
Member since 2009 • 3806 Posts
7.5/10
Avatar image for rmfd341
rmfd341

3808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#16 rmfd341
Member since 2008 • 3808 Posts
Definitely a 7.