MAC vs PC for university

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for LegendRyder
LegendRyder

656

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 LegendRyder
Member since 2008 • 656 Posts

I need a laptop for university and I'm torn in the mac vs pc debate. I will be using the laptop for general purposes such as assignments, music downloads, web surfing, etc. No gaming or anything like that. I need something that's fast and I can save tons of music and pictures on.


The basic things I've learned is that macs are better overtime (less problems with software, don't slow down after a while, etc), they're less prone to viruses, they can basically do what a PC can do. On the con side, they're crazy expensive. PCs, on the other hand, I'm familiar with the software, no adjusting needed, much less expensive. Cons are that they're known to have lots of problems, viruses, etc.


If you can add anything to that and shed some knowledge it would be great. Any help is much appreciated. Thank you!

EDIT: I'll pay more for a mac if I have to. Obviously the less I have to spend, the better. However, if a mac is significantly superior I wouldn't mind digging out the extra cash for it. (max $2000)

Avatar image for samuraiguns
samuraiguns

11588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 samuraiguns
Member since 2005 • 11588 Posts

what is your budget?

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
You get faster hardware for a much cheaper price out of a PC, but with Mac you get really good battery life, sturdy construction of the casing and don't have to deal with the bloatware they put onto Windows. If I were you I would just look for something that uses Core 2 (Centrino 2) 1.8GHz+ or AMD Turion 2.00GHz+, 4GB of RAM and the biggest HDD you can find to store your music/pictures/videos/downloads. Like I said, Macs are going to be much more expensive. Windows will be just as functional if not more though (just make sure you take off the bloat). EDIT: No Mac is not vastly superior at all, it's just a little better in certain areas.
Avatar image for Ravirr
Ravirr

7931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#4 Ravirr
Member since 2004 • 7931 Posts

If you purchases a laptop now, you get a free upgrade to windows 7 :P

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

PC here is why: Most supported software, (games), cheap hardware, customizable, easy to support, does everything a Mac can do. Viruses? Just put avast free, macs aren't more secure if someone gets them in their hands, they are actually more vulnerable.They are just wannabe UNIX systems...

Avatar image for djmillard2
djmillard2

1372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 djmillard2
Member since 2005 • 1372 Posts

If you purchases a laptop now, you get a free upgrade to windows 7 :P

Ravirr
ravirr i like the tales of vesperia pic in your sig
Avatar image for --Anna--
--Anna--

4636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 --Anna--
Member since 2007 • 4636 Posts

I'm a pc person..no doubt. But, when it comes to college...been there--done that..and a MacBook Pro either 13" or 15" is the way to go. Cheers

Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts
Don't believe all the FUD from Apple about PCs being riddled with problems and Macs "just working." Both are just as likely to experience hardware problems (pretty much everyone buys from the same manufacturers) And I've never had a Windows installation go bad on me because it is incredibly simple to keep it in good running order. (Free antivirus program, not downloading suspicious/shady programs)/ Basically you can pay 900-1300 for a quality PC, or 2000+ for an equivalent (spec wise) Mac.
Avatar image for bobaban
bobaban

10560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 bobaban
Member since 2005 • 10560 Posts

I'm a pc person..no doubt. But, when it comes to college...been there--done that..and a MacBook Pro either 13" or 15" is the way to go. Cheers

--Anna--
Yeah basically: Mac for school PC for games
Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts
The new 13" Macbook Pro is not all that expensive all things considered, and comes with absolutely incredible battery life. I'd get the cheapest 2.26GHz model and upgrade the RAM to 4GB yourself (or you could just stick with 2GB I guess, considering what you're doing), and upgrade the hard drive from Apple itself ($50 isn't too bad for another 100GB considering you won't have to muck about with OS installation yourself).
Avatar image for Munkyman587
Munkyman587

2007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 Munkyman587
Member since 2003 • 2007 Posts
The new 13" Macbook Pro is not all that expensive all things considered, and comes with absolutely incredible battery life. I'd get the cheapest 2.26GHz model and upgrade the RAM to 4GB yourself (or you could just stick with 2GB I guess, considering what you're doing), and upgrade the hard drive from Apple itself ($50 isn't too bad for another 100GB considering you won't have to muck about with OS installation yourself).RayvinAzn
I agree. Macs are great for classes, and some schools GREATLY encourage macs based on software they sell and/or require for students. I know at UCSB, they only really kept macs in stock, and the software was very heavily mac oriented. Plus, bootcamp can be used if you MUST have windows for a random class. My mac was a lifesaver, only crashed 1x in 3 years.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
there is really no difference, mac and pc both get slow when working overtime, they both tend to have just as many problems as each other. apple does make some nice mac book pros, but avoid the macbook. plus when looking a laptops you have to sacrifice the right click on the touch pad with a mac. a windows base laptop will get you a lot more power for the same price.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
You get faster hardware for a much cheaper price out of a PC, but with Mac you get really good battery life, sturdy construction of the casing and don't have to deal with the bloatware they put onto Windows. If I were you I would just look for something that uses Core 2 (Centrino 2) 1.8GHz+ or AMD Turion 2.00GHz+, 4GB of RAM and the biggest HDD you can find to store your music/pictures/videos/downloads. Like I said, Macs are going to be much more expensive. Windows will be just as functional if not more though (just make sure you take off the bloat). EDIT: No Mac is not vastly superior at all, it's just a little better in certain areas. Marfoo
that is so true, there is one massive speed difference between the vanilla windows and the windows that ships on prebuilds. they load all this junk on and then windows gets this bad name for being slower. the mac would slow down just as much if they loaded it up with junk. If you get a windows pc you are just about better off formating the hdd and loading just windows if the maker gives you a straight windows disk. Dell loads junk on but has a standard windows disk which lets you install it without any junk.
Avatar image for tcarruth
tcarruth

926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 tcarruth
Member since 2005 • 926 Posts

I just don't understand this ongoing MAC vs PC debate. I'm a researcherandhave the privaledge to work on all four combinations of MAC/PC desktop/notebook. Simply put, the MACS are much more expensive and don't run all of the software that you can on a PC.

If you want MAC softwareits easy to dual boot a PC. Oh and the MACS I have used were,if anything, more prone to crashing than the Vista machines we have at work that so far have NEVER crashed.The only reason I can see to have a MAC is if you are in desperate need to have some kind of identity/ have bought intoall the markettingBS.

Plus MACs relatively poor at games.

Avatar image for SgtMoreless
SgtMoreless

311

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 SgtMoreless
Member since 2009 • 311 Posts

PC.

More support. Plus, MAC now uses parts in PCs in there MACS. Same parts, but more expensive? Macs were better at video editing/drawing only 5 or 6 years ago. Dont listen to anyone who tells you different. The only reason they were better was because of the LCD screens being better quality, so you could see your images in more detail. Load Photoshop on a Mac, then load it on a PC. They run the same.

My friend bought a 1100 dollar Mac laptop (2 months ago) and cant play COD 5 in bootcamp (without heavy lag). He also has to turn down all his game settings. I have a laptop that is 1100 dollars and play Crysis on medium to high settings. He has to play on the lowest settings and STILL lags like hell.

He also uses bootcamp more than OS X (or whatever it's called)

Avatar image for Lyron-Baktos
Lyron-Baktos

334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Lyron-Baktos
Member since 2008 • 334 Posts

What is your major? If you are going into something like engineering you will want a PC, whereas if you go into something like art you would probably want a Mac.

Avatar image for mhh91
mhh91

446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 mhh91
Member since 2007 • 446 Posts
not considering the budget,get a mac
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

PC for everything. Macs are just on overpriced fashion statement.

Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts

PC.

More support. Plus, MAC now uses parts in PCs in there MACS. Same parts, but more expensive? Macs were better at video editing/drawing only 5 or 6 years ago. Dont listen to anyone who tells you different. The only reason they were better was because of the LCD screens being better quality, so you could see your images in more detail. Load Photoshop on a Mac, then load it on a PC. They run the same.

My friend bought a 1100 dollar Mac laptop (2 months ago) and cant play COD 5 in bootcamp (without heavy lag). He also has to turn down all his game settings. I have a laptop that is 1100 dollars and play Crysis on medium to high settings. He has to play on the lowest settings and STILL lags like hell.

He also uses bootcamp more than OS X (or whatever it's called)

SgtMoreless
Seriously? Apples LCD screens have NEVER been of "better" quality. They have been of fairly average quality given their price, but considering some of the professional screens on the market from companies like Eizo, NEC, and a few others, Apple's screens are mediocre (but cheap). Apple computers are similar to every other component in your PC in that it's not all about marketable BS. If you believe Apple computers are crap then you should also believe that a 3.73GHz Pentium D is the fastest processor on the market, a $100 Apevia 1kw power supply is better than a $150 Corsair 850w power supply, a 1GB 9500GT is better than an HD4850 512MB, and a 2TB hard drive is faster than a 128GB SSD. In almost every segment of PC hardware except possibly RAM, the important specs aren't the easily marketable ones, they're the things that aren't seen to most users. Not to mention the fact that you have to look at what you're going to be DOING with your hardware. If your friend got a Macbook to play games and run Windows, he's a moron. That doesn't make the Macbook a bad machine (I notice you didn't compare screen quality, build quality, battery life, or any number of important things in your assessment), it just means it's not built to play games (nor is any laptop really, they're a complete waste of money compared to a desktop when it comes to that).
Avatar image for LegendRyder
LegendRyder

656

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 LegendRyder
Member since 2008 • 656 Posts

What is your major? If you are going into something like engineering you will want a PC, whereas if you go into something like art you would probably want a Mac.

Lyron-Baktos

I'm going into business admin. I'm going to have classes like english, psych, math, economics, philosophy, etc.

Basically just a lot of typing.

Thanks a lot for the help so far but please keep in mind I'm not using the laptop for gaming at all.

So far it seems as though there is a significant price difference from a PC to a MAC but not a significant difference in quality.

Avatar image for polarwrath11
polarwrath11

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 polarwrath11
Member since 2006 • 1676 Posts
[QUOTE="SgtMoreless"]

PC.

More support. Plus, MAC now uses parts in PCs in there MACS. Same parts, but more expensive? Macs were better at video editing/drawing only 5 or 6 years ago. Dont listen to anyone who tells you different. The only reason they were better was because of the LCD screens being better quality, so you could see your images in more detail. Load Photoshop on a Mac, then load it on a PC. They run the same.

My friend bought a 1100 dollar Mac laptop (2 months ago) and cant play COD 5 in bootcamp (without heavy lag). He also has to turn down all his game settings. I have a laptop that is 1100 dollars and play Crysis on medium to high settings. He has to play on the lowest settings and STILL lags like hell.

He also uses bootcamp more than OS X (or whatever it's called)

RayvinAzn
Seriously? Apples LCD screens have NEVER been of "better" quality. They have been of fairly average quality given their price, but considering some of the professional screens on the market from companies like Eizo, NEC, and a few others, Apple's screens are mediocre (but cheap). Apple computers are similar to every other component in your PC in that it's not all about marketable BS. If you believe Apple computers are crap then you should also believe that a 3.73GHz Pentium D is the fastest processor on the market, a $100 Apevia 1kw power supply is better than a $150 Corsair 850w power supply, a 1GB 9500GT is better than an HD4850 512MB, and a 2TB hard drive is faster than a 128GB SSD. In almost every segment of PC hardware except possibly RAM, the important specs aren't the easily marketable ones, they're the things that aren't seen to most users. Not to mention the fact that you have to look at what you're going to be DOING with your hardware. If your friend got a Macbook to play games and run Windows, he's a moron. That doesn't make the Macbook a bad machine (I notice you didn't compare screen quality, build quality, battery life, or any number of important things in your assessment), it just means it's not built to play games (nor is any laptop really, they're a complete waste of money compared to a desktop when it comes to that).

Thats the biggest pwning I've seen in my life hands down.
Avatar image for muff07
muff07

945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 muff07
Member since 2007 • 945 Posts

I'm having the same problem too (And I don't know alot about Computers)

I'm going to be doing a Geology based coarse at Aberdeen University (I've no idea what OS the campus computers are going to be running on though it will be one of my first enquiries saying as im probably going to need the library computers for printing etc.) does Word work on a Mac? or is there anything similar available for macs? And would it be easy to convert a file from this into a file type functional with Microsoft word?

I do however want a LaptopAble to play Empire: Total war (Which I think needs a 256mb shader? it's the only game im going to be running on it so it's not a massive part of decision making) I was Jw does anyone know if it only runs on windows or will it work on a mac too?

Edit: Also what would be considered a good battery life? If I didn't get a Mac I was going to get the Sony VGN-NS 30ES

Is there still a problem with the Bettery's used in the Sony laptops?

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

The thing is, why? If you want a UNIX system, run Linux, it's free(open source), more secure, and better. Sure it's not as user friendly as Windows or Mac on mostly ever distrobution, but Macs are just so incredibly useless. My question is whyyyyyyyyyyyyy, why do you want to be separated from the pc? Why do you not want to be able to share the same programs? Why do you want to deal with your own seperate problems that PC tech's can't help? LInux is not like that, because there is a reason you're using it, you're probably not using it as a desktop in the first place, probably for hosting something. Or even if you do use it for a desktop which I do on my laptop, it has a better GUI if you use a KDE of GNU one with compiz, and you can also dual boot it with Windows. (Also better support for "emulating" Windows, note I use "emulating" because Wine/compiz are not emulators, but there is better support for it. I never understood the point of bootcamp, all the thing bloody does is partition your hard drive. Now this isn't a debate between Linux and Macs, but it's proving how useless a Mac is. It's either you run Windows or a distro of Linux. (Maybe freebsd or UNIX(not free))

Now if you are going to say it's to get away from the PC BSODs and viruses, you are a dolt. Why? Windows hardly ever BSODs, the reason Win95/98/ME bsod'd all the time is because of the way the drivers talked to the OS, and the drivers were almost always poorly written, Windows NT 4.0 changed that, and that's why Windows 2000, xp, Vista, and 7 are all based on the great NT 4.0. About viruses, get avast, you are safe. Macs are less secure than Windows to being hacked, there was that hacking competition a few years ago, Mac went first, then Windows, and Linux never got rooted. There are just less viruses on Macs, which will change; so buy a pc.

Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts

I'm having the same problem too (And I don't know alot about Computers)

I'm going to be doing a Geology based coarse at Aberdeen University (I've no idea what OS the campus computers are going to be running on though it will be one of my first enquiries saying as im probably going to need the library computers for printing etc.) does Word work on a Mac? or is there anything similar available for macs? And would it be easy to convert a file from this into a file type functional with Microsoft word?

I do however want a LaptopAble to play Empire: Total war (Which I think needs a 256mb shader? it's the only game im going to be running on it so it's not a massive part of decision making) I was Jw does anyone know if it only runs on windows or will it work on a mac too?

muff07
Given your questions and the fact that Empire: Total War is fairly resource-intensive, I'd say you'd be better off with a Windows-based machine. If you can afford around $1700, the ASUS G51Vx -A1 comes with a quad-core CPU (handy for strategy games), GTX 260M graphics (just about the best you can get), 4GB of RAM, and a healthy 640GB worth of storage. Battery life probably won't be all that great though, so I'd definitely pick up a spare battery for a full day of classes. It is a bit bulky though, and between that and the battery life you might want to consider something else. Any laptop with a 9600M based graphics chip should suffice for your needs.
Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts
[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"] The thing is, why? If you want a UNIX system, run Linux, it's free(open source), more secure, and better. Sure it's not as user friendly as Windows or Mac on mostly ever distrobution, but Macs are just so incredibly useless. My question is whyyyyyyyyyyyyy, why do you want to be separated from the pc? Why do you not want to be able to share the same programs? Why do you want to deal with your own seperate problems that PC tech's can't help? LInux is not like that, because there is a reason you're using it, you're probably not using it as a desktop in the first place, probably for hosting something. Or even if you do use it for a desktop which I do on my laptop, it has a better GUI if you use a KDE of GNU one with compiz, and you can also dual boot it with Windows. (Also better support for "emulating" Windows, note I use "emulating" because Wine/compiz are not emulators, but there is better support for it. I never understood the point of bootcamp, all the thing bloody does is partition your hard drive. Now this isn't a debate between Linux and Macs, but it's proving how useless a Mac is. It's either you run Windows or a distro of Linux. (Maybe freebsd or UNIX(not free))

Why was that reply directed at me?
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
Accidently quoted, sorry.
Avatar image for muff07
muff07

945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 muff07
Member since 2007 • 945 Posts

[QUOTE="muff07"]

I'm having the same problem too (And I don't know alot about Computers)

I'm going to be doing a Geology based coarse at Aberdeen University (I've no idea what OS the campus computers are going to be running on though it will be one of my first enquiries saying as im probably going to need the library computers for printing etc.) does Word work on a Mac? or is there anything similar available for macs? And would it be easy to convert a file from this into a file type functional with Microsoft word?

I do however want a LaptopAble to play Empire: Total war (Which I think needs a 256mb shader? it's the only game im going to be running on it so it's not a massive part of decision making) I was Jw does anyone know if it only runs on windows or will it work on a mac too?

RayvinAzn

Given your questions and the fact that Empire: Total War is fairly resource-intensive, I'd say you'd be better off with a Windows-based machine. If you can afford around $1700, the ASUS G51Vx -A1 comes with a quad-core CPU (handy for strategy games), GTX 260M graphics (just about the best you can get), 4GB of RAM, and a healthy 640GB worth of storage. Battery life probably won't be all that great though, so I'd definitely pick up a spare battery for a full day of classes. It is a bit bulky though, and between that and the battery life you might want to consider something else. Any laptop with a 9600M based graphics chip should suffice for your needs.

I've around1000 Pounds. But I was hoping to get a Mp3 player or Ipod (Because Ineed something to do on the bus trip and I'l be to skint to buy one when I get there)with that aswell so say 850 pounds.

I'd rather have a Laptop I can actually use on a day to day basis and for my course than something I'm only going to play one game on. It's just I noticed that on all the covers for Empire total war (Or at least the PAL box-art)It says Games for Windows which gives me the impression it wornt work on a mac at all. Is that right?

Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts
You can run Windows on a Mac, but for one game it really seems pointless.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#30 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

[QUOTE="RayvinAzn"][QUOTE="muff07"]

I'm having the same problem too (And I don't know alot about Computers)

I'm going to be doing a Geology based coarse at Aberdeen University (I've no idea what OS the campus computers are going to be running on though it will be one of my first enquiries saying as im probably going to need the library computers for printing etc.) does Word work on a Mac? or is there anything similar available for macs? And would it be easy to convert a file from this into a file type functional with Microsoft word?

I do however want a LaptopAble to play Empire: Total war (Which I think needs a 256mb shader? it's the only game im going to be running on it so it's not a massive part of decision making) I was Jw does anyone know if it only runs on windows or will it work on a mac too?

muff07

Given your questions and the fact that Empire: Total War is fairly resource-intensive, I'd say you'd be better off with a Windows-based machine. If you can afford around $1700, the ASUS G51Vx -A1 comes with a quad-core CPU (handy for strategy games), GTX 260M graphics (just about the best you can get), 4GB of RAM, and a healthy 640GB worth of storage. Battery life probably won't be all that great though, so I'd definitely pick up a spare battery for a full day of classes. It is a bit bulky though, and between that and the battery life you might want to consider something else. Any laptop with a 9600M based graphics chip should suffice for your needs.

I've around1000 Pounds. But I was hoping to get a Mp3 player or Ipod (Because Ineed something to do on the bus trip and I'l be to skint to buy one when I get there)with that aswell so say 850 pounds.

I'd rather have a Laptop I can actually use on a day to day basis and for my course than something I'm only going to play one game on. It's just I noticed that on all the covers for Empire total war (Or at least the PAL box-art)It says Games for Windows which gives me the impression it wornt work on a mac at all. Is that right?

You can also run Mac on a PC... I'm not sure on the legality of the issue.
Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts
[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"] You can also run Mac on a PC... I'm not sure on the legality of the issue.

As long as you have an Intel processor and specific GPU, yes. And I believe it is still illegal.
Avatar image for Sporknife
Sporknife

403

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Sporknife
Member since 2009 • 403 Posts

You say you need good word processing? pc, no question

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"][QUOTE="muff07"]

Given your questions and the fact that Empire: Total War is fairly resource-intensive, I'd say you'd be better off with a Windows-based machine. If you can afford around $1700, the ASUS G51Vx -A1 comes with a quad-core CPU (handy for strategy games), GTX 260M graphics (just about the best you can get), 4GB of RAM, and a healthy 640GB worth of storage. Battery life probably won't be all that great though, so I'd definitely pick up a spare battery for a full day of classes. It is a bit bulky though, and between that and the battery life you might want to consider something else. Any laptop with a 9600M based graphics chip should suffice for your needs.RayvinAzn

I've around1000 Pounds. But I was hoping to get a Mp3 player or Ipod (Because Ineed something to do on the bus trip and I'l be to skint to buy one when I get there)with that aswell so say 850 pounds.

I'd rather have a Laptop I can actually use on a day to day basis and for my course than something I'm only going to play one game on. It's just I noticed that on all the covers for Empire total war (Or at least the PAL box-art)It says Games for Windows which gives me the impression it wornt work on a mac at all. Is that right?

You can also run Mac on a PC... I'm not sure on the legality of the issue.

Yeah, they call that Hackintosh for a reason, it's strictly against Apple's EULA. More and more computers (especially laptops from Dell) are starting to ship with EFI's making the process a no brainer with perfect compatibility for the most part.
Avatar image for Sporknife
Sporknife

403

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Sporknife
Member since 2009 • 403 Posts

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"] You can also run Mac on a PC... I'm not sure on the legality of the issue.RayvinAzn
As long as you have an Intel processor and specific GPU, yes. And I believe it is still illegal.

If you go the hackintosh route you can also use an amd cpu, im not sure about gpus.

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts

[QUOTE="RayvinAzn"][QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"] You can also run Mac on a PC... I'm not sure on the legality of the issue.Sporknife

As long as you have an Intel processor and specific GPU, yes. And I believe it is still illegal.

If you go the hackintosh route you can also use an amd cpu, im not sure about gpus.

Yeah I think there are only so many drivers available for certain GPUs available on MAC. You can use any CPU as long as it's x86 and the EFI on the board supports it.
Avatar image for samuraiguns
samuraiguns

11588

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 samuraiguns
Member since 2005 • 11588 Posts
[QUOTE="muff07"]

[QUOTE="RayvinAzn"] Given your questions and the fact that Empire: Total War is fairly resource-intensive, I'd say you'd be better off with a Windows-based machine. If you can afford around $1700, the ASUS G51Vx -A1 comes with a quad-core CPU (handy for strategy games), GTX 260M graphics (just about the best you can get), 4GB of RAM, and a healthy 640GB worth of storage. Battery life probably won't be all that great though, so I'd definitely pick up a spare battery for a full day of classes. It is a bit bulky though, and between that and the battery life you might want to consider something else. Any laptop with a 9600M based graphics chip should suffice for your needs.JigglyWiggly_

I've around1000 Pounds. But I was hoping to get a Mp3 player or Ipod (Because Ineed something to do on the bus trip and I'l be to skint to buy one when I get there)with that aswell so say 850 pounds.

I'd rather have a Laptop I can actually use on a day to day basis and for my course than something I'm only going to play one game on. It's just I noticed that on all the covers for Empire total war (Or at least the PAL box-art)It says Games for Windows which gives me the impression it wornt work on a mac at all. Is that right?

You can also run Mac on a PC... I'm not sure on the legality of the issue.

Hackintosh? Unfortunately, AMD users cant use it because it only works on Intel CPU's....:(
Avatar image for death1505921
death1505921

5260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 death1505921
Member since 2004 • 5260 Posts
Highly portable laptop easily. They're small, lightweight, decent battery and have full sized keyboards. You don't get gimped on software support and don't look like a tool for buying into over-priced stuff. Macs are very expensive with very little difference. They look nice, but that's debatble, they have the best build quality no doupt, and great battery life, but the battery life on laptops isn't that bad either.
Avatar image for NSR34GTR
NSR34GTR

13179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 NSR34GTR
Member since 2007 • 13179 Posts
get a pc. i made the mistake of getting a mac
Avatar image for SgtMoreless
SgtMoreless

311

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 SgtMoreless
Member since 2009 • 311 Posts

[QUOTE="SgtMoreless"]

PC.

More support. Plus, MAC now uses parts in PCs in there MACS. Same parts, but more expensive? Macs were better at video editing/drawing only 5 or 6 years ago. Dont listen to anyone who tells you different. The only reason they were better was because of the LCD screens being better quality, so you could see your images in more detail. Load Photoshop on a Mac, then load it on a PC. They run the same.

My friend bought a 1100 dollar Mac laptop (2 months ago) and cant play COD 5 in bootcamp (without heavy lag). He also has to turn down all his game settings. I have a laptop that is 1100 dollars and play Crysis on medium to high settings. He has to play on the lowest settings and STILL lags like hell.

He also uses bootcamp more than OS X (or whatever it's called)

RayvinAzn

Seriously? Apples LCD screens have NEVER been of "better" quality. They have been of fairly average quality given their price, but considering some of the professional screens on the market from companies like Eizo, NEC, and a few others, Apple's screens are mediocre (but cheap). Apple computers are similar to every other component in your PC in that it's not all about marketable BS. If you believe Apple computers are crap then you should also believe that a 3.73GHz Pentium D is the fastest processor on the market, a $100 Apevia 1kw power supply is better than a $150 Corsair 850w power supply, a 1GB 9500GT is better than an HD4850 512MB, and a 2TB hard drive is faster than a 128GB SSD. In almost every segment of PC hardware except possibly RAM, the important specs aren't the easily marketable ones, they're the things that aren't seen to most users. Not to mention the fact that you have to look at what you're going to be DOING with your hardware. If your friend got a Macbook to play games and run Windows, he's a moron. That doesn't make the Macbook a bad machine (I notice you didn't compare screen quality, build quality, battery life, or any number of important things in your assessment), it just means it's not built to play games (nor is any laptop really, they're a complete waste of money compared to a desktop when it comes to that).

My point was that I bought a pc laptop (barebones) for the same price as his MAC. However, my laptop is almost twice as fast, because I hand picked all the parts and built it myself.

About the hardware: MACs are now using generic hardware that Dell and HP use in their computers. Apple used to build all their parts specifically for apple computers. (from what I understood) So, MACs now can break down just as much as a regular PC. (still, apples broke down just as much as pcs when they used their parts)

Screen quality 5 or 6 years ago? Im pretty sure MACs had better quality back then. Now they are pretty even when comparing PC and MAC.

My friend bought it because he wanted to be different or cool. This alone pisses me off.

Avatar image for kemar7856
kemar7856

11783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#40 kemar7856
Member since 2004 • 11783 Posts

i'm a pc user but u can always put windows on your mac

Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts

My point was that I bought a pc laptop (barebones) for the same price as his MAC. However, my laptop is almost twice as fast, because I hand picked all the parts and built it myself.

About the hardware: MACs are now using generic hardware that Dell and HP use in their computers. Apple used to build all their parts specifically for apple computers. (from what I understood) So, MACs now can break down just as much as a regular PC. (still, apples broke down just as much as pcs when they used their parts)

Screen quality 5 or 6 years ago? Im pretty sure MACs had better quality back then. Now they are pretty even when comparing PC and MAC.

My friend bought it because he wanted to be different or cool. This alone pisses me off.

SgtMoreless
Even the fastest laptop pales in comparison to a desktop in the same price range. If you want speed, get a desktop machine, a laptop is no substitute. As for your laptop being faster, that's great - but what are you doing with all that speed? Or more importantly, what is the thread creator going to do with it? He's not gaming, so the integrated 9400M in the Macbook Pro is more than enough. He wants battery life, and OSX gets about 30% better battery life than Windows on the same hardware. Not having to carry around a spare battery for a day of classes is worth quite a bit I'd say. You're also getting an illuminated keyboard, high-quality screen (there are better on the market, but they're certainly better than the average screen you'll find, especially if you're going cheaper), and great customer service. Hardware speed isn't everything, especially when it's not going to be used much. And Apple's hardware may be Intel-based, but it's anything but generic (Apple never made their own hardware, the PowerPC architecture they used to have was made by IBM). All the boards have to be specially built and loaded with UEFI instead of a standard BIOS, and have to fit in with Apple's requirements. Apple's QC is better than most though, so fewer rotten apples will actually ship unlike with many other companies. DOAs on Apple machines are still much lower than any other major system builder, so they must be doing something right. As for screen quality, even back in those days companies like NEC and Eizo had better screens for professional use. Granted, we're talking $1000+ for 20" screens, but there were better models, just not for general consumer use. And I agree that someone that buys Apple to be different or cool is stupid. Buying a Macbook because it has a sleek, proprietary OS, good build quality, great customer support, exceptional battery life, and will do everything you want it to makes perfect sense to me. We all splurge somewhere - some of us have overkill power supplies, some of us have dual-GPU setups, some of us have dual 24" monitors, some of us have all-aluminum cases, some have liquid-cooling loops, etc. Just to show you this in terms you might understand, there are two people with similar setups: Core 2 Quad processors, 4GB of RAM, HD4800 series graphics cards, 1TB of drive space, etc. One of them runs his setup in a bone stock Antec NSK series case with included power supply, stock cooling on everything, an old membrane-dome Compaq keyboard, and 3 year old 19" TN monitor. The other guy runs his setup in a Lian-Li case, Thermalright CPU and GPU cooling, Corsair power supply, a mechanical Filco keyboard, and a nice 19" widescreen VA panel. On paper, their rigs are pretty much identical. The devil is in the details however, and most of us here are more likely to be impressed with the second setup than the first.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts

The thing is, why? If you want a UNIX system, run Linux, it's free(open source), more secure, and better. Sure it's not as user friendly as Windows or Mac on mostly ever distrobution, but Macs are just so incredibly useless. My question is whyyyyyyyyyyyyy, why do you want to be separated from the pc? Why do you not want to be able to share the same programs? Why do you want to deal with your own seperate problems that PC tech's can't help? LInux is not like that, because there is a reason you're using it, you're probably not using it as a desktop in the first place, probably for hosting something. Or even if you do use it for a desktop which I do on my laptop, it has a better GUI if you use a KDE of GNU one with compiz, and you can also dual boot it with Windows. (Also better support for "emulating" Windows, note I use "emulating" because Wine/compiz are not emulators, but there is better support for it. I never understood the point of bootcamp, all the thing bloody does is partition your hard drive. Now this isn't a debate between Linux and Macs, but it's proving how useless a Mac is. It's either you run Windows or a distro of Linux. (Maybe freebsd or UNIX(not free))

Now if you are going to say it's to get away from the PC BSODs and viruses, you are a dolt. Why? Windows hardly ever BSODs, the reason Win95/98/ME bsod'd all the time is because of the way the drivers talked to the OS, and the drivers were almost always poorly written, Windows NT 4.0 changed that, and that's why Windows 2000, xp, Vista, and 7 are all based on the great NT 4.0. About viruses, get avast, you are safe. Macs are less secure than Windows to being hacked, there was that hacking competition a few years ago, Mac went first, then Windows, and Linux never got rooted. There are just less viruses on Macs, which will change; so buy a pc.

JigglyWiggly_
macs are far from useless but they don't offer much over pc except final cut pro which is a big one on the video editing side. windows gives you much better value and tend to have less lockups on average. The imacs at uni can hardly run firefox without lockups while it could be a server issue all the non mac pros tend to be painfully slow.
Avatar image for NamelessPlayer
NamelessPlayer

7729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 NamelessPlayer
Member since 2004 • 7729 Posts
Macs tend to "just work" since the hardware and software are tightly woven together, tend to have long battery life, and FireWire Target Disk Mode can come in handy if something's really screwed up and you have access to another FireWire-equipped Mac. (Basically, it turns your Mac into an external FireWire drive enclosure so you can access its hard drive and optical drive from another computer. It also works on PCs with FireWire, but Windows needs special software in order to read the HFS+ file system you find on Mac hard drives.) However, the main issue I see with Macs and students: there are no tablet Macs. Tablet PC + OneNote = godsend for students. ESPECIALLY in math courses and other subjects which have information that is NOT just plain text you can easily punch out en masse with a keyboard. Oh, and for the record, most Tablet PCs nowadays look like small laptops whose screens swivel around and fold flat to form a makeshift slate. You do NOT have to give up the keyboard. (Now, if I could just have it all...the Axiotron ModBooks fail in that, unlike my old HP TC1100 and most Motion tablets, there is no well-integrated detachable keyboard. Plus, they're EXPENSIVE.)
Avatar image for CStheGreat
CStheGreat

705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 CStheGreat
Member since 2008 • 705 Posts

I've been a PC guy all of my life and a huge "hater" of Macs for some time. However, after working at Best Buy in the computer section, I would definitely go with a Mac instead of a PC. The battery life, the overall build quality, the power, the ease of use of Macs trump anything PC's have to offer. You get what you pay for.