Massive Steam updates coming soon!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for orangeillini14
orangeillini14

10608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#1 orangeillini14
Member since 2004 • 10608 Posts

http://www.totalgamerzone.com/story-482-Massive-Steam-Updates-Coming-Soon.html

Is this awesome or what?! :D I can't wait to see what else they have planned. :)

Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts
very nice.
Avatar image for Doom_HellKnight
Doom_HellKnight

12217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 Doom_HellKnight
Member since 2005 • 12217 Posts
Indeed, very nice.
Avatar image for DarKre
DarKre

9529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DarKre
Member since 2003 • 9529 Posts
Looks like they are going the route of Xbox Live....only free.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

Great things liek this make me shake my head at the people who claim that Steam is complete crap..

Avatar image for sircyrus
sircyrus

6358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 sircyrus
Member since 2003 • 6358 Posts

Looks like they are going the route of Xbox Live....only free.DarKre
Wouldn't it be beautiful if Steam ends up standing up for the PC gaming crowd and forces Microsoft togive Lifefree for PC.

Of course MS would never do that, but just once I'd like to see them forced to come hat-in-hand and admit they were wrong in how they're approaching PC gaming.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60752 Posts
Ive been saying this for a while, but I will say it again: programs like Steam are the key to saving the future of PC gaming. Not only does it allow a dev to bypass the middleman (publisher), but it comes with all sorts of good features. I also cant imagine it costing that much to develop, or at the most a fraction of what it costs to physically reproduce, distribute, and put on shelves.
Avatar image for m14a3l
m14a3l

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 m14a3l
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

You all seem to like flaming M$ for what they did with Windows Live... so I'm gonna do the same thing :P.

You just can't make someone pay 2 minimal salaries for a game (I'm in Bulgaria) and then ask them to pay extra 1 minimal salary per year just to get online play. This is simply ridiculous. :evil: Online gaming is meant to be free of charge (except MMORPGs).

I'm going to stick with Steam, as I always have. And with these new additions, I'd be running around the block screaming like a madman from happyness :P. And it's free!

Halo 2 was my most important game on the calendar for this year, but when I saw what it is (with LIVE and such paid crap), it convinced me to stay with Steam (and Battlefield 2 of course).

Avatar image for Ein-7919
Ein-7919

3490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Ein-7919
Member since 2003 • 3490 Posts

You just can't make someone pay 2 minimal salaries for a game (I'm in Bulgaria) and then ask them to pay extra 1 minimal salary per year just to get online play. This is simply ridiculous. :evil: Online gaming is meant to be free of charge (except MMORPGs).

m14a3l

This is a common misperception regarding Live for Windows. Live for Windows comes in two services: Gold and Silver. The Gold service costs $50/year to use (unless you already have an XBox Live Gold account). Silver is free and allows you to play online just like we always have been able to do...except now, it has the Live for Windows name stamped on it. Now, the primary difference between Gold and Silver is that Gold has accomplishments, matchmaking, and cross-platform online gaming (for the games that have/will have it).

So yes, online gaming is meant to be free of charge (except for MMOs)...and it is free of charge even under Live for Windows.

Avatar image for sircyrus
sircyrus

6358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 sircyrus
Member since 2003 • 6358 Posts

So yes, online gaming is meant to be free of charge (except for MMOs)...and it is free of charge even under Live for Windows. Ein-7919
It's needlessly limited through the Silver/Gold tier subscriptions. Therefore it isn't free, it simply offers a limited version for free. There's a difference there, even though I personally wouldn't want to play cross-platform matches. To be completely honest I wouldn't want to play a multiplatform game regardless of if it used Live or not.

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts

[QUOTE="Ein-7919"]So yes, online gaming is meant to be free of charge (except for MMOs)...and it is free of charge even under Live for Windows. sircyrus

It's needlessly limited through the Silver/Gold tier subscriptions. Therefore it isn't free, it simply offers a limited version for free. There's a difference there, even though I personally wouldn't want to play cross-platform matches. To be completely honest I wouldn't want to play a multiplatform game regardless of if it used Live or not.

That it's limited isn't in itself automatically a bad thing, because the things that ARE limited in Live just plain don't exist in Steam right now. So you have free with a given featureset, vs. free with nearly the exact same feature set + not free with more features. What's so bad about the free vs. free? People are doing the same thing complaining about Hellgate: London, completely ignoring that the free online multiplayer completely annihilates the online action-RPGs we've had since D2. To give a vaguely roundabout analogy, it's like someone complaining about buying a BMW for $30k, because they're pissed off that BMW offers a betterversion of the same model for $40k. So, in response, they go buy a Daewoo for $30k, completely ignoring whether it's better or worse for their needs than the $30k bimmer. That said, the new Steam additions are completely and totally awesome. :D I'm guessing the friends lists probably have been working perfectly for a while now, then? I remember on launch sort of giving up on that part. But I use Steam for almost all the games I can get that are available there for sale, unless they're like 2x the price or something. Which happens. -_-
Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#12 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts
yeah nice move, more customisation can't be bad. Steam is going to keep evolving too with the constant additoin of more games and profits. It's at the point now where it's not a concept, it's the real deal and publishers have jumped on board.