Medal of Honor--#1 & #2 on Leaderboards use Artificial Aiming hack

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Expatriate
Expatriate

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Expatriate
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

This is unbelievable. The number 1 and number 2 players on the PC Leaderboards for Medal of Honor are hackers--and proud of it--they use the AA clan tag--Artificial Aiming is the hack--IN YOUR FACE EA-- and EA does nothing to remove them or other players using it, like Robogear.

http://www.medalofhonor.com/stats/leaderboard

Player ScoreScore SkillSkill KillsKills TimeTime
1 PowerRager 2240030 11704 69045 120:13:51
2 badkiller100 2234080 8847 44602 88:27:23

http://www.artificialaiming.net/forum/

"This hack is just as powerful as the BFBC2 hack with a deadly accurate Aimbot with trajectory aiming, 3D radar, 2D radar, Warning system, NoSpread, NoShake, NoRecoil, ... and last but not least a Teleportation hack!"


AA clan tag screenshot

Avatar image for da_chub
da_chub

3140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#2 da_chub
Member since 2007 • 3140 Posts
its ok...im sure they are happy in their sad little lives as losers who think its fun to ruin games for everyone else.
Avatar image for Crimsader
Crimsader

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Crimsader
Member since 2008 • 11672 Posts
This is pathetic.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#4 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Who cares its moh. Its not like the hit detection ever worked properly.
Avatar image for Expatriate
Expatriate

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Expatriate
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

It's weird, like the people at EA can't do anything.

If something like that happened at my company, I'd immediately delete the accounts.

They didn't even reply to my post in the Medal of Honor forums--they just locked the thread, as if posting info about a hacker was the crime and not the hacking itself.

And how ridiculous can it get--their own leaderboards advertising the hackers.

Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts
It's not like anyone wastes their time playing MoH. Besides jakes on them for being failures at life and having to cheat at a videogame.
Avatar image for Expatriate
Expatriate

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Expatriate
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

its ok...im sure they are happy in their sad little lives as losers who think its fun to ruin games for everyone else.da_chub

Or they're the programmers behind the Artificial Aiming hack, and laughing like crazy at the free advertising from EA putting them at the top of the leaderboards.

Hackers suck, but EA is really the guilty party here.

Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#8 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts
It's not like anyone wastes their time playing MoH. Besides jakes on them for being failures at life and having to cheat at a videogame.Remmib
Heeeey that's not nice ;) But yeah, they pretty much dropped support for this game it looks like. I think DICE is busy working on BF3 and doesn't really care about MoH at this point. There's only ever about 10k people on at a time across all three platforms. A lot of PS3 players for whatever reason...
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#9 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
Pathetic. If you need to use hacks and cheat to "win" in this game then you really have no skill. Medal of Honor has next to no recoil. You can shoot down an opponent from across the map with any gun. Gun mechanics are far from authentic. EA publishes some awesome games like Mass Effect, Dead Space, and BFBC2, but they are terrible in customer and game support.
Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#10 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts
Pathetic. If you need to use hacks and cheat to "win" in this game then you really have no skill. Medal of Honor has next to no recoil. You can shoot down an opponent from across the map with any gun. Gun mechanics are far from authentic. EA publishes some awesome games like Mass Effect, Dead Space, and BFBC2, but they are terrible in customer and game support. Elann2008
Wellll guns have a good bit more recoil now than they did at launch, but yeah they are still pretty accurate.
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
People still play MoH online? Within the first 10 minutes of playing it I could tell it sucked.
Avatar image for GuitarPAaron
GuitarPAaron

1368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#12 GuitarPAaron
Member since 2006 • 1368 Posts

I played against power rager the other day. I could tell he was botting. What a little *****.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#13 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

i just love how people whine over a medicore game like this.. i swear no one did this with sniper: ghost warrior or combat zone.. or fear combat.. no one cried like this..

im sorry jst.. wow..

Avatar image for darkfox101
darkfox101

7055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 darkfox101
Member since 2004 • 7055 Posts
I like how no one mentions the fact he linked a hacking site :|
Avatar image for Expatriate
Expatriate

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Expatriate
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

I like how no one mentions the fact he linked a hacking site :|darkfox101

It's so people can see how real it is.

badkiller100 even uses the same name there--pretty funny--thumbing his nose at EA, and still they do nothing.

badkiller100 ArtificialAiming VIP

Just search on badkiller100 and artificialaiming.net and you'll see his posts in the forum.

Avatar image for Nick3306
Nick3306

3429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Nick3306
Member since 2007 • 3429 Posts
Its ok, once they are done hacking they are reminded of their pathetic lives and know they will probably live in their parents basements for the rest of their lives.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#17 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Don't worry, this has been happening on leaderboards since online gameing.

People really think they need to hack to be good. They just don't realize how pointless it is.

Avatar image for da_chub
da_chub

3140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#18 da_chub
Member since 2007 • 3140 Posts

[QUOTE="da_chub"]its ok...im sure they are happy in their sad little lives as losers who think its fun to ruin games for everyone else.Expatriate

Or they're the programmers behind the Artificial Aiming hack, and laughing like crazy at the free advertising from EA putting them at the top of the leaderboards.

Hackers suck, but EA is really the guilty party here.

hackers suck, but ea is really the guility one??? so if i rob a bank, its the banks fault for not having a good enough security??? EA might have some blame, but it all falls back on the criminals. if they didnt feel the need to cheat/steal (or whatever) then there would be no need for this. But that isnt the world we live in, people are going to exploit anything they can and its the innocent who pay the ultimate price
Avatar image for oldskooler79
oldskooler79

1632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 oldskooler79
Member since 2004 • 1632 Posts

its the innocent who pay the ultimate priceda_chub

Nobody is innocent.. when you get down to it. Something to think about.

Avatar image for ButchDeadlift
ButchDeadlift

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 ButchDeadlift
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
Good for them. I hope it validates their existence to cheat in order to be up on a video game ranking board. Me, I enjoy PLAYING the game, and wherever I land that's good enough for me.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#21 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="Elann2008"]Pathetic. If you need to use hacks and cheat to "win" in this game then you really have no skill. Medal of Honor has next to no recoil. You can shoot down an opponent from across the map with any gun. Gun mechanics are far from authentic. EA publishes some awesome games like Mass Effect, Dead Space, and BFBC2, but they are terrible in customer and game support. MyopicCanadian
Wellll guns have a good bit more recoil now than they did at launch, but yeah they are still pretty accurate.

Well, that's good that they touched up on the recoil a bit.
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

The guns on MoH have more recoil and feel much better than the guns in CoD, too bad that is the only thing MoH has over CoD multiplayer wise, and that is pretty depressing because CoD sucks.

Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#23 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts

The guns on MoH have more recoil and feel much better than the guns in CoD, too bad that is the only thing MoH has over CoD multiplayer wise, and that is pretty depressing because CoD sucks.

SF_KiLLaMaN
Which CoD, Blops? MoH has a few things going for it over that game. I like the map design much more.. Blops maps are designed so you can run around like a madman everywhere with an SMG and always be in range of something. Forget quick-scoping, they pretty much eliminted snipers through map design. Combat Mission modes actually require some semblance of teamwork to complete, and the scorechain rewards are much more interesting than Blops' killstreaks. I like that you can select abilities that help your team, and the offensive abilities like the cruise missile are pretty badass. I got MoH as something to play a week or so before Blops came out, and I went right back to it after a few weeks of CoD. What a disappointment that game was...
Avatar image for Expatriate
Expatriate

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Expatriate
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

Good for them. I hope it validates their existence to cheat in order to be up on a video game ranking board. Me, I enjoy PLAYING the game, and wherever I land that's good enough for me.ButchDeadlift

Yep--since hackers make the leaderboards meaningless, that's the only attitude to take.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#25 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

The guns on MoH have more recoil and feel much better than the guns in CoD, too bad that is the only thing MoH has over CoD multiplayer wise, and that is pretty depressing because CoD sucks.

SF_KiLLaMaN
Eh no, no, just no. Even mw2 has more recoil. I dont know if they added MORE recoil on the new patches bust in the first patch, it was preety much the same as the begining. Cod does not suck, proof? EA did it much worse with moh.
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]

The guns on MoH have more recoil and feel much better than the guns in CoD, too bad that is the only thing MoH has over CoD multiplayer wise, and that is pretty depressing because CoD sucks.

dakan45

Eh no, no, just no. Even mw2 has more recoil. I dont know if they added MORE recoil on the new patches bust in the first patch, it was preety much the same as the begining. Cod does not suck, proof? EA did it much worse with moh.

No, they didn't. For one, MoH is way more balanced than CoD. Also, the story mode, although very short, is a hell of a lot better than any CoD game after CoD4. The killstreaks in MoH are actually good. and yes, there is more recoil in MoH than in any CoD game. I have both and have played both for periods of time. MoH is pretty much on par with any CoD game released after CoD4, but that's not saying much at all.

Proof CoD sucks? Just play the damn game and compare it to games that are actually good, like Bad Company 2.

Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#27 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]

The guns on MoH have more recoil and feel much better than the guns in CoD, too bad that is the only thing MoH has over CoD multiplayer wise, and that is pretty depressing because CoD sucks.

Eh no, no, just no. Even mw2 has more recoil. I dont know if they added MORE recoil on the new patches bust in the first patch, it was preety much the same as the begining. Cod does not suck, proof? EA did it much worse with moh.

Depends on the gun.. MW2 is all over the place. Something like the Tavor or FAL you actually need to work with, but the ACR or M4 is ridiculously accurate, much more so than MoH guns. Also they re-balanced the game a couple months ago, you may or may not have played that patch... increased the recoil of all guns, reduced hipfire accuracy, and decreased sniper damage. No more OHK's.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#28 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]

The guns on MoH have more recoil and feel much better than the guns in CoD, too bad that is the only thing MoH has over CoD multiplayer wise, and that is pretty depressing because CoD sucks.

SF_KiLLaMaN

Eh no, no, just no. Even mw2 has more recoil. I dont know if they added MORE recoil on the new patches bust in the first patch, it was preety much the same as the begining. Cod does not suck, proof? EA did it much worse with moh.

No, they didn't. For one, MoH is way more balanced than CoD. Also, the story mode, although very short, is a hell of a lot better than any CoD game after CoD4. The killstreaks in MoH are actually good. and yes, there is more recoil in MoH than in any CoD game. I have both and have played both for periods of time. MoH is pretty much on par with any CoD game released after CoD4, but that's not saying much at all.

Proof CoD sucks? Just play the damn game and compare it to games that are actually good, like Bad Company 2.

No no and no. Its not more balanced, the sniper class is very overpowered, is usefull in all ranges. The story is NOT better than cod. Atleast cod has a story, moh was generic as hell, there are no memorable characters or villians or plot twists or epic moments. Its utter boredom. Also you dont really do anything, you move, the game takes automaticly control and you go into airstrike mode. No control whatsoever. Hell the only thing that breaks the generic shooting gallery is grenades which are few in numbers. Atleat cod has flashbangs, c4s, predator missiles and a large variety of weapons in the campaign. Moh is the linearity of the linearity. Cod seems like an amazing game in comparison. Also cod has better scripting. The scripting in moh is crap. i dropped the m249 and i can no longer do covering fire so someone can get there and take out the mg nest. Cod would have provided another way to get past that part or atleast add a machinegun there. But moh didnt. So underthought. This proves that developers in cod actually spend time on what they do unlike moh that they rushed it out without caring at all. The killstreaks in moh are unimpressive crap and there is no recoil. Fn 2000 has clearly more recoil in mw2 than in moh. Also thats not proof cod sucks, because any cod> any battlefield. So pretty much, yeah when i play cod and bad company 2, bad company 2 sucks and cod is fun.
Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#29 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]

Eh no, no, just no. Even mw2 has more recoil. I dont know if they added MORE recoil on the new patches bust in the first patch, it was preety much the same as the begining. Cod does not suck, proof? EA did it much worse with moh.dakan45
No, they didn't. For one, MoH is way more balanced than CoD. Also, the story mode, although very short, is a hell of a lot better than any CoD game after CoD4. The killstreaks in MoH are actually good. and yes, there is more recoil in MoH than in any CoD game. I have both and have played both for periods of time. MoH is pretty much on par with any CoD game released after CoD4, but that's not saying much at all.

Proof CoD sucks? Just play the damn game and compare it to games that are actually good, like Bad Company 2.

No no and no. Its not more balanced, the sniper class is very overpowered, is usefull in all ranges. The story is NOT better than cod. Atleast cod has a story, moh was generic as hell, there are no memorable characters or villians or plot twists or epic moments. Its utter boredom. Also you dont really do anything, you move, the game takes automaticly control and you go into airstrike mode. No control whatsoever. Hell the only thing that breaks the generic shooting gallery is grenades which are few in numbers. Atleat cod has flashbangs, c4s, predator missiles and a large variety of weapons in the campaign. Moh is the linearity of the linearity. Cod seems like an amazing game in comparison. Also cod has better scripting. The scripting in moh is crap. i dropped the m249 and i can no longer do covering fire so someone can get there and take out the mg nest. Cod would have provided another way to get past that part or atleast add a machinegun there. But moh didnt. So underthought. This proves that developers in cod actually spend time on what they do unlike moh that they rushed it out without caring at all. The killstreaks in moh are unimpressive crap and there is no recoil. Fn 2000 has clearly more recoil in mw2 than in moh. Also thats not proof cod sucks, because any cod> any battlefield. So pretty much, yeah when i play cod and bad company 2, bad company 2 sucks and cod is fun.

I found the MoH campaign rather enjoyable. It's not realistic but it is steeped in realistic events, so you get a more authentic war feel instead of that total over-the-top CoD stuff. CoD games tend to be more like blockbuster action movies, whereas I'd put MoH has a military drama. It also has a great cover system in SP that's fun to use, and weapon sounds are fantastic. I get a real kick out of clearing a room in MoH that I never really get with any CoD. The scorechain rewards (read: killstreak rewards) are great. MW2's were pretty fun, but the ones in Blops are just boring. I like that you can help out your teammates with flak vests, ammo upgrades, ballistic protection, or blow them all up to high heaven. There are some scorechains that make a huge boom, namely the bombing run and cruise missile. They're damn fun to use. I'm also not sure I understand one of your points.. the scripting in MoH is crap because you dropped the gun you should've been using to suppress an MG nest? Were you unable to pick it back up? I know I encountered a few bugs through the SP campaign, so that wouldn't surprise me.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#30 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Well i found the story borring and the weapons meh. The killstreaks could be fun, if everyone didnt play with spawnkilling if you know what i mean. It did not overally felt much of a teamwork game. I think you understand the mg bug just fine. I had to use that mg to flank the nest but i dropped because i did not like it and i couldnt get past the mission, i had to restart the entire mission. Could would have give you the mg there. But in moh it was like "use your mg to supress the..." WAIT....what mg? I am not carring an mg.
Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#31 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts
Well i found the story borring and the weapons meh. The killstreaks could be fun, if everyone didnt play with spawnkilling if you know what i mean. It did not overally felt much of a teamwork game. I think you understand the mg bug just fine. I had to use that mg to flank the nest but i dropped because i did not like it and i couldnt get past the mission, i had to restart the entire mission. Could would have give you the mg there. But in moh it was like "use your mg to supress the..." WAIT....what mg? I am not carring an mg.dakan45
Are you sure they didn't give you another MG there? Because I might have dropped mine as well. Oh well, I plan to play through the campaign again so I'll know eventually. You don't really work together in team deathmatch, that's for sure.. but combat missions require a good deal of teamwork to be an effective team. Unfortunately that's also good and bad, because like BC2, if the other team is really good and yours is awful, it will be a painful experience.
Avatar image for kdawg88
kdawg88

2923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 kdawg88
Member since 2009 • 2923 Posts
Who cares its mohdakan45
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

Also thats not proof cod sucks, because any cod> any battlefield.dakan45
That's a joke, right? If not, you have to be the biggest CoD fanboy to claim such a ridicuouls thing.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#34 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="MyopicCanadian"] Are you sure they didn't give you another MG there? Because I might have dropped mine as well. Oh well, I plan to play through the campaign again so I'll know eventually. You don't really work together in team deathmatch, that's for sure.. but combat missions require a good deal of teamwork to be an effective team. Unfortunately that's also good and bad, because like BC2, if the other team is really good and yours is awful, it will be a painful experience.

200% sure. In combat missions, well i did not play them much. But its infested with campers. Seriously everyone just sits there and pop whoever tries to move forward. Felt kinda stupid, the game never moves on.

[QUOTE="dakan45"] Also thats not proof cod sucks, because any cod> any battlefield.SF_KiLLaMaN

That's a joke, right? If not, you have to be the biggest CoD fanboy to claim such a ridicuouls thing.

So personal opinion does not matter? If not, still ratings and sales are higher so yeah i am right. I might be the biggest cod fanboy, (cod4, mw2 and black ops that is. The rest were ok, nothing impressive) but you are the biggest cod hater so you gonna say that cod sucks at every occasion. ...and lets not start the recyclement theory again. Because battlefield games are most certainly recycled. Even bc2 was pretty much the same as bc1. Atlest i got a point, i dont like vehicles. Same reason i never played Onslaught in UT 2004. Just for the record, Battlefield is more generic than cod. Its just fps with classes and vehicles. Cod has a deeper upgrade and customization system with varied weapons and perks.
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="MyopicCanadian"] 200% sure. In combat missions, well i did not play them much. But its infested with campers. Seriously everyone just sits there and pop whoever tries to move forward. Felt kinda stupid, the game never moves on.

[QUOTE="dakan45"] Also thats not proof cod sucks, because any cod> any battlefield.SF_KiLLaMaN

That's a joke, right? If not, you have to be the biggest CoD fanboy to claim such a ridicuouls thing.

So personal opinion does not matter? If not, still ratings and sales are higher so yeah i am right. I might be the biggest cod fanboy, (cod4, mw2 and black ops that is. The rest were ok, nothing impressive) but you are the biggest cod hater so you gonna say that cod sucks at every occasion. ...and lets not start the recyclement theory again. Because battlefield games are most certainly recycled. Even bc2 was pretty much the same as bc1. Atlest i got a point, i dont like vehicles. Same reason i never played Onslaught in UT 2004. Just for the record, Battlefield is more generic than cod. Its just fps with classes and vehicles. Cod has a deeper upgrade and customization system with varied weapons and perks.

I have over 100 hours on CoD4, but I guess that doesn't matter since I'm the biggest CoD hater. Bad Company 2 does just about everything better than Call of Duty. It is a hell of a lot more balanced, got free map packs, knifing is better (a bit glitchy but it looks like a stab would actually kill you unlike in CoD) You can destroy buildings, vehicles add a whole new dimension to the game, the guns feel better, there are no stupid perks or ridiculous kill streaks. Also, DICE knows how to support their games. The Vietnam expansion pack is the same price as a Call of Duty map pack with 5 times the content. Call of Duty has better advertising, that's about it. and lol at you using sales and reviews to prove your opinion.
Avatar image for jwsoul
jwsoul

5472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#36 jwsoul
Member since 2005 • 5472 Posts

For once just once it would be nice to have a leader board that truly represents the best players.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#37 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Nope, vehicles are stupid, planting c4 in building and killing people gets old and annoying. Perks and killstreaks are not stupid and finally all weapons feel the freaking same. Hell its like they used the same animation all over.
Avatar image for tequilasunriser
tequilasunriser

6379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 tequilasunriser
Member since 2004 • 6379 Posts
Nope, vehicles are stupid, planting c4 in building and killing people gets old and annoying. Perks and killstreaks are not stupid and finally all weapons feel the freaking same. Hell its like they used the same animation all over.dakan45
That has to be a joke.
Avatar image for Expatriate
Expatriate

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 Expatriate
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]Nope, vehicles are stupid, planting c4 in building and killing people gets old and annoying. Perks and killstreaks are not stupid and finally all weapons feel the freaking same. Hell its like they used the same animation all over.tequilasunriser
That has to be a joke.

Or a paid blogger.

He knows nothing about moh since the latest patches. Sniper is basically useless, and there's plenty of recoil in the weapons.

But it's a stupid argument--most of us play moh, bc2 and cod -- each has it's own advantages and disadvantages -- I'm glad they're different.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#40 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="tequilasunriser"][QUOTE="dakan45"]Nope, vehicles are stupid, planting c4 in building and killing people gets old and annoying. Perks and killstreaks are not stupid and finally all weapons feel the freaking same. Hell its like they used the same animation all over.Expatriate

That has to be a joke.

Or a paid blogger.

He knows nothing about moh since the latest patches. Sniper is basically useless, and there's plenty of recoil in the weapons.

But it's a stupid argument--most of us play moh, bc2 and cod -- each has it's own advantages and disadvantages -- I'm glad they're different.

Not joke at all, many people have complained about it. Dont tell me you never complain about those random c4 explosions and the whole building goes down with you. I hope there wont be anything like it in Battlefied 3. As for moh, i cant speak for sniper class but there is hardly any siginificant diffirence in recoil.
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

[QUOTE="Expatriate"]

[QUOTE="tequilasunriser"] That has to be a joke.dakan45

Or a paid blogger.

He knows nothing about moh since the latest patches. Sniper is basically useless, and there's plenty of recoil in the weapons.

But it's a stupid argument--most of us play moh, bc2 and cod -- each has it's own advantages and disadvantages -- I'm glad they're different.

Not joke at all, many people have complained about it. Dont tell me you never complain about those random c4 explosions and the whole building goes down with you. I hope there wont be anything like it in Battlefied 3. As for moh, i cant speak for sniper class but there is hardly any siginificant diffirence in recoil.

You don't like that C4 can destroy a building? Are you serious? Also, all the weapons in BC2 feel different. Use the UMP, the AN-94, and then the M60. How can you honestly say they all feel the same? You have obviously not played the game for more than 20 minutes if you say all the weapons feel the same.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#42 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Are you seriously comparing an smg to a burst assault rifle and a machinegun? Also i am amazed that i spotted the complain about the overuse of c4 in the first days the game came out and now people forgot about it. If we gonna argue like that, might as well forget about it and never argue it about it again. You say cod sucks, i say bc2 sucks. Thats about it.
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
Are you seriously comparing an smg to a burst assault rifle and a machinegun? Also i am amazed that i spotted the complain about the overuse of c4 in the first days the game came out and now people forgot about it. If we gonna argue like that, might as well forget about it and never argue it about it again. You say cod sucks, i say bc2 sucks. Thats about it.dakan45
Except that you have no valid reason as to why you don't like the game.... Maybe if you would just say "I don't like the feel of the gameplay." Or, "I prefer smaller maps and player sizes," Then it would make sense. but saying that C4 blowing up a building is stupid ,is a weak reason, since it is realistic. Also, saying that all guns feel the same, which they don't, won't hold much weight either.
Avatar image for Expatriate
Expatriate

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 Expatriate
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

http://www.medalofhonor.com/stats/leaderboard

At least they're not getting any game play--no change in their times, but why does EA have to be so noob and leave them there?

1PowerRager22400301170469045120:13:512badkiller1002234080884744602

88:27:23

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#45 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"]Are you seriously comparing an smg to a burst assault rifle and a machinegun? Also i am amazed that i spotted the complain about the overuse of c4 in the first days the game came out and now people forgot about it. If we gonna argue like that, might as well forget about it and never argue it about it again. You say cod sucks, i say bc2 sucks. Thats about it.SF_KiLLaMaN
Except that you have no valid reason as to why you don't like the game.... Maybe if you would just say "I don't like the feel of the gameplay." Or, "I prefer smaller maps and player sizes," Then it would make sense. but saying that C4 blowing up a building is stupid ,is a weak reason, since it is realistic. Also, saying that all guns feel the same, which they don't, won't hold much weight either.

I think i have stated that i dont like vehicles and big maps. C4 stands just FINE. Since it makes many annoying moments that the whole building falls down and everyone dies unexpectedly. Also the weapons do feel the same, with some damage diffirence on he aug. All the other assault rifles feel the same. (Minus the g3 and an 94) Atleast mw2 has varied weapons like the uzi, the double shotgun or the p90. Weapons in bc2 are just like the pistols that have the same ammo capacity for the excuse of balance. They are so damn similar in order to be balanced. To me that does not hold because if thats dice's idea of balance which they also heavilly increased on moh, then counter strike is inbalanced.
Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#46 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts
[QUOTE="Expatriate"]

http://www.medalofhonor.com/stats/leaderboard

At least they're not getting any game play--no change in their times, but why does EA have to be so noob and leave them there?

1PowerRager22400301170469045120:13:512badkiller1002234080884744602

88:27:23

DICE has pretty much publically stated that they don't care about anything except BF3 at this point. http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/02/03/looking-ahead.aspx Which is a shame, because there are some really annoying bugs that need fixing in MoH.
Avatar image for murekkep
murekkep

761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#47 murekkep
Member since 2005 • 761 Posts
Sh*tty players to sh*tty game. Not surprised.
Avatar image for yourmajesty90
yourmajesty90

1420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 yourmajesty90
Member since 2006 • 1420 Posts
[QUOTE="MyopicCanadian"][QUOTE="Expatriate"]

http://www.medalofhonor.com/stats/leaderboard

At least they're not getting any game play--no change in their times, but why does EA have to be so noob and leave them there?

1PowerRager22400301170469045120:13:512badkiller1002234080884744602

88:27:23

DICE has pretty much publically stated that they don't care about anything except BF3 at this point. http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/02/03/looking-ahead.aspx Which is a shame, because there are some really annoying bugs that need fixing in MoH.

It's a shame they won't even consider about Mirror's Edge 2. Real shame.
Avatar image for Expatriate
Expatriate

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 Expatriate
Member since 2004 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="Expatriate"]

http://www.medalofhonor.com/stats/leaderboard

At least they're not getting any game play--no change in their times, but why does EA have to be so noob and leave them there?

1PowerRager22400301170469045120:13:512badkiller1002234080884744602

88:27:23

MyopicCanadian

DICE has pretty much publically stated that they don't care about anything except BF3 at this point. http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/02/03/looking-ahead.aspx Which is a shame, because there are some really annoying bugs that need fixing in MoH.

Yeah, I saw the Hitler rant video about it, lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPAWyUIyDsw

Avatar image for MyopicCanadian
MyopicCanadian

8345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#50 MyopicCanadian
Member since 2004 • 8345 Posts
[QUOTE="Expatriate"]

[QUOTE="MyopicCanadian"][QUOTE="Expatriate"]

http://www.medalofhonor.com/stats/leaderboard

At least they're not getting any game play--no change in their times, but why does EA have to be so noob and leave them there?

1PowerRager22400301170469045120:13:512badkiller1002234080884744602

88:27:23

DICE has pretty much publically stated that they don't care about anything except BF3 at this point. http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlefield_bad_company/archive/2011/02/03/looking-ahead.aspx Which is a shame, because there are some really annoying bugs that need fixing in MoH.

Yeah, I saw the Hitler rant video about it, lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPAWyUIyDsw

LOL. Hitler rant never gets old...