Metro 2033 has better graphics than crysis and warhead.

In DX10 very high settings it just looks superior to anything that an unmodded crysis or warhead can achieve in my opinion. I think people are being biased in not accpeting that it is simply superior as far as the eye candy is concerned. Sure it's not open world and the environments are not interactive but still I am not saying the game is a superior technological achievement but just that the sheer detail, textures and lightning is unmatched. I would say this game is graphics king.

I let a friend play metro in high settings and warhead in very high with high shaders and he also said that metro just looks better, hez not a PC gamer and had no previous experience with the games...

And Metro has even more eye candy when you slide the option to DirectX 11....

It's also a corridor shooter that was released years after Crysis.DanielDust

[QUOTE="DanielDust"]It's also a corridor shooter that was released years after Crysis.sakshamH

[QUOTE="sakshamH"][QUOTE="DanielDust"]It's also a corridor shooter that was released years after Crysis.Animatronic64

Metro has more high-res textures, indoor areas look better. Crysis has better character models, ourdoor areas look much better and it runs better than Metro

In DX10 very high settings it just looks superior to anything that an unmodded crysis or warhead can achieve in my opinion. I think people are being biased in not accpeting that it is simply superior as far as the eye candy is concerned. Sure it's not open world and the environments are not interactive but still I am not saying the game is a superior technological achievement but just that the sheer detail, textures and lightning is unmatched. I would say this game is graphics king.

I let a friend play metro in high settings and warhead in very high with high shaders and he also said that metro just looks better, hez not a PC gamer and had no previous experience with the games...

Gambler_3

Metro 2033 has superior textures and indoor lightning (dozens of real time light sources at time), but his engine is uncapable to run those light sources in open areas as CryEngine 2 is. The game has also mediocre A.I. and bad animations, so overall Crysis/Warhead is still superior to me (and even ArmA II).

But if you still want to compare corridor shooters against corridor shooters the wait 4 months, Crysis 2 will be a corridor shooter that will put Metro 2033 indoors to shame (and probably any other shooter until at least Doom 4).

I would agree with you in terms of lighting, and dark, indoor settings. However outdoors, Metro 2033 pales in comparison.