You can try Supreme Commander or Company of Heroes. CassiusGaius
Supreme Commander is more CPU intensive than GPU intensive, you can max it out on an X1900 (What I have). I would say Company of Heroes is more graphically demanding, or Oblivion, also try DiRT.
is flight sim majorly demanding in DX9 mode or does it only start to choke up once you install the DX10 patch? jsut curiousgtarmanrob
Flight Simulator X has always brought machines to their knees, regardless of what API it uses. Even overclocked quad-core systems with dual 8800GTX cards and 4GB of RAM can't max out that game smoothly.
[QUOTE="CassiusGaius"]You can try Supreme Commander or Company of Heroes. Sandro909
I've maxed out CoH on a 7600GT, 1GB RAM, and P4 3Ghz... it isn't very demanding at all.
Eh, its pretty demanding. I have a e4400@ 2.66 / 2 gigs of Patriot / 8800 GTS 320 factory o'ced. I have problems running it at 1400 * 900 with 4 x AA and high settings not ultra. I actually keep the physics/shadows/reflections low and its iffy.
Thought it runs at like 1380 * XXX flawlessly. Just when I hit the next resolution the fps is not to my liking.
[QUOTE="gtarmanrob"]is flight sim majorly demanding in DX9 mode or does it only start to choke up once you install the DX10 patch? jsut curiousRayvinAzn
Flight Simulator X has always brought machines to their knees, regardless of what API it uses. Even overclocked quad-core systems with dual 8800GTX cards and 4GB of RAM can't max out that game smoothly.
lol, really? thats insane haha.
theres this new game released on Steam that looks really graphically demanding. Prolly more than flight sim..forget its name...Commander Keen? major lagger from whati hear...
[QUOTE="CassiusGaius"]You can try Supreme Commander or Company of Heroes. CassiusGaius
I've maxed out CoH on a 7600GT, 1GB RAM, and P4 3Ghz... it isn't very demanding at all.
Eh, its pretty demanding. I have a e4400@ 2.66 / 2 gigs of Patriot / 8800 GTS 320 factory o'ced. I have problems running it at 1400 * 900 with 4 x AA and high settings not ultra. I actually keep the physics/shadows/reflections low and its iffy.
Thought it runs at like 1380 * XXX flawlessly. Just when I hit the next resolution the fps is not to my liking.
for the person with the 8800 gts 320 mb card i have one too, and am getting flight x this week. 1280 x1040 is my native res...i really want shadows...my question is do you think i will be able to play it maxed out on that res?? with my 2 gig of ram?
My comp can handle Oblivion and SupCom with everything, and I mean everything, maxed at 1680x1050 in XP. I'm downloading the FSX demo now to see how well I can handle it, though from what everyone is saying I'm not very optimistic.
I tryed to play FX demo. I was thinking " oh i only have 19" LCD i am sure i can easily max this game out". So i put ALL detailes to max and 16xAA, 16xAF, and transparency AA through nvidia control panel. Happily ran the game. And it was running at around 10FPS when i was still down on land.
SupCom with shaddows easily. It will chew through all the processing time on a quadcore if you let it and it will eat all of your memory until it crashes. Sad thing is i like TA and its graphics more now in direct comparison....
Log in to comment