Need Some Advice From Audiophiles

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for T-Bone998
T-Bone998

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 T-Bone998
Member since 2004 • 51 Posts

Hey guys, I am just about ready to get myself a nice home theatre system, now that I have every other component.

I have a 32" Toshiba LCD, A PS3, and an XBox 360 Elite.

The TV has 2 HDMI inputs in the back, which the PS3 hooks into and the 360 is hooked up using the component cables (I think that's the one, with the green, blue and red).

Now I'm hoping that'll be enough background for answering my question which is...

What will be my best choice for getting the best audio out of both systems? I'm shooting for a 5.1 system, but I'm not sure what is better, getting a home theatre in a box, or buying a reciever and speakers seprately. Plus, I'm not sure what features I'm looking for to get the best system I can.

Now, I know there are some amazing systems out there, but I'm on a budget (preferably under $500, even better under $300). I don't need anything too crazy, this is for my bedroom, I just want something that is gonna make playing games even more fun and immersive and be the best bang for my buck.

The reason I'm on a budget is because I'm only 15 and have really put a nice dent in my bank account by buying the previous things stated plus other things such as a computer and everything else.

If it helps any (Don't think it would but...) you can see my set-up by looking at my Images.

Thanks for any help,

TBone998

Avatar image for cspiffo
cspiffo

2841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 cspiffo
Member since 2005 • 2841 Posts

The problem with HTIB's is that they are usually very cheaply made and not very upgradable.

I would definately look into buying seperate components. If I were you, I would wait and save up for a nice Onkyo 605 receiver and either JBL or Polk audio speakers. Look at spending around $800-$1000.

If you're impatient though I would look into this. This is basically a standard receiver with speakers thrown in so you still get the upgradablity of standard receivers. Sony makes very good receivers.

http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/Specifications-of-Sony-5-1-Channel-Home-Theater-System-HT-DDW995/sem/rpsm/oid/181861/rpem/ccd/productDetailSpecification.do#tabs

Avatar image for dmanrevived
dmanrevived

1595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 dmanrevived
Member since 2004 • 1595 Posts

This is definitely not an audiophile thing. Audiophiles are in a whole different league than this.

Question, why is the 360 hooked up using component and not HDMI?

Avatar image for T-Bone998
T-Bone998

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 T-Bone998
Member since 2004 • 51 Posts

Thanks for that, I was looking at a few Sony's earlier also. But I do have one question...

If I got a system like that, how would I be running the wires? I assume, both systems into the reciever, then the reciever out to the TV?

And, what is the best way for me to send audio? I'm pretty sure its through HDMI, but I could be wrong.

Thanks again,

TBone998

Avatar image for T-Bone998
T-Bone998

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 T-Bone998
Member since 2004 • 51 Posts

This is definitely not an audiophile thing. Audiophiles are in a whole different league than this.

Question, why is the 360 hooked up using component and not HDMI?

For surround sound, since you're on a budget, look for a receiver or a HTiB with a receiver that has optical input.

dmanrevived

Yes, you're right this isn't an audiophile thing, they are in a much higher league, but they'll at least know what is best for my situation.

And to answer your question, the 360 isn't using the HDMI, because I don't feel I need to buy one yet. I just used the HDMI cable that came with the 360 on the PS3, because I know it has games at 1080p and from as far as I can tell the 360 only has games at 720p, which the components will do just fine (I can do without the upscaling for now).

Avatar image for kidkit
kidkit

2783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 kidkit
Member since 2005 • 2783 Posts
[QUOTE="dmanrevived"]

This is definitely not an audiophile thing. Audiophiles are in a whole different league than this.

Question, why is the 360 hooked up using component and not HDMI?

For surround sound, since you're on a budget, look for a receiver or a HTiB with a receiver that has optical input.

T-Bone998

Yes, you're right this isn't an audiophile thing, they are in a much higher league, but they'll at least know what is best for my situation.

And to answer your question, the 360 isn't using the HDMI, because I don't feel I need to buy one yet. I just used the HDMI cable that came with the 360 on the PS3, because I know it has games at 1080p and from as far as I can tell the 360 only has games at 720p, which the components will do just fine (I can do without the upscaling for now).

True, but you can find an HDMI cable for $5... The benefits? - an hdmi cable i less to manage behind your tv - You now only need a single audio out from your TV to your new reciever, rather than switching between sources when you switch from 360 to ps3 - hdmi video is a moderate upgrade from component so... you're down to 3 cables now hdmi in from ps3 hdmi in from 360 hdmi or (most likely) optical ToSlink out to reciever.
Avatar image for kidkit
kidkit

2783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 kidkit
Member since 2005 • 2783 Posts
Oh yeah... Basically there are 2 new HD Sound Formats that requier HDMI Dolby TrueHD & DTS-HD - To me, both of these formats are too much of a luxury - Recievers that support these formats start at a Very high cost... The reciever that cspiffo pointed out is an amazing value for everything that it supports but still expect to pay $400 or so. It's a good one to look at if you're ok with that price. So... back to cabling - you have a couple of options now - run all your av equipment through the reciever and then from there one video to the tv, or vice versa.
Avatar image for cspiffo
cspiffo

2841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 cspiffo
Member since 2005 • 2841 Posts

To answer your question, the 360 isn't using the HDMI, because I don't feel I need to buy one yet. I just used the HDMI cable that came with the 360 on the PS3, because I know it has games at 1080p and from as far as I can tell the 360 only has games at 720p, which the components will do just fine (I can do without the upscaling for now).

T-Bone998

You don't have a 1080p TV anywayso it doesn't even matter for the PS3 either. You could use component on both the PS3 and 360 and you wouldn't see much difference.Regardless of whatSony hyped the PS3to be it falls a bit short. I'm notsaying it's a bad system, quite the contrary. Just don't believe all the hype. HDMI is only nice for convenience on anything less than the best equipment.

To answer your other question. The best way to hook up the consoles is to the receiver first and then from the receiver to the TV. That receiver that I linked only has HDMI passthrough so you will have to also provide a optical Toslink for both the PS3 and the 360 even if hooked up via HDMI.

Avatar image for cspiffo
cspiffo

2841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 cspiffo
Member since 2005 • 2841 Posts

Oh yeah... Basically there are 2 new HD Sound Formats that requier HDMI Dolby TrueHD & DTS-HD - To me, both of these formats are too much of a luxury - Recievers that support these formats start at a Very high cost... kidkit

Actually the price of these receivers has come down quite drastically. The Onkyo 605 supports true HDMI decoding so you can have 7.1 Dolby True HD and DTS-HD for $470 on sale at circuit city. That receiver doesn't come with speakers though so it doesn't quite fit the OP's budget.

Avatar image for PS2_ROCKS
PS2_ROCKS

4679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 PS2_ROCKS
Member since 2003 • 4679 Posts

For $500 a HTIB is almost your only solution if you want 5.1 surround sound. A low end reciever would cost at least $300 and then 5 decent speakers and a powered sub would be around another $1000. But there are other options too. If this is all set up in your room or a smaller place like that then the Logitch Z-5500's are a killer set of 5.1 speakers with optical and analog 5.1 inputs. If PC speakers aren't your thing and you want at least a dedicated receiver that a HTIB offers then your best option is to go to your local BestBuy or someplace like that, find some that are in your price range and play a movie or CD on them to see if you like how they sound.

Avatar image for NamanOWNSyou
NamanOWNSyou

1191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 NamanOWNSyou
Member since 2005 • 1191 Posts

This is definitely not an audiophile thing. Audiophiles are in a whole different league than this.

Question, why is the 360 hooked up using component and not HDMI?

dmanrevived

QFT. Audiophiles would go for pre/pros, amps, wacko-gadgets and do-hickies.

Avatar image for cspiffo
cspiffo

2841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 cspiffo
Member since 2005 • 2841 Posts
[QUOTE="dmanrevived"]

This is definitely not an audiophile thing. Audiophiles are in a whole different league than this.

Question, why is the 360 hooked up using component and not HDMI?

NamanOWNSyou

QFT. Audiophiles would go for pre/pros, amps, wacko-gadgets and do-hickies.

He was only trying to catch our attention. NBD

Avatar image for virtual-human
virtual-human

1922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 virtual-human
Member since 2004 • 1922 Posts

Hey guys, I am just about ready to get myself a nice home theatre system, now that I have every other component.

I have a 32" Toshiba LCD, A PS3, and an XBox 360 Elite.

The TV has 2 HDMI inputs in the back, which the PS3 hooks into and the 360 is hooked up using the component cables (I think that's the one, with the green, blue and red).

Now I'm hoping that'll be enough background for answering my question which is...

What will be my best choice for getting the best audio out of both systems? I'm shooting for a 5.1 system, but I'm not sure what is better, getting a home theatre in a box, or buying a reciever and speakers seprately. Plus, I'm not sure what features I'm looking for to get the best system I can.

Now, I know there are some amazing systems out there, but I'm on a budget (preferably under $500, even better under $300). I don't need anything too crazy, this is for my bedroom, I just want something that is gonna make playing games even more fun and immersive and be the best bang for my buck.

The reason I'm on a budget is because I'm only 15 and have really put a nice dent in my bank account by buying the previous things stated plus other things such as a computer and everything else.

If it helps any (Don't think it would but...) you can see my set-up by looking at my Images.

Thanks for any help,

TBone998

T-Bone998

1) You can't get "the best audio out of both systems" for $500.

2) Buying a receiver & speakers separately is a better deal than a HTIB. HTIBs are generally very poor sound quality. Tiny, tinny speakers with a very high crossover and cheap, sealed-box subs that don't go low orplay loud, and are sluggish, boomy and distorted.

As noted, the Onkyo 605 is a great receiver for you to consider. While you don't need HDMI 1.3 & HD codec decoding, since the PS3 can decode TrueHD and output LPCM (and may possible be able to do DTS-HD MA in a later firmware update) and can also pass up to 7.1 ch LPCM, you do need a receiver with HDMI that is capable of taking a 5.1 LPCM signal to get the most out of your PS3, for a 5.1 setup. To get the most out of the 360, you just need optical/5.1 DD. The Elite can only pass 2-channel LPCM over HDMI. The Onkyo is still a good price though if you want an HDMI receiver.

My recommendation would be to buy the receiver and maybe just the front two speakers. Then buy the center and surrounds when you can afford them. Then buy a sub when you can afford that. Or you could buy a speaker package deal. Check out internet-direct companies for good cost/value.

You don't have a 1080p TV anywayso it doesn't even matter for the PS3 either. You could use component on both the PS3 and 360 and you wouldn't see much difference.Regardless of whatSony hyped the PS3to be it falls a bit short. I'm notsaying it's a bad system, quite the contrary. Just don't believe all the hype. HDMI is only nice for convenience on anything less than the best equipment.

cspiffo

Not sure what Sony over-hyping has to do with this. However, I own both the PS3 and 360, and I can tell you that the PS3 takes a lot better advantage of it. I wouldn't be getting uncompressed HD audio for both games and movies on my 360 with or without HDMI. The Elite can't even do more than 2 channels of LPCM so no HD sound from an HD-DVD add-on either. I'm also sure you know that - even if it is marginal - there is a difference in PQ between component and HDMI. Otherwise, my eyes are fooling me when I switch between inputs from my Moto 3416 HD-DVR/Comcast feed (on my 720p TV). Certainly, even without touching "audiophile"-level equipment, the bottom-of-the-line of the new models of Onkyo HDMI receivers doesn't constitute the "best equipment". Nor do HTIBs with HDMI.So, I would argue that HDMI is more than a convenience.

Avatar image for cspiffo
cspiffo

2841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 cspiffo
Member since 2005 • 2841 Posts

Not sure what Sony over-hyping has to do with this. However, I own both the PS3 and 360, and I can tell you that the PS3 takes a lot better advantage of it. I wouldn't be getting uncompressed HD audio for both games and movies on my 360 with or without HDMI. The Elite can't even do more than 2 channels of LPCM so no HD sound from an HD-DVD add-on either. I'm also sure you know that - even if it is marginal - there is a difference in PQ between component and HDMI. Otherwise, my eyes are fooling me when I switch between inputs from my Moto 3416 HD-DVR/Comcast feed (on my 720p TV). Certainly, even without touching "audiophile"-level equipment, the bottom-of-the-line of the new models of Onkyo HDMI receivers doesn't constitute the "best equipment". Nor do HTIBs with HDMI.So, I would argue that HDMI is more than a convenience.

virtual-human

I was mostly talking about PQ. There really isn't much of a diff. between component and HDMI. Maybe if you are sitting 3-4ft from the TV you will notice. Anything else will look the same. As far as sound goes. Maybe I overshot by saying "the best" equipment. What I was trying to convey was the fact that you need far more than a standard 720p HDTV and a entry level receiver and speakers to take advantage of HDMI. So if you want to argue semantics go ahead. I think a I made my point though.

Avatar image for T-Bone998
T-Bone998

51

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 T-Bone998
Member since 2004 • 51 Posts

Okay, thanks for the help to all those who added their input, I'm not quite sure what I'm going to do yet, I might save up and go for the "higher end" systems that have been mentioned here (I know these aren't THE high-end in audio, but I mean just in the thread specifically). But, nothing is final yet, because I need to start saving for a car and such.

But, I do have one more question...

If I end up being cheap and just buy a 5.1 HTiB :

1. Will it still give me different audio from each speaker? (I think this is a stupid question, but I'll ask it anyways)

2. Will I just run some kind of audio out cable from my TV to the reciever? (I assume the reciever wouldn't have the high tech inputs for both systems)

Just keep in mind, I'm 15 and this is for my bedroom. I like having good audio, but not sure if I want to spend $500+ to get it. All I really need is to have sound all around me, such as hearing someone sneaking up behind me in GeOW or Resistance.

Again, thanks for all the help guys, I'll keep all these options in mind, and these will be my last questions for you.

Avatar image for dmanrevived
dmanrevived

1595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 dmanrevived
Member since 2004 • 1595 Posts

1. It will give you proper 5.1 surround sound if you connect using either HDMI or optical (toslink), so always try to find one with either of those inputs even if you're going budget-style.

2. For watching cable tv, run the audio from your cable box or from your tv if you don't use a cable box. For consoles, you should connect directly from the console to the receiver.

Avatar image for dgbiker1
dgbiker1

2139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 dgbiker1
Member since 2003 • 2139 Posts

First, as many have already said, don't go for the HTIB.

Second, I can provide some info on my setup that could work well for you if you don't mind getting your hands dirty. It's not as good as my dad's HarmanKardon/Klipsch Reference series (w/2000 watt sub!) system, but beats the pants of his Bose lifestyle system.

-First, go to ebay and find a Soundblaster Extigy 5.1 sound card for $50. They don't make them anymore, so if you want something new and under warranty you'll have to go for an audigy2 nx ($100).

-On ebay, find a Klipsch Promedia 2.1 system, you can find them for about $100 w/shipping. Great THX certified system.

-Find a promedia 2.1 sub/control unit ONLY (no satelite speakers). If you can find one, they go for about $60. Make sure it comes with the volume control pod. Alternatively, buy the whole 2.1 system, take the pod off the satellite, and ebay the satellites.

-Find some Polk bookshelf speakers on ebay. Polk is a good one to look for because it's not as popular as some other brands so they command less on ebay, but they sound awesome (much better than the klipsch satellites). I picked up some R15 speakers for $30/pair. Really crisp and clear sound. Come to think of it, you could buy four of these and do away with the klipsch satellites completely. I kept them (Klipsch) in the back since I don't really pick up on little details in the back anyway.

-I dug up a Klipsch SWS sub that I had from a few years ago to add to the setup. They don't make them anymore and I can't find any more on eBay, so you're outta luck there unless you can find one somewhere. AWESOME sub, really deep bass. I paid $300 new.

-Finally, pick up some optical toslink cables. I don't remember how much they are. A little spendy but not crazy. These will carry the 5.1 signal from the console. Also, get some speaker cable with no connectors on one end, and pins on the other (the lower the wire gage, thicker cable, the better). You may have to buy the pins separately and install them or if you bought the full second 2.1 system cut the mini-jack end of the wire and strip the ends.

So basically connect the optical cable from the console to the extigy. Connect the Promedia 2.1 system to the rear speaker output. Connect the Promedia Sub-only to the front speaker output. Connect the Polk speakers directly to the speaker output on the Promedia sub (it won't blow out the speakers, they match pretty well). Finally, if you get a SWS sub, you have to connect the front speaker output of the extigy into the SWS, then from the SWS to the Promedia (Extigy---->SWS---->Promedia).

When all is said and done you'll have a THX certified, 4.2 system (4.3 with the SWS sub) that sounds amazing for the price. I haven't added a center channel for 5 channel sound, but I care more about music than movies/games so I don't really need it. With your budget you can easily add a center channel and the extigy supports it. Finally, you can connect the extigy to your computer to mess around with the equalizer settings. It doesn't have to be plugged in to function though. I just used my laptop to set up the equalizer and balance, then unplugged it and it's set. Hope this helps.

Summary:

  • THX Certified 4.2 or 4.3 Channel (easily upgraded to 5.3 channel)
  • About $270 with cables ($570 with additional sub)
  • 500Watts RMS, about 1300 Watts peak power (With these efficient horn speakers, it's bona-fide 500Watts. It's LOUD. I can't stand more than about 1/3 volume before ear pain sours the experience or stuff starts falling from shelves :) )
  • Sounds way better than any HTIB or logitech PC speaker junk.

Avatar image for cspiffo
cspiffo

2841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 cspiffo
Member since 2005 • 2841 Posts
^^^^^^^ :lol: LOL! Frankensystem...It's Alive!!!!!!!!!!!! ^^^^^^^^
Avatar image for dgbiker1
dgbiker1

2139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 dgbiker1
Member since 2003 • 2139 Posts

^^^^^^^ :lol: LOL! Frankensystem...It's Alive!!!!!!!!!!!! ^^^^^^^^cspiffo

Haha, and that's not even everything. I didn't describe the signal conditioning circuits, sofa iPod jack, and multi-room network I built for it too :) I'm glad I had to take those electrical engineering classes now.

Avatar image for BadAndy642
BadAndy642

1069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 BadAndy642
Member since 2006 • 1069 Posts

[QUOTE="kidkit"]Oh yeah... Basically there are 2 new HD Sound Formats that requier HDMI Dolby TrueHD & DTS-HD - To me, both of these formats are too much of a luxury - Recievers that support these formats start at a Very high cost... cspiffo

Actually the price of these receivers has come down quite drastically. The Onkyo 605 supports true HDMI decoding so you can have 7.1 Dolby True HD and DTS-HD for $470 on sale at circuit city. That receiver doesn't come with speakers though so it doesn't quite fit the OP's budget.

First you can get that receiver on Amazon for $400 w/ free shipping every so often, and as of now it is not necessary, because there is not one single player that sends Dolby TrueHD nor DTS-HD bitstream. All players that have them decode them internally a send it via LPCM over HDMI (done w/ 1.1 spec) or via 5.1/7.1 analog. But in the future we will see players that send send the bitstream.

Please read this to learn more

Avatar image for kodex1717
kodex1717

5925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 kodex1717
Member since 2005 • 5925 Posts
[QUOTE="dmanrevived"]

This is definitely not an audiophile thing. Audiophiles are in a whole different league than this.

Question, why is the 360 hooked up using component and not HDMI?

For surround sound, since you're on a budget, look for a receiver or a HTiB with a receiver that has optical input.

T-Bone998

Yes, you're right this isn't an audiophile thing, they are in a much higher league, but they'll at least know what is best for my situation.

And to answer your question, the 360 isn't using the HDMI, because I don't feel I need to buy one yet. I just used the HDMI cable that came with the 360 on the PS3, because I know it has games at 1080p and from as far as I can tell the 360 only has games at 720p, which the components will do just fine (I can do without the upscaling for now).

You've got that bass-ackwards. Both the 360 and the PS3 have games in 720p, not 1080p. The PS3 can scale games to 1080p or 480p, but the 360 can scale to 1080p/i or 480p/i. The 360 also has the benifit of many games running at 60fps.
Avatar image for kidkit
kidkit

2783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 kidkit
Member since 2005 • 2783 Posts
Would you consider head phones? you would need to swap the optical cable everytime you switched from ps3 to xbox360 but sound quality is excellent. http://www.trittontechnologies.com/products/TRIGA600.htm
Avatar image for virtual-human
virtual-human

1922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 virtual-human
Member since 2004 • 1922 Posts

[QUOTE="virtual-human"]

Not sure what Sony over-hyping has to do with this. However, I own both the PS3 and 360, and I can tell you that the PS3 takes a lot better advantage of it. I wouldn't be getting uncompressed HD audio for both games and movies on my 360 with or without HDMI. The Elite can't even do more than 2 channels of LPCM so no HD sound from an HD-DVD add-on either. I'm also sure you know that - even if it is marginal - there is a difference in PQ between component and HDMI. Otherwise, my eyes are fooling me when I switch between inputs from my Moto 3416 HD-DVR/Comcast feed (on my 720p TV). Certainly, even without touching "audiophile"-level equipment, the bottom-of-the-line of the new models of Onkyo HDMI receivers doesn't constitute the "best equipment". Nor do HTIBs with HDMI.So, I would argue that HDMI is more than a convenience.

cspiffo

I was mostly talking about PQ. There really isn't much of a diff. between component and HDMI. Maybe if you are sitting 3-4ft from the TV you will notice. Anything else will look the same. As far as sound goes. Maybe I overshot by saying "the best" equipment. What I was trying to convey was the fact that you need far more than a standard 720p HDTV and a entry level receiver and speakers to take advantage of HDMI. So if you want to argue semantics go ahead. I think a I made my point though.

Again, I have a 720p TV. It's 37" and I sit 6-7' away. I can see a difference when flipping between inputs. Cut and dry. Where are the semantics? I suppose maybe my estimation of the Onkyo 605 as an entry-level receiver, but that's not about PQ...

Avatar image for cspiffo
cspiffo

2841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 cspiffo
Member since 2005 • 2841 Posts
You really have some special eyes then if you can see the diff. between HDMI and Component at the same resolution. There is barely any difference.
Avatar image for virtual-human
virtual-human

1922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 virtual-human
Member since 2004 • 1922 Posts

I seriously doubt my eyes are special. And by your phrasing, you note that there is a difference. Your point of contention is simply how big the difference is.

I will note that - whether the source be HD televison programming, a 360, or a PS3 - the content is digital. Transmitting it via component cables necessitates a digital->analog->digital conversion of the signal. This degrades it. In my experience, the picture looks softer and the colors are more washed out.

As an aside, differences in cabling and PQ extend even to analog vs. analog. There was a wealth of input from the community at AVSForum as to how the Xbox 360 looked better on their sets over VGA as opposed to component - not counting DVD upscaling, obviously, as DVDs are not upscaled via component. I'm sure they just all had really special eyes as well, though.

Having said this, I don't really care to continue discussing with you whether - as this is what it amounts to - I am a liar for stating that on my personal gear I have observed a difference in PQ between HD and component from the same source. The only reason I have carried on thus far is in the hopes that those who might be utilizing threads here as a source of information are not subjected to inaccuracies.

Avatar image for cspiffo
cspiffo

2841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 cspiffo
Member since 2005 • 2841 Posts
Whatever!I was just saying there is no huge difference between the two. Sure you can pick out a few qualities in the picture that are better with HDMI but it's not a world of difference that anyone should be concerned with orwill evennotice. I agree with the rest of what you wrote though, about cables and DACs except the part about washed out colors. In fact I feel component can be a little oversaturated at times. Seeing as you are tired of debating with me and taking it personally, I guess I will also end this discusion too.
Avatar image for virtual-human
virtual-human

1922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 virtual-human
Member since 2004 • 1922 Posts

You're right; I misspoke. I agree they're oversaturated.

Not trying to get back into it, but just saying that the difference that we now agree is there, is, for me, noticeable and enough to make me prefer HDMI. Also not trying to get back into it, but for future reference, others might consider it personal to be told "you really have some special eyes" when discussing the visual characteristics of something.

Avatar image for cspiffo
cspiffo

2841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 cspiffo
Member since 2005 • 2841 Posts
I thought I was being complementary! :D I'm anglasses and contacts man, myself!