Netbooks; are they pretty much dead now?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dbowman
dbowman

6836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1 dbowman
Member since 2005 • 6836 Posts

I've had an Acer Aspire Netbook for about 2 years now. I purchased it when I was at University because it was small and therefore useful for carrying to and from campus.

The only problem is that it is a painfully slow system. Having said that I look at the specifications of modern Netbooks and they don't seem to have improved much. Granted they often have quite large hard drives, but they still use the Intel Atom processor which is pretty useless.

With Tablets taking over (particularly the iPad) do you think the Netbook is finished or will there be some major improvement just around the corner?

Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts

I've had an Acer Aspire Netbook for about 2 years now. I purchased it when I was at University because it was small and therefore useless for carrying to and from campus.

The only problem is that it is a painfully slow system. Having said that I look at the specifications of modern Netbooks and they don't seem to have improved much. Granted they often have quite large hard drives, but they still use the Intel Atom processor which is pretty useless.

With Tablets taking over (particularly the iPad) do you think the Netbook is finished or will there be some major improvement just around the corner?

dbowman
Netbooks have tablets beat in a few categories. For example, productivity. For college use, I'd find a netbook more useful to just get stuff done. But that might just be me. Netbooks are also typically cheaper compared to a decent tablet. But tablets are more "fun" to use as well as "trendy". Portability isn't that much better than a 10 inch netbook. Basically, a netbook is more bang for your buck so to speak. But for the general population, yes netbooks are pretty much dead. Tablets are the new fad.
Avatar image for dbowman
dbowman

6836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 dbowman
Member since 2005 • 6836 Posts

I agree with you that Netbooks are better for getting stuff done (even if they are slow). Tablets don't seem to have many practical functions. People just seem to play games on them and watch videos.

My Netbook uses Windows 7 Starter Edition which is probably why it is so slow. Perhaps I should just install Linux.

Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts

I agree with you that Netbooks are better for getting stuff done (even if they are slow). Tablets don't seem to have many practical functions. People just seem to play games on them and watch videos.

My Netbook uses Windows 7 Starter Edition which is probably why it is so slow. Perhaps I should just install Linux.

dbowman
I'd go with Ubuntu. 7 starter is trash compared to it. Do they still have that limit where you can't change the wallpaper on starter?
Avatar image for dbowman
dbowman

6836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 dbowman
Member since 2005 • 6836 Posts

You have to stick with the default wallpaper. Pretty hilarious really.

Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts

You have to stick with the default wallpaper. Pretty hilarious really.

dbowman
It is. During the Windows 7 beta back in 09, they even had the balls to limit users only 3 apps open at once like in the starter versions os Vista and XP.
Avatar image for darkmagician06
darkmagician06

6060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 darkmagician06
Member since 2003 • 6060 Posts
Dead in my book once windows 8 tablets come out.
Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

They are pretty much dead, there is not real point to buy one

Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts

The big push now is on Ultrabooks, such as the ASUS UX21

Small, thin, light, and relatively powerful. i7 equipped, SSD, USB 3.0, etc. The only question is the price, which will be under $1000 (but more then a netbook).

Avatar image for dbowman
dbowman

6836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 dbowman
Member since 2005 • 6836 Posts

That UX21 looks mighty impressive. I dread to think how much it will cost.

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
Ultra-books look great to me but they are seriously pricey
Avatar image for entropyecho
entropyecho

22053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 entropyecho
Member since 2005 • 22053 Posts

I use my netbook to work while I travel. It is much better to use a netbook rather than a tablet for things other than media consumption. Plus, netbooks have USB ports! A lot of tablets don't have any. I think the reason your computer is so slow is because of Windows 7 coupled with the Atom processor. The Atom is right up there with the Celeron for being useless CPUs. Well, that was a little harsh, but they do stink. They make good combs though. :P

Anyway, I dual boot Windows XP SP3 and Ubuntu 11.04 and couldn't be happier. I added some Kingston memory to my Acer a while back and the computer seems to be a bit more responsive/zippy.

I wouldn't get a tablet like the iPad for school or for business. For a time I was interested in the Asus EEE Slate EP121 however. It runs Windows, which is great, but Windows 7 is not really made for the slate/tablet form factor.

I'd hold off for a bit until someone figures out how to make a "power user" tablet that allows for both media consumption and increased productivity. Tablets are the future of computing though. They will be ubiquitous human interface devices at the very least.

Avatar image for entropyecho
entropyecho

22053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 entropyecho
Member since 2005 • 22053 Posts

Ultra-books look great to me but they are seriously priceymarkop2003

Yep, I agree. The rule of thumb for me is, if a portable Mac seems to be a more reasonable deal, then there's a problem with the pricing. :P

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
I'd get an ultra book. But then I realize I am way too rad and I would take a 20in laptop to class.
Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts

I use my netbook to work while I travel. It is much better to use a netbook rather than a tablet for things other than media consumption. Plus, netbooks have USB ports! A lot of tablets don't have any. I think the reason your computer is so slow is because of Windows 7 coupled with the Atom processor. The Atom is right up there with the Celeron for being useless CPUs. Well, that was a little harsh, but they do stink. They make good combs though. :P

Anyway, I dual boot Windows XP SP3 and Ubuntu 11.04 and couldn't be happier. I added some Kingston memory to my Acer a while back and the computer seems to be a bit more responsive/zippy.

I wouldn't get a tablet like the iPad for school or for business. For a time I was interested in the Asus EEE Slate EP121 however. It runs Windows, which is great, but Windows 7 is not really made for the slate/tablet form factor.

I'd hold off for a bit until someone figures out how to make a "power user" tablet that allows for both media consumption and increased productivity. Tablets are the future of computing though. They will be ubiquitous human interface devices at the very least.

entropyecho
Unless its a Sandy Bridge Celeron. Those things are right up there with Core 2 Duos.
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

You get what you pay for?

Netbooks are, at best, a stop gap measure for immediate computing needs. I dont think its reasonable to expect to pay $300 for a device thats capable of lasting 4 years of college.

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16903

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16903 Posts

imo, netbook cpus have been getting stronger lately. The intel atoms are still stuck in the same place that they were pretty much 2 years back, but AMD has been pushing the limits of the netbook with their fusion processors the c-60 and the e-350. Next year they will release another upgraded netbook processor based on bulldozer which will make netbooks able to play pretty much most pc games well.

Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#18 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts

You get what you pay for?

Netbooks are, at best, a stop gap measure for immediate computing needs. I dont think its reasonable to expect to pay $300 for a device thats capable of lasting 4 years of college.

XaosII
IDK. Word Processing, email and Facebook should run fine for 4 years. Typically, Word Processors and web browsers don't get much more demanding as both are pretty mature right now.
Avatar image for entropyecho
entropyecho

22053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 entropyecho
Member since 2005 • 22053 Posts

Unless its a Sandy Bridge Celeron. Those things are right up there with Core 2 Duos. gmaster456

I still question the Celeron branding choice of these CPUs. Do people really have such short memories?

Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#21 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts

[QUOTE="gmaster456"] Unless its a Sandy Bridge Celeron. Those things are right up there with Core 2 Duos. entropyecho

I still question the Celeron branding choice of these CPUs. Do people really have such short memories?

I agree. I questioned their decision to still call it a Celeron.
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

14 - 15.6" laptop.. inexpensive, fast, full-sized keyboard.

They weight about the same as one textbook so it's not a big deal imo. Netbooks are, for the most part, dead.