[QUOTE="frost_mourne13"]It looks good man. Though I say if you have any more money, just go for the 8800GTX. If not then it's cool. The rig looks nice. I also say stick with a Quad, Crysis will thank youMunkyman587
I see you going to everyone's rigs and telling them to get a gtx, but the price range is really different. The gts (lowest price on newegg) is $279 (evga). The gtx is $529 (by leadtek = / ).
That is cause GTX is basicly pretty more powerfull than GTS. Most of ppls think: " No there isnt bigg difference nah, ill just take GTS which is way cheaper". But they are wrong GTX is around 25% more powerfull than GTS, which can be decicive in Crysis betwen playable and non-playable. Just for record. And about quads, we really dont know what kind of quad will be needed in games like Alan Wake which will need quad core to be maxed out. Let alone crysis , UT3, Bioshock. Those games will probably dont need quad core to being maxed out. And also wont offer that huge boost whit quad compared to dual core. By time Alan Wake comes out, there will hopefully already be Nehalem (i think thats the code name), so called "true" quad core, and that time when quad core could really be needed Q6600 will just fell even low end quad core. Of course it will still peform better in Alan Wake than Dual core. Its possible that it will also get max settings. But ATM GPU will be more important in Crysis, Bioshock, UT3 than procesor. Thats why it seems smart to invest in better GPU and dual core. DOnt rush on me. Its just my opinion. But it is true that quad core will be more future proof and he will also be able to do moer multitasking.
Log in to comment