New gameplay, prey 2, the darkness 2, mw3

Prey 2

Darkness 2

MW3 - Now thats a gameplay demo, mission is so awesome, should have been in cryisis 2 instead of shooting crappy ass aliens.

MW3 - Now thats a gameplay demo, mission is so awesome, should have been in cryisis 2 instead of shooting crappy ass aliens.
dakan45

How are you not sick of this yet? I mean CoD 4 was cool and all, but after MW2, WaW, Black Ops it's just the same stuff over and over and it's getting really stale.

[QUOTE="dakan45"]MW3 - Now thats a gameplay demo, mission is so awesome, should have been in cryisis 2 instead of shooting crappy ass aliens.
FatSlasH

How are you not sick of this yet? I mean CoD 4 was cool and all, but after MW2, WaW, Black Ops it's just the same stuff over and over and it's getting really stale.

^ Nope Infact if they had helicopter scenes in NY, it would be a major step up in the crysis 2 campaign.

Gameplay>graphics, also moh and homefront where nowhere near as good, so who is the king of modern war fps? Cod ofcourse.

Also stalker has gotten pretty stale too, same stuff all over, infact much more than cod, but fans are not angry about it.

That being said i am excited for far cry 3 ,prey 2 and dead island but cod is cod, they aint gonna change it and dissapoint their fans. Latest example: Red faction armagedon, its being bashed by fans for not being sandbox like the previous.

cod is cod, if you change it, its not that game anymore and fans getting dissapointed. You might want a new engine but its stupid to do so in the end of the gen, let alone it will give diffirent feel to the game.

Also i really liked cod4, but mw2 was the best and black ops was pretty good. Waw was terrible though and i did not find cod 2 to be better than average.

Uncharted, resistance and MW are my favorite franchises this gen and they all turning into a trilogy this year, couldnt be more happy. :)

[QUOTE="FatSlasH"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"]MW3 - Now thats a gameplay demo, mission is so awesome, should have been in cryisis 2 instead of shooting crappy ass aliens.
dakan45

How are you not sick of this yet? I mean CoD 4 was cool and all, but after MW2, WaW, Black Ops it's just the same stuff over and over and it's getting really stale.

^ Nope Infact if they had helicopter scenes in NY, it would be a major step up in the campaign.

Gameplay>graphics, also moh and homefront where nowhere near as good, so who is the king of modern war fps? Cod ofcourse.

Also stalker has gotten pretty stale too, same stuff all over, infact much more than cod, but fans are not angry about it. T

hat being said i am excited for far cry 3 ,prey 2 and dead island but cod is cod, they aint gonna change it and dissapoint their fans. Latest example: Red faction armagedon, its being bashed by fans for not being sandbox like the previous.

cod is cod, if you change it, its not that game anymore and fans getting dissapointed. You might want a new engine but its stupid to do so in the end of the gen, let alone it will give diffirent feel to the game.

Also i really liked cod4, but mw2 was the best and black ops was pretty good. Waw was terrible though and i did not find cod 2 to be better than average.

Uncharted, resistance and MW are my favorite franchises this gen and they all turning into a trilogy this year, couldnt be more happy. :)

STALKER was non-linear and encouraged exploration. COD blocks off any idea of exploration in tightly scripted corridors. I also could care less about BF3 SP (I found the tank battle video to mind-numbingly boring).

STALKER was non-linear and encouraged exploration. COD blocks off any idea of exploration in tightly scripted corridors. I also could care less about BF3 SP (I found the tank battle video to mind-numbingly boring).

the_ChEeSe_mAn2

I rest my case.

PS: as i said bf has only showed a cod ripped sp so far, so mw3 E3 was much more impressive than what BF showed. Show some dogfights dice :P

Also as i said before, prey 2, rage, far cry 3, dead island, the linear scripted fps fad will die with so many games like that doing the opposite.

[QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"]STALKER was non-linear and encouraged exploration. COD blocks off any idea of exploration in tightly scripted corridors. I also could care less about BF3 SP (I found the tank battle video to mind-numbingly boring).

dakan45

I rest my case.

PS: as i said bf has only showed a cod ripped sp so far, so mw3 E3 was much more impressive than what BF showed. Show some dogfights dice :P

Also as i said before, prey 2, rage, far cry 3, dead island, the linear scripted fps fad will die with so many games like that doing the opposite.

[QUOTE="FatSlasH"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"]MW3 - Now thats a gameplay demo, mission is so awesome, should have been in cryisis 2 instead of shooting crappy ass aliens.
dakan45

How are you not sick of this yet? I mean CoD 4 was cool and all, but after MW2, WaW, Black Ops it's just the same stuff over and over and it's getting really stale.

cod is cod, if you change it, its not that game anymore and fans getting dissapointed. You might want a new engine but its stupid to do so in the end of the gen, let alone it will give diffirent feel to the game.

So CoD is allowed to be linear, scripted and generic just because it's CoD? I don't know what you saw in the CoD demo that was so much better...

And what has MW3 E3 shown that hasn't been seen before in other MW games? the_ChEeSe_mAn2

So CoD is allowed to be linear, scripted and generic just because it's CoD? I don't know what you saw in the CoD demo that was so much better...

FatSlasH

Never said linear was bad...

Anyway I would be excitied for Darkness 2 but it's very disappointing that Kirk acevedo isn't doing the voice of Jackie anymore...

Never said linear was bad...

Anyway I would be excitied for Darkness 2 but it's very disappointing that Kirk acevedo isn't doing the voice of Jackie anymore...

FatSlasH

[QUOTE="FatSlasH"]

Never said linear was bad...

Anyway I would be excitied for Darkness 2 but it's very disappointing that Kirk acevedo isn't doing the voice of Jackie anymore...

dakan45

Nah he was talking about Mike Patton, the guy who does the voice of the darkness, he's also awesome :P

MW3 looks like another terrible rehash.

Prey 2 and Darkness 2 both look decently good, might pick them up when they come out.

And BF3 looks AMAZING.

First thing I noticed in MW3, sounds like the same **** voice acting, and the exact same m4 animations, same font from old MW's, same un realistic gun sounds.

Bad quality video, but I wasnt un-impressed with the lighting, and I doubt it will look any better on PC, just going to be another port.

First thing I noticed in MW3, sounds like the same **** voice acting, and the exact same m4 animations, same font from old MW's, same un realistic gun sounds.

Bad quality video, but I wasnt un-impressed with the lighting, and I doubt it will look any better on PC, just going to be another port.

deathshand707

[QUOTE="deathshand707"]

First thing I noticed in MW3, sounds like the same **** voice acting, and the exact same m4 animations, same font from old MW's, same un realistic gun sounds.

Bad quality video, but I wasnt un-impressed with the lighting, and I doubt it will look any better on PC, just going to be another port.

dakan45

Black ops looked like crap on pc. And You know what if I followed uncharted, I would probably be complaining about it also. Your point is invalid.

Black ops looked like crap on pc. And You know what if I followed uncharted, I would probably be complaining about it also. Your point is invalid.

deathshand707

That they even dare to put a 3 in the title of that call of duty name, it's just the same old crappy game.
I'm very interested in Prey 2, the darkness 2 not as much but I'll check it out.dannenissan2

Hell even fallout 2 and doom 2 did it in the past. That they call it 2 or 3 does not mean the game has to be night and day with the previous one.

Prey 2

dakan45

wow...just...wow. Looks amazing. First-person shooter set in a gritty Prey world, Mirror's Edge-like parkour and chase mechanics, awesome scifi weapons and characters, ethical choices, and gadgets.

I think this is my new most-anticipated game!

Everytime i see Dakan post i think hes a console gamer in pc forums for some reason. :lol:

Modern Warfare 3 looked cool enough to me, the multiplayer part will be a lot more important to me personally so I can only cross my fingers and hope they do not screw up that part. It does kind of look like Modern Warfare 2.5 though, with no real drastic changes. I must say that switchable scope is a nice touch, I wonder if multiplayer will have that element too. I guess only time can tell.

So many games coming out in November (Battlefield 3, Modern Warfare 3, Diablo 3, Skyrim) it's going to be hard to pick.

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

wow...just...wow. Looks amazing. First-person shooter set in a gritty Prey world, Mirror's Edge-like parkour and chase mechanics, awesome scifi weapons and characters, ethical choices, and gadgets.

I think this is my new most-anticipated game!

mrbojangles25

Dakan is primarily a console (ps3) gamer, who's first fps was MW2. Its the only explanation...RandomGSer

Everytime i see Dakan post i think hes a console gamer in pc forums for some reason. :lol:

edinsftw

MW3 looks like crap, no surprise. :lol: @ Blops having better graphics than BC2. Oh may GOD that was funny. millerlight89

[QUOTE="millerlight89"]MW3 looks like crap, no surprise. :lol: @ Blops having better graphics than BC2. Oh may GOD that was funny. dakan45

everything in context.

MW generally takes place in tight settings, where attention to detail (buildings, streets, etc) must be high, even if the technology is inferior to other games.

With BF, they need to render not only buildings, but large and open maps. The tradeoff for this larger area to play in is that attention to specific things (structures, in this case) is toned down as to not hog resources.

This is not a case of what looks better, but what is both appropriate and better suited for the type of game and the environment they are trying to portray. You don't criticize a cuttng-edge flight sim for looking bad at ground level, nor do you criticize a horror game for looking bad with the lights on :P

Everytime i see Dakan post i think hes a console gamer in pc forums for some reason. :lol:

edinsftw

he just likes to bust balls and is the exact opposite of every single "DERRRRR PC gaming is becoming consolized" frothy-mouthed nutcase revolutionary that wants to game like it is 1990. I can empathize with that a bit.

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="millerlight89"]MW3 looks like crap, no surprise. :lol: @ Blops having better graphics than BC2. Oh may GOD that was funny. mrbojangles25

everything in context.

MW generally takes place in tight settings, where attention to detail (buildings, streets, etc) must be high, even if the technology is inferior to other games.

With BF, they need to render not only buildings, but large and open maps. The tradeoff for this larger area to play in is that attention to specific things (structures, in this case) is toned down as to not hog resources.

This is not a case of what looks better, but what is both appropriate and better suited for the type of game and the environment they are trying to portray. You don't criticize a cuttng-edge flight sim for looking bad at ground level, nor do you criticize a horror game for looking bad with the lights on :P

I think i said all that. I even said that bc2 has much bigger areas and destruction so it tones down the indoor areas for big maps and destruction. I said that for not sounding biased, but some people like to read whatever they want to read :roll:

Cod gets alot of hate but black ops while linear and in small areas it had great texture detail and lighting and very detailed areas, i value that much more than a generic enviroment in arma 2, that while it has high tech graphics, the areas are bland and empty.

In any case 2 things are important here, right now most of the devs put their effort into making their worlds more alive and detailed rather use cutting edge graphics. Finally black ops is not a graphically impressive game, but if you compare them with others, say homefront, you will see that the graphics are great in comparison. So the bashing the graphics get is missplaced.

[QUOTE="dannenissan2"][QUOTE="dakan45"] Like crap? Good man, how good do you need the graphics to be? Also how is my point invalid?dakan45

Is there any possible way to block posts from users like this? if so it would make it so much easier to read these forums.

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="dannenissan2"] To be honest, Black Ops graphics weren't any fancy. Its just below the average pc game.gunmaster55555

Is there any possible way to block posts from users like this? if so it would make it so much easier to read these forums.

I liked and enjoyed the first MW anything after that same SH** different coat of paint, although I enjoyed WaW.

wow that MW3 gameplay looks just like that one stryker level in MW2, only now you are not in the suberbs, you're in the city.