Here.
October 15th.
Gave me goose bumps...Can't wait.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I had no idea DICE was making the multiplayer component...Sweet!Looks good. The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is enought for me to get excited, but if the rest of the game is good, then that's just dandy...
arto1223
Pointless trailer..... really.dakan45I don't think it was meant to be awe inspiring but meant to point out that there will be a back story for the protagonist. But I gotta say this looks way better than MW2's trailer did.
Looks good. The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is enought for me to get excited, but if the rest of the game is good, then that's just dandy...
arto1223
That's actually got me worried considering it's supposed to take on Call of Duty directly. It needs to be a fast paced shooter not slow and tactical like the BF series. That and Dice just makes guns weird... they sit weird on the screen and aren't fun to use.
[QUOTE="arto1223"]
Looks good. The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is enought for me to get excited, but if the rest of the game is good, then that's just dandy...
the_mitch28
That's actually got me worried considering it's supposed to take on Call of Duty directly. It needs to be a fast paced shooter not slow and tactical like the BF series. That and Dice just makes guns weird... they sit weird on the screen and aren't fun to use.
The exact same concern here. Making a moh game with vehicles seems kinda out of place to me.[QUOTE="arto1223"]
Looks good. The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is enought for me to get excited, but if the rest of the game is good, then that's just dandy...
the_mitch28
That's actually got me worried considering it's supposed to take on Call of Duty directly. It needs to be a fast paced shooter not slow and tactical like the BF series. That and Dice just makes guns weird... they sit weird on the screen and aren't fun to use.
The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is kind of worrisome. Their guns are always very weak and peashooter-like. Also, their netcode for their games has always been a bit crappy with hit detection and what not.[QUOTE="arto1223"]
Looks good. The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is enought for me to get excited, but if the rest of the game is good, then that's just dandy...
the_mitch28
That's actually got me worried considering it's supposed to take on Call of Duty directly. It needs to be a fast paced shooter not slow and tactical like the BF series. That and Dice just makes guns weird... they sit weird on the screen and aren't fun to use.
DICE is an amazing company, their multiplayer games are always leaps and bounds over the other military shooters.[QUOTE="the_mitch28"][QUOTE="arto1223"]
Looks good. The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is enought for me to get excited, but if the rest of the game is good, then that's just dandy...
millerlight89
That's actually got me worried considering it's supposed to take on Call of Duty directly. It needs to be a fast paced shooter not slow and tactical like the BF series. That and Dice just makes guns weird... they sit weird on the screen and aren't fun to use.
DICE is an amazing company, their multiplayer games are always leaps and bounds over the other military shooters.hahaha I'm sorry but no.
I like the CoD series a hell of a lot more than the Battlefield series simply because I like fast paced shooters with satisfying guns... something that the BF series doesn't offer.
If this game is supposed to be a substitute for CoD then it needs to have a similar pace something which DICE hasn't done and their recent slow sluggish BC2 isn't confidence inspiring either.
Oh and DICE's multiplayer shooters being leaps and bounds above everything else? Well that's just not true at all.
A non sandbox fps nowadays being more than 10 hours? No way.Looks sorta like a Modern Warfare 2 on steroids.
If it's longer than 10 hours, I'll grab it. Otherwise, I'll just stick to Modern Warfare 1 and 2.
Oh, but if they change the cover of the game to something better, I'll get it anyways.
gashoe13
hahaha I'm sorry but no.
I like the CoD series a hell of a lot more than the Battlefield series simply because I like fast paced shooters with satisfying guns... something that the BF series doesn't offer.
If this game is supposed to be a substitute for CoD then it needs to have a similar pace something which DICE hasn't done and their recent slow sluggish BC2 isn't confidence inspiring either.
Oh and DICE's multiplayer shooters being leaps and bounds above everything else? Well that's just not true at all.
the_mitch28
CoD does indeed have satisfying guns, BF series never really did due to the crappy net code DICE always had.
I just hope this is a bit slower paced than the CoD games.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment