This topic is locked from further discussion.
There is no 128 bit OS for at least the next10-20 years. Theoritically 64 bit allows for 2^64 kb of memory, that's 17592186044416 GB of memory.matrixian
So 32bit is not enough?
64-bit is the final solution, at least for the lifetime of everyone reading this post today. It will be a LONG time before we run out of memory address space.
Might as well settle in and get used to 64-bit, it's possible we will never see a 128-bit OS, kind of disturbing huh :shock:
"Suffice it to say that we won't be running out of physical or virtual address space on 64-bit operating systems for the forseeable future. It's the final solution, at least for the lifetime of everyone reading this blog post today"
64-bit is the final solution, at least for the lifetime of everyone reading this post today. It will be a LONG time before we run out of memory address space.
Might as well settle in and get used to 64-bit, it's possible we will never see a 128-bit OS, kind of disturbing huh :shock:
"Suffice it to say that we won't be running out of physical or virtual address space on 64-bit operating systems for the forseeable future. It's the final solution, at least for the lifetime of everyone reading this blog post today"
Nitrous2O
how old are u? like 50? cause i don't think it'll be that long before we require ram like that. yes it'll take probably 30-40 years but thats not in our lifetime lol :p unless we all die in a war or car accident or some fetal injuries lol :P except that you'll probably see one.
DOS has basically been the forerunner for almost all of the 16-bit era, and Microsoft only started to provide proper 32-bit computing support with Windows 95. And we've only started seeing 64-bit support in Windows with XP x64 and a 64-bit build of Server 2003.
In short, it will be a long time before a move to 128-bit computing will be justified, if even necessary.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment