nvidia 8500 gt verto, a worthy purchase ?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for AIRMAX95s
AIRMAX95s

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 AIRMAX95s
Member since 2005 • 49 Posts

Ok so todaii I had to go downtown, and my dad bought me a new graphic card. He bought me the NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

Verto 512 MB. The card cost us $150 including the tax. My dilemma is, was it worth it? Or should I have gotten the 7900 which is

20x more powerful than the intel intergrated grpahics. The 8600 is only 7x more powerful... (what gives?) BTW the 7900 also costs

$150.

On a side note is it true that some manufactures produce cheap cards. I am asking this because my dad rather pay more for a

PCI or MSI than buy a XFX. My dad is an experianced technician and he says XFX is known to be unstable and crash often.

PS if anyone can advise me if there is an even better card in the $140 range. And how is the 7900 GT more powerful than the 8500 GT?

THX and have a good Holiday :P

Avatar image for AIRMAX95s
AIRMAX95s

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 AIRMAX95s
Member since 2005 • 49 Posts
Sry
Avatar image for shanelevy
shanelevy

1316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 shanelevy
Member since 2004 • 1316 Posts

Uh, the 8500 GT sucks compared to the 7900GT (and it pretty much just sucks regardless of comparison), but both cards are obsolete. You should have gotten an Radeon HD 3850 for about $180. For $140 you got royally ripped off, sorry.

Also, your dad has no idea what he's talking about. XFX is one of the best GFX card brands and they have a great warranty.

I'm not sure what you're talking about with the 7x and 20x more powerful than integrated graphics, but it doesn't really make sense.

So yeah...I, uh, hope that helps. Just return that crappy 8500GT.

Avatar image for kmusky
kmusky

927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 kmusky
Member since 2004 • 927 Posts

If I were you, I'd save up a few more dollers and get an 3850.

But if those are your only two choices, get the 7900. The 8500 is just not meant for serious gaming.

Avatar image for AIRMAX95s
AIRMAX95s

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 AIRMAX95s
Member since 2005 • 49 Posts

Uh, the 8500 GT sucks compared to the 7900GT (and it pretty much just sucks regardless of comparison), but both cards are obsolete. You should have gotten an Radeon HD 3850 for about $180. For $140 you got royally ripped off, sorry.

Also, your dad has no idea what he's talking about. XFX is one of the best GFX card brands and they have a great warranty.

I'm not sure what you're talking about with the 7x and 20x more powerful than integrated graphics, but it doesn't really make sense.

So yeah...I, uh, hope that helps. Just return that crappy 8500GT.

shanelevy

So do you have any card from NVDIA thats priced at around $140.That is good for gaming. Ihonestly dont understand graphic cards why does the 8500 GT suck compare to 7900 GT? Isn't the 8500 GT newer?

Avatar image for ILostOnJeprody
ILostOnJeprody

338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ILostOnJeprody
Member since 2005 • 338 Posts
Well, the 7900 would be a better overall option when compared to the 8500 GT. Essentially, the 8500 has a higher number because it is in Nvidia's new line of DirectX10 cards. However, the card is a mid range 8 series that is not designed specifically for gaming, while the 7900 is at the top of Nvidia's 7000 series and was built with gaming in mind. Personally, I would order a Radeon 3850, which is a fairly high performance directX 10 card at the affordable price of about $170. To summarize: Buy the 7900 over the 8500, but the Radeon 3850 is the best value in that price range. Also, I am certain that others could explain the details much better than myself, and they may even make different recommendations, so wait for a few more replies. Edit: Seems like others have already responded.
Avatar image for AIRMAX95s
AIRMAX95s

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 AIRMAX95s
Member since 2005 • 49 Posts
Thank you Im learning alot.
Avatar image for gatorteen
gatorteen

2760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 gatorteen
Member since 2005 • 2760 Posts
Like the other guy said save alittle money and get the ati hd 3850. Its 30 bucks more but it outperforms the 7900 by more than 50%.
Avatar image for kmusky
kmusky

927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 kmusky
Member since 2004 • 927 Posts

The Key is the memory interface. The 7900 has a 256mb interface, whereas the 8500 only has a 128mb interface, which throttles it back.

So an ATI product is not an option for you? You should really consider an 3850.

Are you limited to AGP?

Avatar image for Indestructible2
Indestructible2

5935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Indestructible2
Member since 2007 • 5935 Posts

7900GT kills 8500GT in gaming,enuff said.

Avatar image for AIRMAX95s
AIRMAX95s

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 AIRMAX95s
Member since 2005 • 49 Posts
No PCI is okaii
Avatar image for yoyo462001
yoyo462001

7535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#12 yoyo462001
Member since 2005 • 7535 Posts

The Key is the memory interface. The 7900 has a 256mb interface, whereas the 8500 only has a 128mb interface, which throttles it back.

So an ATI product is not an option for you? You should really consider an 3850.

Are you limited to AGP?

kmusky
its not only that the whole GPU is not designed for gaming really whereas the 7900 is, the 8500 is a bugdet/low end card so its meant to be in mainstream PC's where maybe the sims is the most graphical thing that you could play.
Avatar image for kmusky
kmusky

927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 kmusky
Member since 2004 • 927 Posts
[QUOTE="kmusky"]

The Key is the memory interface. The 7900 has a 256mb interface, whereas the 8500 only has a 128mb interface, which throttles it back.

So an ATI product is not an option for you? You should really consider an 3850.

Are you limited to AGP?

yoyo462001

its not only that the whole GPU is not designed for gaming really whereas the 7900 is, the 8500 is a bugdet/low end card so its meant to be in mainstream PC's where maybe the sims is the most graphical thing that you could play.

I stand corrected.

Avatar image for AIRMAX95s
AIRMAX95s

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 AIRMAX95s
Member since 2005 • 49 Posts
Wowzers good thing I can still return it!!!!
Avatar image for yoyo462001
yoyo462001

7535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#15 yoyo462001
Member since 2005 • 7535 Posts
[QUOTE="yoyo462001"][QUOTE="kmusky"]

The Key is the memory interface. The 7900 has a 256mb interface, whereas the 8500 only has a 128mb interface, which throttles it back.

So an ATI product is not an option for you? You should really consider an 3850.

Are you limited to AGP?

kmusky

its not only that the whole GPU is not designed for gaming really whereas the 7900 is, the 8500 is a bugdet/low end card so its meant to be in mainstream PC's where maybe the sims is the most graphical thing that you could play.

I stand corrected.

nah i wasn't correcting you all you said was right i just developed on it and showed why it cant ever compete with the 7900.
Avatar image for blackstar
blackstar

1252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 blackstar
Member since 2004 • 1252 Posts
return it. Save yourself a bit more money and get an ATI 3850 HD which is close to your budget range.