Also, the extra 128MB framebuffer and 320-bit bus on the GTS will definitely make a difference at resolutions above 1600x1200. Not sure why nvidia went back to the 512MB 256-bit interface for the GT.
It is still too early to talk about that now.512MB memory is great but 256 bit memory interface is unexpected.3dMark06 scores are solid but will it keep it's power to games.I hope it will.If 8800GT stay in it's position as it did in the chart,nVIDIA has created a Titan that will eat 8800GTS cards.
What do you care? This is the most worthless post of the month... congrads on your new found site that only occasionaly has reliable information and realizing that technology actually gets better over the years. You should check out this one.
People who create topics like this fail at life. The 8800GTS has been out for a year, it's only natural something replaces it. I've had mine since March and I intend to keep using it for quite some time. I am glad that I got an 8800gts, it's just a darn shame that I max out every game I play :)
i dont care if people give me crap about my card i have a 8800gts 320mb coming from a Nvidia mx 440.....what i have now is leaps and bounds aheadGreg_888_v8
True. Why do we need the "BEST" card out? If these cards can still play most games, I can handle games at 45+ FPS or higher, my 640MB does that gives that to me on most games.
I got gts 640s in sli and im as happy as i can be for what I paid and when I got them. The 8800 is a good card dont get me wrong I just dont care much about it. The only good thing i see is maybe nvidia is finally realised that they need to sell high-end cards cheaper.
I don't admit defeat because I bought my 8800GTS 3 months ago and since then I've played a lot of games. At that time it was the best choicedayaccus007
Log in to comment