NVIDIA Thanks Intel For Saying GPUs Are 'ONLY' 14 Times Faster Than CPU's!

LINK

This is pretty funny stuff. Obviously GPU's cant run any kind of program but when they do Intel cant deny they kick the living **** out of ANY CPU out there.

Thats pretty funny weird thing that intel actually said that.

Oh and epic picture right there.

It's like why don't we just convert GPUs into CPUs? Also for video converting they seem to suck but maybe thats just due to the software not being optimized for it.

It's like why don't we just convert GPUs into CPUs? Also for video converting they seem to suck but maybe thats just due to the software not being optimized for it.

zaku101

[QUOTE="zaku101"]

It's like why don't we just convert GPUs into CPUs? Also for video converting they seem to suck but maybe thats just due to the software not being optimized for it.

BDK-Soft

What program you using? Give convertxtodvd a try it beats my GPU.

try cyberlink mediashow espresso. it has ati stream support

Intel made a huge PR error there. But NVIDIA also made a few mistakes in their answer:

• They complain the the last-gen 280 was tested. The paper was written in '09 - the 280 was the most advanced GPU from NVIDIA at that time, due to all the delays.
• Thay say it probably was "out of the box" unoptimized testing. That is not true, Intel's paper states the methodology and optimization done.

Source

But no doubt, Intel had a brain-fart.It would be the same as admitting that "AMD's CPUs" are 'only' 14 times faster than ours. Not 100 as they claim". :-)