Official HD 5870 Performance Numbers from ATI.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts

Here we are, official HD 5870 performance numbers, article taken from TechPowerUp! Enjoy.

ATI Radeon Graphics

First Radeon HD 5870 Performance Figures SurfaceHere are some of the first performance figures of AMD's upcoming Radeon HD 5870 published by a media source. Czech Gamer posted performance numbers of the card compared to current heavyweights including Radeon HD 4870 X2, Radeon HD 4890, and GeForce GTX 285. Having not entered an NDA with AMD, the source was liberal with its performance projections citing AMD's internal testing that include the following, apart from the two graphs below:

  • Radeon HD 5870 is anywhere between 5~155 percent faster than GeForce GTX 285. That's a huge range, and leaves a lot of room for uncertainty.
  • When compared to GeForce GTX 295, its performance ranges between -25 percent (25% slower) to 95 percent (almost 2x faster), another broad range.
  • When two HD 5870 cards are set up in CrossFire, the resulting setup is -5 percent (5% slower) to 90 percent faster than GeForce GTX 295. Strangely, the range maximum is lesser than that on the single card.
  • When three of these cards are setup in 3-way CrossFireX, the resulting setup is 10~160 percent faster than a GeForce GTX 295.
  • The Radeon HD 5850 on the other hand, can be -25 percent (25% slower) to 120 percent faster than GeForce GTX 285.

AMD reportedly used a set of 15 games to run its tests. Vague as they seem, the above numbers raise more questions than provide answers. The graphs below are clear, for a change.

Avatar image for UltimateGamer95
UltimateGamer95

4720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 UltimateGamer95
Member since 2006 • 4720 Posts

wow! the 5870 is twice as fast as the GTX 285, amazing! Got any Crysis benchmarks though?

Avatar image for vegita92
vegita92

224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 vegita92
Member since 2009 • 224 Posts

wow! the 5870 is twice as fast as the GTX 285, amazing! Got any Crysis benchmarks though?

UltimateGamer95
http://forums.gametrailers.com/thread/5870-benchies/915061 crysis^^
Avatar image for ravenguard90
ravenguard90

3064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ravenguard90
Member since 2005 • 3064 Posts

The jump between 4890 and the 5870 is actually very impressive. Almost double the framerates in Hawx, and 3000 more points in 3dMark. I'm already regretting not waiting one month longer before purchasing my rig :(

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
Looks to me like they just need sometime to tune the drivers, the raw hardware power is definitely there
Avatar image for MajorGamer531
MajorGamer531

1215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#6 MajorGamer531
Member since 2005 • 1215 Posts

My concern are the huge ranges. Makes me think the card is unstable, unless it is a driver error I may avoid this card.

Avatar image for UltimateGamer95
UltimateGamer95

4720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 UltimateGamer95
Member since 2006 • 4720 Posts

what's interesting though is that theorectically the 5870 would be about as fast as two 4890's in crossfireX.

Avatar image for PunishedOne
PunishedOne

6045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 PunishedOne
Member since 2003 • 6045 Posts

Yeah, the ranges seem like it's pointing to the drivers. That's one hell of a card, that just means 4870s/4890s will go even further in price, although they're already dirt cheap for what they can do.

Avatar image for MajorGamer531
MajorGamer531

1215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#9 MajorGamer531
Member since 2005 • 1215 Posts

Anybody know if it is double PCB config? Or two GPUs to a single PCB?

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

Anybody know if it is double PCB config? Or two GPUs to a single PCB?

MajorGamer531
Only the X2s use double GPUs. In the 5*** generation though they will be stacked, they will not use a crossfire chip on the card and so you can have 6 GPUs instead of the previous limit of 3.
Avatar image for MorbidToaster
MorbidToaster

1434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#11 MorbidToaster
Member since 2008 • 1434 Posts

I've got my 4890, and this is pretty impressive...But I want to see what nVidia have in store for this next set of cards.

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

If this turns out to be correct then this will be like a new 8800GTX in performance jumps!

Avatar image for MajorGamer531
MajorGamer531

1215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#13 MajorGamer531
Member since 2005 • 1215 Posts

[QUOTE="MajorGamer531"]

Anybody know if it is double PCB config? Or two GPUs to a single PCB?

markop2003

Only the X2s use double GPUs. In the 5*** generation though they will be stacked, they will not use a crossfire chip on the card and so you can have 6 GPUs instead of the previous limit of 3.

Thanks.

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
.

If this turns out to be correct then this will be like a new 8800GTX in performance jumps!

Daytona_178
I don't know, ATI's performance jump has been consistent X1950XTX>2900XT/HD3870>HD4870/HD4890>HD5870 have all been 2.0 to 2.5x gains. 8800GTX was just amazing because the 7900GTX was slower than the X1900XTX and the 8800GTX was more than 2.5X more powerful the X1900XTX so there were huge gains going from 7900GTX>8800GTX. A consistent performance jump but definitely an indicator that the strategy works well, because in todays situation it's translating well. Maybe if it had 2000 shaders it would be a big jump like the 8800GTX, but ATI dropped the gargantuan die idea.
Avatar image for johnny27
johnny27

4400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 johnny27
Member since 2006 • 4400 Posts
is there other benchmarks as they only show HAWK which heavily favors ati and dx10.1 so it would be nice to see some benchmarks for different games.
Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
is there other benchmarks as they only show HAWK which heavily favors ati and dx10.1 so it would be nice to see some benchmarks for different games.johnny27
Unfortunately that's all that was included, the site that released these figures apparently breached the NDA, so expect more to come in.
Avatar image for No_Quoter
No_Quoter

281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 No_Quoter
Member since 2008 • 281 Posts

I'll believe it when I test them out personaly after many years in this industry I have to say it happens every time yet somehow people always fall for the hype of fake tests results im seriously getting tired of this. Endless links to forums and blogs till eventualy it ends up in a rumour section of actaul hardware site... if anyone has knows its them, wait 2-3 months then compare thses benchmarks to the actual benchmarks from reviews.

English is not my first language I appologise.

Avatar image for Threesixtyci
Threesixtyci

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Threesixtyci
Member since 2006 • 4451 Posts
How much is it going to be?
Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
How much is it going to be?Threesixtyci
HD 5850 1GB $300. HD 5870 1GB $400. HD 5870 2GB $450. I believe those are the projected prices.
Avatar image for olly436
olly436

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 olly436
Member since 2007 • 113 Posts
5770 is 200$
Avatar image for Threesixtyci
Threesixtyci

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Threesixtyci
Member since 2006 • 4451 Posts
Awww,,,, that's too much. 5770 @ $200? But that's what a 4890 costs, now. Wonder how the benches between the two are going to compare if they do end up being around the same price... Although, I have to say this is the first time I've heard of a 5770.
Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
Awww,,,, that's too much. 5770 @ $200? But that's what a 4890 costs, now. Wonder how the benches between the two are going to compare if they do end up being around the same price... Although, I have to say this is the first time I've heard of a 5770.Threesixtyci
Yeah that sounds a little fishy to me as well, probably gonna be an HD 5830 and then once they get a die shrink in go 57xx if past trends hold true. Doesn't make sense to launch an HD 5770 right now.
Avatar image for UltimateGamer95
UltimateGamer95

4720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 UltimateGamer95
Member since 2006 • 4720 Posts
[QUOTE="Threesixtyci"]Awww,,,, that's too much. 5770 @ $200? But that's what a 4890 costs, now. Wonder how the benches between the two are going to compare if they do end up being around the same price... Although, I have to say this is the first time I've heard of a 5770.

The midrange cards of the 5000 series will release in October.
Avatar image for gamerloks
gamerloks

509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 gamerloks
Member since 2008 • 509 Posts
wow it looks promising
Avatar image for Ownsin
Ownsin

1331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Ownsin
Member since 2007 • 1331 Posts
Okay im buying it.... screw buying the GTX 275 SLI.... i now know guys why you told me to wait! i guess i was ignorant xD, sorry!
Avatar image for Hekynn
Hekynn

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Hekynn
Member since 2003 • 2164 Posts
No thanks I know its fast and all but I'm going with 2 4890's that has the Zalman coolers on it.
Avatar image for kaitanuvax
kaitanuvax

3814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 kaitanuvax
Member since 2007 • 3814 Posts

No thanks I know its fast and all but I'm going with 2 4890's that has the Zalman coolers on it. Hekynn

What a waste of the electricity bills...

Avatar image for Jamiemydearx3
Jamiemydearx3

4062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Jamiemydearx3
Member since 2008 • 4062 Posts

Im waiting.. For the GTX 3xx, 6870 or whatever nvidia and AMD's next gen cards will be...

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
5870 is the next generation...