[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]
"more of a game then ARMA 2"
Sure:roll:
devious742
:roll: :) It is "more of a game" than arma 2 Arma 2 is mostly simulator and not designed to be a fun game for the public with shiny graphics, just detailed. Arma 2 is mostly a simulator and less a "fun" game So yeah it is more of a game than arma 2 Thats not a bad thing, its just the reviewer pointing out that the game is more playable than arma 2 and it focuses better on what games need to be good than giving a total realism and simulation. Also i like how he points out that there are a few console aspects... most reviewers ignore that, but judging by the fact that i he pointed out that it has console touches, i would say i trust this review as a pc review and not a copy and paste console review like gamespot does.actually thats what ppl want from a game like arma 2.. a war simulator.. what the reviewer is saying that they made it more accesible and dumbed down certain aspects to make it more "fun"..
i dont think the reviewer should say this game is more fun than the other especially when they are different..one caters to the hardcore..(Let's face it, awe-inspiring in terms of depth and complexity ArmA II) and the other caters to a more casual crowd (Concessions are made to the use of pads - radial menus, checkpoints that revive your comrades, and so on)(Dragon Rising makes this activity challenging but always pleasurable. It might be helping you out a bit too much at times with its life-giving checkpoints and magic syringes, but sometimes a bit of assistance isn't a bad thing. Some people will doubtless hate it, saying it's not a par on ArmA II)
i don't think it's fair to call it "dumbed down". you said it yourself - they are different, so what's there to dumb down if there's nothing to compare? plus, the review - let's say it's credible for now - clearly stated that it has enough depth and realism to satisfy all but the most hardcore nuts.
Log in to comment