"As the FX-8150 has an unlocked multiplier, you can overclock the processor without overclocking your RAM and the motherboard's chipset. With the stock cooler, we only managed to get it up to 4.2GHz, but with a Cooler Master V8 cooler (£45 from www.expansys.com) we could set the processor multiplier to 45x to see a stable 4.5GHz - an increase of 900MHz. At this speed, our overall benchmarks score increased to 96 - a 10 per cent improvement. It's a useful speed boost, but it's overshadowed by the overclockability of Intel's Core i5-2500K. Even with the stock cooler we could get this up to 4GHz, an increase of 700MHz, and this led to an overall score of 118 in our benchmarks - far ahead of AMD's chip."Bulldozer:
2500k:
Source:
http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/processors/1287799/amd-fx-8150/2
kraken2109
Oh ya testing 2 CPU's at stock speeds when the slower clocked one actually overclocks better is a useless test.
I find it a bit strange that the 2500k gained that much performance by overclocking it to just 4Ghz but hey you posted the link and according to that for anyone who overclocks 2500k >>>> 8150. Nevermind the fact that they didnt even bother putting a cooler on the 2500k to see how much it will overclock and yet it managed to beat the 8150
Add the fact that the 8150 is much more expensive, ya it's a massive fail.
Log in to comment