Ok so I just upgraded from a Phenom II 940 to the FX8150....

  • 93 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#51 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

Bulldozer:

2500k:

Source:

http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/processors/1287799/amd-fx-8150/2

kraken2109

"As the FX-8150 has an unlocked multiplier, you can overclock the processor without overclocking your RAM and the motherboard's chipset. With the stock cooler, we only managed to get it up to 4.2GHz, but with a Cooler Master V8 cooler (£45 from www.expansys.com) we could set the processor multiplier to 45x to see a stable 4.5GHz - an increase of 900MHz. At this speed, our overall benchmarks score increased to 96 - a 10 per cent improvement. It's a useful speed boost, but it's overshadowed by the overclockability of Intel's Core i5-2500K. Even with the stock cooler we could get this up to 4GHz, an increase of 700MHz, and this led to an overall score of 118 in our benchmarks - far ahead of AMD's chip."

Oh ya testing 2 CPU's at stock speeds when the slower clocked one actually overclocks better is a useless test.

I find it a bit strange that the 2500k gained that much performance by overclocking it to just 4Ghz but hey you posted the link and according to that for anyone who overclocks 2500k >>>> 8150. Nevermind the fact that they didnt even bother putting a cooler on the 2500k to see how much it will overclock and yet it managed to beat the 8150

Add the fact that the 8150 is much more expensive, ya it's a massive fail.

Avatar image for superclocked
superclocked

5864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 superclocked
Member since 2009 • 5864 Posts

Add the fact that the 8150 is much more expensive, ya it's a massive fail.

Gambler_3
I have a striking suspicion that Zambezi will actually outperform Sandy Bridge in games eventually, but consoles have made engines much lighter on CPU resources, so that day likely won't come for a very long time...
Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

[QUOTE="kraken2109"]

Bulldozer:

2500k:

Source:

http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/processors/1287799/amd-fx-8150/2

Gambler_3

"As the FX-8150 has an unlocked multiplier, you can overclock the processor without overclocking your RAM and the motherboard's chipset. With the stock cooler, we only managed to get it up to 4.2GHz, but with a Cooler Master V8 cooler (£45 from www.expansys.com) we could set the processor multiplier to 45x to see a stable 4.5GHz - an increase of 900MHz. At this speed, our overall benchmarks score increased to 96 - a 10 per cent improvement. It's a useful speed boost, but it's overshadowed by the overclockability of Intel's Core i5-2500K. Even with the stock cooler we could get this up to 4GHz, an increase of 700MHz, and this led to an overall score of 118 in our benchmarks - far ahead of AMD's chip."

Oh ya testing 2 CPU's at stock speeds when the slower clocked one actually overclocks better is a useless test.

I find it a bit strange that the 2500k gained that much performance by overclocking it to just 4Ghz but hey you posted the link and according to that for anyone who overclocks 2500k >>>> 8150. Nevermind the fact that they didnt even bother putting a cooler on the 2500k to see how much it will overclock and yet it managed to beat the 8150

Add the fact that the 8150 is much more expensive, ya it's a massive fail.

Why are you so aggressive all the time? I was just posting something interesting that i haven't seen on this board before. This is why people call you a fanboy.

Avatar image for GTR12
GTR12

13490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 GTR12
Member since 2006 • 13490 Posts

The motherboard is a very important component, putting a powerful processor in a crap motherboard is like putting a big block V8 in a model T chassis. Yes the motherboard doesn't actually make it go fast, but it allows the processor to unlock its full potential. For myself, I use basically every USB and esata port that is available. I don't just run 1 game at once, I run many things constantly, which includes gaming, which is why I have extra ram, extra monitors, etc.

Your stance is very ignorant.

GummiRaccoon

You do realise my post was a light-hearted joke post, hence the excessive emotes.

Avatar image for mixedplanet
mixedplanet

1215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 mixedplanet
Member since 2005 • 1215 Posts

[QUOTE="mixedplanet"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] So more is better for BD.

mitu123

so far I noticed it too, hopefully its futureproof. HOPEFULLY. So far I am enjoying it. got it upto 4Ghz and tightened up the ram timings, every program it load balzing fast, even booting windows.

How's your gaming status on it?

Battlefield 3 does not stutter or slowdown like it used to with my old 1055T. FPS went up by 6 to 10. Arkham City Physx actually improves performance by like 5 FPS with bulldozer handling physx. Still under 30 though, screw Nvidia for that. Shogun 2 is smooth as butter, no hitch up. So is empire total war. Main games I play. Haven't bought skyrim yet. my Vantage H score went up a lot (forget the number for 1055T, but it was rather low). Uniengine haven gave a 100 point boost, 1622 at 180P, tessalation normal, 2x AA, 16x AF, shader High. for gaming, this processor is amazing, I don't care what it gets in cinebench, My primary use is gaming.
Avatar image for dabigsiebowski
dabigsiebowski

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 dabigsiebowski
Member since 2003 • 887 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"] So more is better for BD.

mixedplanet

so far I noticed it too, hopefully its futureproof. HOPEFULLY. So far I am enjoying it. got it upto 4Ghz and tightened up the ram timings, every program it load balzing fast, even booting windows.

Same here pretty much, just now finished fine tuning everything. Everything is a dream right now ;D As far as gaming Status goes I noticed little improvement over my previous chip but obviously now I don't have to worry about down grading my graphics and video quality to stream online, with multiple other operations running.
Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

The motherboard is a very important component, putting a powerful processor in a crap motherboard is like putting a big block V8 in a model T chassis. Yes the motherboard doesn't actually make it go fast, but it allows the processor to unlock its full potential. For myself, I use basically every USB and esata port that is available. I don't just run 1 game at once, I run many things constantly, which includes gaming, which is why I have extra ram, extra monitors, etc.

Your stance is very ignorant.

GTR12

You do realise my post was a light-hearted joke post, hence the excessive emotes.

Apologies. I am so used to gambler's asinine ramblings that I am starting to see them everywhere.

Avatar image for hofuldig
hofuldig

5126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#58 hofuldig
Member since 2004 • 5126 Posts
[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="mixedplanet"]

so far I noticed it too, hopefully its futureproof. HOPEFULLY. So far I am enjoying it. got it upto 4Ghz and tightened up the ram timings, every program it load balzing fast, even booting windows.

mixedplanet

How's your gaming status on it?

Battlefield 3 does not stutter or slowdown like it used to with my old 1055T. FPS went up by 6 to 10. Arkham City Physx actually improves performance by like 5 FPS with bulldozer handling physx. Still under 30 though, screw Nvidia for that. Shogun 2 is smooth as butter, no hitch up. So is empire total war. Main games I play. Haven't bought skyrim yet. my Vantage H score went up a lot (forget the number for 1055T, but it was rather low). Uniengine haven gave a 100 point boost, 1622 at 180P, tessalation normal, 2x AA, 16x AF, shader High. for gaming, this processor is amazing, I don't care what it gets in cinebench, My primary use is gaming.

So your saying you went from a Phenom 2 X6 1055T to a Buldozer 8120 and Overclocked it to 4GHz and your only getting an average of 5-10FPS more? did you overclock your P2X6 at all?
Avatar image for mixedplanet
mixedplanet

1215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 mixedplanet
Member since 2005 • 1215 Posts

[QUOTE="mixedplanet"][QUOTE="mitu123"] How's your gaming status on it?

hofuldig

Battlefield 3 does not stutter or slowdown like it used to with my old 1055T. FPS went up by 6 to 10. Arkham City Physx actually improves performance by like 5 FPS with bulldozer handling physx. Still under 30 though, screw Nvidia for that. Shogun 2 is smooth as butter, no hitch up. So is empire total war. Main games I play. Haven't bought skyrim yet. my Vantage H score went up a lot (forget the number for 1055T, but it was rather low). Uniengine haven gave a 100 point boost, 1622 at 180P, tessalation normal, 2x AA, 16x AF, shader High. for gaming, this processor is amazing, I don't care what it gets in cinebench, My primary use is gaming.

So your saying you went from a Phenom 2 X6 1055T to a Buldozer 8120 and Overclocked it to 4GHz and your only getting an average of 5-10FPS more? did you overclock your P2X6 at all?

no, I went to an FX-6120 because I built my machine focusing on Bulldozer and I planned on getting it from the start. I got the 1055T second hand and then sold it to my brother. Did you miss the parts where I mentioned everything is smooth in my games and there is not stuttering or hick ups? The increased FPS is just a bonus to me. I am impressed with the fluidity of my system and fast response time. I did overclock the 1055T to 3.3

Avatar image for hofuldig
hofuldig

5126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 hofuldig
Member since 2004 • 5126 Posts

[QUOTE="hofuldig"][QUOTE="mixedplanet"] Battlefield 3 does not stutter or slowdown like it used to with my old 1055T. FPS went up by 6 to 10. Arkham City Physx actually improves performance by like 5 FPS with bulldozer handling physx. Still under 30 though, screw Nvidia for that. Shogun 2 is smooth as butter, no hitch up. So is empire total war. Main games I play. Haven't bought skyrim yet. my Vantage H score went up a lot (forget the number for 1055T, but it was rather low). Uniengine haven gave a 100 point boost, 1622 at 180P, tessalation normal, 2x AA, 16x AF, shader High. for gaming, this processor is amazing, I don't care what it gets in cinebench, My primary use is gaming. mixedplanet

So your saying you went from a Phenom 2 X6 1055T to a Buldozer 8120 and Overclocked it to 4GHz and your only getting an average of 5-10FPS more? did you overclock your P2X6 at all?

no, I went to an FX-6120 because I built my machine focusing on Bulldozer and I planned on getting it from the start. I got the 1055T second hand and then sold it to my brother. Did you miss the parts where I mentioned everything is smooth in my games and there is not stuttering or hick ups? The increased FPS is just a bonus to me. I am impressed with the fluidity of my system and fast response time. I did overclock the 1055T to 3.3

Ok well your profile says 8120 not 6120 thats why i said that. but that still dosnt change the fact that you were using a 1055T at 3.3GHz then got a 6120 and overclocked it to 4GHz and your only getting about 10 FPS more.

EDIT: i would also like to add i use a dual core CPU and my games are smooth with no stuttering or hickups so you cant really use that as a selling point. on another not my friend has a Phenom 2 X3 and he dose not experience any stuttering in his games either. that includes Battlefield 3.

Avatar image for mixedplanet
mixedplanet

1215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 mixedplanet
Member since 2005 • 1215 Posts

my mistake, typo. 8120 is what got

I am not trying to sell the product to you or to anyone in this site. I play my games @ 1080p with max detail and I doubt shogun 2 or battlefield 3 running smoothly with the processors your mentioned. In fact, I know it isn't true because 1055T couldn't do it. I built this system for 3 years. My next cpu upgrade will come with steamroller most likely. I am excited to see how multi threading takes advatage of bulldozer. I have various things open and running during my play sessions and still not hick ups. I absoltely love it.

Avatar image for mastershake575
mastershake575

8574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 mastershake575
Member since 2007 • 8574 Posts

[QUOTE="mastershake575"]

[QUOTE="dabigsiebowski"]

GummiRaccoon

Your 95% estimate is not very close.

You mean to tell me that a well developed game won't give similar performance to a high clocked quad core vs a new eight core cpu that most games don't even utilize ? yeah okay

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

[QUOTE="mastershake575"]

mastershake575

Your 95% estimate is not very close.

You mean to tell me that a well developed game won't give similar performance to a high clocked quad core vs a new eight core cpu that most games don't even utilize ? yeah okay

Go look for yourself.

Avatar image for mastershake575
mastershake575

8574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 mastershake575
Member since 2007 • 8574 Posts
[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

[QUOTE="mastershake575"]

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

Your 95% estimate is not very close.

You mean to tell me that a well developed game won't give similar performance to a high clocked quad core vs a new eight core cpu that most games don't even utilize ? yeah okay

Go look for yourself.

I just looked at 5 reviews of the fx 8150 (anandtech, hardocp, guru3d.....ect) and all I saw was it performing close to if not right at the same performance as a phenom x4 and it getting destroyed by an i5........ (don't see how a higher clocked q9150 would fair any different then the x4)
Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#65 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

Why are you so aggressive all the time? I was just posting something interesting that i haven't seen on this board before. This is why people call you a fanboy.

kraken2109

You were posting it as if you have discovered some cold hard fact that bulldozer is better than sandy bridge, you should have read your own link better which you didnt thats why I pointed out the things you missed.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#66 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="GTR12"]

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

I have your motherboard, I love it so much, so many usb ports.

GummiRaccoon

:lol: its about CPU's, not mobos :P

The motherboard is a very important component, putting a powerful processor in a crap motherboard is like putting a big block V8 in a model T chassis. Yes the motherboard doesn't actually make it go fast, but it allows the processor to unlock its full potential. For myself, I use basically every USB and esata port that is available. I don't just run 1 game at once, I run many things constantly, which includes gaming, which is why I have extra ram, extra monitors, etc.

Your stance is very ignorant.

The motherboard is important for SOME people. For others, expensive mobos just have a bunch of features and extra slots/ports that they will never use. What counts is how fast the CPU is, not how loaded-up the mobo is. For me, all I need are 4 SATA ports, 4 RAM slots, at least 1 full-length PCI-E X16 slot, and 2 PCI slots. The rest is pretty much fluff.

Avatar image for hofuldig
hofuldig

5126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#67 hofuldig
Member since 2004 • 5126 Posts

my mistake, typo. 8120 is what got

I am not trying to sell the product to you or to anyone in this site. I play my games @ 1080p with max detail and I doubt shogun 2 or battlefield 3 running smoothly with the processors your mentioned. In fact, I know it isn't true because 1055T couldn't do it. I built this system for 3 years. My next cpu upgrade will come with steamroller most likely. I am excited to see how multi threading takes advatage of bulldozer. I have various things open and running during my play sessions and still not hick ups. I absoltely love it.

mixedplanet
Ok well you dont really seem to know what your talking about because if you upgraded from a Phenom 2 1055T (6 core) to a Bulldozer 8120 wich is what 8 cores? and are only getting 10FPS more in games it seems like a pretty big waist of money to me. not to mention you had the 1055T at 3.3GHz and you have the bulldozer at 4GHz. the stuttering most likely did not come from your CPU but something else or maby you were just imagining it. and yes my friend plays BF3 fluently with a Phenom 2 X3.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#68 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
You didn't even need to upgrade imo. red12355
That was the first thing that came to my mind..
Avatar image for mixedplanet
mixedplanet

1215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 mixedplanet
Member since 2005 • 1215 Posts
[QUOTE="mixedplanet"]

my mistake, typo. 8120 is what got

I am not trying to sell the product to you or to anyone in this site. I play my games @ 1080p with max detail and I doubt shogun 2 or battlefield 3 running smoothly with the processors your mentioned. In fact, I know it isn't true because 1055T couldn't do it. I built this system for 3 years. My next cpu upgrade will come with steamroller most likely. I am excited to see how multi threading takes advatage of bulldozer. I have various things open and running during my play sessions and still not hick ups. I absoltely love it.

hofuldig
Ok well you dont really seem to know what your talking about because if you upgraded from a Phenom 2 1055T (6 core) to a Bulldozer 8120 wich is what 8 cores? and are only getting 10FPS more in games it seems like a pretty big waist of money to me. not to mention you had the 1055T at 3.3GHz and you have the bulldozer at 4GHz. the stuttering most likely did not come from your CPU but something else or maby you were just imagining it. and yes my friend plays BF3 fluently with a Phenom 2 X3.

It wasn't much of an upgrade for the present as we all seen by benchmarks, its just an enthusiast thing. I wanted to get it and I got it. Its not like I lost any money on it cause I re-cooperated the entire cost of 1055T. I am going by the standard I set with my previous setup. You are free to disagree. I got 8120 30 bucks cheaper than 2500K and I am fine with it.
Avatar image for whitey_rolls
whitey_rolls

2547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 whitey_rolls
Member since 2006 • 2547 Posts

Call me a fanboy or whatever but this thing is beast!! 7zip ex, 3 1080p youtube videos,itunes,windows media player, BF3, Crysis, SC2, Skyrim, WoW, and even the flippin windows side bar without a a single hitch! Sure you can say this is an unrealistic benchmark and the ram is mostly handling my multi tasking but this baby is snappy.. Sad that I feel a lot of you are gonna be turning your heads to a true innovating processor which probably hasn't had most programs optimized for it yet.

My new rig (Waiting on 7970)

FX 8150@4.2 w/ 212+,16GB 1600, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3, Corsair Force GT 60GB SSD, 600 GB Raptor, 2x 2TB Samsung 7200RPM RAID0, using my brothers 6870 for the meantime! (he has 2)

I was smart and bought my hard drives when I thought bulldozer was coming out sooner, but when it finally released I couldn't seem to order one anywhere without getting too terribly ripped off. Worth the wait and it doesn't even get hot sitting at 46c @4.2 w/ load!

First time overclocking as well and it couldn't have been easier really! True innovation money can't buy! (Intel)

dabigsiebowski
Congratulations, I'm happy for your great experience... thankfully I've been having an even better experience with my 2600K for almost a year now!
Avatar image for C_Rule
C_Rule

9816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 C_Rule
Member since 2008 • 9816 Posts

[QUOTE="dabigsiebowski"]

Call me a fanboy or whatever but this thing is beast!! 7zip ex, 3 1080p youtube videos,itunes,windows media player, BF3, Crysis, SC2, Skyrim, WoW, and even the flippin windows side bar without a a single hitch! Sure you can say this is an unrealistic benchmark and the ram is mostly handling my multi tasking but this baby is snappy.. Sad that I feel a lot of you are gonna be turning your heads to a true innovating processor which probably hasn't had most programs optimized for it yet.

My new rig (Waiting on 7970)

FX 8150@4.2 w/ 212+,16GB 1600, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3, Corsair Force GT 60GB SSD, 600 GB Raptor, 2x 2TB Samsung 7200RPM RAID0, using my brothers 6870 for the meantime! (he has 2)

I was smart and bought my hard drives when I thought bulldozer was coming out sooner, but when it finally released I couldn't seem to order one anywhere without getting too terribly ripped off. Worth the wait and it doesn't even get hot sitting at 46c @4.2 w/ load!

First time overclocking as well and it couldn't have been easier really! True innovation money can't buy! (Intel)

whitey_rolls

Congratulations, I'm happy for your great experience... thankfully I've been having an even better experience with my 2600K for almost a year now!

Oh, snap.

Avatar image for robertoenrique
robertoenrique

1191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 robertoenrique
Member since 2004 • 1191 Posts

Call me a fanboy or whatever but this thing is beast!! 7zip ex, 3 1080p youtube videos,itunes,windows media player, BF3, Crysis, SC2, Skyrim, WoW, and even the flippin windows side bar without a a single hitch! Sure you can say this is an unrealistic benchmark and the ram is mostly handling my multi tasking but this baby is snappy.. Sad that I feel a lot of you are gonna be turning your heads to a true innovating processor which probably hasn't had most programs optimized for it yet.

My new rig (Waiting on 7970)

FX 8150@4.2 w/ 212+,16GB 1600, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3, Corsair Force GT 60GB SSD, 600 GB Raptor, 2x 2TB Samsung 7200RPM RAID0, using my brothers 6870 for the meantime! (he has 2)

I was smart and bought my hard drives when I thought bulldozer was coming out sooner, but when it finally released I couldn't seem to order one anywhere without getting too terribly ripped off. Worth the wait and it doesn't even get hot sitting at 46c @4.2 w/ load!

First time overclocking as well and it couldn't have been easier really! True innovation money can't buy! (Intel)

dabigsiebowski
You don't have to convince anyone here of your superb "upgrade" just yourself.
Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts

No way in hell would I buy Bulldozer now, they arent terrible but damn they arent great either. I would have gone 2500k or 2600k no doubt.

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#75 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

This thread sure backfired a bit.

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

[QUOTE="kraken2109"]

Why are you so aggressive all the time? I was just posting something interesting that i haven't seen on this board before. This is why people call you a fanboy.

Gambler_3

You were posting it as if you have discovered some cold hard fact that bulldozer is better than sandy bridge, you should have read your own link better which you didnt thats why I pointed out the things you missed.

The fact i was pointing out is that in some cased bulldozer CAN be better than sandy bridge. The article shows that. I wasn't talking about overclocking, as overclocking depends on the chip.
Avatar image for msfan1289
msfan1289

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 msfan1289
Member since 2011 • 1044 Posts

i might get one a 8020 or 8150 for the heck of it. PC is my hobby so i wont be losing out much from it. plus i already have a Am3+ motherboard, so why not.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

[QUOTE="GTR12"]

:lol: its about CPU's, not mobos :P

hartsickdiscipl

The motherboard is a very important component, putting a powerful processor in a crap motherboard is like putting a big block V8 in a model T chassis. Yes the motherboard doesn't actually make it go fast, but it allows the processor to unlock its full potential. For myself, I use basically every USB and esata port that is available. I don't just run 1 game at once, I run many things constantly, which includes gaming, which is why I have extra ram, extra monitors, etc.

Your stance is very ignorant.

The motherboard is important for SOME people. For others, expensive mobos just have a bunch of features and extra slots/ports that they will never use. What counts is how fast the CPU is, not how loaded-up the mobo is. For me, all I need are 4 SATA ports, 4 RAM slots, at least 1 full-length PCI-E X16 slot, and 2 PCI slots. The rest is pretty much fluff.

Now imagine if you got a motherboard that didn't meet your minimum requirements? For instance there are micro atx am3 motherboards that are only 95W.

Get the motherboard that suits your needs, I got my brother a 40 dollar AM3 board with 2 ram slots, micro atx because he will never get to the point of needing more.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

I like how no one read that the TC got the 1055 cheap 2nd hand and recouped all the cost he spent reselling it.

Also if he had done the exact same thing, but instead spent more getting a 2500k and new motherboard (motherboards resell like crap) everyone would be knocking each other over to praise his excellent decision. All for similarly superfluous extra performance.

Avatar image for superclocked
superclocked

5864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 superclocked
Member since 2009 • 5864 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

The motherboard is a very important component, putting a powerful processor in a crap motherboard is like putting a big block V8 in a model T chassis. Yes the motherboard doesn't actually make it go fast, but it allows the processor to unlock its full potential. For myself, I use basically every USB and esata port that is available. I don't just run 1 game at once, I run many things constantly, which includes gaming, which is why I have extra ram, extra monitors, etc.

Your stance is very ignorant.

GummiRaccoon

The motherboard is important for SOME people. For others, expensive mobos just have a bunch of features and extra slots/ports that they will never use. What counts is how fast the CPU is, not how loaded-up the mobo is. For me, all I need are 4 SATA ports, 4 RAM slots, at least 1 full-length PCI-E X16 slot, and 2 PCI slots. The rest is pretty much fluff.

Now imagine if you got a motherboard that didn't meet your minimum requirements? For instance there are micro atx am3 motherboards that are only 95W.

Get the motherboard that suits your needs, I got my brother a 40 dollar AM3 board with 2 ram slots, micro atx because he will never get to the point of needing more.

Yeah, I just got my son a $75 95w Phenom II X4 and $40 MicroATX AM3 motherboard (Biostar N68S), and that's plenty enough for him.. But to add to the earlier posts, if you're going to overclock your CPU, you will want to get a decent motherboard with solid state capacitors, heatsinked VRM's, a decent chipset, and good ratings...
Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#81 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

I like how no one read that the TC got the 1055 cheap 2nd hand and recouped all the cost he spent reselling it.

Also if he had done the exact same thing, but instead spent more getting a 2500k and new motherboard (motherboards resell like crap) everyone would be knocking each other over to praise his excellent decision. All for similarly superfluous extra performance.

GummiRaccoon

Stop assuming stuff, I certainly wouldnt be praising upgrading from a phenom X6 to ANYTHING be it intel 990X or 2700k or whatever. It's a completely unnecessary upgrade only for personal satisfaction. But atleast in the case of a 2600k he would be getting a significant boost in single thread performance, here all he got is a 2 core upgrade thats it which proportionately isnt anything like going from dual to quad core or even going hexa core from quad core. And it's really funny how many people end up with these super second hand deals, I wonder if they actually got those deals or is it just a fabricated thing to justify a decision.

And I sold a micro ATX intel 775 board at a very good price compared to price of new, that mitigated my mistake of ever buying a micro board but ofcourse I still lost money as I bought it new. So yes motherboards can be sold at good price depending on if there is still demand for it's CPU's.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

I certainly wouldnt be praising upgrading from a phenom X6 to ANYTHING be it intel 990X or 2700k or whatever. It's a completely unnecessary upgrade only for personal satisfaction. But

Gambler_3

Then goes on to praise. nice.

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#83 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]

I certainly wouldnt be praising upgrading from a phenom X6 to ANYTHING be it intel 990X or 2700k or whatever. It's a completely unnecessary upgrade only for personal satisfaction. But

GummiRaccoon

Then goes on to praise. nice.

No just stating it would be a less unreasonable thing to do than what he did, that doesnt itself make it reasonable.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

[QUOTE="Gambler_3"]

I certainly wouldnt be praising upgrading from a phenom X6 to ANYTHING be it intel 990X or 2700k or whatever. It's a completely unnecessary upgrade only for personal satisfaction. But

Gambler_3

Then goes on to praise. nice.

No just stating it would be a less unreasonable thing to do than what he did, that doesnt itself make it reasonable.

Replacing a part that makes you start over from scratch is more reasonable than a drop in replacement?

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#85 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

Replacing a part that makes you start over from scratch is more reasonable than a drop in replacement?

GummiRaccoon

Yes when the "drop in replacement" is hardly an upgrade the other option does make more sense. He spent $280 for get 1/3 more cores, there is no way to justify it. Your blatant defending of it goes to show how much of a hypocrite you are considering your stance on phenom II vs 2500k builds.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

Replacing a part that makes you start over from scratch is more reasonable than a drop in replacement?

Gambler_3

Yes when the "drop in replacement" is hardly an upgrade the other option does make more sense. He spent $280 for get 1/3 more cores, there is no way to justify it. Your blatant defending of it goes to show how much of a hypocrite you are considering your stance on phenom II vs 2500k builds.

Except he didn't ask if he should replace his 1055T, he already replaced it. I am just not one of these poorly behaved children on this board that sits there and tells people that stuff they already did is a terrible idea and they should be ashamed.

Besides I favor drop in replacement over replacing everything if it is at all possible.

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#87 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

Except he didn't ask if he should replace his 1055T, he already replaced it. I am just not one of these poorly behaved children on this board that sits there and tells people that stuff they already did is a terrible idea and they should be ashamed.

Besides I favor drop in replacement over replacing everything if it is at all possible.

GummiRaccoon

lol you clearly didnt read the first post it seems. Ah no you did but the shameless AMD fanboy in you didnt...

First time overclocking as well and it couldn't have been easier really! True innovation money can't buy! (Intel)

dabigsiebowski

The TC is an obvious troll and deserved what he got in this thread.

Thank god the new TOU of gamespot, I wont be getting moderated dealing with trolls.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

Except he didn't ask if he should replace his 1055T, he already replaced it. I am just not one of these poorly behaved children on this board that sits there and tells people that stuff they already did is a terrible idea and they should be ashamed.

Besides I favor drop in replacement over replacing everything if it is at all possible.

Gambler_3

lol you clearly didnt read the first post it seems. Ah no you did but the shameless AMD fanboy in you didnt...

First time overclocking as well and it couldn't have been easier really! True innovation money can't buy! (Intel)

dabigsiebowski

The TC is an obvious troll and deserved what he got in this thread.

Thank god the new TOU of gamespot, I wont be getting moderated dealing with trolls.

You get moderated because you insult people and constantly troll, mods sometimes read threads and you disappear for a while.

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#89 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

No because the old TOU was pretty stupid. Now I can call you a dumbass stupid fanboy and not get moderated for that. Basically 95% of things that got you moderated previously wont anymore.

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#90 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

And I never got suspended that often, only reason I disappear is because you know I have a life.

Avatar image for dabigsiebowski
dabigsiebowski

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 dabigsiebowski
Member since 2003 • 887 Posts
[QUOTE="dabigsiebowski"]

Call me a fanboy or whatever but this thing is beast!! 7zip ex, 3 1080p youtube videos,itunes,windows media player, BF3, Crysis, SC2, Skyrim, WoW, and even the flippin windows side bar without a a single hitch! Sure you can say this is an unrealistic benchmark and the ram is mostly handling my multi tasking but this baby is snappy.. Sad that I feel a lot of you are gonna be turning your heads to a true innovating processor which probably hasn't had most programs optimized for it yet.

My new rig (Waiting on 7970)

FX 8150@4.2 w/ 212+,16GB 1600, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3, Corsair Force GT 60GB SSD, 600 GB Raptor, 2x 2TB Samsung 7200RPM RAID0, using my brothers 6870 for the meantime! (he has 2)

I was smart and bought my hard drives when I thought bulldozer was coming out sooner, but when it finally released I couldn't seem to order one anywhere without getting too terribly ripped off. Worth the wait and it doesn't even get hot sitting at 46c @4.2 w/ load!

First time overclocking as well and it couldn't have been easier really! True innovation money can't buy! (Intel)

robertoenrique
You don't have to convince anyone here of your superb "upgrade" just yourself.

lol?? People are still hung up on my awesome build?? It's a great upgrade! I paid 15% less than you did!
Avatar image for dabigsiebowski
dabigsiebowski

887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 dabigsiebowski
Member since 2003 • 887 Posts

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

Except he didn't ask if he should replace his 1055T, he already replaced it. I am just not one of these poorly behaved children on this board that sits there and tells people that stuff they already did is a terrible idea and they should be ashamed.

Besides I favor drop in replacement over replacing everything if it is at all possible.

Gambler_3

lol you clearly didnt read the first post it seems. Ah no you did but the shameless AMD fanboy in you didnt...

First time overclocking as well and it couldn't have been easier really! True innovation money can't buy! (Intel)

dabigsiebowski

The TC is an obvious troll and deserved what he got in this thread.

Thank god the new TOU of gamespot, I wont be getting moderated dealing with trolls.

Hey bro as much as you like to hate...Pretty sure my 8150 eats your q8400 for lunch and your rolling a gts 250? Message me and i'll give you a deal on my old 260, I get jealous to when I start lagging behind with hardware.
Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#93 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

lol?? People are still hung up on my awesome build?? It's a great upgrade! I paid 15% less than you did!dabigsiebowski
The only difference being that his CPU is 100% better lol.

I get jealous to when I start lagging behind with hardware.dabigsiebowski
Cool story bro, there are much more serious things to get jealous on in life than what graphics someone else is gaming on lol. I have had my fair share of high end computers back in the day, I no longer crave it that much hence other things take priority now.