One more question.

mathematics my friend

6300-6000 = 300

the 6300 is better

(¿?)

mathematics my friend

6300-6000 = 300

the 6300 is better

(¿?)

wklzip

Dude I know math, I was in calculus as a Sophomore in high school last year. Duh. And I was talking about the C2D E6300 vs. the 6000+ x2

mathematics my friend

6300-6000 = 300

the 6300 is better

(¿?)

wklzip

6000+ is even equivalent to 6600.

[QUOTE="wklzip"]

mathematics my friend

6300-6000 = 300

the 6300 is better

(¿?)

moo111

Dude I know math, I was in calculus as a Sophomore in high school last year. Duh. And I was talking about the C2D E6300 vs. the 6000+ x2

thats why i said:

according to the theory: core 2 duo = x2

c2d 6300 1.86.ghz > x2 6000+ 3.0ghz

1.86> 3.0 ghz

also "intel > amd" because intel has more letters (?????)

if you are not OCing Stock AMD beats Stock Intel

here's proof

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=130115

[QUOTE="moo111"][QUOTE="wklzip"]

mathematics my friend

6300-6000 = 300

the 6300 is better

(¿?)

wklzip

Dude I know math, I was in calculus as a Sophomore in high school last year. Duh. And I was talking about the C2D E6300 vs. the 6000+ x2

thats why i said:

according to the theory: core 2 duo = x2

c2d 6300 1.86.ghz > x2 6000+ 3.0ghz

1.86> 3.0 ghz

also "intel > amd" because intel has more letters (?????)