I'm really excited about the so-called "Future of gaming" platform which was announced at this years GDC. Great idea, though I'm not sure if this will actually work. One thing is that companies like Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo and gaming stores would never allow games to be played on a device like this, too much money would be lost. One the other hand, if these companies were to co-op with the OnLive service they would be saving cash as they would not have to spend lots of money marketing and developing their consoles. This platform is by the way the most perfect way to make PC gaming as popular is it was before. I really hope it's something good attached to this idea even though it may cause problems for some. Please post your thoughts- _XcScore_
I'm really excited about the so-called "Future of gaming" platform which was announced at this years GDC. Great idea, though I'm not sure if this will actually work. One thing is that companies like Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo and gaming stores would never allow games to be played on a device like this, too much money would be lost. One the other hand, if these companies were to co-op with the OnLive service they would be saving cash as they would not have to spend lots of money marketing and developing their consoles. This platform is by the way the most perfect way to make PC gaming as popular is it was before. I really hope it's something good attached to this idea even though it may cause problems for some. Please post your thoughts- _XcScore_DOA-TEKKEN-SF
Wow, this is really neat, not sure if it will work though. I'm a little uneasy about the whole thing. Here's the link -http://pc.ign.com/articles/965/965535p1.htmland the video is at the bottom of the page .
It is not just for tvs. If you read the article the microconsole is only for people who WANT to use the tv. The OnLive system itself will work on ANY computer. No need for graphics cards anymore or consoles for that matter. You could play Crysis at max on a netbook is what makes me get so excited about this thing. It utilzes cloud computing to make this possible. You basically just stream a video game on to a screen and you can play it just as normal. ANd according to IGN, they played it, and it was responsive with no delays whatsoever.
It is not just for tvs. If you read the article the microconsole is only for people who WANT to use the tv. The OnLive system itself will work on ANY computer. No need for graphics cards anymore or consoles for that matter. You could play Crysis at max on a netbook is what makes me get so excited about this thing. It utilzes cloud computing to make this possible. You basically just stream a video game on to a screen and you can play it just as normal. ANd according to IGN, they played it, and it was responsive with no delays whatsoever.
SEANMCAD
intresting well at first I thought "who wants 720p?" but now that I think about it, its less about the resolution and more about shaders etc.
I am slowly starting to understand.
Yeah, and don't forget, "max settings" also means LOTS of anti-aliasing. it would look farrrrr better than any 360 or PS3 game. Anti-aliasing would negate the effect of a lower resolution quite a bit. Also keep in mind that this is also a far higher graphical setting than the average pc user will ever come close to seeing. All in all, I think it's worth it. On top of that, they are promising achievements, video capture (brag clips), demos, multiplayer, voice chat, video conferencing, and so on and so forth. Even the ability to watch ANY players game progress in realtime much like a youtube video. All included in the subrcription. No more having to buy new hardware ever again. So much money saved. OnLive also said in the interview they will be upgrading their graphics systems and computers every 6 months to the highest quality graphics for every game. The main thing that is going to allow them to stream all this in real time is a patented extreme compression technique that they created by themselves, specifically for video games rather than other media.
1. I have zero desire to play games on my TV. I strongly resist this.
2. The max resolution is 720p most gamers are running what would be 1080p while I myself am running 1600p.
The problems I have with it specifically for just me is this.
1. I dont have a TV.
2. I have a 30" monitor and anything less than 1080p on my PC I am forced to move to away from my desk and that causes all kinds of problems.
SEANMCAD
Just so you know, the 'max 720p' is time limited. In a few years, it will be 1080p, and a year after that, whatever the next best lines of resolution there is. We are only limited to our connection. it's going to be a really great service, and lag free. If there is lag, it will be your, or whoever's in your house dll oogly photos.
There will undoubtedly be a sizable monthly fee (I'd project upwards of $20-40/mo in addition to the cost of games. I have more fun building my own PC/owning my own consoles. While an interesting diversion, I do not see a future in it. Also, I don't believe that the stream could possibly keep up on a mainstream connection, regardless of what they say. 720p or better real-time stream? GL.
will i be able to play Empire Total War on it (I've only seen a few games like crysis)? How soon will that game be available? Will MOST games be on it at some point in the near future?? Most importantly, Total War is heavily dependent on its great upcoming mods--will mods be available?
when do you think this will be available with the majority of games for the general public?
Log in to comment