Phenom II x4 955 vs i5 2500k big difference for gaming?

  • 73 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

SO lately I have been thinking of upgrading my CPU to an i5 2500k but I am wondering if I will see a big difference in games. I know the intel CPUs are generally much better and in other CPU intensive tasks it would walk all over the 955. But is there much of a difference gaming wise? Currently running my 955 with an Asus GTX 670, but I don't want to splash lots of money on an i5 and a new mobo if the increase isn't going to be a lot better.

Avatar image for jakes456
jakes456

1398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 jakes456
Member since 2011 • 1398 Posts

AMD have terrible drivers. Go Intel or you will end up suffering.

Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts
I don't think you'd see an appreciable enough difference for the cost to be honest. I'd wait until at least Haswell roles around before upgrading.
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

I don't think you'd see an appreciable enough difference for the cost to be honest. I'd wait until at least Haswell roles around before upgrading.General_X

That's what im afraid of. It's a lot of money for a small increase in FPS.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

[QUOTE="General_X"]I don't think you'd see an appreciable enough difference for the cost to be honest. I'd wait until at least Haswell roles around before upgrading.seanmcloughlin

That's what im afraid of. It's a lot of money for a small increase in FPS.

At 1080 even with 7970 a Phenom 2 X4 holds up well against even the i7's. the only times you will see good improvements, over phenom's is when the app or game only uses one or two core's and or is very cpu dependent.
Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#6 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts
i doubt you will any significant differences in vast majority of games especially if you have that 955 at 3,6-3,8ghz Sure there are a few games that dont take advantage quad cores and require a fast CPU with high IPC and modern architecture but imo for 5-10 games is not worth upgrading I'd say wait to see what intel will have with the next line of CPU's Also is good waiting to see what AMD will do with piledriver. If piledriver has 15-20% clock for clock performance boost over phenom II and have lower power consumption and good OC capabilities then why not ( especially if you can use one with your current AM3/Am3+ mobo )
Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts
Get the i5, there is no need to go AMD at this moment in time unless you are on a really tight budget. I have a 940 x4 which is very similar to the 955, mine is OC to 3.6Ghz and I get games like Dirt 3 which really kick my CPUs ass and bring down my framerates.
Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts

AMD have terrible drivers. Go Intel or you will end up suffering.

jakes456
Why...?
Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#9 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts
i doubt you will any significant differences in vast majority of games especially if you have that 955 at 3,6-3,8ghz Sure there are a few games that dont take advantage quad cores and require a fast CPU with high IPC and modern architecture but imo for 5-10 games is not worth upgrading I'd say wait to see what intel will have with the next line of CPU's Also is good waiting to see what AMD will do with piledriver. If piledriver has 15-20% clock for clock performance boost over phenom II and have lower power consumption and good OC capabilities then why not ( especially if you can use one with your current AM3/Am3+ mobo )
Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
[QUOTE="jakes456"]

AMD have terrible drivers. Go Intel or you will end up suffering.

General_X
Why...?

Trololo
Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts
[QUOTE="General_X"][QUOTE="jakes456"]

AMD have terrible drivers. Go Intel or you will end up suffering.

MonsieurX
Why...?

Trololo

Yeah... I more meant "Why" in the meta sense of "Why do you waste your life posting garbage on an internet forum just to get a reaction?"
Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#13 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

In most games, the answer is no. With cpu intensive games, though, the difference will probably be noticeable (but not huge).

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

In most games, the answer is no. With cpu intensive games, though, the difference will probably be noticeable (but not huge).

Lox_Cropek

Yeah I ordered a cooler master hyper 212 EVO CPU cooler and it should be here in a few days so I will see if I can OC a bit with that first and maybe hold off on a new CPU for a while.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]

In most games, the answer is no. With cpu intensive games, though, the difference will probably be noticeable (but not huge).

seanmcloughlin

Yeah I ordered a cooler master hyper 212 EVO CPU cooler and it should be here in a few days so I will see if I can OC a bit with that first and maybe hold off on a new CPU for a while.

You should download cpu-z and see what stepping "revision" is your 955. Because you can with the C3 version overclock the cpu to 3.6 ghz easily without having to touch the voltage. But with a little trial and error you can get it to 3.8 or better.
Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#16 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]

In most games, the answer is no. With cpu intensive games, though, the difference will probably be noticeable (but not huge).

seanmcloughlin

Yeah I ordered a cooler master hyper 212 EVO CPU cooler and it should be here in a few days so I will see if I can OC a bit with that first and maybe hold off on a new CPU for a while.

Great choice! The Hyper 212 is freaking amazing. I also recommend that you overclock it as far as you can (safely) and hold on for the next line of processors.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
Get the i5, there is no need to go AMD at this moment in time unless you are on a really tight budget. I have a 940 x4 which is very similar to the 955, mine is OC to 3.6Ghz and I get games like Dirt 3 which really kick my CPUs ass and bring down my framerates.V4LENT1NE
There's something else causing your issue. Because even with a downclocked i7 920 at 2 ghz is only 9 fps difference between a i7 920 at 3.8 ghz 99 vs 108.... Also even an Athlon X4 645 averages nearly 60 fps paired with a GTX 590 with Dirt 3. Let alone a 3.7 ghz Phenom 2 4 980 out performing an i7 2600k at stock by 3 fps average 96 fps vs 93.
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]

In most games, the answer is no. With cpu intensive games, though, the difference will probably be noticeable (but not huge).

04dcarraher

Yeah I ordered a cooler master hyper 212 EVO CPU cooler and it should be here in a few days so I will see if I can OC a bit with that first and maybe hold off on a new CPU for a while.

You should download cpu-z and see what stepping "revision" is your 955. Because you can with the C3 version overclock the cpu to 3.6 ghz easily without having to touch the voltage. But with a little trial and error you can get it to 3.8 or better.

Yeah just checked and it has a stepping version of 3 and a revision of RB-C3 so that sounds good then. And it seems overclocking is a far more cost effective strategy right now. I'm looking at like 300 euro for a new mobo and 2500k, but 36 euro for an aftermarket cooler :P

Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#19 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Yeah I ordered a cooler master hyper 212 EVO CPU cooler and it should be here in a few days so I will see if I can OC a bit with that first and maybe hold off on a new CPU for a while.

seanmcloughlin

You should download cpu-z and see what stepping "revision" is your 955. Because you can with the C3 version overclock the cpu to 3.6 ghz easily without having to touch the voltage. But with a little trial and error you can get it to 3.8 or better.

Yeah just checked and it has a stepping version of 3 and a revision of RB-C3 so that sounds good then. And it seems overclocking is a far more cost effective strategy right now. I'm looking at like 300 euro for a new mobo and 2500k, but 36 euro for an aftermarket cooler :P

And you can also keep the cooler for your future processor

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] You should download cpu-z and see what stepping "revision" is your 955. Because you can with the C3 version overclock the cpu to 3.6 ghz easily without having to touch the voltage. But with a little trial and error you can get it to 3.8 or better. Lox_Cropek

Yeah just checked and it has a stepping version of 3 and a revision of RB-C3 so that sounds good then. And it seems overclocking is a far more cost effective strategy right now. I'm looking at like 300 euro for a new mobo and 2500k, but 36 euro for an aftermarket cooler :P

And you can also keep the cooler for your future processor

True dat :P

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16905 Posts

in most games it is definitely a big jump in gaming. However, it doesn't really mean its necessary to have an i5 to game. Most of your games are fine with the 955 so no need to change it until it starts to really chug.

Avatar image for Bishop1310
Bishop1310

1274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Bishop1310
Member since 2007 • 1274 Posts

I'm using an fx6100, it's benchmarked a bit higher than the phenom. A friend of mine has a 2500 and we sit both systems side by side often and I've actually done better then him in some games when it comes to the FPS. Both using radeon 6850's. Like I said the 6100's benchmarks are a bit better than the 955, but I don't think you'll see a huge drop in fps compared to the 2500k... not for the money anyway

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Yeah just checked and it has a stepping version of 3 and a revision of RB-C3 so that sounds good then. And it seems overclocking is a far more cost effective strategy right now. I'm looking at like 300 euro for a new mobo and 2500k, but 36 euro for an aftermarket cooler :P

seanmcloughlin

And you can also keep the cooler for your future processor

True dat :P

*If the cooler has a bracket for new socket types*
Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#24 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]And you can also keep the cooler for your future processor

04dcarraher

True dat :P

*If the cooler has a bracket for new socket types*

Isn't piledriver supposed to be AM3+?

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]And you can also keep the cooler for your future processor

04dcarraher

True dat :P

*If the cooler has a bracket for new socket types*

Well the cooler seems to be pretty flexible with socket types

Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#26 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

True dat :P

seanmcloughlin

*If the cooler has a bracket for new socket types*

Well the cooler seems to be pretty flexible with socket types

Intel's Haswell won't use the current socket (LGA1155). But I think Piledriver will still use AM3+, so the 212 will work with them.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] *If the cooler has a bracket for new socket types*Lox_Cropek

Well the cooler seems to be pretty flexible with socket types

Intel's Haswell won't use the current socket (LGA1155). But I think Piledriver will still use AM3+, so the 212 will work with them.

Believe me I won't be getting Haswell :P they will be over my price range when they come out. It will be sandy bridge if anything

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#28 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Well the cooler seems to be pretty flexible with socket types

seanmcloughlin

Intel's Haswell won't use the current socket (LGA1155). But I think Piledriver will still use AM3+, so the 212 will work with them.

Believe me I won't be getting Haswell :P they will be over my price range when they come out. It will be sandy bridge if anything

IMO Sandy Bridge isn't a worthwhile upgrade for gaming when you already have a 3ghz+ Phenom II X4 or X6. You should be able to get that 955 up to 3.6- 4ghz, which will give you a decent boost. I'm waiting for Haswell or Piledriver. Well, really I'm waiting for some games that I play to really punish my 3.7ghz 955. So far it hasn't happened. I'm sure it will within the next couple of years.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#29 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]Intel's Haswell won't use the current socket (LGA1155). But I think Piledriver will still use AM3+, so the 212 will work with them.

hartsickdiscipl

Believe me I won't be getting Haswell :P they will be over my price range when they come out. It will be sandy bridge if anything

IMO Sandy Bridge isn't a worthwhile upgrade for gaming when you already have a 3ghz+ Phenom II X4 or X6. You should be able to get that 955 up to 3.6- 4ghz, which will give you a decent boost. I'm waiting for Haswell or Piledriver. Well, really I'm waiting for some games that I play to really punish my 3.7ghz 955. So far it hasn't happened. I'm sure it will within the next couple of years.

Same here. The only chance to upgrade is if piledriver will still use AM3+ socket so i wont need a new mobo and offers at least 15-25% performance increase clock for clock over my 955 and has good OC capabilities and lower power consumption . That of course if there is a model at a reasonable 120-150 euros with decent enough boost over my 3,5ghz 955
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]Intel's Haswell won't use the current socket (LGA1155). But I think Piledriver will still use AM3+, so the 212 will work with them.

hartsickdiscipl

Believe me I won't be getting Haswell :P they will be over my price range when they come out. It will be sandy bridge if anything

IMO Sandy Bridge isn't a worthwhile upgrade for gaming when you already have a 3ghz+ Phenom II X4 or X6. You should be able to get that 955 up to 3.6- 4ghz, which will give you a decent boost. I'm waiting for Haswell or Piledriver. Well, really I'm waiting for some games that I play to really punish my 3.7ghz 955. So far it hasn't happened. I'm sure it will within the next couple of years.

Good point. I will wait and see how things pan out but for now Im going to overclock rather than replace.

Will I need dual fans on the Hyper 212? I know it will help but how good is it on one fan?

Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Believe me I won't be getting Haswell :P they will be over my price range when they come out. It will be sandy bridge if anything

seanmcloughlin

IMO Sandy Bridge isn't a worthwhile upgrade for gaming when you already have a 3ghz+ Phenom II X4 or X6. You should be able to get that 955 up to 3.6- 4ghz, which will give you a decent boost. I'm waiting for Haswell or Piledriver. Well, really I'm waiting for some games that I play to really punish my 3.7ghz 955. So far it hasn't happened. I'm sure it will within the next couple of years.

Good point. I will wait and see how things pan out but for now Im going to overclock rather than replace.

Will I need dual fans on the Hyper 212? I know it will help but how good is it on one fan?

One fan is plenty to see a huge improvement over stock.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

IMO Sandy Bridge isn't a worthwhile upgrade for gaming when you already have a 3ghz+ Phenom II X4 or X6. You should be able to get that 955 up to 3.6- 4ghz, which will give you a decent boost. I'm waiting for Haswell or Piledriver. Well, really I'm waiting for some games that I play to really punish my 3.7ghz 955. So far it hasn't happened. I'm sure it will within the next couple of years.

General_X

Good point. I will wait and see how things pan out but for now Im going to overclock rather than replace.

Will I need dual fans on the Hyper 212? I know it will help but how good is it on one fan?

One fan is plenty to see a huge improvement over stock.

It also depends on your case cooling too
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#33 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

If you want to avoid bottlenecks, get that i5, I did and I have no regrets, in fact, I don't want an AMD cpu for high end gaming anymore, AMD cpus sucks for that now. I could imagine a massive bottleneck when I get my 2nd 670 soon.:lol:

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

If you want to avoid bottlenecks, get that i5, I did and I have no regrets, in fact, I don't want an AMD cpu for high end gaming anymore, AMD cpus sucks for that now. I could imagine a massive bottleneck when I get my 2nd 670 soon.:lol:

mitu123

Well my GPU gets over 90% usage in something like BF3 so I doubt it's being bottlenecked just yet.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="General_X"][QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Good point. I will wait and see how things pan out but for now Im going to overclock rather than replace.

Will I need dual fans on the Hyper 212? I know it will help but how good is it on one fan?

04dcarraher

One fan is plenty to see a huge improvement over stock.

It also depends on your case cooling too

I have the corsair 600t white edition case so it's pretty spacious inside and has big fans too so it should be ok

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#36 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

If you want to avoid bottlenecks, get that i5, I did and I have no regrets, in fact, I don't want an AMD cpu for high end gaming anymore, AMD cpus sucks for that now. I could imagine a massive bottleneck when I get my 2nd 670 soon.:lol:

seanmcloughlin

Well my GPU gets over 90% usage in something like BF3 so I doubt it's being bottlenecked just yet.

When the cpu gets used you'll certainly want a strong one, and that AMD cpu certainly isn't going to last too long either if you plan to max future games a few years from now.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

If you want to avoid bottlenecks, get that i5, I did and I have no regrets, in fact, I don't want an AMD cpu for high end gaming anymore, AMD cpus sucks for that now. I could imagine a massive bottleneck when I get my 2nd 670 soon.:lol:

mitu123

Well my GPU gets over 90% usage in something like BF3 so I doubt it's being bottlenecked just yet.

When the cpu gets used you'll certainly want a strong one, and that AMD cpu certainly isn't going to last too long either if you plan to max future games a few years from now.

Of course. I won't have it by this time next year I'd say but for now Im glad to keep it

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#38 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
for tribes ascend yeah http://www.techspot.com/review/522-tribes-ascend-performance-test/page5.html
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#39 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Ha, ha, well yeah. It's just when I upgraded to that i5 I saw performance increase that my AMD cpu couldn't do even though I overclocked the f*** out of it!

Avatar image for msfan1289
msfan1289

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 msfan1289
Member since 2011 • 1044 Posts

AMD have terrible drivers. Go Intel or you will end up suffering.

jakes456

that is the most stupidest thing i ever read.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

Ha, ha, well yeah. It's just when I upgraded to that i5 I saw performance increase that my AMD cpu couldn't do even though I overclocked the f*** out of it!

mitu123
Your forgetting the fact that you were running two gpu's in SLI totally different conditions for a cpu load for gpu's. Even with a Phenom 2 X4 955 you still see 98% gpu usage with a GTX 670 at 1080 with BF3. And above 60 fps the point is moot.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]for tribes ascend yeah http://www.techspot.com/review/522-tribes-ascend-performance-test/page5.html

Pointless because a Phenom 2 at 3.6+ ghz is only a few frames behind i5 2500k
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#43 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Ha, ha, well yeah. It's just when I upgraded to that i5 I saw performance increase that my AMD cpu couldn't do even though I overclocked the f*** out of it!

04dcarraher

Your forgetting the fact that you were running two gpu's in SLI totally different conditions for a cpu load for gpu's. Even with a Phenom 2 X4 955 you still see 98% gpu usage with a GTX 670 at 1080 with BF3. And above 60 fps the point is moot.

Yet my FPS increased a lot going with the i5, it's the main reason why I went with it, if AMD was doing fine I would had stuck with it. And BF3 wasn't the only game that got an increase, the Crysis games, Witcher 2, Metro 2033 and others also did.

Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#44 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

If you want to avoid bottlenecks, get that i5, I did and I have no regrets, in fact, I don't want an AMD cpu for high end gaming anymore, AMD cpus sucks for that now. I could imagine a massive bottleneck when I get my 2nd 670 soon.:lol:

mitu123

Hoping piledriver changes that :(

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="mitu123"]

Ha, ha, well yeah. It's just when I upgraded to that i5 I saw performance increase that my AMD cpu couldn't do even though I overclocked the f*** out of it!

mitu123

Your forgetting the fact that you were running two gpu's in SLI totally different conditions for a cpu load for gpu's. Even with a Phenom 2 X4 955 you still see 98% gpu usage with a GTX 670 at 1080 with BF3. And above 60 fps the point is moot.

Yet my FPS increased a lot going with the i5, it's the main reason why I went with it, if AMD was doing fine I would had stuck with it. And BF3 wasn't the only game that got an increase, the Crysis games, Witcher 2, Metro 2033 and others also did.

There's a difference between getting an increase performance and a real bottleneck to the hardware, You can stick a 9800GTX with a i5 2500k then an i5 750 and 9800GTX and see a 10+ fps difference does that mean that the i5 750 is preventing the 9800GTX from performing as it should... no.

Here's an example of what I mean. Once you hit past a certain resolution in a single gpu setup with a Phenom 2 past 3.4 ghz isnt going to hold you back that much compared to an i7.

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/radeon_hd_7970_cpu_scaling_performance_review,9.html

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#46 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] Your forgetting the fact that you were running two gpu's in SLI totally different conditions for a cpu load for gpu's. Even with a Phenom 2 X4 955 you still see 98% gpu usage with a GTX 670 at 1080 with BF3. And above 60 fps the point is moot. 04dcarraher

Yet my FPS increased a lot going with the i5, it's the main reason why I went with it, if AMD was doing fine I would had stuck with it. And BF3 wasn't the only game that got an increase, the Crysis games, Witcher 2, Metro 2033 and others also did.

There's a difference between getting an increase performance and a real bottleneck to the hardware, You can stick a 9800GTX with a i5 2500k and a 9800GTX with a i5 750 and 9800GTX and see a 10+ fps difference does that mean that the i5 750 is preventing the 9800GTX from performing as it should... no.

Here's an example of what I mean. Once you hit past a certain resolution in a single gpu setup with a Phenom 2 past 3.4 ghz isnt going to hold you back that much compared to an i7.

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/radeon_hd_7970_cpu_scaling_performance_review,9.html

I agree with the point that you're trying to make. However, I don't think you'd see a performance increase with a 9800gtx in most modern games if you went from a 1st-gen i5 to a 2500k:P. Not if you're playing at a decent resolution and with details turned up. That would be a very GPU-bound situation.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] Yet my FPS increased a lot going with the i5, it's the main reason why I went with it, if AMD was doing fine I would had stuck with it. And BF3 wasn't the only game that got an increase, the Crysis games, Witcher 2, Metro 2033 and others also did.

hartsickdiscipl

There's a difference between getting an increase performance and a real bottleneck to the hardware, You can stick a 9800GTX with a i5 2500k and a 9800GTX with a i5 750 and 9800GTX and see a 10+ fps difference does that mean that the i5 750 is preventing the 9800GTX from performing as it should... no.

Here's an example of what I mean. Once you hit past a certain resolution in a single gpu setup with a Phenom 2 past 3.4 ghz isnt going to hold you back that much compared to an i7.

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/radeon_hd_7970_cpu_scaling_performance_review,9.html

I agree with the point that you're trying to make. However, I don't think you'd see a performance increase with a 9800gtx in most modern games if you went from a 1st-gen i5 to a 2500k:P. Not if you're playing at a decent resolution and with details turned up. That would be a very GPU-bound situation.

I should have used say a GTX 460 as for my example then :P
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#48 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]for tribes ascend yeah http://www.techspot.com/review/522-tribes-ascend-performance-test/page5.html04dcarraher
Pointless because a Phenom 2 at 3.6+ ghz is only a few frames behind i5 2500k

nop

also true warriors play on nintendo ds graphics config

at at 1024x768 so gota have them 300fps

all cpu

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#49 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] Your forgetting the fact that you were running two gpu's in SLI totally different conditions for a cpu load for gpu's. Even with a Phenom 2 X4 955 you still see 98% gpu usage with a GTX 670 at 1080 with BF3. And above 60 fps the point is moot. 04dcarraher

Yet my FPS increased a lot going with the i5, it's the main reason why I went with it, if AMD was doing fine I would had stuck with it. And BF3 wasn't the only game that got an increase, the Crysis games, Witcher 2, Metro 2033 and others also did.

There's a difference between getting an increase performance and a real bottleneck to the hardware, You can stick a 9800GTX with a i5 2500k then an i5 750 and 9800GTX and see a 10+ fps difference does that mean that the i5 750 is preventing the 9800GTX from performing as it should... no.

Here's an example of what I mean. Once you hit past a certain resolution in a single gpu setup with a Phenom 2 past 3.4 ghz isnt going to hold you back that much compared to an i7.

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/radeon_hd_7970_cpu_scaling_performance_review,9.html

I've experience bottlenecks or else I wouldn't had upgraded now would I? I'm getting a 30+FPS increase on various games thanks to the i5. I only use benchmarks as a guide but usually FPS various on where you're at in the game, what settings you use, etc. so there's too many variables in that. I always judge on what I experience, and if I don't like it, I upgrade.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] Yet my FPS increased a lot going with the i5, it's the main reason why I went with it, if AMD was doing fine I would had stuck with it. And BF3 wasn't the only game that got an increase, the Crysis games, Witcher 2, Metro 2033 and others also did.

mitu123

There's a difference between getting an increase performance and a real bottleneck to the hardware, You can stick a 9800GTX with a i5 2500k then an i5 750 and 9800GTX and see a 10+ fps difference does that mean that the i5 750 is preventing the 9800GTX from performing as it should... no.

Here's an example of what I mean. Once you hit past a certain resolution in a single gpu setup with a Phenom 2 past 3.4 ghz isnt going to hold you back that much compared to an i7.

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/radeon_hd_7970_cpu_scaling_performance_review,9.html

I've experience bottlenecks or else I wouldn't had upgraded now would I? I'm getting a 30+FPS increase on various games thanks to the i5. I only use benchmarks as a guide but usually FPS various on where you're at in the game, what settings you use, etc. so there's too many variables in that. I always judge on what I experience, and if I don't like it, I upgrade.

Well lets see, You had a Phenom 2 with two GTX 460's then went to a i5 of course your going to see improvement, two gpu's is a big strain on a cpu and on a Phenom 2 depending on the game's load you can choke"bottleneck". Now if you had only one high end gpu it would be a different story which I was pointing out. that Phenom 2 at 3.6 ghz with a single gpu like a GTX 670 isnt going to have a large gap in general at 1080 vs an i5.

Running two gpu's even though slower then your 670 now, those 460's in sli created more work for your cpu.