This topic is locked from further discussion.
Its stupid and outtdated. More than half thos games have not seen the light of day and wont till 2008 and the other half of them blowDude_1000
dont look at the post...pretend its not there...or make a new one
Its stupid and outtdated. More than half thos games have not seen the light of day and wont till 2008 and the other half of them blowDude_1000think of how long it took the creator of the thread to make it, the effort and work. And 2007 isnt over yet, so if it really bothers you that much, dont press your left mouse button when you go over it.
Its stupid and outtdated. More than half thos games have not seen the light of day and wont till 2008 and the other half of them blow. Sherlock Holmes especially sucks balls. Only a 3/10 rating on several game sitesDude_1000
I commend your efforts, but there's an extremely low chance the moderators will say, "If Dude_1000 says we should remove it, then we're definitely going to."
Its stupid and outtdated. More than half thos games have not seen the light of day and wont till 2008 and the other half of them blow. Sherlock Holmes especially sucks balls. Only a 3/10 rating on several game sitesDude_1000
OH I def AGREE
Its stupid and outtdated. More than half thos games have not seen the light of day and wont till 2008 and the other half of them blow. Sherlock Holmes especially sucks balls. Only a 3/10 rating on several game sitesDude_1000
Wow. Immature, much?
First of all, nobody asked for your opinion on how good the games on that list are. I would suspect you say those games "blow" because many of them are from genres you don't like, or have never tried.
I would hope you realize not everyone like the same games, specifically PC gamers..since it has by far the most diverse titles of all platforms. A game you might think is boring might be enjoyed very much so by another PC gamer. Conversely, the games you like on that list, or on any other platform, might "blow" to another player.
Second, Sherlock Holmes: The Awakened has an average score of 71% at GameRankings, and a score of 8.3 here at Gamespot. Your opinion of the game is pretty irrelevant.
Third, do you realize there's over THREE MONTHS left in this year? And many of the games on that list still unreleased are coming out during that time? In fact, these last few months are the most active time every year for game releases, across every platform.
Think before you post.
Its stupidDude_1000
and outtdated. Dude_1000
More than half thos games have not seen the light of day and wont till 2008Dude_1000
and the other half of them blow. Dude_1000
Sherlock Holmes especially sucks balls. Only a 3/10 rating on several game sitesDude_1000
[QUOTE="Dude_1000"]Its stupid and outtdated. More than half thos games have not seen the light of day and wont till 2008 and the other half of them blow. Sherlock Holmes especially sucks balls. Only a 3/10 rating on several game sitesSkullheart
I commend your efforts, but there's an extremely low chance the moderators will say, "If Dude_1000 says we should remove it, then we're definitely going to."
That is true, although there is a better chance that a moderator will say:
Hey that thread is kind of old.
[QUOTE="Dude_1000"]Its stupid and outtdated. More than half thos games have not seen the light of day and wont till 2008 and the other half of them blow. Sherlock Holmes especially sucks balls. Only a 3/10 rating on several game sitesDeihmos
Your post made me laugh. Thanks....
Looks like the sticky was removed.
Its still in the index. I guess he is going to have to make a new thread complaining about that.[QUOTE="Skullheart"][QUOTE="Dude_1000"]Its stupid and outtdated. More than half thos games have not seen the light of day and wont till 2008 and the other half of them blow. Sherlock Holmes especially sucks balls. Only a 3/10 rating on several game sitesduxup
I commend your efforts, but there's an extremely low chance the moderators will say, "If Dude_1000 says we should remove it, then we're definitely going to."
That is true, although there is a better chance that a moderator will say:
Hey that thread is kind of old.
Great. Thanks for noticing that . Its useless
Its stupid and outtdated. More than half thos games have not seen the light of day and wont till 2008 and the other half of them blow. Sherlock Holmes especially sucks balls. Only a 3/10 rating on several game sitesDude_1000
"Its stupid"
saying anything "stupid" without a reason is infact, stupid.
"and outtdated"
It's not 2020. I doubt if you know that.
"More than half thos games have not seen the light of day and wont till 2008"
As far as I know all of those games had release dates in 2007. Games generally get delayed & it's nobody's fault. And even if some of those games will bereleased in 2008, what's so troublesome in getting to knowabout them early?
"and the other half of them blow"
If you take drugs, try something else.
"Sherlock Holmes especially sucks balls. Only a 3/10 rating on several game sites"
Statistics say something else though, naturally.
Reasons why it's worth to be a PC gamer series threads are one of my most favorite threads. Very informative, helpful, constructive & much better than those boring & repetitive threads which generally flood the GS PC forum. Keep up the good work Adrian!
In this day in age everything is outdated a second after releaseCracker__Jack
Mostly in hardware terms.
That sticky in any form is a GREAT resource for PC games. I find myself checking it often just to keep a heads up of what's coming out for different genres, especially ones I don't normally play.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment