Poll: PCs easier to build today or in the past?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Bozanimal
Bozanimal

2500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#1 Bozanimal
Member since 2003 • 2500 Posts
A blog entry somewhere got me thinking: is it easier to build a PC today than, say, ten years ago? Even five years ago?

I believe yes; manufacturers have extensive online and (occasionally) phone support, produce compatibility sheets for parts like RAM, and certain details no longer exist (I'm talking DIP switches, people!).

Conversely, people are confronted with more choices from more manufacturers today. A number of memory types are not compatible with one another, there are numrous interfaces being phased out (IDE, DDR), and other complexities such as Socket type.

Let's hear some opinions!

Boz
Avatar image for Kiwi_1
Kiwi_1

2963

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Kiwi_1
Member since 2003 • 2963 Posts
Over the immediate past five years, it seems about the same, ten years ago I am less sure about (I felt flush enough to have a white box builder do my assembly and setup for me for a short while), twenty years ago, though, it was MUCH more of a challenge to build a PC by yourself.
Avatar image for D9-THC
D9-THC

3081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 D9-THC
Member since 2007 • 3081 Posts

PCs are MUCH easier to build than they used to be...

Remember jumper settings? *shudder*

Avatar image for Shegevara
Shegevara

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#4 Shegevara
Member since 2005 • 2124 Posts
lol.. when i started building new pc, i was inserting CPU. And then it ended with a cooler. It has wtf strange buttons so you don't need to screw them. I am more used to screwing it on than this new system. And that's about the only thing i find it stupid. Everything seems to be the same or better.
Avatar image for yoyo462001
yoyo462001

7535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#5 yoyo462001
Member since 2005 • 7535 Posts
i would say that it was easier these days because of the internet, it helps so much, a good 8 years ago (before the internet was in every single home) it was harder to find things out, but the actually building is farely the same.
Avatar image for Baselerd
Baselerd

5104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#6 Baselerd
Member since 2003 • 5104 Posts

The only differences between now and 10 years ago are:

a) jumper settings (not a huge deal)

b) availability of parts (HUGE deal.... shopping online for parts is soo much better than running around shops with higher prices and limited inventory)

Avatar image for codezer0
codezer0

15898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#7 codezer0
Member since 2004 • 15898 Posts
If you only need something basic, motherboards with integrated everything have made the job a lot easier, as then there is many less components that you have to buy now to have a functioning system. On the flip side, if you want to go full-on for a gamer system, I can almost argue that it'd be a bit more difficult... increased worry about thermals involving some high-end CPU's and SLi/XF'd video cards, finding a way to fit both a sound card and the PhysX PPU on the motherboard, deciding whether to get a separate dedicated NIC so you can then overclock further, how much RAM, storage space you want... it gets pretty involved.
Avatar image for Bozanimal
Bozanimal

2500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 68

User Lists: 0

#8 Bozanimal
Member since 2003 • 2500 Posts

Remember jumper settings? *shudder*

D9-THC

D9-THC, you took the words out of my mouth.

i would say that it was easier these days because of the internet, it helps so much, a good 8 years ago (before the internet was in every single home) it was harder to find things out, but the actually building is farely the same.yoyo462001

Very, very true.

The only differences between now and 10 years ago are:

a) jumper settings (not a huge deal)

b) availability of parts (HUGE deal.... shopping online for parts is soo much better than running around shops with higher prices and limited inventory)

Baselerd

Yes, as was the lack of availability of information for research and troubleshooting.

If you only need something basic, motherboards with integrated everything have made the job a lot easier, as then there is many less components that you have to buy now to have a functioning system. On the flip side, if you want to go full-on for a gamer system, I can almost argue that it'd be a bit more difficult... increased worry about thermals involving some high-end CPU's and SLi/XF'd video cards, finding a way to fit both a sound card and the PhysX PPU on the motherboard, deciding whether to get a separate dedicated NIC so you can then overclock further, how much RAM, storage space you want... it gets pretty involved.codezer0
True, but isn't this a, "it can be as complicated as you want it to be" assessment?

Avatar image for DGFreak
DGFreak

2234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DGFreak
Member since 2003 • 2234 Posts

It really depends on what you're putting the components into. Many newer cases are becoming nearly screwless, while other, more customized cases, will certainly take a lot more work.

I'd have to say that the act of just putting together the parts is more or less the same as its ever been.

Avatar image for TUnified
TUnified

423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#10 TUnified
Member since 2003 • 423 Posts

10 years ago, it was easier to configure harder to build, about the only competition you had was AMD's recently released K6 processor (which sucked, but was really cheap) and Intel's Pentium line. Other than that, you had separate boards for everything; the NIC, Video, Sound, and not many choices that made a difference in the overall setup and everything was PCI and ISA, and there was only beige cases (cringe). The only thing that made a difference back then was the Processor.

Today it's harder to configure. Most things you absolutely need are integrated into the motherboard, and you also have many different features to choose from (RAID, SATA, eSATA, Video, chipset, etc.). The processor battle is still around with Intel and AMD, but now there's even bigger battles with Nvidi/ATI for video cards, RAM speeds, motherboard specs and reliability, PSU power and quality, even choice of OS is a major factor in the decision.

But, once you've done the necessary research to purchase your parts, it is MUCH easier to build nowadays.

Avatar image for DeathStar17
DeathStar17

4858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#11 DeathStar17
Member since 2005 • 4858 Posts
There are so many guides out now, it is way easier...
Avatar image for cbolaes
cbolaes

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 cbolaes
Member since 2003 • 25 Posts

Parts aside, there are FAR more resources to help you if you screw something up. There are so many hardware and enthusiast forums to bounce questions off of, it's damn near impossible to screw it up. Well, maybe not impossible...:P

On another note, as certain things get easier, other things get more delicate and more of a PITA to install like CPUs and heatsinks. With my first handbuilt rig, you pop open the arm, drop in the CPU, close the ARM, finagle the HSF and done. Now I have to drop in the proc (God forbid I bend one of the LLPGA contacts), turn the mobo around, bolt in the heatsink, and hope it works.

Avatar image for The_Tombo
The_Tombo

3537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#13 The_Tombo
Member since 2005 • 3537 Posts

way easier.. Besides the fact that everything says where it as to go on the items.. You have internet and customer service to help, no jumper and internet shopping...

Avatar image for Innovazero2000
Innovazero2000

3159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 Innovazero2000
Member since 2006 • 3159 Posts

It's much easier now a days, it's basically plug in, check settings, install drivers...bam your done. However, with todays high powered parts, you need to be VERY careful. More precise then you used to have to be.

Back in the day you had to deal with jumper settings, IRQ settings, etc, etc...you needed to know way more.

Avatar image for filmography
filmography

3202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 filmography
Member since 2004 • 3202 Posts

way easier

my other computer I had to use a fricking screw driver to get the dam CPU heat sink on and now a days the powersupply is at the bottom so its much easier. seriously all I had to do for the fan this time around was place it in and turn a fricken knob.

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
How quickly we forget manually configured IRQ ports. :(
Avatar image for Yura_Narsole
Yura_Narsole

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Yura_Narsole
Member since 2006 • 174 Posts

Computers are becoming more easy to build all the time. Compared to 10 years ago it is ridiculously easy.

Like everyone here is saying, the hardware has become much easier to work with. But don't forget the software.Back in 1997, Windows 95 was still pretty new and didn't work worth a damn. A lot of people were still using DOS.

Avatar image for My_name_a_Borat
My_name_a_Borat

762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 My_name_a_Borat
Member since 2007 • 762 Posts
It's way easier today. That's why I was a Mac user until the Pentium 2 / Plug-and-Play era came along. :D
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#19 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
Easier - far easier. We've come a long way in terms of standardization and availibility of parts. The pencil-mod, flashing cards, jumper settings, soldering, retrofitted cooling, lack of parts... nah those days are past. Now we just have to wait for the revolution that occured in desktop PC building to move over to laptops.
Avatar image for xcryonicx
xcryonicx

1294

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#20 xcryonicx
Member since 2006 • 1294 Posts
Way easier. I don't know how anyone could vote otherwise. I built a rig in 2003 as my first build and I remember it being a lot harder than my 2006 build. Then again I knew what I was doing the 2nd time around, but things like Hard Drive set ups have definitely simplified with SATA and the like.
Avatar image for st3wi3
st3wi3

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 st3wi3
Member since 2005 • 367 Posts
Easier - far easier. We've come a long way in terms of standardization and availibility of parts. The pencil-mod, flashing cards, jumper settings, soldering, retrofitted cooling, lack of parts... nah those days are past. Now we just have to wait for the revolution that occured in desktop PC building to move over to laptops.subrosian
ditto
Avatar image for SimpJee
SimpJee

18309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 SimpJee
Member since 2002 • 18309 Posts

Oh yeah. Companies have been listening to us when we asked for easier to put together parts.

Avatar image for Cdscottie
Cdscottie

1872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 Cdscottie
Member since 2004 • 1872 Posts
Oh they are extremely easy to build these days than in the past. First off all you have this nice technology called plug and play....yes, it came around in the days of 95 and 98 but back then it was called plug and pray. (And was even more fun before then) Then you have to throw out all of the jumper settings (Except for IDE hard drives) out the door. Then you have the fact that any new builder can easily navigate through their BIOS and overclock their system without much effort.....now compare that to having to manually set jumpers, dip switches, IRQs, having a headache as a driver wasn't working, contiuous hardware issues as it ran in Real Mode instead of protected mode....and you have yourself thanking the gods for computers the way they are today.
Avatar image for Boulio
Boulio

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Boulio
Member since 2006 • 58 Posts

Oh they are extremely easy to build these days than in the past. First off all you have this nice technology called plug and play....yes, it came around in the days of 95 and 98 but back then it was called plug and pray. (And was even more fun before then) Then you have to throw out all of the jumper settings (Except for IDE hard drives) out the door. Then you have the fact that any new builder can easily navigate through their BIOS and overclock their system without much effort.....now compare that to having to manually set jumpers, dip switches, IRQs, having a headache as a driver wasn't working, contiuous hardware issues as it ran in Real Mode instead of protected mode....and you have yourself thanking the gods for computers the way they are today.Cdscottie

LOL I starting building pcs since the 386 came out and let me tell you it was not pretty! You had to isolate the board MANUALLY before putting it in the case and if u plug the power switch wrong u will fry it. Windows 95 well = trouble early compatibility issues to inserted issues in the revisions - actually made it worse! -. Remember PII Socket 1 cpu, it used to give so much trouble - loosening and overheating - every single day ... SInce PIII it got easier by the generation update ........

Avatar image for My_name_a_Borat
My_name_a_Borat

762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 My_name_a_Borat
Member since 2007 • 762 Posts

[QUOTE="Cdscottie"]Oh they are extremely easy to build these days than in the past. First off all you have this nice technology called plug and play....yes, it came around in the days of 95 and 98 but back then it was called plug and pray. (And was even more fun before then) Then you have to throw out all of the jumper settings (Except for IDE hard drives) out the door. Then you have the fact that any new builder can easily navigate through their BIOS and overclock their system without much effort.....now compare that to having to manually set jumpers, dip switches, IRQs, having a headache as a driver wasn't working, contiuous hardware issues as it ran in Real Mode instead of protected mode....and you have yourself thanking the gods for computers the way they are today.Boulio

LOL I starting building pcs since the 386 came out and let me tell you it was not pretty! You had to isolate the board MANUALLY before putting it in the case and if u plug the power switch wrong u will fry it. Windows 95 well = trouble early compatibility issues to inserted issues in the revisions - actually made it worse! -. Remember PII Socket 1 cpu, it used to give so much trouble - loosening and overheating - every single day ... SInce PIII it got easier by the generation update ........

Nah! The P2s and P3s were the easiest CPUs to install ever! No need to worry about bent pins, and they smoothly clicked into their slots.If you actually used the right type of retention bracket for a SECC, SECC2, or SEPP cartridge, it would never get loose. Overheating? Even the tiny Intel stock cooler worked fine!

Avatar image for codezer0
codezer0

15898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#26 codezer0
Member since 2004 • 15898 Posts
With "plug and play" the days of having to reserve the limited amount of IRQ addresses that previously had to be done with a computer are a thing of the past... and to overcome that limit, it seems we have since gone on to do "virtual" IRQ addressing, in a sense. Just take a look at the device manager in Windows and have it sort by "resources by type", then expand the list for "Interrupt Request (IRQ)". The spec for it initially was only from 0-7 (very early), and then was only later expanded from 0-15. Many of us may have many more IRQ's than that by now, or at least a higher number, because some of us have systems where we don't have components that initially were reserved for specific components. I'm willing to bet some money that nobody here uses anything requiring a serial port anymore, or has a motherboard that uses them on their newest computer systems. It may be time to rethink the limits of the IRQ address pool, or start re associating some of those that have been obsolesced for newer devices. What gets to be frustrating (IMO) though is that even with advances such as Plug 'n Play and jumperless configuration, there are still some that choose not to follow the strictest implementation of the spec for devices that really should. You never see this happen with "Mac compatible" peripherals like printers, scanners, etc. because Apple enforces that devices follow the strictest form of the PnP specification, and always have since it first adopted the spec. I can't be the only one that gets tired of these devices that claim they're "Plug and play" when they require this proprietary software installed to even be able to do anything with it. If they were mandated to follow the strictest version of the spec, most of the stuff would actually be "plug in and play", and not require some hatcheted up driver or a proprietary software interface to be able to access it.
Avatar image for Cdscottie
Cdscottie

1872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 Cdscottie
Member since 2004 • 1872 Posts

With "plug and play" the days of having to reserve the limited amount of IRQ addresses that previously had to be done with a computer are a thing of the past... and to overcome that limit, it seems we have since gone on to do "virtual" IRQ addressing, in a sense. Just take a look at the device manager in Windows and have it sort by "resources by type", then expand the list for "Interrupt Request (IRQ)". The spec for it initially was only from 0-7 (very early), and then was only later expanded from 0-15. Many of us may have many more IRQ's than that by now, or at least a higher number, because some of us have systems where we don't have components that initially were reserved for specific components. I'm willing to bet some money that nobody here uses anything requiring a serial port anymore, or has a motherboard that uses them on their newest computer systems. It may be time to rethink the limits of the IRQ address pool, or start re associating some of those that have been obsolesced for newer devices. What gets to be frustrating (IMO) though is that even with advances such as Plug 'n Play and jumperless configuration, there are still some that choose not to follow the strictest implementation of the spec for devices that really should. You never see this happen with "Mac compatible" peripherals like printers, scanners, etc. because Apple enforces that devices follow the strictest form of the PnP specification, and always have since it first adopted the spec. I can't be the only one that gets tired of these devices that claim they're "Plug and play" when they require this proprietary software installed to even be able to do anything with it. If they were mandated to follow the strictest version of the spec, most of the stuff would actually be "plug in and play", and not require some hatcheted up driver or a proprietary software interface to be able to access it.codezer0

At my work site, I require using serial ports to communicate with a device that converts CanBus data to RS-232 to be able to read. At home on the other hand, I have dedicated everything to my USB ports....which of course only uses one IRQ for all components....not even a keyboard or mouse with PS/2 ports in the house anymore....

Also, don't forget that most Cisco enterprise routers require configuration via a serial port. So serial isn't dead...just not very lively anymore.

Avatar image for Boulio
Boulio

58

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Boulio
Member since 2006 • 58 Posts
[QUOTE="Boulio"]

[QUOTE="Cdscottie"]Oh they are extremely easy to build these days than in the past. First off all you have this nice technology called plug and play....yes, it came around in the days of 95 and 98 but back then it was called plug and pray. (And was even more fun before then) Then you have to throw out all of the jumper settings (Except for IDE hard drives) out the door. Then you have the fact that any new builder can easily navigate through their BIOS and overclock their system without much effort.....now compare that to having to manually set jumpers, dip switches, IRQs, having a headache as a driver wasn't working, contiuous hardware issues as it ran in Real Mode instead of protected mode....and you have yourself thanking the gods for computers the way they are today.My_name_a_Borat

LOL I starting building pcs since the 386 came out and let me tell you it was not pretty! You had to isolate the board MANUALLY before putting it in the case and if u plug the power switch wrong u will fry it. Windows 95 well = trouble early compatibility issues to inserted issues in the revisions - actually made it worse! -. Remember PII Socket 1 cpu, it used to give so much trouble - loosening and overheating - every single day ... SInce PIII it got easier by the generation update ........

Nah! The P2s and P3s were the easiest CPUs to install ever! No need to worry about bent pins, and they smoothly clicked into their slots.If you actually used the right type of retention bracket for a SECC, SECC2, or SEPP cartridge, it would never get loose. Overheating? Even the tiny Intel stock cooler worked fine!

Tryed that tiny cooler on PII 300 socket 1 with intel 740 AGP and almost fried it because the system kept crashing! When I changed the cooling everything went smooth... so yes it does get hot!

As for bent pins I used to work with a S****heat who just inserted by force a PI in a ZIF Socket7(ZIF= zero insertion force) :: he did not pull the lever up!

Avatar image for Runningflame570
Runningflame570

10388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Runningflame570
Member since 2005 • 10388 Posts

Way easier. Theres a lot more documentation available online, the parts themselves even better explain what they are for, and a lot of new cases are tool-less. Thats not even taking into account things like IRQ settings (which thankfully I never had to personally deal with).

Of course cooling is more of an issue now, but thats usually not a huge issue unless you are doing something really elaborate.

Nah! The P2s and P3s were the easiest CPUs to install ever! No need to worry about bent pins, and they smoothly clicked into their slots.My_name_a_Borat

Maybe so, but removing them was a PITA. :|

Avatar image for codezer0
codezer0

15898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#30 codezer0
Member since 2004 • 15898 Posts
serial ports just need to die altogether. There are many more efficient and better ways of connecting devices together now. And USB is a serial interface as well. So why keep legacy code to interface with serial ports anyway? Or why with my 680i motherboard, the BIOS still has an option for a serial port when it does not physically exist on the board? It makes me wish that we could move to the EFI model for firmware already. Hell, if Vista natively supported EFI (in addition to the legacy BIOS system), I would even buy into it now and bear with its problems.
Avatar image for Cdscottie
Cdscottie

1872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#31 Cdscottie
Member since 2004 • 1872 Posts

Easier said than done. First you have to come up with a way to make it so you can't remove the connector easily. With serial ports you have the screws on each side to keep it in place. USB it is almost impossible to find anything to keep it in the socket. This is a requirement as the units that we have serial on are continously suffering shock and vibration.

I do agree that USB is here and should replace the need for the older technologies but people need to get more creative so that we don't have to opt for the older technology.