purchasing a new PC....need advice badly

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for lenwood24
lenwood24

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 lenwood24
Member since 2005 • 63 Posts

Looking to make a purchase for a new PC but have NO idea what to look for...not spending alot (600-800 canadian $) but sooo many processor types....AMD or Intell, triple core or quad core.....what would be a good onboard vid card ( I have a PS3 so most gaming will be on that), anything to watch out for...things NOT to buy......help !

what is a good monitor as well...certrain brand ??

sigh...

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

Looking to make a purchase for a new PC but have NO idea what to look for...not spending alot (600-800 canadian $) but sooo many processor types....AMD or Intell, triple core or quad core.....what would be a good onboard vid card ( I have a PS3 so most gaming will be on that), anything to watch out for...things NOT to buy......help !

what is a good monitor as well...certrain brand ??

sigh...

lenwood24
Just make sure its either a Intel core2duo or AMD X2 at 3Ghz or more. Also 2GB's of RAM is standard for games now. Also make sure it has a decent grahpics card,,,,this is where people normally loose out on pre-builds!
Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts
For a monitor you cant really get a 'bad' one, if you want brilliant quality and not break the bank then always go Samsung!
Avatar image for lenwood24
lenwood24

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 lenwood24
Member since 2005 • 63 Posts
thanks daytona, now by 3Ghz do you mean the general core speed or the total speed.....assuming single core speed...no preference to AMD or Intell ??
Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts
thanks daytona, now by 3Ghz do you mean the general core speed or the total speed.....assuming single core speed...no preference to AMD or Intell ??lenwood24
Intel's core2duo is better than AMD's X2's but not by a Huge amount. By 3Ghz i mean the........speed....i dont know another way to put it.
Avatar image for lenwood24
lenwood24

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 lenwood24
Member since 2005 • 63 Posts
forgive my ignorance on the topic =P, all I meant is my PC now is a single core 2.2 running at 3ghz, a few years old....seems like the technology should be faster than it was a few years ago. I'm assuming with triple or quad cores its triple or so the actual processing speed.
Avatar image for Sordidus
Sordidus

2036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Sordidus
Member since 2008 • 2036 Posts

thanks daytona, now by 3Ghz do you mean the general core speed or the total speed.....assuming single core speed...no preference to AMD or Intell ??lenwood24

3Ghz per Core.I would go with Intel.

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts
forgive my ignorance on the topic =P, all I meant is my PC now is a single core 2.2 running at 3ghz, a few years old....seems like the technology should be faster than it was a few years ago. I'm assuming with triple or quad cores its triple or so the actual processing speed.lenwood24
No the speeds havent increased by much, the new thing is having multiple cores.
Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts
forgive my ignorance on the topic =P, all I meant is my PC now is a single core 2.2 running at 3ghz, a few years old....seems like the technology should be faster than it was a few years ago. I'm assuming with triple or quad cores its triple or so the actual processing speed.lenwood24
Also with a quad core its not '4 x 3Ghz = 12Ghz' its just '4, 3Ghz's',,,i know its hard to understand but you just dont add up the speeds.
Avatar image for NeilCardiff
NeilCardiff

834

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#10 NeilCardiff
Member since 2008 • 834 Posts
I agree Sordidus, Intel has the lead on multiple core cpu's
Avatar image for NeilCardiff
NeilCardiff

834

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#11 NeilCardiff
Member since 2008 • 834 Posts
A quad core CPU is like having 4 people doing the job of one, different tasks are shared between the cores, so if the software is written correctly it runs much faster.
Avatar image for NeilCardiff
NeilCardiff

834

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#12 NeilCardiff
Member since 2008 • 834 Posts

Remember these are british prices.

if you can afford it go for

quad core intel q6600 really fast and really overclockable, £160

mobo asus pq5 pro,£100

gfx card, Powercolour gxt 260 216 or nvidia 4870 1024 mb both about £200

Memory, Corsair 4GB DDR2 XMS2 PC2-6400C5 TwinX (2x2GB about £40

Antec 300 case, $40

Psu Coolermaster Real Power 520w Modular Power Supply £60

Cooler, Arctic Cooling Freezer Xtreme CPU Cooler $30

hard drive Seagate baracuda or samsung sdpinpoint 500gb, both £46

dvd _RW - lg, asus, sony any good make will be great £20

I would spend more and get this,

Shop around, you will be supprised at how little you could spend on something like this, especially in canada,

good luck

This is more than you planned but it is a kick aaa system

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="lenwood24"]thanks daytona, now by 3Ghz do you mean the general core speed or the total speed.....assuming single core speed...no preference to AMD or Intell ??Daytona_178
Intel's core2duo is better than AMD's X2's but not by a Huge amount. By 3Ghz i mean the........speed....i dont know another way to put it.

but amd is good for a cheap build
Avatar image for NeilCardiff
NeilCardiff

834

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#14 NeilCardiff
Member since 2008 • 834 Posts

[QUOTE="Daytona_178"][QUOTE="lenwood24"]thanks daytona, now by 3Ghz do you mean the general core speed or the total speed.....assuming single core speed...no preference to AMD or Intell ??imprezawrx500
Intel's core2duo is better than AMD's X2's but not by a Huge amount. By 3Ghz i mean the........speed....i dont know another way to put it.

but amd is good for a cheap build

With the asus pro you can overclock the 6600 like madalso the q9550

lots of "old" intels will clock to 3gb with practice and good cooling

Some ppl banging on about i7 but any other descent intel chip will keep up for a year at half the price for a kick ass overclocked rig.

Even on stock speeds it will easily let the 260 kick ass in games

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts
[QUOTE="Daytona_178"][QUOTE="lenwood24"]thanks daytona, now by 3Ghz do you mean the general core speed or the total speed.....assuming single core speed...no preference to AMD or Intell ??imprezawrx500
Intel's core2duo is better than AMD's X2's but not by a Huge amount. By 3Ghz i mean the........speed....i dont know another way to put it.

but amd is good for a cheap build

yeah i never said they were bad, intel is better for cheap build if you are overclocking.