Q6600 performance in current games

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for adam0926
adam0926

5064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#1 adam0926
Member since 2006 • 5064 Posts
I'm thinking of getting a Q6600 CPU but people keep saying its only good for future game and I wont see good performnce in current games, is this true can any one who owns a Q6600 tell me how they perform.
Avatar image for mastershake575
mastershake575

8574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 mastershake575
Member since 2007 • 8574 Posts
you won't really get much of a performance boost at all with a Q6600 because very very few games support multi cores and the one's that do you can still get around the same fps with a dual core if i were you id just get a decent dual core for now and upgrade to quad later when you actually really need one because they will be cheaper and and way better
Avatar image for adam0926
adam0926

5064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3 adam0926
Member since 2006 • 5064 Posts
will I be able to play current games in high with a Q6600 and my current setup
Avatar image for Shegevara
Shegevara

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#4 Shegevara
Member since 2005 • 2124 Posts
yes i think so
Avatar image for mastershake575
mastershake575

8574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 mastershake575
Member since 2007 • 8574 Posts
will I be able to play current games in high with a Q6600 and my current setup adam0926
yep of course a decent dual core will be able to let you do that you have a nice @SS mobo why don't you just buy a E4400 overclock it save like $150 and wait till quad cores become mainstream then you can get one
Avatar image for TDuiker
TDuiker

11689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TDuiker
Member since 2004 • 11689 Posts

Maybe not yet with a quad, but you should def get a C2D ..

Avatar image for adam0926
adam0926

5064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 adam0926
Member since 2006 • 5064 Posts
but isn't the quad just two E6600 in one
Avatar image for Shegevara
Shegevara

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#8 Shegevara
Member since 2005 • 2124 Posts
it is. I have one E6600. And yes Q6600 is 2 E6600 glued together.
Avatar image for Zaber123
Zaber123

1159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 Zaber123
Member since 2003 • 1159 Posts
This is a no brainer, if you are buying now and don't want to upgrade next year get a quad. It will run any current game great and the Q6600 easily overclocks to 3ghz. All of the high profile games coming out will be multithreaded, and many already are (Bioshock, Supreme Commander, Oblivion, WoW: BC, and CoD2). In the next year you will see a huge advantage to having a quad, as when a game is multithreaded they naturally perform much better than dual cores. Your graphics card will be absolete before a Q6600 at 3ghz is.
Avatar image for burntout_83
burntout_83

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 burntout_83
Member since 2006 • 465 Posts
Found very little that supports it so far but after seeing that alan wake quad core tech demo i was converted
Avatar image for burntout_83
burntout_83

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 burntout_83
Member since 2006 • 465 Posts

This is a no brainer, if you are buying now and don't want to upgrade next year get a quad. It will run any current game great and the Q6600 easily overclocks to 3ghz. All of the high profile games coming out will be multithreaded, and many already are (Bioshock, Supreme Commander, Oblivion, WoW: BC, and CoD2). In the next year you will see a huge advantage to having a quad, as when a game is multithreaded they naturally perform much better than dual cores. Your graphics card will be absolete before a Q6600 at 3ghz is.Zaber123

I ran bioshock in a window and kept an eye on my cpu monitor, only seemed to use the one core, do have a screenshot somewhere...

Avatar image for mastershake575
mastershake575

8574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 mastershake575
Member since 2007 • 8574 Posts
This is a no brainer, if you are buying now and don't want to upgrade next year get a quad. It will run any current game great and the Q6600 easily overclocks to 3ghz. All of the high profile games coming out will be multithreaded, and many already are (Bioshock, Supreme Commander, Oblivion, WoW: BC, and CoD2). In the next year you will see a huge advantage to having a quad, as when a game is multithreaded they naturally perform much better than dual cores. Your graphics card will be absolete before a Q6600 at 3ghz is.Zaber123
like all of those games can be maxed out on a decent dual core why would the topic creator want to pay an extra $150 just so he can play a few games that support quad core that can be maxed out on just 2 cores
Avatar image for ThE_SoCK
ThE_SoCK

459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 ThE_SoCK
Member since 2003 • 459 Posts

wow, this is a weird thread...

im just going to comment that a quad core is absolutely useless at the moment and a waste of time and money.

most apps dont even support dual cores yet, what good would a quad core do?

Avatar image for TDuiker
TDuiker

11689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 TDuiker
Member since 2004 • 11689 Posts

wow, this is a weird thread...

im just going to comment that a quad core is absolutely useless at the moment and a waste of time and money.

most apps dont even support dual cores yet, what good would a quad core do?

ThE_SoCK

Your comment is a waste of time to anyone with knowledge on the subject.. let alone experience..

Avatar image for Gog
Gog

16376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Gog
Member since 2002 • 16376 Posts

I'm thinking of getting a Q6600 CPU but people keep saying its only good for future game and I wont see good performnce in current games, is this true can any one who owns a Q6600 tell me how they perform. adam0926

You'll get great perfomance in games (at least as good as with a dual core E6600) but not necessary better perfromance than with a dual core. In games 3 out of the 4 cores will remain largely unused.

Avatar image for Zaber123
Zaber123

1159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 Zaber123
Member since 2003 • 1159 Posts
[QUOTE="Zaber123"]This is a no brainer, if you are buying now and don't want to upgrade next year get a quad. It will run any current game great and the Q6600 easily overclocks to 3ghz. All of the high profile games coming out will be multithreaded, and many already are (Bioshock, Supreme Commander, Oblivion, WoW: BC, and CoD2). In the next year you will see a huge advantage to having a quad, as when a game is multithreaded they naturally perform much better than dual cores. Your graphics card will be absolete before a Q6600 at 3ghz is.mastershake575
like all of those games can be maxed out on a decent dual core why would the topic creator want to pay an extra $150 just so he can play a few games that support quad core that can be maxed out on just 2 cores

For the future, not everyone buys a processor just to plan on upgrading the next year. If it runs current games great and will run future games better, then if he has the money it is a better option.
Avatar image for mastershake575
mastershake575

8574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 mastershake575
Member since 2007 • 8574 Posts
[QUOTE="mastershake575"][QUOTE="Zaber123"]This is a no brainer, if you are buying now and don't want to upgrade next year get a quad. It will run any current game great and the Q6600 easily overclocks to 3ghz. All of the high profile games coming out will be multithreaded, and many already are (Bioshock, Supreme Commander, Oblivion, WoW: BC, and CoD2). In the next year you will see a huge advantage to having a quad, as when a game is multithreaded they naturally perform much better than dual cores. Your graphics card will be absolete before a Q6600 at 3ghz is.Zaber123
like all of those games can be maxed out on a decent dual core why would the topic creator want to pay an extra $150 just so he can play a few games that support quad core that can be maxed out on just 2 cores

For the future, not everyone buys a processor just to plan on upgrading the next year. If it runs current games great and will run future games better, then if he has the money it is a better option.

yeah thats true but for now he should just geta E4400 and overclock thats all he needs for now and its less than half theprice of theQ6600 plus by the time quad cores become mainstream,Nelahem and AM3 will be out,completely killing the Q6600 in performance
Avatar image for TDuiker
TDuiker

11689

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 TDuiker
Member since 2004 • 11689 Posts

[QUOTE="Zaber123"][QUOTE="mastershake575"][QUOTE="Zaber123"]This is a no brainer, if you are buying now and don't want to upgrade next year get a quad. It will run any current game great and the Q6600 easily overclocks to 3ghz. All of the high profile games coming out will be multithreaded, and many already are (Bioshock, Supreme Commander, Oblivion, WoW: BC, and CoD2). In the next year you will see a huge advantage to having a quad, as when a game is multithreaded they naturally perform much better than dual cores. Your graphics card will be absolete before a Q6600 at 3ghz is.mastershake575
like all of those games can be maxed out on a decent dual core why would the topic creator want to pay an extra $150 just so he can play a few games that support quad core that can be maxed out on just 2 cores

For the future, not everyone buys a processor just to plan on upgrading the next year. If it runs current games great and will run future games better, then if he has the money it is a better option.

yeah thats true but for now he should just geta E4400 and overclock thats all he needs for now and its less than half theprice of theQ6600 plus by the time quad cores become mainstream,Nelahem and AM3 will be out,completely killing the Q6600 in performance

There is always something new around the corner..

Avatar image for Zaber123
Zaber123

1159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 Zaber123
Member since 2003 • 1159 Posts
So really it all comes down to when quad cores become mainstream. So really we won't be able to see the outcome of dual core vs quad core until later on. However for someone like me who only upgrades every 3 or 4 years quad core is definately a better choice. Also I think quad core will become mainstream much sooner than most people think. UE3 supports multithreading, Valve is all the way on board, id software's new engine supports it, and we will see it in the less mainstream developers like Crytek as well. That's Valve, id, Epic, and Crytek. I think we've already moved into multithreading.
Avatar image for mastershake575
mastershake575

8574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 mastershake575
Member since 2007 • 8574 Posts

[QUOTE="mastershake575"][QUOTE="Zaber123"][QUOTE="mastershake575"][QUOTE="Zaber123"]This is a no brainer, if you are buying now and don't want to upgrade next year get a quad. It will run any current game great and the Q6600 easily overclocks to 3ghz. All of the high profile games coming out will be multithreaded, and many already are (Bioshock, Supreme Commander, Oblivion, WoW: BC, and CoD2). In the next year you will see a huge advantage to having a quad, as when a game is multithreaded they naturally perform much better than dual cores. Your graphics card will be absolete before a Q6600 at 3ghz is.TDuiker

like all of those games can be maxed out on a decent dual core why would the topic creator want to pay an extra $150 just so he can play a few games that support quad core that can be maxed out on just 2 cores

For the future, not everyone buys a processor just to plan on upgrading the next year. If it runs current games great and will run future games better, then if he has the money it is a better option.

yeah thats true but for now he should just geta E4400 and overclock thats all he needs for now and its less than half theprice of theQ6600 plus by the time quad cores become mainstream,Nelahem and AM3 will be out,completely killing the Q6600 in performance

There is always something new around the corner..

yep sure is but thats no the point the point is he can geta E4400 overclock it then be set till he REALLY needs a quad core and then when he really does need one he can get a better one why get something you don't need now when you can just wait till you need it
Avatar image for rogreslief
rogreslief

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 rogreslief
Member since 2007 • 267 Posts

E6750 for example will be faster, and i saw a lot of benchmarks and also with 8 runnings from different progs will the E6750 be faster then a Q6600.

Its will be fast when game support it, but it doesnt, and when it does there a lot more faster cpu's.

So i advice u to buy a E6750.

I got one and it owns!!!!!!

With the heaviests games excisting u can easily going from game to windows, playing Realplayer etc..

And also very fast hdd writing...

It just owns the Quad.

BTW: a E6750 can be easily overclocked with standard cooler till 3,45Mhz with nice temperatures.

Avatar image for r3351925
r3351925

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 r3351925
Member since 2006 • 1728 Posts

hey adam, how r ya, long time no c, congrats about the processor 3.9ghz lol.about the processor, get an e6550, or an e6420. then OC OC AND OC.

RESPEKT

Avatar image for bignice12
bignice12

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 bignice12
Member since 2003 • 2124 Posts

E6750 for example will be faster, and i saw a lot of benchmarks and also with 8 runnings from different progs will the E6750 be faster then a Q6600.

Its will be fast when game support it, but it doesnt, and when it does there a lot more faster cpu's.

So i advice u to buy a E6750.

I got one and it owns!!!!!!

With the heaviests games excisting u can easily going from game to windows, playing Realplayer etc..

And also very fast hdd writing...

It just owns the Quad.

BTW: a E6750 can be easily overclocked with standard cooler till 3,45Mhz with nice temperatures.

rogreslief

I disagre, you can easily buy a Q6600 and overclock it past E6750 speeds(mines are E6850 speeds) and now you have 2 E6750s compared to your 1, how is that better? But if you are really tight on money E6750 is a great choice. We shall see how Quads peform in Crysis, I think the result is going to be awesome.

Right now my Quad can handle anything I can throw at it without breaking a sweat. It all depends on your budget imo.

Avatar image for Gog
Gog

16376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Gog
Member since 2002 • 16376 Posts
I disagre, you can easily buy a Q6600 and overclock it past E6750 speeds(mines are E6850 speeds) and now you have 2 E6750s compared to your 1, how is that better? But if you are really tight on money E6750 is a great choice. We shall see how Quads peform in Crysis, I think the result is going to be awesome.

Right now my Quad can handle anything I can throw at it without breaking a sweat. It all depends on your budget imo.

bignice12

You can oc a E6750 also far past a Q6600 that so that's a moot point.

Avatar image for rogreslief
rogreslief

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 rogreslief
Member since 2007 • 267 Posts

lol yeah,

sure u can clock it till E6750 Speed.

But what i mean is that the E6750 got standard a higher speed cpu-clock, so i think its possible to clock higher then a Q6600.

But don't know about the multipair (with E6750 max 9x)

But look for a 1333MHz cuz E6600 for example is with lower fsb > Q6600 FSB=1333FSB

&

where it is all about, what is faster..

A duo core is faster @ the moment in games, so if u buy a new cpu now, buy a duo, cuz in a couple of moths u got the first next-gen cpu's that are faster of course. (Q6600 is 'some older' @ that time)

Avatar image for da1on2
da1on2

4885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 da1on2
Member since 2006 • 4885 Posts
Wont you be able to multi task more with a quad core? Although you wont see a big performance jup for gaming wont it have a generally better performance?
Avatar image for LordEC911
LordEC911

9972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 LordEC911
Member since 2004 • 9972 Posts

Wont you be able to multi task more with a quad core? Although you wont see a big performance jup for gaming wont it have a generally better performance?da1on2

Yes and no.
Yes you can multitask more.
And no to not seeing a large performance jump in games.

Once games become multithreaded, dualcores will see a 20% MAX increase in performance over single cores. Quadcores, on the other hand, will see a much larger performance increase. Crysis and Valve's updated Source engine will be two games that really show off the performance increase of quadcores.

Avatar image for da1on2
da1on2

4885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 da1on2
Member since 2006 • 4885 Posts

[QUOTE="da1on2"]Wont you be able to multi task more with a quad core? Although you wont see a big performance jup for gaming wont it have a generally better performance?LordEC911

Yes and no.
Yes you can multitask more.
And no to not seeing a large performance jump in games.

Once games become multithreaded, dualcores will see a 20% MAX increase in performance over single cores. Quadcores, on the other hand, will see a much larger performance increase. Crysis and Valve's updated Source engine will be two games that really show off the performance increase of quadcores.

I meant for single threaded games, I guess I should have stated that.

Avatar image for MadExponent
MadExponent

11454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 MadExponent
Member since 2003 • 11454 Posts
Well I do more than just game so my quad core is great for me. I would say that if you are buying a cpu just for games just get a E6600 or something like that. That is a great CPU and should be great for you until more games offer more multithreaded support.
Avatar image for b0ssy
b0ssy

602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 b0ssy
Member since 2007 • 602 Posts
QUADCORE