Quad Core Processors

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Neobrio
Neobrio

140

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 Neobrio
Member since 2004 • 140 Posts

In my computer I have an AMD Phenom 9500 quad core processor 2.2GHz. I was just wondering if their was a way to either:

-Dedicate just one of the four processors to gaming and the rest cope with background operations. (This is assuming games such as the sims 2 cannot utilise any more than one processor at a time)

-Merge all four into one processor (so all four work as one?)

Also I would just like to know. Would I benefit from a quad core with future games which will soon be able to utilise all four at once?

Avatar image for muirplayer
muirplayer

406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 muirplayer
Member since 2004 • 406 Posts
You can't merge them all to work as one. Windows spreads the work load across the four cores. For games though, I'm pretty sure they have to be threaded to take advantage of dual and quad core processors. But yes... you will benefit from quadcore with future games.
Avatar image for mjarantilla
mjarantilla

15721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 mjarantilla
Member since 2002 • 15721 Posts

In my computer I have an AMD Phenom 9500 quad core processor 2.2GHz. I was just wondering if their was a way to either:

-Dedicate just one of the four processors to gaming and the rest cope with background operations. (This is assuming games such as the sims 2 cannot utilise any more than one processor at a time)

-Merge all four into one processor (so all four work as one?)

Also I would just like to know. Would I benefit from a quad core with future games which will soon be able to utilise all four at once?

Neobrio

You can set the affinity of each application in the task manager so that the app only uses a specific core (or specific multiple cores). But it's tedious. I'm not sure if there's any way to automatically set a program's affinity.

Avatar image for danb0
danb0

445

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#4 danb0
Member since 2004 • 445 Posts

THG Task Assignment Manager lets you set up processor affinity for applications. You have to do it yourself the first time for each application you want to change but once it's done you won't have to do it again as long as THG is running in the background.

Another tool I used to get System Shock 2 working properly is imagecfg. Using this tool will permanently alter the program so it's a good idea to make a backup of any files you're going to use it on. It is a little more involved than THG and you will need to use the command prompt to make it work. Tutorial here and more detailed here

Note that it should be:

0x1 = CPU0 , 0x2 = CPU1 , 0x4 = CPU2 , 0x8 = CPU3

Avatar image for gslaughs
gslaughs

167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 gslaughs
Member since 2008 • 167 Posts
if you want to have the best level of gaming as of yesterday go dual core, if you want to future proof yourself for tomarrows games then go quad core. the q6600 g0 is lame on stock, but a little bit of over clocking makes it a monster, if you spend a little cash on an aftermarket cooler. I recommend the xigmatek 1283 w/arcitc freeze MX2.
Avatar image for deadwolf13
deadwolf13

66

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#6 deadwolf13
Member since 2004 • 66 Posts

I like my Q6600 due to the smooth performance i get with my RTS's. RTS's some how take more advantage with 4 cores than two and allow you to run apps in the background with out hurting your gaming performance.

Avatar image for titanium2108
titanium2108

305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 titanium2108
Member since 2008 • 305 Posts

having a multi-core system means nothing if the applications arent written for multithreading

im not referencing you in this statement but i get sick of hearing about people thinking they need a dual core for basic office tasks.

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

having a multi-core system means nothing if the applications arent written for multithreading

im not referencing you in this statement but i get sick of hearing about people thinking they need a dual core for basic office tasks.

titanium2108

If you are building a pc you have no excuse not to get a duel core because they are available for so little money now days!