Question about GPU and workstation cards

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

Okay, let me see if I can explain this. My girlfriend is interning at a broadcasting stationa nd she is about to go to college for film. They use a video editor called Media Composer 6 by Avid. It normally cost $2500 (I know, are you kidding me?), but if you have a valid student ID, then you can get it for only $300. This si wha she wants, so I will get it for her, but there is ne issue. I messaged AVid about how my card would work for this video editing and their response was pretty rude. I have a GTX 580 SC and when I told them what card I had he said:

Although expensive, it's not supported. Avid only qualifies the nVidia Quadro & Quadro FX series. Bad assumption. The Avid code exploits Quadro and Quadro FX Open GL

Maybe he is confused, or just wants me to buy somethig I don't need. No idea. Here is my question, does a workstation card really do things that much better then my card? If I need one, which one do you recommend. I also have the i5-2500k at stock, but since this is video editing, I might either overclock, or should I just get whatever is the best new processor like the i7-2600k? I have been out of the loop for a few months, so help me guys! Thanks.

Avatar image for deactivated-60e799a72eb68
deactivated-60e799a72eb68

1678

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-60e799a72eb68
Member since 2008 • 1678 Posts

If I understand correctly, quaddro cards and those other rediculously expensive cards are actually mostly the same as a gaming card. They use the same gpu, but might have more VRAM and a slightly different PCB and BIOS that allows the card to run highly optimized software. Some of the older radeon cards could be flashed into the workstation variant, but I don't think it's possible with modern cards.

It's an arbitrary distinction, but they do it so they can fund their teams to do nothing but optimize the hell out of drivers designated to only the high end graphic design cards, when in theory the gaming cards would do just as well thanks to hardware similarities.

Avatar image for GTR12
GTR12

13490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 GTR12
Member since 2006 • 13490 Posts

The guy is right, workstation cards rip through encoding/decoding, if you have any CAD program, run a render and watch, takes forever.

You dont need a better CPU, it wont do anything, even an i3 paired with a workstation card is fine. The card does all the work.

Just for a simple example, download Design Garage from Nvidia's website, and set everything to max, and render.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#4 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts
depends what quadro card you will have, you can let them act as a gaming card just by installing normal nvidia drivers, it will work I don't know if it will be faster than your gtx 580 though, then you gotta tell me the exact type of the quadro card.
Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts
I don't know what exact kind of quadro I would need. I don't want to break the bank on this purchase since the program is $300. Does anyone have a good card they would suggest for a reasonable price?Also, can I just put the card in my second slot and only use it when we are video editing and keep my 580 in the other? I have an 850W PSU, so it should be enough.
Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts
All I really need is for the card to be able to edit videos using this program. I don't see how a GTX 580 cannot do the same thing for just editing videos. Maybe I need to know more about how the card helps render or something? I'm just getting on edge because I'd like this done as soon as possible for her.
Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
All I really need is for the card to be able to edit videos using this program. I don't see how a GTX 580 cannot do the same thing for just editing videos. Maybe I need to know more about how the card helps render or something? I'm just getting on edge because I'd like this done as soon as possible for her. LordsLoss
It'll likely 'work,' just not anywhere near as quickly than with the card would be. This is totally off the cuff and I know nothing about the specific software and their support/how the hardware works. A lot of business stuff in that general direction is hyper-expensive, though.
Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

:(Would this card work as a pretty good workstation card? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814133382&Tpk=quadro%202000d

Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

You dont need a Quadro card. Yes, it makes things nicer, but its not required.

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

Why isn't your girlfriend getting financial aide/getting stuff herself? It's the 21st century, women are powerful and independent and are capable of taking care of themselves. :lol:

With that being said, I think the difference in price is mostly the drivers, which cost a lot more to develop per unit sold than the geforce series.

You could try and buy a quaddro off of ebay for a decent bit, the software may or may not work on your card, you might want to check specialized forums for the answer to that.

Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

Well, I'm downloading the 30 day trial now, so we can see how this goes. Nailed, maybe some people were not gifted with having a family to help pay for everything, and seeing how she is still in high school, she is not free of her parental grasp. I came from a wealthy family and can afford to help her on her career path, so shut up.

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

Well, I'm downloading the 30 day trial now, so we can see how this goes. Nailed, maybe some people were not gifted with having a family to help pay for everything, and seeing how she is still in high school, she is not free of her parental grasp. I came from a wealthy family and can afford to help her on her career path, so shut up.

LordsLoss

You asked for a critique of the situation when you decided this was a blog.

Also I was joking around, of course your girlfriend wants you to buy her stuff, that's how girlfriend work.

Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts
At what point did I turn this into a blog post? Your post did not sound like a joke, but if it was then sorry for what I said. I just posted my situation, and wanted advice on what exactly to do.
Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

At what point did I turn this into a blog post? Your post did not sound like a joke, but if it was then sorry for what I said. I just posted my situation, and wanted advice on what exactly to do. LordsLoss

Do you see the emoticon? What do you think that is there for?

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

Quadro does not help video editing. It helps 3D & filter effect rendering. Unless your transcoding using a program that utilizes CUDA . But, most mid to high end Geforce cards have multiple the amount of CUDA cores than the best Quadro card.. And as long as the Geforce card has equal or better amount of memory along with bandwidth and more cuda cores then a Geforce card will be generally better.

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

Quadro does not help video editing. It helps 3D & filter effect rendering. Unless your transcoding using a program that utilizes CUDA . But, most mid to high end Geforce cards have multiple the amount of CUDA cores than the best Quadro card.. And as long as the Geforce card has equal or better amount of memory along with bandwidth and more cuda cores then a Geforce card will be generally better.

04dcarraher

That isn't necessarily true. It's all about how they write their software, there may be a function that they have that uses something that only the quadro has support for.

Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts
Well with my slow end bandwidth the trial download will take around 3 hours. I'll let you know if my card works. If not, I'll be back for recommendations.
Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
Well with my slow end bandwidth the trial download will take around 3 hours. I'll let you know if my card works. If not, I'll be back for recommendations. LordsLoss
Yeah- I probably didn't express it strongly enough, but it almost certainly WILL work just fine with pretty much anything. It'd be pretty insane of them to flat-out require a workstation GPU for the software to work at all.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

Quadro does not help video editing. It helps 3D & filter effect rendering. Unless your transcoding using a program that utilizes CUDA . But, most mid to high end Geforce cards have multiple the amount of CUDA cores than the best Quadro card.. And as long as the Geforce card has equal or better amount of memory along with bandwidth and more cuda cores then a Geforce card will be generally better.

NailedGR

That isn't necessarily true. It's all about how they write their software, there may be a function that they have that uses something that only the quadro has support for.

As I said generally, better , most programs anymore just dont design for certain cards anymore since the architecture between the cards are very close and limits their user base size, and the companies that continue to only use Quadro cards are in an agreement with Nvidia in one way shape or form. Adobe products, 3Dmax, Maya supports Geforce CUDA based cards as an example. You can take a Quadro FX4800 vs a GTX 580 3gb model and in most video editing programs just plains kills the FX4800 and costs nearly a 3rd of the price. The only real difference in Quadro cards and Geforce based cards is the bit color and pixel fidelity. And with Avid Media Composer 6, it wants only Quadro cards to use the GPU processing functions even though any Geforce 400 or 500's have full OpenCL support. Also it wants Quadro FX 560 or higher for gpu functions. The program will work just fine but all processing jobs will be on the CPU, and since you have an i5 it will perform fine.

Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

[QUOTE="NailedGR"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

Quadro does not help video editing. It helps 3D & filter effect rendering. Unless your transcoding using a program that utilizes CUDA . But, most mid to high end Geforce cards have multiple the amount of CUDA cores than the best Quadro card.. And as long as the Geforce card has equal or better amount of memory along with bandwidth and more cuda cores then a Geforce card will be generally better.

04dcarraher

That isn't necessarily true. It's all about how they write their software, there may be a function that they have that uses something that only the quadro has support for.

As I said generally, better , most programs anymore just dont design for certain cards anymore since the architecture between the cards are very close and limits their user base size, and the companies that continue to only use Quadro cards are in an agreement with Nvidia in one way shape or form. Adobe products, 3Dmax, Maya supports Geforce CUDA based cards as an example. You can take a Quadro FX4800 vs a GTX 580 3gb model and in most video editing programs just plains kills the FX4800 and costs nearly a 3rd of the price. The only real difference in Quadro cards and Geforce based cards is the bit color and pixel fidelity. And with Avid Media Composer 6, it wants only Quadro cards to use the GPU processing functions even though any Geforce 400 or 500's have full OpenCL support. Also it wants Quadro FX 560 or higher for gpu functions. The program will work just fine but all processing jobs will be on the CPU, and since you have an i5 it will perform fine.

Thank you. I plan on overclocking my processor to like 4.5 soon anyways, so that will be a boost. Do you use Media Composer?

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts
Having an i5 at 4.5 ghz will decrease encoding times and speed up general response time.
Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

Ok, so it will be a big increase or just a small one?

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

Ok, so it will be a big increase or just a small one?

LordsLoss
Your not going to see major increases, your talking about shaving minutes and or seconds in encoding time.
Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts
I installed the trial version and it will not load out all. I did a clean install and everything a second time. When I click on the program it begins to startup, then it goes to a black screen and freezes. If I click anywhere it says Avid is not responding and then I have to close it. Can it be my card? Even the customer support person replied and said my card would work. Any other idea? I have 16gig of ram so it can't be that. Everything else is working fine. Edit: I asked in their forum if I need the newest drivers to get it to work. They replied and said I do not need the newest drivers, only the correct drivers and I would need to experiment. What does this mean? Do I have to revert back to an older driver or just install the newest ones?
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts
I installed the trial version and it will not load out all. I did a clean install and everything a second time. When I click on the program it begins to startup, then it goes to a black screen and freezes. If I click anywhere it says Avid is not responding and then I have to close it. Can it be my card? Even the customer support person replied and said my card would work. Any other idea? I have 16gig of ram so it can't be that. Everything else is working fine. Edit: I asked in their forum if I need the newest drivers to get it to work. They replied and said I do not need the newest drivers, only the correct drivers and I would need to experiment. What does this mean? Do I have to revert back to an older driver or just install the newest ones?LordsLoss
The complete lack of feedback from the program makes it difficult to ascertain what could be causing such issues....other than a poorly written program. The line you are fed about "experiment" is, frankly, your only option. Its also lingo for "I got no clue, you figure it out by trying anything." look at forums to see if other users are having the same issue, run it under disabled desktop composition, run it in compatibility mode, try updating drivers or even rolling back to a previous one, disable any custom codecs, try modifying any user file settings directly if you can, etc. At this point you are basically on your own unless someone has experienced that exact same problem before and knows the solution.
Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts
[QUOTE="LordsLoss"]I installed the trial version and it will not load out all. I did a clean install and everything a second time. When I click on the program it begins to startup, then it goes to a black screen and freezes. If I click anywhere it says Avid is not responding and then I have to close it. Can it be my card? Even the customer support person replied and said my card would work. Any other idea? I have 16gig of ram so it can't be that. Everything else is working fine. Edit: I asked in their forum if I need the newest drivers to get it to work. They replied and said I do not need the newest drivers, only the correct drivers and I would need to experiment. What does this mean? Do I have to revert back to an older driver or just install the newest ones?XaosII
The complete lack of feedback from the program makes it difficult to ascertain what could be causing such issues....other than a poorly written program. The line you are fed about "experiment" is, frankly, your only option. Its also lingo for "I got no clue, you figure it out by trying anything." look at forums to see if other users are having the same issue, run it under disabled desktop composition, run it in compatibility mode, try updating drivers or even rolling back to a previous one, disable any custom codecs, try modifying any user file settings directly if you can, etc. At this point you are basically on your own unless someone has experienced that exact same problem before and knows the solution.

Thanks, but Im just going to make a new topic. I found some answers.