Question about my 1900GT

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ncderek
ncderek

5513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 ncderek
Member since 2004 • 5513 Posts
i've had my 1900GT for a while now, but noticed in ATI tool it says for core i have 513mhz and for mem i have 657 mhz. but at a place like tomshardware, it says my 1900GT is 580 and 1100 mhz. what is going on?? something wrong with my card? is it underclocked some how or getting read wrong, is it working poorly, whys it not what it is supposed to be? it is the sapphire 1900gt if that makes a difference
Avatar image for Big_Black_Eyes
Big_Black_Eyes

407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Big_Black_Eyes
Member since 2007 • 407 Posts

i've had my 1900GT for a while now, but noticed in ATI tool it says for core i have 513mhz and for mem i have 657 mhz. but at a place like tomshardware, it says my 1900GT is 580 and 1100 mhz. what is going on?? something wrong with my card? is it underclocked some how or getting read wrong, is it working poorly, whys it not what it is supposed to be? it is the sapphire 1900gt if that makes a differencencderek

Yep you are right different brand has different clock-speed

Avatar image for ncderek
ncderek

5513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 ncderek
Member since 2004 • 5513 Posts
so sapphire is probably a cheaper and underclocked version of the 1900?
Avatar image for Dedicationism
Dedicationism

106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Dedicationism
Member since 2007 • 106 Posts
so sapphire is probably a cheaper and underclocked version of the 1900?ncderek
Why not OC it?
Avatar image for Big_Black_Eyes
Big_Black_Eyes

407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Big_Black_Eyes
Member since 2007 • 407 Posts

so sapphire is probably a cheaper and underclocked version of the 1900?ncderek

Nope saphire is the default version. The one you saw on the review was the OC version

Avatar image for ncderek
ncderek

5513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 ncderek
Member since 2004 • 5513 Posts
i have another thread about that
Avatar image for Hiryuu_
Hiryuu_

2521

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Hiryuu_
Member since 2006 • 2521 Posts

You got the X1900GT rev. 2, which featured lower clock speeds than the original X1900GT.

http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php?card1=415&card2=484

Still not a bad card though.

Avatar image for ncderek
ncderek

5513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 ncderek
Member since 2004 • 5513 Posts

ah, thanks very much

Avatar image for kakishi1
kakishi1

1065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 kakishi1
Member since 2005 • 1065 Posts
Ya i have the same card, and the same clocks, u can always overclock it alittle i guess.