QX67 and X68 to discontinue....?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Link2legends
Link2legends

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Link2legends
Member since 2005 • 179 Posts

alright well i was reading a report that said the QX6700 and X6800 was going to be discontinued to change it from 65 nanometre to 45 nanometre, so is that a good thing or bad?

 

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=616&Itemid=35

 

Avatar image for Masterfulfish
Masterfulfish

230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Masterfulfish
Member since 2005 • 230 Posts
depends what you mean by good or bad, but basically less nanometres=faster speed
Avatar image for Link2legends
Link2legends

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Link2legends
Member since 2005 • 179 Posts

awsome

 

wait wait, how fast are we talking about? like 25% faster? 

Avatar image for _0V3RKI11_
_0V3RKI11_

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 _0V3RKI11_
Member since 2006 • 2267 Posts
Smaller chips take less power and produce less heat.
Avatar image for r3351925
r3351925

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 r3351925
Member since 2006 • 1728 Posts

Smaller chips take less power and produce less heat. _0V3RKI11_

quite accurate, more overclocking ability.

Avatar image for _0V3RKI11_
_0V3RKI11_

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 _0V3RKI11_
Member since 2006 • 2267 Posts

[QUOTE="_0V3RKI11_"]Smaller chips take less power and produce less heat. r3351925

quite accurate, more overclocking ability.

 

= More fun ;) 

Avatar image for MondoCool
MondoCool

866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 MondoCool
Member since 2007 • 866 Posts
But that means my cpu will be less common, thats a good and bad thing : /
Avatar image for jfelisario
jfelisario

2753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 jfelisario
Member since 2006 • 2753 Posts

But that means my cpu will be less common, thats a good and bad thing : /MondoCool

Lol its not like that chip is being sold in the vast quantities of the likes of the E6300, E6400, E6600, trust me they'll still be hanging around due to the insane price. 

Avatar image for Link2legends
Link2legends

179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Link2legends
Member since 2005 • 179 Posts

So how fast are these "new" cpu going to be? give me a %, plz.

edit: and will the qx67 be almost as fast as the qx68? 

Avatar image for LordEC911
LordEC911

9972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 LordEC911
Member since 2004 • 9972 Posts

So how fast are these "new" cpu going to be? give me a %, plz.

edit: and will the qx67 be almost as fast as the qx68?

Link2legends

Well my best guess is these new Penryn chips will top out, stock settings, around 3.5-3.6ghz, so we might see a quad at 3.3 or so. Overclocks into the 4ghz should be pretty average on air coolers and probably 6ghz on LN2 and suicide runs should be possible.

So that is about a 20% increase in clockspeed, with a few minor changes in the marchitecture we might see a 25-30% increase in performance over C2D, stock vs stock.

We shall see sometime in July, I believe that is when the Penryn NDA expires...