This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="aliblabla2007"]What? We shouldn't buy Red Alert 3 because the graphics aren't good? Okay. :|thusahaWe shouldn't buy RA3 because of that nasty DRM.
That's not the topic, though.
guys although alot of friends and members adviced me not to buy RE 3 i bought it but the graphics is bad so anyone don't buy RA 3 For your best interst i bought company of heroes and it's better it was relesed in 2006 so again DO NOT BUY RE 3Dark_prince123
The graphics are quite good... not that they matter over gameplay.
guys although alot of friends and members adviced me not to buy RE 3 i bought it but the graphics is bad so anyone don't buy RA 3 For your best interst i bought company of heroes and it's better it was relesed in 2006 so again DO NOT BUY RE 3Dark_prince123
the graphics are brilliant ...what kind of a pc do you have?
RA3 is a disgrace to the RA series, seriously, it's terrible.strider_ATI
What dont you like about it? I don't have that one yet...
[QUOTE="strider_ATI"]RA3 is a disgrace to the RA series, seriously, it's terrible.biggest_loser
What dont you like about it? I don't have that one yet...
i expected it to be groundbreaking, just like RA1 and 2, but it was mediocre. Why the hell did they make cartoony graphics for!?!?DO NOT BUY RE 3Dark_prince123I didn't know they made Resident Evil 3 for the PC...
Oh... RED ALERT 3... now it makes sense...
If you played RA2 (the game before RA3) you'd realize the graphics make perfect sense.
The graphics aren't technically complex, but IMO they look nice.
However, the gameplay matters more, and I definitely love the focus on smaller armies and micro.
It's Red Alert - it's not supposed to be serious or have the best technology. If you don't like the previous RA games, then don't buy this one. It's that simple. It isn't C&C 3, and it's nothing like CoH. ...and it wasn't intended to be, so it's not as if it failed.
Â
In other news, it's a terrific game.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment